题名

桌上遊戲課程與教學之應用-以小學六年級學生為例

并列篇名

The Application of Board Games in Curriculum and Instruction - Taking Sixth-Grade Students of Primary School for Example

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2017.2502.02

作者

常雅珍(Ya-Jane Chaung)

关键词

人際關係 ; 自創桌上遊戲 ; 桌上遊戲 ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Self-Made Board Game ; Board Games

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期(2017 / 06 / 01)

页次

119 - 142

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

研究者設計一系列桌上遊戲相關課程,不僅幫助學生引起動機和注意力,也發揮其創意自創桌上遊戲。研究者首先自編「小學生對桌上遊戲的態度量表」及「小學生自創桌上遊戲量表」,建立信效度後,進行準實驗研究設計,實驗組實施為期十六週創新課程,控制組接受十六週一般課程,實驗組和控制組都是國小六年級學生,研究結果顯示:一、發現接受桌上遊戲課程之實驗組受試者,在「小學生對桌上遊戲的態度量表」之「接受度」、「學習助益」及「人際感受」分量表中顯著高於控制組;二、在「小學生自創桌上遊戲量表」之「自創能力」及「自創助益」分量表中也顯著高於控制組;三、經由質化資料分析,瞭解實施桌上遊戲課程的歷程、學生喜愛的原因、學習助益以及對人際關係的影響。最後根據研究結果,提出相關結論與建議。

英文摘要

The purpose of this research is to design a serial of board games curriculum for education. They can not only increase the students' motivation and attention, but also release students' potential to create board games by themselves. The researcher made two scales: one was "The attitude of primary school students to board games," while the other was "The attitude of primary school students to self-made board games." The experimental group had creative board games curriculum on every Tuesday for 16 weeks. The control groups had ordinary board games curriculum on every Tuesday for 16 weeks. The experimental and control groups were sixth-grade students of primary school. The results were as follows: 1. The scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group in the acceptance scale, learning assistance scale and interpersonal relationship scale of "The attitude of primary school students to board games"; 2. The scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group in the creative capability scale and learning assistance scale of "The attitude of primary school students to self-made board games". This research summarized the experiments with qualitative data analysis to find out the cause of why students like board games, the learning assistance, and the influence of interpersonal relationship. Finally, this study offers discussion on instructional assistance and future studies.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 常雅珍(2016)。心智圖法運用於質性資料分析課程的學習成效評估。課程與教學季刊,19(2),193-228。
    連結:
  2. 盧秀琴、施慧淳(2016)。玩「昆蟲大富翁」遊戲培養國小學童的科學過程技能。科學教育學刊,24(1),1-30。
    連結:
  3. 蕭佳純(2015)。國小學童科學創造力成長歷程之縱貫性分析。科學教育學刊,23(1),23-51。
    連結:
  4. 許永清(2011)。桌上遊戲附加價值高,開啟八大智能。查詢日期:2014年7月28日,檢自 http://pchomekids.pixnet.net/blog/post/35282631
  5. Kiyosaki, R. T., & Parta, R. F. (2000). U.S. Patent No. US6032957 A. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office..
  6. Baines, L. A.,Slutsky, R.(2009).Developing the sixth sense: Play.Educational Horizons,87(2),97-101.
  7. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  8. Caldwell, M. L.(1998).Parents, board games, and mathematical learning.Teaching Children Mathematics,4(6),365-367.
  9. Chen, J.(2007).Flow in games.Communications of the ACM,50(4),31-34.
  10. Clark, K.,Brandt, J.,Hopkins, R.,Wilhelm, J.(2009).Making games after school: Participatory game design in non-formal learning environment.Educational Technology,49(6),40-44.
  11. Crews, A.(2011).Getting teachers on "board".Knowledge Quest,40(1),10-13.
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York:Harper and Row.
  13. de Freitas, S.,Oliver, M.(2006).How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated?.Computers and Education,46(3),249-264.
  14. Emmons, R. A.(Ed.),McCullough, M. E.(Ed.)(2004).The psychology of gratitude.New York:Oxford University Press.
  15. Emmons, R. A.(Ed.),Mc-Cullough, M. E.(Ed.)(2004).The psychology of gratitude.New York:Oxford University Press.
  16. Gamlath, S. L.(2007).Outcomes and observations of an extended accounting board game.Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Learning,34,132-137.
  17. Garris, R.,Ahlers, R.,Driskell, J. E.(2002).Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model.Simulation & Gaming,33(4),441-467.
  18. Gibson, V.,Douglas, M.(2013).Criticality: The experience of developing an interactive educational tool based on board games.Nurse Education Today,33(12),1612-1616.
  19. Gruending, D. L.,Fenty, D.,Hogan, T.(1991).Fun and games in nursing staff development.The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,22(6),259-262.
  20. Hinebaugh, J. P.(2009).A board game education.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  21. Kafai, Y. B.(2006).Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies.Games and Culture,1(1),36-40.
  22. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39(1),31-36.
  23. Kaniuga, N. J.(1990).Kalamazoo, MI,Western Michigan University.
  24. Khan, A.,Pearce, G.(2015).A study into the effects of a board game on flow in undergraduate business students.The International Journal of Management Education,13(3),193-201.
  25. Kinzie, M. B.,Joseph, D. R. D.(2008).Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: Implications for educational game design.Educational Technology Research and Development,56(5),643-663.
  26. Kirikkaya, E. B.,Iseri, S.,Vurkaya, G.(2010).A board game about space and solar system for primary school students.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,9(2),1-13.
  27. Kuhn, M. A.(1995).Gaming: A technique that adds spice to learning?.Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,26(1),35-39.
  28. Lantz, J. F.,Nelson, J. M.,Loftin, R. L.(2004).Guiding children with autism in play: Applying the integrated play group model in school settings.Teaching Exceptional Children,37(2),8-14.
  29. Ormrod, J. E.(2008).Human learning.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  30. Paris, T. N. S. T.,Yussof, R. L.(2012).Enhancing grammar using board game.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,68,213-221.
  31. Pavlova, M.,Turner, S.(2007).It's never too early: Education for sustainable development.The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability,2(7),69-76.
  32. Prensky, M.(2007).Digital game-based learning.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  33. Prensky, M.(2008).Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else?.British Journal of Educational Technology,39(6),1004-1019.
  34. Prompramot, S.,Blashki, K.,Nichol, S.(2007).Learn to design vs design to learn.International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2007,Lisbon, Portugal:
  35. Smith, R. D.,Muhro, E.(2009).Educational card games.Physics Education,44(5),479-483.
  36. Speers, A. T.(1993).Games in nursing staff development.Journal of Nurses in Staff Development,9(6),274-277.
  37. Swacha, J.,Skrzyszewski, A.,Syslo, W. A.(2010).Computer game design classes: The students "and professionals" perspectives.Informatics in Education,9(2),249-260.
  38. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  39. 王幼軍、金之明(2000)。著名數學家和他的一個重大發現。新竹市:凡異。
  40. 王芯婷(2012)。桌上遊戲運用於兒童培力團體之初探。社區發展季刊,140,94-106。
  41. 王保進(1999)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。
  42. 邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析例解析。臺北市:五南。
  43. 侯禎塘(2001)。注意力缺陷過動症兒童的教育與輔導。國教天地,146,12-18。
  44. 張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
  45. 張賴妙理、李慈惠、楊坤原(2012)。科學玩具遊戲教學對四年級學童的昆蟲概念學習與「對科學的態度」之影響。第二十八屆科學教育國際研討會,臺北市:
  46. 教育部編、國立師範大學編(2006)。科學素養的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部。
  47. 陳介宇(2005)。寓教於樂的桌上遊戲。師友月刊,458,69-71。
  48. 陳介宇(2010)。從現代桌上遊戲的特點探討其運用於兒童學習的可行性。國教新知,57(4),40-45。
  49. 陳杭生(1993)。視聽媒體與教學正常化。視聽教育雙月刊,34(3),1-10。
  50. 陳貞如(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市,國立嘉義大學幼兒教育學系研究所。
  51. 陳雅慧(2015)。找回一起玩的樂趣。親子天下,69,16。
  52. 趙文敏(1981)。數學遊戲。新竹市:凡異。
  53. 饒見維(1996)。國小數學遊戲教學法。臺北市:五南。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡惟寧(2022)。國小兒童人際壓力之探討與輔導策略。諮商與輔導,437,22-24+17。
  2. 蘇淑真,吳振鋒(2019)。應用桌遊於引導式教學法成功因素之探討。管理資訊計算,8(1),1-10。
  3. 張育傑,池惠琳(2022)。氣候變遷桌上遊戲教學轉化前後之教材特質與促進學習要素之研究。環境教育研究,17(2),47-88。
  4. 鄭蕙萱(2022)。桌遊媒材應用於兒童團體輔導-實務經驗分享與省思。教育研究與實踐學刊,69(1),39-46。