線上小組學習的發生處－以迷思概念為探針

Critical Learning Events Triggered by Misconceptions in an Online Small Group Knowledge Co-construction Environment

10.6173/CJSE.2014.2202.04

張秀美(Hsiu-Mei Chang)；曾仁佑(Ren-Yow Tzeng)；陳斐卿(Fei-Ching Chen)；鄭凱天(Kai-Tien Cheng)

合作知識共構 ； 迷思概念 ； 探究式學習 ； 電腦支援協作學習 ； 學習過程 ； Knowledge Co-Construction ； Misconception ； Inquiry-Based Learning ； Computer Supported Collaborative Learning ； Learning Process

科學教育學刊

22卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

185 - 209

繁體中文

本研究從迷思概念為線上小組合作的共同學習成品之觀點，分析在同儕合作共構知識下迷思概念的發展過程與消長關鍵，並藉以深入揭露線上小組合作的學習內涵。研究場域是在一個探究「大氣科學」範疇的線上討論區，其中的學習活動是以小組合作進行，同儕間一同進行長達六週的探究式學習。在研究分析上，本研究看重同儕合作的對話過程，包含了以單篇文章為單位的「迷思概念」和「探究行動」、及文章與文章之間為單位的「迷思概念發展和同儕合作互動之間的動態關係」。研究結果的發現有三：第一、除了指認出同儕間探究「大氣科學」研究範疇「地溫」專題的主要迷思概念、迷思概念座落的討論片段與主題；第二、發現在小組合作學習下引發迷思概念消長的五個關鍵，包含了參考資料驗證的釐清、同儕指認下的終止、實踐經驗下的修正、同儕認同下的延展、事過境遷下的混沌與遲滯。同儕間互為主體性的相互接應，是影響迷思概念發展的重要條件。第三、本研究企圖對線上小組合作知識共構的分析方法有一些啟發，及對於概念學習的教學提出建議。

This study attempts to investigate the meaningful learning of online-group knowledge co-construction by identifying the misconceptions, tracking the developmental trajectories of misconceptions, and recognizing the critical moments in the trajectories of misconceptions. Instead of using the ＂product＂ perspective that the contributions for leading a misconception are accounted by the number of their postings, we here adopt the ＂contextual-process＂ perspective that considers the whole temporal trajectories of misconceptions taken place and focuses on the group members’ interaction. In particular, we analyze our data by identifying misconception and inquiry action of each single post, and figuring out the dynamic relationship between the developmental trajectories of the misconceptions and the group peer’s interaction. The results show that there are 56 posts involve the misconceptions and can be categorized to five themes, in which three themes are aware to have the positive learning effects after group discussions, one has negative effect, and the remained one does not cause any effect for learning. We also discovered the five critical moments: ＂sharing and justification＂, ＂recognition＂, ＂practical knowledge＂, ＂identification＂, and ＂confusion and hesitation＂. Finally, we further consider ＂intersubjectivity＂ is the important key for the development of and reconsider the meaning-making of the trajectories of misconceptions in online-group knowledge co-construction. And some methodological consideration and teaching strategy about online-group knowledge co-construction was discussed.

1. 李賢哲、張蘭友(2001)。國小學童「電池」概念之探究─理論與實證。科學教育學刊，9(3)，253-280。
   連結：
2. 李賢哲、樊琳、張蘭友(2005)。國小學童「電池」概念之診斷─以兩段式選題為例。科學教育學刊，13(3)，263-288。
   連結：
3. 林素華、劉燿誠(2010)。國中學生「恆定性」的另有概念之探討。科學教育學刊，18(1)，25-41。
   連結：
4. 洪振方、林志能(2011)。網路與課室學習環境促進學童論證能力之效益。教育實踐與研究，24(1)，67-106。
   連結：
5. 張秀美、陳斐卿、曾仁佑(2012)。小組建立假設的合作探究策略─以網路環境為例。科學教育學刊，20(4)，295-317。
   連結：
6. 許良榮(2003)。中小學生對於金屬之分類的迷思概念研究。科學教育學刊，11(3)，277-296。
   連結：
7. 陳文正、古智雄、許瑛玿、楊文金(2011)。概念卡通論證教學促進學童論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，19(1)，69-99。
   連結：
8. 陳均伊、張惠博、郭重吉(2004)。光反射與折射的另有概念診斷工具之發展與研究。科學教育學刊，12(3)，311-340。
   連結：
9. 曾永祥、許瑛玿(2006)。線上課程對高二學生四季成因概念學習的影響。科學教育學刊，14(3)，257-282。
   連結：
10. 楊坤原、張賴妙理(2004)。遺傳學迷思概念之文獻探討及其在教學上的啟示。科學教育學刊，12(3)，365-398。
    連結：
11. 蔡興國、陳錦章、張惠博(2010)。高中學生解題歷程之力圖表徵與列式關係之研究。科學教育學刊，18(2)，155-175。
    連結：
12. Acar, B.,Tarhan, L.(2008).Effects of cooperative learning on students' understanding of metallic bonding.Research in Science Education,38(4),401-420.
13. Akbaş, Y.,Gençtürk, E.(2011).The effect of conceptual change approach to eliminate 9th grade high school students' misconceptions about air pressure.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,11(4),2217-2222.
14. Akkuş, H.,Kadayifçi, H.,Atasoy, B.,Geban, Ö.(2003).Effectiveness of instruction based on the constructivist approach on understanding chemical equilibrium concepts.Research in Science and Technological Education,21(2),209-227.
15. Bricker, L. A.,Bell, P.(2008).Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education.Science Education,92(3),473-498.
16. Cardak, O.(2009).Science students' misconceptions of the water cycle according to their drawings.Journal of Applied Sciences,9(5),865-873.
17. Chang, H. M.,Chen, F. C.,Tzeng, R. Y.,Chen, Y. J.(2012).Reconsidering meaning-making of lurkers in online small group knowledge co-construction.Global Chinese Conference on Computing in Education,Kenting, Taiwan:
18. Chen, F. C.,Jiang, H. M.,Lee, Y. W.(2004).Addressing the challenges of secondary school students' collaborative inquiry-based learningZ-the Porscin experience.Earth Science Classroom Agenda for Learning and Teaching (ESCALAT),Taoyuan, Taiwan:
19. Chuy, M.,Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.,Prinsen, F.,Resendes, M.,Messina, R.(2010).Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach.Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology,36(1),1-21.
20. Gasson, S.,Waters, J.(2011).Using a grounded theory approach to study online collaboration behaviors.European Journal of Information Systems,22(1),95-118.
21. Gooding, J.,Metz, B.(2011).From misconceptions to conceptual change.The Science Teacher,78(4),34-37.
22. Henriques, L.(2002).Children's ideas about weather: A review of the literature.School Science and Mathematics,102(5),202-215.
23. Jeong, H.,Chi, M. T. H.(2007).Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning.Instructional Science,35(4),287-315.
24. Kim, H.,Song, J.(2006).The features of peer argumentation in middle school students' scientific inquiry.Research in Science Education,36(3),211-233.
25. McGilly, K.(Ed.)(1994).Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
26. Michael, J.(2002).Misconceptions-What students think they know.Advances in Physiology Education,26(1),5-6.
27. Mintzes, J. J.(Ed.),Wandersee, J. H.(Ed.),Novak, J. D.(Ed.)(1998).Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
28. National Research Council(2012).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
29. Oliveira, A. W(2010).Developing elementary teachers' understanding of the discourse structure of inquiry-based science classrooms.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,8(2),247-269.
30. Oliveira, A. W.,Sadler, T. D.(2008).Interactive patterns and convergence of meaning during student collaborations in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,45(5),634-658.
31. Osborne, R. J.,Gilbert, J. K.(1980).A method for investigating concept understanding in science.European Journal of Science Education,2(3),311-321.
32. Roth, W. M.,Lee, Y. J.(2007).Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory.Review of Educational Research,77(2),186-232.
33. Rozenszayn, R.,Assaraf, O. B. Z.(2011).When collaborative learning meets nature: Collaborative learning as a meaningful learning tool in the ecology inquiry based project.Research in Science Education,41(1),123-146.
34. Sawyer, R. K.(Ed.)(2006).The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.New York:Cambridge University Press.
35. Schmidt, H. J.(1997).Students' misconceptions: Looking for a pattern.Science Education,81(2),123-135.
36. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
37. Wescott, D. J.,Cunningham, D. L.(2005).Recognizing student misconceptions about science and evolution.Mountain Rise,2(2)
38. 林燕文、洪振方(2007)。對話論證的探究中學童論述策略對促進科學概念理解之研究。屏東教育大學學報，26，285-324。
39. 張靜儀、李采褱(2004)。國小中、高年級學童光迷思概念與相關因素探究。屏東師院學報，20，315-354。
40. 教育部(2012)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要（第三版）。台北市:作者。
41. 陳彥廷、柳賢(2005)。合作學習情境中學生數學概念學習之研究─以Posner概念改變模式與Toulmin論證模式分析為例。科學教育研究與發展季刊，39，80-105。
42. 黃志敘、楊德清(2007)。兒童分數迷思概念與解題策略之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，47，63-88。

1. 王明旭(2023)。協作學習理論發展團隊協作四部曲之跨域教學成效評估：以設計思考課程為例。教育實踐與研究，36(1)，73-120。