Paulo Freire意識覺醒理念及其對教師教學理念的啟示

Implications for Teachers' Teaching Ideas Based on Paulo Freire's Idea of Conscientização

10.3966/199679772015123202001

施宜煌(Yi-Huang Shih)

批判意識 ； 意識覺醒 ； critical consciousness ； conscientização ； Paulo Freire

新竹教育大學教育學報

32卷2期（2015 / 12 / 31）

1 - 34

繁體中文

Paulo Freire（1921-1997），一位巴西教育家，在其《受壓迫者教育學》一書揭櫫激進的意識覺醒理念，於不同學術領域為人們所關注。本文欲圖探究Freire意識覺醒理念對教師教學理念的啟示，首先論述分析意識覺醒的意涵；其次，闡析意識覺醒者的性質；繼之，探討提問式教育與意識覺醒間的關聯性；終而，詮釋意識覺醒理念對教師教學理念的啟示。這些啟示如：一、師生共同制定紀律，尊重學生的自願性；二、教師應體認學生亦是思考的主體，允許學生有發聲的機會；三、教師應體悟教學相長的真實意義，尊重學生所知；四、師生皆要做出真實的行動，偕同選擇教與學的內涵；五、教師不應與學生的自由處於對立的立場，師生互為教學活動的認知主體。冀望以此探究為基礎，誘發教育現場教師洞識Freire意識覺醒理念的基調，進而實踐人性化的教學，使師生成為更完善之人。

In his Pedagogy of the Oppressed, the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire (1921–1997) described a radical idea of conscientização, which attracted much attention from various fields. This essay discusses Paulo Freire's idea of conscientização and its implications for teachers' teaching ideas. First, this essay explores the meaning of conscientização. Second, it illuminates the characteristics of people who can raise their consciousness to critical consciousness. Third, it explores the relationship between problem-posing education and conscientização. Finally, the essay explores Freire’s idea of conscientização and its implications for teaching ideas. The implications are as follows: (a) teachers and students should develop discipline, and teachers should respect students voluntariness; (b) teachers should recognize that students are also thinking subjects and allow students opportunities to voice their opinions; (c) teachers should realize the true meaning of teaching and learning and have respect for what the students know; (d) teachers and students should make real actions and select the content of teaching and learning together; and (e) teachers and students should not oppose freedom, and teachers and students are both cognitive subjects in teaching activities. On the basis of the aformentioned explorations of Paulo Freire's idea of conscientização, teachers can further understand the key idea and practice humanistic teaching, which will help teachers and students learn more humanity-based values.

1. 李奉儒(2003)。P. Freire的批判教學論對於教師實踐教育改革的啟示。教育研究集刊，49(3)，1-30。
   連結：
2. 唐文慧、鄭英耀(2010)。性別平等通識教育課程的建構與實施：以「性別與社會」為例。教育學刊，34，33-67。
   連結：
3. Coben, D.(1998).Radical heroes: Gramsci, Freire, and the politics of adult education.New York, NY:Garland.
4. Collins, D. E.(1977).Paulo Freire: His life, works, and thought.New York, NY:Paulist Press.
5. Elias, J. L.(1994).Paulo Freire: Pedagogue of liberation.Malabar, FL:Krieger.
6. Elias, J. L.(1976).Conscientization and deschooling: Freire's and Illich's proposals for reshaping society.Malabar, FL:Krieger.
7. Elias, J. L.,Merriam, S. B.(1995).Philosophical foundations of adult education.Malabar, FL:Krieger.
8. Fanon, Frantz、陳瑞華譯(2005)。黑皮膚，白面具。臺北市:心靈工坊。
9. Freire, P.(1993).Pedagogy of the city.New York, NY:The Continuum.
10. Freire, P.(1994).Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:The Continuum.
11. Freire, P.(1998).Politics and education.Los Angeles, CA:University of California.
12. Freire, P.(1998).Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage.New York, NY:Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Freire, P.(1998).Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
14. Freire, P.(1997).Education for critical consciousness.New York, NY:The Continuum.
15. Freire, P.(1985).The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
16. Freire, P.(1985).Reading the world and reading the word: An interview with Paulo Freire.Language Arts,62(1),15-21.
17. Freire, P.(1975).Cultural action for freedom.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Educational Review.
18. Freire, P.(Ed.)(2000).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:The Continuum.
19. Freire, P.(Ed.)(1985).The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
20. Freire, P.,Faundez, A.(1989).Learning to question: A pedagogy of liberation.New York, NY:The Continuum.
21. Gadotti, M.(1994).Reading Paulo Freire: His life and work.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
22. Grabowski, S. M.(Ed.)(1978).Paulo Freire: A revolutionary dilemma for the adult educator.New York, NY:Syracuse University.
23. Haydon, G.(1999).Morality in the narrow sense.Journal of Philosophy of Education,33(1),31-40.
24. Lewis, T. E.(2012).The aesthetics of education: Theatre, curiosity, and politics in the work of Jacques Rancière and Paulo Freire.New York, NY:The Continuum.
25. Luke, C.(Ed),Gore, J.(Ed)(1992).Feminisms and critical pedagogy.New York, NY:Routledge.
26. Mackie, R.(1981).Literacy and revolution: The pedagogy of Paulo Freire.New York, NY:The Continuum.
27. McLaren, P.(Ed.),Leonard, P.(Ed.)(1993).Paulo Freire: A critical encounter.London, England:Routledge.
28. Peters, R. S.(1966).Ethics and education.London, England:Allen & Unwin.
29. Roberts, P.(2000).Education, literacy, and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire.London, England:Bergin & Garvey.
30. Shor, I.,Freire, P.(1987).A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
31. Smith, W. A.(1976).The meaning of conscientizacao: The goal of Paulo Freire's pedagogy.Amherst, MA:Center for International Education.
32. Smith, W. A.(Ed.)(1976).The meaning of conscientizacao: The goal of Paulo Freire.Amherst, MA:Center for International Education.
33. Taylor, P. A.(1993).The texts of Paulo Freire.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
34. Torres, C. A.(1994).Education and the archeology of consciousness: Freire and Hegel.Educational Theory,44,429-445.
35. 王秋絨(1990)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
36. 李天健(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學。
37. 李錦旭編、王慧蘭編(2006)。批判教育學─臺灣的探索。臺北市:心理。
38. 周育賢(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學。
39. 林怡萱(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立中山大學。
40. 施宜煌(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
41. 張建成(2002)。批判的教育社會學研究。臺北市:學富。
42. 馮朝霖(2004)。駱駝‧獅子與孩童：尼采精神三變說與批判教育學及另類教育學的起源。教育研究，121，5-13。
43. 黃志成(2003)。被壓迫者的教育學─弗萊勒解放教育理論與實踐。北京市:人民教育。

1. 郭丁熒,林哲彥(2023)。「臺大教學傑出教師的故事」之教學理念分析。教育學誌，50，1-41。
2. 林秀蓉(2021)。戰後世代的意識覺醒：論李敏勇詩的本土性與全球性。臺灣詩學學刊，37，33-63。
3. (2020)。Henry Giroux的跨界教學論及其教育蘊義。中正教育研究，19(1)，1-38。