非營利老人福利機構的組織績效與困境：社會影響力觀點的分析

Performance Contents and Predicaments of Nonprofit Long-Term Care Institutions for the Elderly: Perspective of Social Impacts

10.6785/SPSW.202012_24(2).0003

張玉龍(Yu-Lung Chang)

非營利組織 ； 績效管理 ； 社會影響力 ； 長期照顧 ； nonprofit organization ； performance management ； social impacts ； long-term care

社會政策與社會工作學刊

24卷2期（2020 / 12 / 01）

95 - 141

繁體中文

社會大眾對責信要求意識逐漸抬頭，非營利組織一方面須維護它的使命價值，另一方面又須面對資源有限及案主需求增加的壓力，各界對於績效的重視隨之水漲船高。為進一步瞭解非營利老人福利機構的績效目標與其所面臨的困境，以提出有助於促進組織績效推動的相關建議，本研究運用社會影響力觀點，以立意取樣方法，針對臺灣西部7間非營利老人福利機構，訪談24位核心經營管理者、基層主管／一般員工及長者。研究結果將非營利老人福利機構的績效目標歸納成三構面，並將其面臨的績效困境彙整成四個面向，在進行分析與檢視後，提出以下結論與建議：（1）鼓勵各界跳脫績效目標單向因果邏輯觀念，建構良性循環的非營利老人福利機構績效模式；（2）倡導從「服務使用者中心」到「以人為本」的思維轉變；（3）推動外籍看護工為「人力資源」而非僅是「勞力」的積極作為，重新檢視外籍看護工的勞動條件與運用策略；（4）檢視公私協力運作現況，建構非營利組織與政府對等的夥伴關係。

The society keeps raising the requirement for accountability. The nonprofit organizations, on one hand, have to stand up for their missions and values; on the other hand, they are encountering many obstacles, such as limited resources and augmented stress because of increased needs. In addition, all walks of life ask higher requirement for performance. By using the perspective of social impacts to understand the performance contents and predicaments of nonprofit long-term care institutions for the elderly, we use the method of purposive sampling to conduct 24 interviews consisting of core administrators, first-line supervisors or ordinary employees and elders, which are from 7 nonprofit long-term care institutions in west of Taiwan. For the results of this research, we sum up the performance contents into three dimensions and performance predicaments into four aspects. After further analyzing, this research further come up with the following conclusions and suggestions: (1) to encourage people thinking out of the concept of one-way causality of performance objectives and constructing a virtuous cycle performance mode of nonprofit long-term care institutions for the elderly; (2) to advocate our thinking out of box from ＂service users centred＂ to ＂person centred＂; (3) to treat foreign care workers as ＂human resources＂ instead of ＂manpower＂ , and to review the labor conditions and application strategies for them; (4) to review the current operations of public-private collaboration and to establish the collaborative partnership between the government and nonprofit organizations.

1. 王潔媛,楊培珊(2018)。「客工」？臺灣小型長期照顧機構外籍看護工之照顧勞動。社會政策與社會工作學刊，22(2)，95-134。
   連結：
2. 余健慈(2016)。台灣中部地區社會企業特色分析：組織特質、發展趨勢與社會影響力初探。國家與社會，18，111-157。
   連結：
3. 謝玉玲(2011)。看得到的照護政策、看不見的勞動差異：照顧工作者與勞動場域的檢視。臺灣社會福利學刊，10(1)，53-96。
   連結：
4. Arvidson, M.,Lyon, F.(2014).Social Impact Measurement and Non-Profit Organisations: Compliance, Resistance, and Promotion.Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,25(4),869-886.
5. Barman, E.(2007).What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector.Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,18(2),101-115.
6. Becker, H. A.(ed.),Vanclay, F.(ed.)(2003).The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
7. Carroll, A. B.(1979).A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance.Academy of Management Review,4(4),497-505.
8. Carroll, A.B.(1991).The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.Business Horizons,34(4),39-48.
9. Carroll, R. J.,Primo, D. M.,Richter, B. K.(2016).Using Item Response Theory to Improve Measurement in Strategic Management Research: An Application to Corporate Social Responsibility.Strategic Management Journal,37(1),66-85.
10. Clarkson, M. E.(1995).A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Review,20(1),92-117.
11. Dietz, T.(1987).Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment.Sociological Inquiry,57(1),54-69.
12. Drucker, P. F.(2006).Managing the Non-Profit Organization: Practices and Principles.New York:Harper Business.
13. Ebrashi, R. E.(2013).Social Entrepreneurship Theory and Sustainable Social Impact.Social Responsibility Journal,9(2),188-209.
14. Emerson, J.,Wachowicz, J.,Chun, S.(1999).Social Return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Nonprofit Sector.San Francisco:The Roberts Enterprise Development Fund.
15. Epstein, M. J.,Yuthas, K.(2014).Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies, and Impact Investors.San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler.
16. Freudenburg, W. R.(1986).Social Impact Assessment.Annual Review of Sociology,12,451-478.
17. Gentile, M. C.(2002).Social Impact Management and Social Enterprise: Two Sides of the Same Coin or a Totally Different Currency.New York:Business and Society Program.
18. Greening, D. W.,Turban, D. B.(2000).Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce.Business and Society,39(3),254-280.
19. Hammack, D. C.(1995).Accountability and Nonprofit Organizations: A Historical Perspective.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,6(2),127-139.
20. Jiao, H.(2011).A Conceptual Model for Social Entrepreneurship Directed toward Social Impact on Society.Social Enterprise Journal,7(2),130-149.
21. Johnson, S. (2000). Literature Review on Social Entrepreneurship. September 10, 2020. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246704544_Literature_Review_Of_Social_Entrepreneurship).
22. Kaplan, R. S.(2001).Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,11(3),353-370.
23. Kaplan, R. S.,Norton, D. P.(1996).The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action.Bonston:Harvard Business Review.
24. Kaplan, R. S.,Norton, D. P.(2004).Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes.Boston:Harvard Business School.
25. Khatutsky, G.,Wiener, J. M.,Anderson, W. L.(2010).Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Certified Nursing Assistants in Nursing Homes: How do they Differ?.Journal of Aging and Social Policy,22(3),267-287.
26. Le Roux, K.,Wright, N. S.(2010).Does Performance Measurement Improve Strategic Decision Making? Findings from a National Survey of Nonprofit Social Service Agencies.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,39(4),571-587.
27. Neely, A.(2002).Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Neely, A.,Bourne, M.(2000).Why Measurement Initiatives Fail.Measuring Business Excellence,4(4),3-7.
29. Niven, P. R.(2002).Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results.New York:John Wiley and Sons.
30. Niven, P. R.(2011).Balanced Scorecard: Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies.New York:John Wiley and Sons.
31. Preston, L. E.,O’bannon, D. P.(1997).The Corporate SocialFinancial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis.Business and Society,36(4),419-429.
32. Salamon, L. M.,Anheier, H. K.(1996).The Emerging Nonprofit Sector: An Overview.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
33. Savaya, R.,Waysman, M.(2005).The Logic Model: A Tool for Incorporating Theory in Development and Evaluation of Programs.Administration in Social Work,29(2),85-103.
34. Stirk, S.,Sanderson, H.(2012).Creating Person-Centred Organisations: Strategies and Tools for Managing Change in Health, Social Care and the Voluntary Sector.London:Jessica Kingsley.
35. Waddock, S. A.,Graves, S. B.(1997).The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link.Strategic Management Journal,18(4),303-319.
36. Wood, D. J.(1991).Corporate Social Performance Revisited.Academy of Management Review,16(4),691-718.
37. 行政院(2013)。行政院（2013）。《長期照護服務網計畫（第一期）─102 年至105 年（核定本）》。臺北。
38. 李期田,游鑑青,林熅如(2006)。老人安養護機構外籍監護工管理─以員工角度分析。臺灣老人保健學刊，2(2)，70-80。
39. 官有垣,王仕圖(2013)。臺灣社會企業的能力建構與社會影響初探。社區發展季刊，143，51-67。
40. 林淑馨(2011).非營利組織概論.高雄:巨流.
41. 莊俐昕(2013)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系。
42. 黃源協(2014).社會工作管理.臺北:雙葉.
43. 楊子申,趙忠傑(2018)。臺灣社會企業績效與社會影響力評估系統之研究。兩岸企業社會責任與社會企業家學術期刊，3，155-180。
44. 衛生福利部（2018）。《中華民國 106 年老人狀況調查報告》。臺北。

1. 洪士峰,巫麗雪(2023)。在機構安老：鑲嵌在機構照顧下彈性的日常生活安排。社會政策與社會工作學刊，27(1)，1-46。