新住民家長參與親職教育課程之行動研究

Action Research of Parent Education Curriculum for New Immigrant Parents

吳瓊洳(Chiung-Ju Wu)；蔡明昌(Ming-Chang Tsai)

新住民家長 ； 親職教育課程 ； 行動研究 ； Action Research ； Parent Education Curriculum ； New Immigrant Parents

嘉大教育研究學刊

32期（2014 / 03 / 30）

1 - 32

繁體中文

本研究旨在針對新住民家長實施親職教育課程，以了解其實施成效。為達研究目的，本研究採行動研究，由研究者及其他五位教師形成團隊。本研究參與之對象共有六個來自越南、印尼和大陸的新住民家庭，包含八個成員（其中有兩個家庭，父、母親都出席）。本研究為期十二週課程，每次上課二個小時，過程中以訪談、觀察、省思札記、文件資料等方式蒐集資料。所獲得之結論如下：1.參與親職教育課程可協助家長更了解子女、增加親職效能感、改善親子關係，亦可提升部份子女之學業成就表現；2.本研究實施之親職教育課程適切、具體可行，且可增進教師教學專業成長。依據上述之結論，本研究提出具體建議，供實施新住民家庭親職教育課程之參考。

The purposes of this study were to understand the effects of parent education curriculum practice for new immigrant parents and their children. In addition, the purposes of this study were to explore the possibilities when using action research of parent education curriculum for new immigrant parents and to improve teachers' professional growth. To achieve the above purposes, the participants consisted of the researcher, the other five teachers, and six new immigrant parents from Vietnam, Indonesia, and China. The research had been implemented from September 8, 2013, to Nov 10, 2013, for twelve weeks, two hours once a week. The data collection included interview, observation, reflection, and classrooms' documents. The results were as following: 1. The parent-child relation, parental efficiency and their child’s academic achievement could be increased through parent education curriculum practice. 2. The parent education curriculum could promote their professional growth. Based on the conclusions, some suggestions were offered for the teachers and the Schools when practicing parent education curriculum.

1. Cardona, B.,Jain, S.,Canfield-Davis, K.(2012).Home-School Relationships: A Qualitative Study with Diverse Families.Qualitative Report,17,20.
2. Coleman, J. S.,Campell, E. R.,Hobson, J. M.,Mood, A. M.,Wernfield, F. D.,York R. L.(1966).Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, D. C:U. S. Government Printing Office.
3. Coutts, M. J.,Sheridan, S. M.,Kwon, K.,Semke, C. A.(2012).,Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools.
4. Cowan, C. P.,Cowan, P. A.(1995).Interventions to ease the transition to parenthood: why they are needed and what they can do.Family Relations,44,412-423.
5. Doering, W.(1993).U. S. A.,Miami University.
6. Duran, R.(1983).Hispanic' education and background: Predictors of college achievement.New York College Entrance Examination Board.
7. Feinstein, L.,Symons, J.(1999).Attainment in secondary school.Oxford economic papers,51,300-321.
8. Fejgin, N.(1995).Factors contributing to academic excellence of American Jewish and Asian students.Sociology of Education,68,18-30.
9. Henderson, A. T.,Berla, N.(1994).A new generation of evidence: the family is critical to student achievement.St. Louis, Mo:Danforth foundation.
10. Hernandez, R.(1997).U. S. A.,California State University.
11. Karakus, M.,Savas, A. C.(2012).The Effects of Parental Involvement, Trust in Parents, Trust in Students and Pupil Control Ideology on Conflict Management Strategies of Early Childhood Teachers.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,12(4),9.
12. McCullough, J.(2002).U. S. A.,Denver University.
13. Morales, M.(2004).U. S. A.,San Francisco University.
14. Quigley, D. D.(2000).Parents and teachers working together to support third grade achievement: Parents as learning partners.the annual meeting of the American educational research association,New Orleans, LA.:
15. Schaller, A.,Rocha, L. O.,Barshinger, D.(2007).Maternal attitudes and parent education: How immigrant mothers support their child's education despite their own low levels of education.Early childhood education Journal,34(5),351-356.
16. Shaver, A. V.,Walls, R. T.(1998).Effects of title 1 parent involvement on student reading and mathematics achievement.Journal of research & development in education,31(2),90-97.
17. Sheridan, S. M.,Kim, E.M.,Coutts, M. J.,Sjuts, T. M.,Holmes, S. R.,Ransom, K. A.,Garbacz, S. A.(2012).,Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools.
18. Shuang, J. C.,Koblinsky, S. A.(2009).Parent involvement in children education: An exploratory study of urban Chinese immigrant families.Urban Education,44(6),687-709.
19. Tennies, R.(1982).U. S. A.,Florida Atlantic University.
20. Thaman, D.(1998).U. S. A.,Saint Louis University.
21. Waldman, S.(2003).Canada,Manitoba University.
22. Zhong, L.(2011).Canada,Windsor University.
23. 王世英、溫明麗、謝雅惠、黃乃熒、黃嘉莉、陳玉娟(2006)。我國新住民子女學習現況之研究。台北:國立教育資料館。
24. 周新富(2003)。家長參與子女教育之研究與實務。國民教育研究學報，11，69-92。
25. 洪淑萍(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學。
26. 洪麗香(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，輔仁大學。
27. 夏曉鵑(2002)。流離尋岸─資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象。台北:唐山。
28. 張芳全(2007)。新住民子女的教育。台北:心理。
29. 楊艾俐(2003)。台灣變貌─新住民潮。天下，271，94-99。
30. 蔡清田(2004)。課程發展行動研究。台北:五南。
31. 鄭惠雅(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，高雄師範大學教育研究所。
32. 蘭美幸(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東，國立台東大學兒童文學研究所。

1. 陳翊薇,王翊涵(2022)。跨文化的親子互動經驗研究：以一個育有青少年子女的臺印跨國婚姻家庭為例。中華輔導與諮商學報，63，1-34。
2. 黃金蘭,陳孟筳,張硯評,林以正(2020)。親子共讀對新住民孩童心理社會發展困境之緩衝效果。教育心理學報，52(2)，389-414。
3. 李文和(2021)。新住民女性以親職性教育導入子女情感關係歷程之探討。性學研究，11(2)，51-76。
4. (2019)。萬靈丹或安慰劑？多元社會下親職教育設計的再思考。社區發展季刊，167，140-161。