科學傳播歷程中程序性知識特徵的框架探究－以飲食保健類科學研究新聞為例

A Framing Exploration of Procedural Knowledge Characteristics in Science Communication Process: Examples of Research Based Science News Regarding Healthy Diet

10.6173/CJSE.202006_28(2).0003

李松濤(Sung-Tao Lee)；許文怡(Wen-Yi Hsu)

科學研究新聞 ； 框架分析 ； 程序性知識 ； Research Based Science News ； Framing Analysis ； Procedural Knowledge

科學教育學刊

28卷2期（2020 / 06 / 01）

143 - 168

繁體中文

本研究以飲食保健類的科學研究新聞為例，以框架分析的方式針對國內四大媒體網路電子報的相關新聞報導中所出現的程序性知識特徵進行探究。研究結果發現，飲食保健類的科學研究新聞在倒金字塔式的新聞寫作方式中，無論是前二段內容或是全文敘述中的程序性知識特徵都著重在描述「結果」與「實驗」等二個框架，其次則是「現象」與「理論」等框架，而僅有三分之一的樣本新聞會出現「科學不確定性」的相關框架，其中又以「過程」與「推論」的不確定性為主，至於「範圍」、「定義」、「測量」與「風險」等科學不確定性的框架都非常稀少，為了增進社會公民對於「科學」的認識，相關結果值得科學傳播社群加以思考。

The purpose of this study was to use framing analysis to explore how characteristics of procedural knowledge were present in research-based science news regarding a healthy diet. Results showed that the characteristics of ＂results＂ and ＂experiment＂ were the two most common frames that appeared in the first two paragraph analyses and whole news analysis followed by the frames of ＂phenomenon＂ and ＂theory＂ in the research-based science news information that were analyzed in this study. In comparison, only one third of the sample research-based science news information revealed frames of scientific uncertainty in which the frames of ＂process＂ and ＂inference＂ were the most common characteristics. For a better understanding about science in whole society, some reflections were provided for the science communication community.

1. 江佳勳, C.-H.,楊淑晴, S.-C.,許琬甄, W.-C.(2015)。大學生網路健康素養量表建構及其與健康行為之關係研究。中華心理衛生學刊，28(3)，389-420。
   連結：
2. 李松濤, S.-T.(2017)。大學生對於科學研究資訊的閱讀表現探究：以網路科學新聞為例。中華傳播學刊，32，91-128。
   連結：
3. 林照真, C.-C.(2015)。分析與批判傳統報紙在聚合現象中的角色：以臺灣四大報紙集團為例。中華傳播學刊，28，3-34。
   連結：
4. 林照真, C.-C.(2015)。分析與批判傳統報紙在聚合現象中的角色：以臺灣四大報紙集團為例。中華傳播學刊，28，3-34。
   連結：
5. 施琮仁, T.-J.(2016)。社交網站與公眾參與：「Pansci泛科學臉書專頁」使用者研究。傳播研究與實踐，6(2)，209-241。
   連結：
6. 許婉甄, W.-C.,陳素鳳, S.-F.,何青蓉, C.-J.(2011)。大學生網路健康資訊使用經驗之初探—健康素養的觀點。健康促進與衛生教育學報，35，1-22。
   連結：
7. 單文婷, W.-T.(2017)。科學家參與公共傳播的觀察—行政院原子能委員會使用臉書行銷科學政策的討論。教育傳播與科技研究，117，47-65。
   連結：
8. 黃俊儒, C.-J.(2008)。構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例。科學教育學刊，16(1)，105-124。
   連結：
9. 黃俊儒, C.-J.(2014)。科學傳播中「確定」與「不確定」的敘事：以莫拉克風災之系列報導為例。科技醫療與社會，19，73-116。
   連結：
10. 黃俊儒, C.-J.,簡妙如, M.-J.(2006)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分布：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。
    連結：
11. 楊意菁, Y.-J.(2017)。風險溝通、媒體關注與框架分析：以新聞再現企業環境相關議題為例。傳播研究與實踐，7(1)，71-106。
    連結：
12. 楊意菁, Y.-J.,徐美苓, M.-L.(2010)。風險社會概念下的風險溝通與網路傳播：以全球暖化議題為例。中華傳播學刊，18，151-191。
    連結：
13. 楊樺, A. H.,葉欣誠, S. C.(2012)。新聞媒體在天然災難事件中的角色和影響力。危機管理學刊，9(2)，63-70。
    連結：
14. 謝君蔚, J.-W,徐美苓, M.-L.(2011)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例。中華傳播學刊，20，143-179。
    連結：
15. 蘇鑰機, C. Y.-K.(2011)。什麼是新聞？。傳播研究與實踐，1(1)，1-24。
    連結：
16. Bray, B.,France, B.,Gilbert, J. K.(2012).Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say?.International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement,2(1),23-41.
17. Brossard, D.,Lewenstein, B.(2010).A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory.Communicating science: New agendas in communication,New York, NY:
18. Burns, T. W.,O’Connor, D. J.,Stocklmayer, S. M.(2003).Science communication: A contemporary definition.Public Understanding of Science,12(2),183-202.
19. Catts, R.,Lau, J.(2008).Towards information literacy indicators.
20. Chong, D.,Druckman, J. N.(2007).Framing theory.Annual Review of Political Science,10,103-126.
21. Davis, P. R.,Russ, R. S.(2015).Dynamic framing in the communication of scientific research: Texts and interactions.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,52(2),221-252.
22. Entman, R. M.(1993).Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication,43(4),51-58.
23. Entman, R. M.,Matthes, J.,Pellicano, L.(2009).Nature, sources, and effects of news framing.The handbook of journalism studies,New York, NY:
24. Gott, R., Duggan, S., Roberts, R., & Hussain, A. (2008). Research into understanding scientific evidence. Retrieved May 1, 2020, from http://community.dur.ac.uk/rosalyn.roberts/Evidence/cofev.htm
25. Guenther, L.,Bischoff, J.,Löwe, A.,Marzinkowski, H.,Voigt, M.(2019).Scientific evidence and science journalism.Journalism Studies,20(1),40-59.
26. Heidmann, I.(2013).Metal oxide nanoparticle transport in porous media—An analysis about (un)certainties in environmental research.Journal of Physics: Conference Series,429
27. Heidmann, I.,Milde, J.(2013).Communication about scientific uncertainty: How scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research.Environmental Sciences Europe,25
28. Lederman, N. G.,Abd-El-Khalick, F.,Bell, R. L.,Schwartz, R. S.(2002).Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(6),497-521.
29. Leung, J. S. C.,Wong, A. S. L.,Yung, B. H. W.(2017).Evaluation of science in the media by non-science majors.International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement,7(3),219-236.
30. Lin, S.-S.(2014).Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,12(5),1023-1046.
31. Maier, M.,Rothmund, T.,Retzbach, A.,Otto, L.,Besley, J. C.(2014).Informal learning through science media usage.Educational Psychologist,49(2),86-103.
32. Mauldin, R. F.(2012).A novel approach to teaching scientific reasoning to future journalists: An intellectual framework for evaluating press reports about scientific research.Science Communication,34(2),283-291.
33. McClune, B.,Jarman, R.(2012).Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news: What can we learn from the literature?.Studies in Science Education,48(1),1-49.
34. Menkhoff, T.,Evers, H.-D.,Chay, Y. W.,Pang, E. F.(2011).Beyond the knowledge trap: Developing Asia’s knowledge-based economies.Singapore:World Scientific.
35. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2016).Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
36. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2017).Communicating science effectively: A research agenda.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
37. National Association for Media Literacy Education. (n.d.). Media literacy defined. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from https://namle.net/publications/media-literacy-definitions
38. National Research Council(2012).A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
39. Nisbet, M. C.(2009).Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement.Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,51(2),12-23.
40. Nisbet, M. C.,Fahy, D.(2017).New models of knowledge-based journalism.The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication,New York, NY:
41. Norris, S. P.,Phillips, L. M.,Korpan, C. A.(2003).University students’ interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty.Public Understanding of Science,12(2),123-145.
42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016).PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy.Paris, France:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
43. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf
44. Patterson, T. E.(2013).Informing the news: The need for knowledge-based journalism.New York, NY:Vintage Books.
45. Peters, H. P.,Dunwoody, S.(2016).Scientific uncertainty in media content: Introduction to this special issue.Public Understanding of Science,25(8),893-908.
46. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2009, July 9). Public praises science; scientists fault public, media. Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2009/07/09/public-praises-science-scientists-fault-public-media
47. Reis, R.(2008).How Brazilian and North American newspapers frame the stem cell research debate.Science Communication,29(3),316-334.
48. Retzbach, A.,Maier, M.(2015).Communicating scientific uncertainty: Media effects on public engagement with science.Communication Research,42(3),429-456.
49. Richmond, M.,Robinson, C.,Sachs-Israël, M.(2008).The global literacy challenge: A profile of youth and adult literacy at the mid-point of the United Nations Decade 2003–2012.
50. Stewart, C. O.,Dickerson, D. L.,Hotchkiss, R.(2009).Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research.Science Communication,30(4),427-452.
51. Stocklmayer, S. M.,Bryant, C.(2012).Science and the public—What should people know?.International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement,2(1),81-101.
52. Tseng, A. S.(2018).Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: Critical reading or passive acceptance of claims?.International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement,8(3),250-265.
53. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2013).Global media and information literacy assessment framework: Country readiness and competencies.Paris, France:United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
54. Van Gorp, B.(2007).The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in.Journal of Communication,57(1),60-78.
55. Wimmer, R. D.,Dominick, J. R.(2006).Mass media research: An introduction.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
56. Yarden, A.(2009).Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy.Research in Science Education,39(3),307-311.
57. 牛隆光, L.-G.(2009).新聞採訪與寫作.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:學富文化=Pro-Ed.
58. 佘曉清, H.-C.,林煥祥, H.-S.(2017).PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.
59. 林煥祥（編）, H.-S. (Ed.)(2020).2018年臺灣公民科技素養概況.高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:國立中山大學西灣學院公民素養推動研究中心=The Research Center for Promoting Civic Literacy, Si Wan College, National Sun YatSen University.
60. 徐美苓, M.-L.(2015)。新興環境議題的媒體建構：以臺灣替代能源新聞報導為例。傳播與社會學刊，32，19-57。
61. 國家教育研究院(2018年11月2日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域。查詢日期：2020年5月1日，檢自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/63/pta_18538_240851_60502.pdf。[National Academy for Educational Research. (2018, November 2). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu kecheng gangyao—Guomin zhongxiaoxue ji putongxing gaoji zhongdeng xuexiao: Ziran kexue lingyu. Retrieved May 1, 2020, from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/63/pta_18538_240851_60502.pdf]
62. 教育部(n.d.)。計畫說明。查詢日期：2019年9月1日，檢自https://sites.google.com/site/educccproject/direction。[Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Jihua shuoming. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from https://sites.google.com/site/educccproject/direction
63. 陳佳欣, C.(2014)。,未出版
64. 陳瑞麟, R.-L.(2010).科學哲學：理論與歷史.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:群學=Socio.
65. 黃俊儒, C.-J.(2016)。臺灣的公眾科技溝通。臺灣科學教育研究與實踐：挑戰與機會，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
66. 黃臺珠（編）, T.-C. (Ed.)(2014).2012年臺灣公民科學素養概況.高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:國立中山大學通識教育中心公民素養推動研究中心=The Research Center for Promoting Civic Literacy, Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-Sen University.
67. 蔡俊彥（編）, C.-Y. (Ed.)(2016).2015年臺灣公民科學素養概況.高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:國立中山大學通識教育中心公民素養推動研究中心=The Research Center for Promoting Civic Literacy, Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-Sen University.
68. 關尚仁, S.-R.(2014)。臺灣科學傳播的現況與挑戰。科學月刊，531，186-193。

1. Yu-Yun Chang,Chen-Yu Chester Hsieh(2022)。An N-gram Approach to Identifying the Chinese Linguistic Signals for the Problem-Solution Pattern in Annotated Online Health News。中文計算語言學期刊，27(1)，75-110。
2. 鄔啓柔,李松濤(2023)。新冠肺炎（COVID-19）網路新聞資訊的內容分析與其科學教育意涵。科學教育學刊，31(3)，291-315。