從「熱認知觀點」探討國小學童的論證學習與科學解釋合理性判斷之研究

A Study of Exploring Elementary School Students' Argument Learning and Judgment of Rationality on Scientific Explanation From the Perspective of "Hot Cognition"

10.6173/CJSE.202306_31(2).0001

陳文正(Wen-Cheng Chen)；古智雄(Chih-Hsiung Ku)

合理性判斷 ； 科學解釋 ； 熱認知 ； 論證能力 ； Judgment of Rationality ； Science Explanation ； Hot Cognition ； Argumentation Ability

科學教育學刊

31卷2期（2023 / 06 / 01）

109 - 132

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的主要在探討概念卡通論證教學對國小高年級學生論證能力的影響，同時分析論證教學前後，學童在科學解釋合理性判斷上的變化，以及在班級聚集地位影響下，學童在科學解釋合理性判斷上的熱認知現象。研究對象是六個國小高年級班級，四個班級是實驗組（N = 108），另外二個班級是控制組（N = 56）。研究工具包括「論證能力測驗」、「科學解釋合理性測驗卷」及「班級結構問卷」。研究結果發現：一、實驗組學童在論證後測的表現顯著優於控制組。二、實驗組學童在論證教學後傾向選擇具論證型式的科學解釋。三、實驗組和控制組學童在科學解釋合理性的判斷皆表現出熱認知現象。四、實驗組學童論證能力前後測變化量和熱認知喚起程度有負相關。

The purpose of this study was to explore the practical efficacy of concept cartoon argument instruction (CCAI) on elementary upper grader's argument construction. The differences of children's judgment of rationality on scientific explanations (JRSE) after CCAI were analyzed too. Furthermore, whether the arousal of hot cognition in children's JRSE under the intervention of children's aggregated status was investigated too. The four classes of sixth grades (N = 108) were assigned as the experimental group with argumentation instruction, while another two classes (N = 56) with the similar backgrounds using traditional instruction served as the comparison group. The instruments of science argumentation ability test, rationality on scientific explanation test and questionnaire of student's aggregated status in the class were used in this study. The main findings include: (1) the experimental group students outperformed those in comparison group in science argumentation ability, (2) the experimental group students tended to agree to the scientific explanations with Toulmin's Argument Pattern form (TAP form) after CCAI, (3) both the experimental and comparison group students exhibited the hot cognition on the judgment of JRSE induced from the intervention of children's aggregated status, (4) the significant negative correlation existed between the experimental group students' pre-posttest variation scores in the science argumentation ability test and the arousal degree of hot cognition on the judgment of JRSE induced from the intervention of children's aggregated status.

1. 古智雄, C.-H.,孫東志, D.-C.,陳文正, W.-C.,楊文金, W.-G.(2010)。從「熱認知觀點」探討學童科學解釋之合理性判斷—以班級社會常模下的順一致性為例。科學教育學刊，18(4)，305-329。
   連結：
2. 李松濤, S.-T.,林煥祥, H.-S.,洪振方, J.-F.(2010)。探究式教學對學童科學論證能力影響之探究。科學教育學刊，18(3)，177-203。
   連結：
3. 林宗進, T.-J.,林樹聲, S.-S.,陳映均, Y.-C.(2010)。大學生對基因改造作物議題的認知與論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，18(3)，229-252。
   連結：
4. 夏玉林, Y.-L.,靳知勤, C.-C.(2021)。問題答案關係策略融入閱讀教學對國小六年級學生閱讀理解與論證能力之影響：以社會性科學議題為例。科學教育學刊，29(3)，191-217。
   連結：
5. 陳文正, W.-C.,古智雄, C.-H.,許瑛玿, Y.-S.,楊文金, W.-G.(2011)。概念卡通論證教學促進學童論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，19(1)，69-99。
   連結：
6. 湯宜佩, Y.-P.,張文馨, W.-H.,許瑛玿, Y.-S.(2021)。針對高中科學論證教學研究回顧與評析。教育科學研究期刊，66(4)，217-243。
   連結：
7. 楊桂瓊, K.-K.,林煥祥, H.-S.,洪瑞兒, Z.-R.(2012)。以論證活動探討國小學童論證能力和科學本質之表現。科學教育學刊，20(2)，145-170。
   連結：
8. 楊景盛, C.-S.,董曜瑜, Y.-Y.,陳秀溶, S.-R.,王國華, K.-H.(2017)。社會性科學議題情境下論證式探究教學與課程對七年級學生科學學習成就、論證能力和科學素養之影響。科學教育學刊，25(S)，485-500。
   連結：
9. 潘怡如, Y.-J.,陳雅君, Y.-C.,林煥祥, H.-S.(2018)。以科學新聞融入教學提升中學生自我效能及論證能力之探討。科學教育學刊，26(1)，71-96。
   連結：
10. 蘇衍丞, Y.-C.,林樹聲, S.-S.(2012)。在社會性科學議題情境下應用鷹架教學提升國小六年級學生論證能力。科學教育學刊，20(4)，343-366。
    連結：
11. Bianchini, J. A.(1997).Where knowledge construction, equity and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(10),1039-1065.
12. Cavagnetto, A. R.(2010).Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts.Review of Educational Research,80(3),336-371.
13. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Driver, R.,Newton, P.,Osborne, J.(2000).Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education,84(3),287-312.
15. Duschl, R. A.,Osborne, J.(2002).Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education.Studies in Science Education,38(1),39-72.
16. Erduran, S.,Simon, S.,Osborne, J.(2004).TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse.Science Education,88(6),915-933.
17. Kunda, Z.(1999).Social cognition: Making sense of people.MIT Press.
18. Lin, C.-H.,Chiu, C.-H.,Hsu, C.-C.,Wang, T.-I.(2015).The influence of playing a for or against a controversial position on elementary students’ ability to construct cogent arguments.the Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,24(2),409-418.
19. Maloney, J.(2007).Children’s roles and use of evidence in science: An analysis of decision-making in small groups.British Educational Research Journal,33(3),371-401.
20. McDonald, C. V.,McRobbie, C. J.(2012).Utilising argumentation to teach nature of science.Second international handbook of science education
21. National Research Council(2012).A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas.National Academy Press.
22. Naylor, S.,Keogh, B.(2000).Concept cartoons in science education.Millgate House.
23. Naylor, S.,Keogh, B.,Downing, B.(2007).Argumentation and primary science.Research In Science Education,37(1),17-39.
24. Newton-Smith, W. H.(1981).The rationality of science.Routledge.
25. Nielsen, J. A.(2013).Delusions about evidence: on why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making.Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,13(4),373-385.
26. Osborne, J.,Erduran, S.,Simon, S.(2004).Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(10),994-1020.
27. Osborne, J.,Erduran, S.,Simon, S.(2004).Ideas, evidence & argument in science: CPD training pack.King’s College.
28. Sandoval, W. A.,Çam, A.(2011).Elementary children’s judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification.Science Education,95(3),383-408.
29. Sarkar, T. K.(1995).Changing concepts of rationality in science.Facets of rationality
30. Scott, P. H.,Mortimer, E. F.,Aguiar, O. G.(2006).The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons.Science Education,90(4),605-631.
31. Simon, S.,Erduran, S.,Osborne, J.(2006).Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom.International Journal of Science Education,28(2-3),235-260.
32. Strike, K. A.,Posner, G. J.(1992).A revisionist theory of conceptual change.Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice
33. Thagard, P.(2006).Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition.MIT Press.
34. Toulmin, S. E.(1958).The uses of argument.Cambridge University Press.
35. Warwick, P.,Siraj-Blatchford, J.(2006).Using data comparison and interpretation to develop procedural understandings in the primary classroom: Case study evidence from action research.International Journal of Science Education,28(5),443-467.
36. 古智雄, C.-H.(2001)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
37. 佘曉清, H.-C.,黃莉郁, L.-Y.,蘇怡蓓, Y.-B.(2017)。臺灣學生科學素養的表現。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現
38. 林義涵, Y.-H.(2007)。國立花蓮教育大學=National Hualien University of Education。
39. 徐志宏, C.-H.(2005)。國立花蓮師範學院=National Hualien Teachers College。
40. 教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域。https://reurl.cc/gD77bN[Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-Year basic education for elementary, junior high schools and general senior high schools-Natural sciences. https://reurl.cc/gD77bN]
41. 陳春男, C.-N.(2008)。國立花蓮教育大學=National Hualien University of Education。
42. 黃柏鴻, P.-H.,林樹聲, S.-S.(2007)。論證教學相關實證性研究之回顧與省思。科學教育月刊，302，5-20。
43. 楊文金, W.-G.(1999)。「期望地位」對同儕互動的影響分析。科學教育學刊，7(3)，217-232。
44. 楊文金, W.-G.(1998)。「同儕科學家意像」對訊息合理性判斷的影響分析。師大學報：科學教育類，43(1)，1-17。
45. 董又愷, Y.-K.,林樹聲, S.-S.(2014)。以結構式探究教學促進國小學生了解證據和從事論證之行動研究。科學教育月刊，375，2-19。
46. 鄭惠君, H.-C.(2005)。國立花蓮師範學院=National Hualien Teachers College。