题名

中小學學生科學學習成果的評量架構與命題示例之研發

并列篇名

Developing the Assessment Framework and Illustrative Test Items for Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary and High School Students in Taiwan

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2009.1706.01

作者

郭重吉(Chorng-Jee Guo);邱美虹(Mei-Hung Chiu);黃台珠(Tai-Chu Huang);張惠博(Huey-Por Chang);張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang);周進洋(Ching-Yang Chou);王國華(Kuo-Hua Wang);陳忠志(Chung-Chih Chen);譚克平(Hak-Ping Tam);黃鴻博(Hon-Bo Huang)

关键词

科學學習成果 ; 大規模評量 ; 評量架構 ; 命題示例 ; Science Learning Outcomes ; Large-Scale Assessment ; Assessment Framework ; Illustrative Test Items

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

17卷6期(2009 / 12 / 01)

页次

459 - 479

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在參考評量教育進展的文獻和國內外實施大規模評量的經驗,針對中小學學生科學學習成果研擬評量架構和命題示例。評量架構是針對4、6、9、12年級學生,先從生物、化學、地科和物理的學科內容整理重要概念和原理,其次考慮學生科學實務表現,包括重要科學概念和原理的理解、應用、科學探究能力、量化推理能力、科學本質的認識以及態度與情意因素。從這兩個向度的交叉形成雙向細目表,針對選定的細目,敘寫學生在基礎、精熟、進階等三個層級的預期表現,據以發展試題。本研究係屬先期規劃,過程中邀請中小學教師和專家學者參與研發和諮詢;研究成果尚待考驗,但應可供規劃和發展全國性中小學學生科學學習成果調查之參考。

英文摘要

With reference to existing literature and experiences gained from both domestic and international large-scale assessments in science, this study aims at developing an assessment framework and some illustrative test items, which will provide guidelines and concrete examples for item and test developments, and the administration of a national survey in subsequent studies. The assessment framework, designed for the 4(superscript th), 6(superscript th), 9(superscript th), and 12(superscript th) graders, consists of, first of all, a scheme to categorize students' major learning outcomes in content domains including biology, chemistry, physics and earth science. Within these subject areas, students' expected performances in terms of their proficiency in science practices, including understanding and applications of science concepts and principles, scientific enquiry skills, quantitative reasoning skills, nature of science, and attitudes and other affective factors toward learning science are specified. In order to follow up students' learning outcomes on a long term basis, numerous examples of students' expected performances, varying from basic, proficient to advanced levels are developed. Serving as guidelines for subsequent studies along this line, some general principles of quality assessment and specifications for test development in science, as well as illustrative test items, are developed in this study. The study was coordinated by the first author, while the other coauthors respectively organized research teams consisting of science teachers, scientists, and science educators of different content areas in developing the assessment framework and illustrative test items. The work done in this study are of a preliminary nature, field tests and further refinement may be necessary.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Using the student evaluation standards: A field guide for k-12 math & science teachers
  2. Britton, E. D.,Schneider, S. A.,S. Abell (Eds.),N. Lederman (Eds.)(2007).Handbook of research on science education.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  3. Chiu, M. H.,Guo, C. J.,Treagust, D.(2007).Assessing students' conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),379-390.
  4. Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(2003).The student evaluation standards: How to improve evaluations of students.Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press.
  5. Gipps, C.,P. Broadfoot (Eds.),R. Murphy (Eds.),H. Torrance (Eds.)(1990).Changing educational assessment: International perspectives and trends.London:Rotledge.
  6. Guo, C. J.,S. Abell (Eds.),N. Lederman (Eds.)(2007).Handbook of research on science education.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  7. Perspectives on education
  8. TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks
  9. Kali, Y. (Eds.),Linn, M. C. (Eds.),Roseman, J. E. (Eds.)(2008).Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy.New York:Teacher College Press.
  10. The main NAEP version of the NAEP data explorer
  11. National science education standards
  12. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades k-8
  13. National Research Council(2005).How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom, committee on how people learn.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
  14. National Research Council(2003).Assessment in support of instruction and learning: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
  15. National Research Council(2006).Systems for state science assessment.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  16. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school
  17. Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006
  18. Scott, E.,Owen, E.(2005).Brief: Comparing NAEP, TIMSS, and PISA results.Wahington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.
  19. 林煥祥、劉聖忠、林素微、李暉(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC95-2522-S-026-002)行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC95-2522-S-026-002),花蓮巿:國立花蓮教育大學。
  20. 郭重吉、邱美虹、黃台珠、張惠博、張俊彥、周進洋、王國華、譚克平、黃鴻博(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC96-2522-S-143-002-LS)行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC96-2522-S-143-002-LS),台東市:國立台東大學。
  21. 郭重吉、張惠博、陳忠志、周進洋、邱美虹、林陳涌、黃台珠、譚克平(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC92-2511-S-143-007)行政院國家科學委員會計畫編號(NSC92-2511-S-143-007),台東市:國立台東大學。
被引用次数
  1. 林淑梤(2019)。探討學生科學能力與教師探究教學實務的關係。科學教育學刊,27(4),251-274。
  2. (2010)。PODE教學模式在資優科學課程設計之應用。資優教育,117,25-32。