私立幼兒園課程領導困境及其解決策略之探究：質性研究分析取徑

Study of Problems Facing Private Preschool Curriculum Leadership and Solving Strategies: A Qualitative Approach

10.6384/CIQ.201404_17(2).0004

林佳芬(Chia-Fen Lin)；李子建(John Chi-Kin Lee)

幼兒園 ； 課程領導 ； 質性研究 ； 紮根理論 ； preschool ； curriculum leadership ； qualitative research ； grounded theory

課程與教學

17卷2期（2014 / 04 / 01）

67 - 92

繁體中文

本研究主要之目的為探究私立幼兒園課程領導的困境及其解決策略。本研究採行質性研究方法，研究設計包括了兩階段的質性資料蒐集，並以紮根理論進行編碼與分析。第一階段的焦點座談，主要在瞭解課程領導的困境；第二階段的個案訪談是延續焦點座談結果，並以立意取樣方式選取具實務成效之個案園所，探詢因應困境的解決策略。本研究結論發現，課程領導困境包括：課程領導者的定位與職責、幼教人員的專業落差與工作壓力、新課程綱要的困惑與擔憂、家長選擇權的市場競爭與迷失導向；其解決策略包括：建立課程發展之願景與體制、協助幼教人員之專業成長、瞭解趨勢並爭取相關資源、行銷特色課程與增進親師互動。

The goal of this study was to investigate difficulties facing private preschool curriculum leadership and examine strategies for resolving problems. This study employed a qualitative research method, with a research design including two-stage collection of qualitative data, and employed a grounded theory approach to coding and analysis. The first stage consisted of a focus group discussion chiefly intended to gain an understanding of problems encountered by curriculum leadership. The case interviews in the second stage were built on the results of focus group discussion, and purposive sampling was employed to find cases of preschools with practical effectiveness. These preschools were asked about their solving strategies for responding to difficulties. According to the results of the study, difficulties facing curriculum leadership included position or responsibility on the part of curriculum leaders, professional gaps and work pressure among preschool teaching personnel, confusion and anxiety concerning new curriculum outlines, and market orientation of parents' choices. Strategies for resolving problems included establishing the vision and a system for curriculum development, assisting preschool teachers to attain professional growth, understanding trends and securing relevant resources, and marketing distinctive curricula and promoting parent-teacher interaction.

1. 王怡云(2005)。學校組織中的家長式領導─以一個幼稚園為例。家政教育學報，7，55-79。
   連結：
2. 陳雅鈴、高武銓(2008)。中低收入戶幼兒托育品質之探討：以屏東縣市爲例。教育學刊，31，45-77。
   連結：
3. 樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學報，13，127-180。
   連結：
4. 教育部（2012）。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。臺北：教育部。
5. 教育部（1929）。幼稚園暫行課程標準。南京：教育部。
6. 教育部（1987）。幼稚園課程標準。臺北：教育部。
7. Belfield, C. R.,Levin, H. M.(2002).The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States.Review of Educational Research,72(2),279-341.
8. Bradley, L. H.(1985).Curriculum leadership and development handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
9. Bryman, A.,Burgess, E. G.(1999).Qualitative research.London:Sage.
10. Elliott, B.,Brooker, R.,Macpherson, I.,McInman, A.,Thurlow, G.(1997).,未出版
11. Ervay, S. B.,Roach, C.(2001).Curriculum leadership in an era of decentralized control of what student should know and be able to do.International Symposium on Curriculum Leadership: Theories and Practices,Taipei:
12. Friedman, T.(2007).The world is flat 3.0: A brief history of the twenty-first century.New York, NY:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
13. Fullan, M.(2002).The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,8(3),409-419.
14. Glatthorn, A. A.(2000).The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin press.
15. Goethals, G.(Ed.),Sorenson, G.(Ed.),MacGregor, J.(Ed.)(2004).Encyclopedia of leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Gottlieb, R.,Rogers, J.,Rainey, K.(2002).Using curriculum evaluation as a basis for clinical faculty development.College Student Journal,36(2),279-288.
17. Gross, S. J.(1998).Staying centered: Curriculum leadership in a turbulent era.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
18. Harris, A.(2003).Distributed leadership and school improvements.Educational management Administration & Leadership,32(1),11-24.
19. Henderson, J. G.,Hawthorne, R. D.(2000).Transformative curriculum leadership.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
20. Ho, D. C. W.(2010).Leadership for school improvement: Exploring factors and practices in the process of curriculum change.Early Education & Development,21(2),263-284.
21. Kennedy, K.,Lee, J.(2008).Changing schools in Asia: Schools for the knowledge society.London:RoutledgeFalmer.
22. Krueger, R. A.,Casey, M. A.(2009).Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.London:Sage.
23. Lacireno-Paquet, N.,Holyoke, T. T.,Moser, M.,Henig, J. R.(2002).Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,24(2),145-158.
24. Lee, C. K.,Dimmock, C.(1999).Curriculum leadership and management in secondary schools: A Hong Kong case study.School Leadership & Management,19(4),455-481.
25. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
26. Macpherson, I.,Brooker, R.(2000).Positioning stakeholders in curriculum leadership: How can teacher educators work with teachers to discover and create their place?.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,28(1),69-85.
27. Mikkelsen, B. E.(2011).Associations between pedagogues attitudes, praxis and policy in relation to physical activity of children in kindergarten - results from a cross sectional study of health behavior amongst Danish pre-school children.International Journal of Pediatric Obesity,6(2),12-15.
28. Mishler, E. G.(1986).Research interviewing: Context and narrative.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
29. Murray, L.,Lawrence, B.(2000).Practitioner-based enquiry.London:Falmer.
30. Oliva, P. F.(1997).Developing the curriculum.New York, NY:Longman.
31. Patterson, J. L.,Kelleher, P.(2005).Resilient school leaders: Strategies for turning adversity into achievement.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32. Somekha, B.,Zeichnerb, K.(2009).Action research for educational reform: Remodeling action research theories and practices in local contexts.Educational Action Research,17(1),5-21.
33. Stake, R. E.(2006).Multiple case study analysis.New York, NY:Guilford.
34. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
35. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
36. Townsend, T.(Ed.),MacBeath, J.(Ed.)(2011).International handbook of leadership for learning.Dordrecht, NED:Springer.
37. 王為國(2003)。幼稚園園長之課程領導。幼教資訊，149，8-12。
38. 江志正(2010)。學校課程領導的永續思考。課程研究，5(1)，39-59。
39. 李子建編(2010)。綜合人文學科─課程設計、教學與實施。南京:南京師範大學出版社。
40. 孫立葳(2000)。幼兒教師工作壓力之研究。新竹師院學報，13，265-279。
41. 張愛絹(2007)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系。
42. 張瑞財(2003)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
43. 許明珠(2008)。屏東，國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所。
44. 郭芳辰(2006)。臺中，朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系。
45. 陳國泰(2003)。幼兒教師的困擾問題及其因應方式之研究。幼兒保育學刊，1，185-213。
46. 陳淑琴(2008)。臺灣幼托機構課程模式的發展探究：從課程就是敘事文本的觀點。香港中文大學基礎教育學報，17(1)，17-32。
47. 陳慈娟(2003)。臺北，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
48. 黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計─理論與實務。臺北:五南。
49. 黃旭鈞(2003)。課程領導：理論與實務。臺北:心理。
50. 黃政傑(1999)。課程改革。臺北:師大書苑。
51. 楊于萱(2009)。新竹，國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育學系。
52. 歐用生(2000)。轉型的課程領導及其啟示。國民教育，41(1)，2-9。
53. 歐用生(2004)。校長的課程領導和專業成長。研習資訊，21(1)，60-70。
54. 歐用生編、莊梅枝編(2003)。活化課程領導。臺北:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
55. 戴文青(2005)。從深層結構論臺灣幼兒園教師專業認同轉化的可能性。南大學報，39(2)，19-42。
56. 簡楚瑛(2009)。課程發展理論與實務。臺北:心理。

1. (2020)。非營利幼兒園園長領導風格與園所課程發展之個案研究。教育研究月刊，317，91-109。
2. (2024)。學校本位課程發展歷程模式之研究：幼兒園、家庭與社區合作取徑特色課程。課程與教學，27(2)，231-263。