受督者、機構與外聘督導的共舞：初探臺灣小型社福機構引入外督資源之成效評量與合作經驗

In between- The Supervision Evaluation and Collaborative Experience of Supervisees, Small NGOs, and External Supervisors in Taiwan

10.6785/SPSW.202206_26(1).0002

陳玟如(Wen-Ju Chen)

督導成效評量 ； 小型社福機構 ； 外聘督導 ； 混合研究 ； outcome evaluation ； small NGO ； external supervisor ； mixed-method research

社會政策與社會工作學刊

26卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

45 - 88

繁體中文

為了解臺灣小型社福機構引入外聘督導資源對社工與機構的影響與成效，本研究以混合研究方法（mixed-method research）分別對92位受督者進行督導成效調查與40個機構進行督導評量調查，亦針對5位機構主管進行2次焦點團體，及深度訪談4位外聘督導。研究結果發現，受督者與機構主管多反映外督資源有助提升受督者專業知能、維護個案福祉、降低人事訓練成本且改善機構凝聚力與內部溝通。然而，小型社福機構受限在服務對象多元且議題複雜、主管專業知能有限及既有督導培力計畫部分限制有礙機構內部跨專業整合下，因此研究建議應放寬既有計畫部分規定引入具多元專業背景之外聘督導，並將主管與內部相鄰專業者納為受督對象，且在未來能為受督者發展具傷害性督導評量指標及提供以實證為基礎的督導內容。

This paper explores the experience of introducing external supervision of small NGOs in Taiwan. Mixed-method approach was used to survey 92 supervisees and 40 small NGO managers; five managers participated in two focus groups, and four external supervisors were involved in in-depth interviews. The findings indicate that external supervision had brought positive development for supervisees and managers, including building professional skills and knowledge, improving the well-being of service users, reducing costs of personnel training and internal communication, and facilitating the cohesion of a multi-professional team. However, small NGOs face the challenge of working with diverse service users and their complex issues, the insufficient capacity of managers, and the limitation of the existing supervision subsidy program. In practice, this article suggests the government extend the eligibility of the supervision subsidy program to meet supervisees' needs, increase multi-professional supervisors, and include managers and other helping professionals in the same setting as formal supervisees. For research, developing the evaluation indicators of harmful supervision and providing evidence-based supervisory programs are needed.

1. 許雅惠, Y.-H.,張英陣, Y.-C.(2016)。風險管理下的社會工作督導。社會政策與社會工作學刊，20(2)，1-41。
   連結：
2. 鄭夙芬, S.-F.(2005)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用。選舉研究，12(1)，211-239。
   連結：
3. Adamson, C.(2012).Supervision is Not Politically Innocent.Australian Social Work,65(2),185-196.
4. Beddoe, L.(2012).External Supervision in Social Work: Power, Space, Risk, and the Search for Safety.Australian Social Work,65(2),197-213.
5. Beddoe, L.(2016).Supervision in Social Work in Aotearoa New Zealand: Challenges in Changing Contexts.The Clinical Supervisor,35(2),156-174.
6. Beddoe, L.(2010).Surveillance or Reflection: Professional Supervision in “the Risk Society”.The British Journal of Social Work,40(4),1279-1296.
7. Beddoe, L.(2017).Harmful Supervision: A Commentary.The Clinical Supervisor,36(1),88-101.
8. Bronstein, L. R.,Kovacs, P. J.(2013).Writing a Mixed Methods Report in Social Work Research.Research on Social Work Practice,23(3),354-360.
9. Carpenter, J.,Webb, C. M.,Bostock, L.(2013).The Surprisingly Weak Evidence Base for Supervision: Findings from a Systematic Review of Research in Child Welfare Practice (2000-2012).Children and Youth Services Review,35(11),1843-1853.
10. Davys, A.,Beddoe, L.(2010).Best Practice in Professional Supervision: A Guide for the Helping Professions.London:Jessica Kingsley.
11. Davys, A.,May, J.,Burns, B.,O’Connell, M.(2017).Evaluating Social Work Supervision.Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work,29(3),108-121.
12. Department of Health (2017). Knowledge and Skills Statement for Social Work Supervisors in Adult Social Care. Septemter 28, 2021. (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662633/Practice_Supervisors_Knowledge_and_Skills_Statement_Consultation-2.pdf).
13. Egan, R.,Maidment, J.,Connolly, M.(2016).Who is Watching Whom? Surveillance in Australian Social Work Supervision.The British Journal of Social Work,46(6),1617-1635.
14. Ellis, M. V.,Creaner, M.,Hutman, H.,Timulak, L.(2015).A Comparative Study of Clinical Supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United States.Journal of Counseling Psychology,62(4),621-631.
15. Hunt, S.,Goddard, C.,Cooper, J.,Littlechild, B.,Wild, J.(2016).“If I Feel Like This, How Does the Child Feel?” Child Protection Workers, Supervision, Management and Organisationall Response to Parental Violence.Journal of Social Work Practice,30(1),5-24.
16. Kadushin, A.,Harkness, D.(2014).Supervision in Social Work.New York:Columbia University Press.
17. Milne, D.(2007).An Empirical Definition of Clinical Supervision.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,46,437-447.
18. Morrell, M.(2001).External Supervision-Confidential or Accountable? An Exploration of the Relationship between Agency, Supervisor and Supervisee.Social Work Review,Autumn,36-41.
19. Morrison, T.(2001).Staff Supervision in Social Care: Making a Real Difference for Staff and Service Users.Brighton:Pavilion.
20. Motley, V.,Reese, M. K.,Campos, P.(2014).Evaluating Corrective Feedback Self-Efficacy Changes among Counselor Educators and Site Supervisors.Counselor Education and Supervision,53(1),34-46.
21. O’Connor, T.(2012).Developing “Home-Grown” Supervisors.Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand,18(5),30.
22. Pack, M.(2012).Two Sides to Every Story: A Phenomenological Exploration of the Meanings of Clinical Supervision from Supervisee and Supervisor Perspectives.Journal of Social Work Practice,26(2),163-179.
23. Rankine, M.(2019).The Internal/External Debate: The Tensions within Social Work Supervision.Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work,31(3),32-45.
24. Rosenberg, M.(1962).The Association between Self-Esteem and Anxiety.Journal of Psychiatric Research,1(2),135-152.
25. Rothwell, C.,Kehoe, A.,Farook, S.,Illing, J.(2019).,未出版
26. The Policy, Ethics and Human Rights Committee(2011).UK Supervision Policy.Birmingham:The British Association of Social Workers.
27. Yeung, K.-C.(1998).Hong Kong,University of Hong Kong.
28. 沈慶盈, C.-Y.(2007)。談社工員自我效能的提升。社區發展季刊，120，208-220。
29. 林月英, Y.-Y.(2017)。Taichung，東海大學社會工作學系=Tunghai University。
30. 施麗紅, L.-H.(2017)。社會工作督導關係探討。社區發展季刊，159，369-384。
31. 財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會（編）=Taiwan Fund for Children and Families (ed.)(2002).社會工作督導實施方式之理論與實務.臺中=Taichung:財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會=Taiwan Fund for Children and Families.
32. 陳秋山（譯）, C.-S.(trans.),Tsui, M.-S.(2017).社會工作督導：脈絡與概念.新北=New Taipei:心理=Psychological.
33. 游美貴, M.-K.,鄭麗珍, L.-C.(2018)。社會工作督導概論。社會工作督導：理論與實務工作手冊，臺北=Taipei:
34. 鈕文英, W.-I.(2014).質性研究方法與論文寫作.臺北=Taipei:雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book.
35. 廖美蓮, M.-L.(2018)。督導倫理與關係界線。社會工作督導：理論與實務工作手冊，臺北=Taipei:
36. 劉淑瓊, S.-C.(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會委託研究報告行政院國家科學委員會委託研究報告,Taipei:National Science Council。