畫出美麗新境界──視覺藝術教學融合語文賞析的美感經驗之探究

Draw a Beautiful New Realm-Exploration of the Aesthetic Experience of Visual Art Instructions with Literature

10.3966/199679772016103302004

胡郁珮(Yu-Pei Hu)

美感教育 ； 美感經驗 ； 視覺藝術教學 ； aesthetic education ； aesthetic experience ； visual arts instruction

新竹教育大學教育學報

33卷2期（2016 / 10 / 01）

95 - 144

繁體中文

美好人生需透過美感教育薰陶得以豐富、完滿。國內在「課程美學探究」（aesthetic inquiry to curriculum）之研究上，是以美學概念探究課程情境中美感特質以及美感經驗；多數的研究只強調美感特質對於課程重要性的論述層面，鮮少深入討論學習者的美感經驗。因此，本研究以視覺藝術融合語文的學習活動，透過質性研究法，探究10位6歲至12歲的學習者在此學習歷程中的美感經驗，為視覺藝術教學的研究範疇提供另一種視點與觀照。本研究發現學習者的美感經驗如下：一、學童能在賞析詩文與視覺藝術作品的過程中釋放想像、產生移情，與詩畫共鳴；二、詩文結合視覺藝術作品的審美與創作活動，能引領學童以不同的角度觀看世界，以情意知覺涵養理性思維、詩情畫意妝點生活；三、在本研究設計的學習活動中，學童能專心致志，以昂然的興致、深層投入創作，不畏艱難、信心滿懷地克服難題，而擁懷心滿意足的美感經驗；四、本研究設計的學習活動能引發學童與環境對談的自我言說能力，重寫生命經驗、再創造自身的美感境地。

Through aesthetic education, one can better his life to be nurtured rich and more fulfilling. Studies conducted domestically on aesthetic inquiry on the curriculum are based on the aesthetic concept to explore aesthetic qualities and experiences of the courses' contexts. Most research studies have only emphasized on the importance of aesthetic characteristics but rarely discussed in-depth the aesthetic experiences of learners. Therefore, this study integrates visual arts and literature appreciation in learning activities to explore the aesthetic experiences of 10 six- to twelve-year-old learners through a qualitative research method. We provide an alternative viewpoint for the study on the field of visual arts instructions. In this study, we found the aesthetic experiences of learners are as follows. First, children can reason with the texts and paintings, and then release their imaginations. Second, poetry combined with visual artwork can induce children to appreciate the world from different views, in order to conserve rational affective and perceptual thinking, thus contributing to a ＂poetic life.＂ Third, in the learning activities of the study design, the students can concentrate to proudly spirits, deep into creative, brave, full of confidence to overcome difficulties, to enjoy the satisfying emotional quality of the aesthetic experience. Fourth, the learning activities of the study design can lead the sensitivity and ability to interactive with the environment and create new aesthetic experiences.

1. 李雅婷(2010)。美感教育之實踐策略探究：以敘事課程為例。教育學刊，35，65-98。
   連結：
2. 周淑卿(2011)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質─藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學季刊，14(1)，19-40。
   連結：
3. 陳錦惠(2005)。教學經驗中的美感特質探討杜威美學的觀點。課程與教學季刊，8(2)，15-24。
   連結：
4. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free.
5. (1994).Art and Science Similarities, Differences and Interactions: Special Issue.
6. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books.
7. Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
8. Holzer, M. F. (2007). Aesthetic education, inquiry, and the imagination. Retrieved from http://www.lcinstitute.org/wps/PA_1_0_P1/Docs/495-AEII.pdf
9. 教育部（2012）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php 【The Ministry of Education. (2012). Consistent syllabuses national elementary and high school arts and humanities fields of study. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php】
10. 曾昭旭（2013年12月12日）。庖丁解牛的技術層次和藝術層次——莊子與你16。取自https://m.facebook.com/notes/%E6%9B%BE%E6%98%AD%E6%97%AD/%E5%BA%96%E4%B8%81%E8%A7%A3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E5%92%8C%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E8%8E%8A%E5%AD%90%E8%88%87%E4%BD%A016/636782999701888/ 【Zeng, Z.-X. (2013, December 12). Paodingjieniu technical level and artistic level: Zhuangzi and you 16. Retrieved from https://m.facebook.com/notes/%E6%9B%BE%E6%98%AD%E6%97%AD/%E5%BA%96%E4%B8%81%E8%A7%A3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E5%92%8C%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E8%8E%8A%E5%AD%90%E8%88%87%E4%BD%A016/636782999701888/】
11. Dewey, J. (1938). The philosophy of the arts. Lecture delivered to the Washington Dance Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiKrv6dkPzJAhXmKKYKHUbJCoEQFgg6MAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkurtstuke.com%2FFPU%2FTL705%2FThe%2520Philosophy%2520of%2520the%2520Arts.docx&usg=AFQjCNGD71w4Ig7mbEiOJv0jqTf8ZQ2ddA&sig2=uqd_tOVzHhIG3SQlkqyrPA
12. 教育部（2013）。教育部美感教育中長程計畫第一期五年計畫（103年至107年）「臺灣•好美——美感從幼起、美力終身學」。取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20150225102817/%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E7%BE%8E%E6%84%9F%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%AD%E9%95%B7%E7%A8%8B%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.pdf 【The Ministry of Education. (2013). Aesthetic education in the long range plan of the first five-year plan period (103 years to 107 years) “Taiwan, so beautiful: Aesthetic education from preschool to life-long learning”. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20150225102817/%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E7%BE%8E%E6%84%9F%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%AD%E9%95%B7%E7%A8%8B%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.pdf】
13. Ballengee-Morris, C.,Stuhr, P.(2001).Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world.Art Education,54(4),6-13.
14. Barone, T.(1983).Education as aesthetic experience: Art in germ.Educational Leadership,40(4),21-26.
15. Berns, G. S.,Blaine, K.,Prietula, M. J.,Pye, B. E.(2013).Short- and long-term effects of a novel on connectivity in the brain.Brain Connectivity,3(6),590-600.
16. Butterfield, C. L.(2002).,未出版
17. Dickson, R.,Costigan, A.(2011).Emerging practice for new teachers: Creating possibilities for "aesthetic" readings.English Education,43(2),145-170.
18. Eaton, M. M.,Moore, R.(2002).Aesthetic experience: Its revival and its relevance to aesthetic education.Journal of Aesthetic Education,36(2),9-23.
19. Eisner, A.(Ed.)(1985).Learning and teaching the ways of knowing.Chicago, Ill:National Society of Study of Education.
20. Eisner, E.(2006).Does arts-based research have a future?.Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education,48(1),9-18.
21. Eisner, E. W.(2002).The arts and the creation of mind.New Haven, CT:Yale University.
22. Eisner, E. W.(1996).Cognition and curriculum reconsidered.London, England:SAGE.
23. Eisner, E. W.(2004).What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education?.International Journal of Education & the Arts,5(4),1-13.
24. Eisner, E. W.(1972).Educating artistic vision.New York, NY:Macmillan.
25. Girod, M.,Twyman, T.,Wojcikiewicz, S.(2010).Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience.Journal of Science Teacher Education,21(7),801-824.
26. Greene, M.(1995).Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
27. Greene, M.(1978).Landscapes of learning.New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University.
28. Greene, M.(1977).Imagination and aesthetic literacy.Art Education,30(6),14-20.
29. Greene, M.(2001).Variation on a blue guitar: The Lincoln center institute lectures on aesthetics education.New York, NY:Teachers College.
30. Gulla, A.,Pinhasi-Vittorio, L.,Zakin., A.(2009).Exploring relationships between aesthetic education and writing across the curriculum using poetry.Across the Disciplines,6
31. Henderson, J. G.(Ed.),Kesson, K. R.(Ed.)(1999).Understanding Democratic Curriculum Leadership.New York, NY:Teachers College.
32. Holzer, M. F.(2005).From philosophy to practice: Asking important questions, reating enabling structures.Community in the making: Lincoln center institute, the arts and teacher education,New York, NY:
33. Jakobson, B.(2015).What difference does art make in science? A comparative study of meaning-making at elementary school.Interchange,46(4),323-343.
34. Jakobson, B.,Wickman, P.(2008).The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science.Research in Science Education,38(1),45-65.
35. Johnson, H. L.(2007).Aesthetic experience and early language and literacy development.Early Child Development and Care,177(3),311-320.
36. Kidd, D. C.,Castano, E.(2013).Reading literary fiction impr oves theory of mind.Science,342(6156),377-380.
37. Lacey, S.,Hagtvedt, H.,Patrick, V. M.,Anderson, A.,Stilla, R.,Deshpande, G.,Sathian, K.(2011).Art for reward's sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum.Neuroimage,55(1),420-433.
38. Maivorsdotter, N.,Lundvall, S.(2009).Aesthetic experience as an aspect of embodied learning: stories from physical education student teachers.Sport, Education and Society,14(3),265-279.
39. Pinar, W. F.(2012).What is curriculum theory.New York, NY:Routledge.
40. Pinar, W. F.(Ed.)(1988).Contemporary curriculum discourses.Scottsdale, AZ:Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
41. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds, W. M.,Slattery, P.,Taubman, P. M.(1995).Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
42. Pugh, K. J.,Girod, M.(2007).Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey's aesthetics.Journal of Science Teacher Education,18(1),9-27.
43. Ramachandran, V. S.,Hirstein, W.(1999).The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience.Journal of Consciousness Studies,6(6-7),15-51.
44. Short, E. C.(Ed.)(1991).Forms of curriculum inquiry.Albany, NY:State University of New York.
45. Sinclair, N.(2009).Aesthetics as a liberating force in mathematics education?.ZDM,41(1-2),45-60.
46. Smith, R. A.(2005).Aesthetic education: Questions and issues.Arts Education Policy Review,106(3),19-34.
47. Vezzali, L.,Stathi, S.,Giovannini, D.,Capozza, D.,Trifiletti, E.(2015).The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,45(2),105-121.
48. Zaidel, D. W.(2010).Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution.Journal of Anatomy,216(2),177-183.
49. Zeman, A.,Milton, F.,Smith, A.,Rylance, R.(2013).By heart an fMRI study of brain activation by poetry and prose.Journal of Consciousness Studies,20(9-10),132-158.
50. 朱光潛(2014)。談美。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan:晨星=Morningstar。
51. 吳承澤(2011)。現象學觀點下的藝術批評─論海德格《藝術作品的本源》。經國學報，29，119-135。
52. 吳莉君譯、Berger, J.(2010)。觀看的方式。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:麥田=Field。
53. 吳惠娟(2002)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東大學=National Pingtung University。
54. 呂玉環(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
55. 李雅婷(2002)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
56. 李雅婷(2009)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會=NSC。
57. 李澤厚(2001)。美學四講。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:三民=San Min。
58. 幸佳慧(1998)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
59. 林世仁編(2010)。樹先生跑哪去了？─童詩精選集。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:天下雜誌=CommonWealth Magazine。
60. 林曼麗(2001)。臺灣視覺藝術教育理念之展開─藝術、人文、新契機。國民教育，41(3)，26-34。
61. 林逢祺(1998)。美感經驗與教育。教育研究集刊，41，155-170。
62. 花英德(2013)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
63. 洪詠善(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
64. 梁川圖(2010)。漏。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:上誼文化=Hsin Yi Publications。
65. 郭禎祥(1999)。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106，1-9。
66. 郭禎祥(1994)。多元文化觀與藝術教育。師大學報，39，545-582。
67. 陳玉婷(2007)。美感教育在藝術與人文學習領域上之運用：一位音樂老師之個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，3(2)，113-136。
68. 陳伯璋(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
69. 陳伯璋(2003)。新世紀的課程研究與發展。國家政策季刊，2(3)，149-167。
70. 陳錦惠(2013)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
71. 陳麗文(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
72. 曾昭旭2013年12月12日。庖丁解牛的技術層次和藝術層次——莊子與你16。取自https://m.facebook.com/notes/%E6%9B%BE%E6%98%AD%E6%97%AD/%E5%BA%96%E4%B8%81%E8%A7%A3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E5%92%8C%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E8%8E%8A%E5%AD%90%E8%88%87%E4%BD%A016/636782999701888/ 【Zeng, Z.-X. 2013, December 12. Paodingjieniu technical level and artistic level: Zhuangzi and you 16. Retrieved from https://m.facebook.com/notes/%E6%9B%BE%E6%98%AD%E6%97%AD/%E5%BA%96%E4%B8%81%E8%A7%A3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E5%92%8C%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E8%8E%8A%E5%AD%90%E8%88%87%E4%BD%A016/636782999701888/】(2015)。課程理論與實務─解構與重建。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
73. 黃彥文(2010)。邁向一種共鳴的課程美學取向。「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇論文集，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
74. 廖仁義(2010)。美的覺醒：公民社會美學教育的理論與實踐。「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇論文集，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
75. 劉思源、何雲姿圖(2009)。小紅傘。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:愛智圖書=Ai-chi Books。
76. 劉梅琴(2007)。論《莊子．人間世》快感．美感．審美境界的現代詮釋。「第三屆中國文哲之當代詮釋學術研討會」會前論文集，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
77. 歐用生(2003)。課程典範的再建構。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:麗文文化=Liwen culture。
78. 鄭振鐸 譯、Tagore, R.(2011)。再見經典： 泰戈爾全集。新北市=Taipei, Taiwan:漢宇國際文化=Han-woo International Culture。
79. 賴傑威譯、董恆秀譯、Dickinson, E.(2006)。艾蜜莉•狄金生詩選。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:木馬文化=Trojan Culture。

1. 胡郁珮(2018)。取徑 SECI 模式實踐美感教育之研究—以視覺藝術教學為例。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，45，121-155。