學習成果導向的教學設計與評量：「教學原理」的實踐案例

Learning Outcome-based Instruction and Assessment: A Practical Case Study of "Teaching Principles" Course

10.6384/CIQ.201404_17(2).0009

詹惠雪(Hui-Hsueh Chan)

學習成果導向 ； 學生學習成果本位評量 ； 師資專業課程 ； 高等教育 ； learning outcome-based education ； students' learning outcomes-based assessment model ； teacher education ； higher education

課程與教學

17卷2期（2014 / 04 / 01）

197 - 225

繁體中文

學習成果導向的教學已是當前高等教育發展的主流，本文即是一個實踐「學習成果導向教學與評量」案例，筆者將此模式運用在2012年所任教之「教學原理」一科，重新建構課程、教學方法及評量活動。課程實踐成果顯示，學習成果評量模式為大多數學生所肯定，主要的成果在：（一）學習目標聚焦，有助於學生學習。（二）重視理論與實務的結合，學生學以致用。（三）學生課堂參與度高，師生互動更佳。（四）評分方式多元，讓不同能力的學生皆能展現亮點。（五）師生共同訂定評分量尺，並實際運用在同儕互評，學生學習準備更有方向可循。（六）分組合作學習展現溝通及團隊能力。不過，此模式之運用亦有幾項值得省思之處：（一）課堂參與度提高，但對不擅參與討論的學生仍需輔導。（二）學習內容太多、課堂教學過於緊湊。（三）學生在評分量尺的訂定與同儕互評的能力有待加強。透過實踐歷程，本文提出此模式對大學課程及教學的啟示如下：（一）透過教、學與評量的校準，能有效提升教學的品質。（二）由教到學的典範轉移，大學教師應精進自己的教學專業。（三）運用翻轉課堂的概念，重新建構課堂的學習活動。（四）評量即是學習，以具體的評分量尺引導學習。

The model of learning outcome-based education focuses on student achievements. Teachers are encouraged to develop standards and guidelines for effectively assessing student-learning outcomes and promoting teaching quality. This study provided a practical case study on learning outcome-based instruction and assessment. This model was applied in a ＂Teaching Principle＂ course taught in 2012. The purpose was to reconstruct the course, teaching methods, and assessment activities based on the student-learning outcomes. Student feedback received after the conclusion of the course indicated that most of the students supported the learning outcome-assessment model. The primary outcomes were as follows:(a) definite learning objectives facilitated student learning; (b) combining theory and practice enabled students to apply what they learned; (c) a high level of student classroom participation improved student-teacher interactions; (d) diverse grading methods assisted students with varying abilities to show their strengths; (e) teachers and students could jointly establish and apply scoring rubrics during peer assessment, which provided students with a clear strategy for learning preparation; and (f) group learning allowed students to demonstrate communication and teamwork skills. However, several concerns were revealed during the model application: (a) although classroom participation improved, counseling was necessary for students who exhibited passivity toward participating in discussions; (b) the course content involved excessive materials and the course schedule was too fast-paced; (c) the student abilities of developing rubrics and peer assessment required further strengthening. Based on the results, the following proposals were made about improving university instruction and assessment: (a) combining teaching, learning and assessment effectively would improve teaching quality; (b) with a paradigm shift from teaching to learning, university professors should substantially improve personal teaching professionalism; (c) classroom learning activities should be revised based on the concept of flipped classroom; and (d) given that assessment is perceived as part of learning, specific rubrics should be used to guide learning.

1. 黃月美、歐用生(2013)。美國大學教學改革的新典範—日本「單元教學研究」的應用。課程與教學，16(2)，57-88。
   連結：
2. 財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會（2012）。第二週期系所評鑑評鑑項目。取自http://www.heeact.edu.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=1545&CtUnit=933&BaseDSD=7&mp=2
3. Classroom Window. (2012). Flipped classrooms: Improved test scores and teacher satisfaction. Retrieved from classroomwindow.com/flipped-classrooms-improved-test-scores-and-teacher-satisfaction
4. November, A., & Mull, B. (2012). Flipped learning: A response to five common criticisms. Retrieved from novemberlearning.com/wp/assets/flipped-learning-a-response-to-five-common-criticisms.pdf
5. Baker, J. W.(2000).The classroom flip: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side.Selected papers from the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning,Jacksonville, FL:
6. Barr, R. B.,Tagg, J.(1995).From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education.Change,27(6),13-25.
7. Biggs, J.(1999).What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning.Higher Education Research & Development,18(1),57-75.
8. Blumberg, P.(2008).Developing learner-centered teachers: A practical guide for faculty.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
9. CHEA(2006).,未出版
10. Driscoll, A.,Wood, S.(2007).Developing outcomes-based assessment for learner-centered education: A faculty introduction.Sterling, VA:Stylus.
11. Earl, L. M.(2003).Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Pre.
12. VLĂSCEANU, L.,GRÜNBERG, L.,PÂRLEA, D.(2007).Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions.Bucharest:UNESCO.
13. Walvoord, B. E.,Banta, T. W.(2004).Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments and general education.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
14. Walvoord, B.,Anderson, V.(2010).Effective grading.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Western Association of Schools and Colleges=WASC(2009).Retreat on student learning and assessment level I retreat handouts.Alameda, CA:Author.
16. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(2005).Understanding by design.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17. 中華民國課程與教學學會編(2009)。課程實驗與教學改革。臺北:五南。
18. 王如哲(2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊，27
19. 王秀槐(2011)。學習成果導向的課程設計與評量：理念與實例。教育研究月刊，207，53-59。
20. 史美瑤(2012)。21 世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊，36
21. 李坤崇(2011)。大學課程發展與學習成效評量。臺北:高等教育。
22. 黃淑玲(2013)。從知識到可觀察的能力：評估學習成效的策略與建議。評鑑雙月刊，44
23. 黃淑玲(2010)。教學典範轉移與評量大學生學習成效之建議。教育研究月刊，207，61-73。
24. 黃淑玲(2010)。學其所做、做其所學─以CHEA 傑出校院學生學習成效執行獎為例。評鑑雙月刊，25
25. 黃淑玲譯、Walvoord, Barbara E.、Banta, Trudy W.(2013)。新手也能上手的學習成效評估。臺北:高等教育。
26. 劉怡甫(2013)。翻轉課堂─落實學生為中心與提升就業力的教改良方。評鑑雙月刊，41
27. 蔡小婷(2012)。AHELO-OECD 高等教育學習成果評量計畫。評鑑雙月刊，39
28. 賴麗珍譯(2008)。重理解的課程設計。臺北:心理。
29. 蘇錦麗、黃曙東、浮絲曼(2011)。評分量尺（rubrics）在大學生學習成效評估之運用。教育研究月刊，207，19-31。

1. 杜念慈(2017)。創新分組機制之教學實務研究。大學教學實務與研究學刊，1(2)，39-68。
2. 胡至沛,周玉琳(2019)。國民小學低年級硬筆書法教學之探討：BTS翻轉教室的實踐與觀察。中國行政評論，25(3)，52-96。
3. 黃淑惠、陳俊良、林伯賢(2017)。快樂之旅還是壓抑的學習過程？以整合型文化創意設計課程研究為例。文化創意產業研究學報，7(3)，89-98。
4. (2016)。創新人才培育新取向：從成果導向教育到CDIO工程教育革新。教育研究月刊，266，32-43。
5. (2016)。跨學期醫學人文課程學習成效評估：行動反思通識之教與學。教育研究月刊，266，44-59。
6. (2019)。高級中等學校教師組織公民行為對學生自主學習影響之研究：以教師教學風格為中介變項。中正教育研究，18(1)，89-128。