國民中學校長教學領導、導師正向管教與班級經營效能關係之研究

A Study on the Relationships Among Principals' Instructional Leadership, Homeroom Teachers' Positive Discipline and Classroom Management Effectiveness in Junior High Schools

10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0009

賴協志(Hsieh-Chih Lai)

校長教學領導 ； 導師正向管教 ； 班級經營效能 ； 國民中學 ； principals' instructional leadership ； homeroom teachers' positive discipline ； classroom management effectiveness ； junior high schools

課程與教學

23卷1期（2020 / 01 / 01）

217 - 247

繁體中文

隨著十二年國民基本教育的推展及相關革新方案的實施，以及新課程綱要的規劃與執行，身為國民中學校長，應具體展現教學領導之影響力，引導導師積極涵養正向管教知能及精進教學實力，進而促進學生有效學習及班級經營效能之提升。本研究旨在探討國民中學校長教學領導、導師正向管教與班級經營效能之現況與關係，並且運用中介效果模式，分析三者之間的關聯性。為達成上述目的，本研究採用問卷調查法。獲得的結論主要包括：國民中學校長教學領導層面在「確保教學品質」、導師正向管教層面在「正面的班級文化」、班級經營效能層面在「班級常規實踐」有較佳表現；國民中學校長教學領導、導師正向管教與班級經營效能三者之間具有密切關聯性，且三者關係模式適配情形良好；國民中學校長教學領導會透過整體導師正向管教之中介作用，正面影響班級經營效能。

Based on the development of twelve-year basic education which focused on the planning and execution of the new curriculum guidelines, the principals should show the influence of instructional leadership to guide homeroom teachers to cultivate the knowledge and ability of positive discipline, and to improve their teaching strength in junior high schools to enhance students' learning and class management. The main purposes of this research were to explore the current circumstances and relationships among principals' instructional leadership, homeroom teachers' positive discipline and classroom management effectiveness in junior high schools. The data were analyzed by using mediated-effects model. The conclusions were as follows. The performance was high in ＂ensuring the quality of teaching＂ of principals' instructional leadership, ＂positive classroom culture＂ of homeroom teachers positive discipline, and ＂the practice of classroom routine＂ of classroom management effectiveness. The significant correlations among the three variables above were found, and data fit mediated-effects model. The relationship between principals' instructional leadership and classroom management effectiveness was mediated by homeroom teachers' positive discipline.

1. 丁一顧(2011)。教師專業發展另一章：班級經營教練。中等教育，62(2)，82-99。
   連結：
2. 李安明,鄭采珮,劉志昀(2011)。國民小學校長教學領導與學生學習成就之研究。學校行政，75，1-20。
   連結：
3. 林永豐(2017)。論十二年國民基本教育課程總綱學習重點的規劃思維與意涵。課程與教學，20(1)，105-126。
   連結：
4. 林易萱,龔心怡(2017)。教師信念、專業承諾與班級經營效能比較之研究—以國高中新手與資深教師為例。師資培育與教師專業發展，10(2)，111-138。
   連結：
5. 林明地(2000)。超越班級界線的班級經營。課程與教學季刊，3(2)，17-31。
   連結：
6. 林明地(2010)。國中校長提升課程品質及師生教與學成效之作為分析。當代教育研究，18(1)，43-76。
   連結：
7. 姚麗英(2018)。高中校長正向領導與教師創新教學關係之研究。學校行政，114，109-134。
   連結：
8. 郭怡立(2011)。從全人教育課程觀點探究高中實施正向管教指標之建構。中等教育，62(1)，72-91。
   連結：
9. 陳木金,吳堂鐘,吳慧蘭(2016)。學校學習環境指標建構對校長推動教學領導的啟示。學校行政，104，15-38。
   連結：
10. 詹志禹(2017)。實驗創新與十二年國民基本教育。課程與教學季刊，20(4)，1-24。
    連結：
11. 甄曉蘭,余穎麒(2016)。科技部教育學門研究趨勢檢視與省思：94-103 學年度專題計畫分析。教育研究集刊，62(2)，131-152。
    連結：
12. 劉素倫,林清文(2007)。國中教師班級經營與學生學習動機之研究。輔導與諮商學報，29(1)，1-24。
    連結：
13. 盧玉燕,吳相儀,陳學志,林秀玲,張雨霖(2016)。教室裡有春天：正向管教獲獎教師之情境式正向管教策略分析。教育心理學報，48(2)，159-184。
    連結：
14. 魏惠娟(2000)。終生學習趨勢對於班級經營的啟示。課程與教學季刊，3(2)，47-61。
    連結：
15. 羅婉娥,古明峰,曾文志(2013)。正向情緒課程對國中生生活適應及情感狀態效果之研究。教育心理學報，44(3)，609-627。
    連結：
16. Ali, N.(2017).Teachers’ perceptions of the relationship between principals’ instructional leadership, school culture, and school effectiveness in Pakistan.Egitim Ve Bilim,42,407-425.
17. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
18. Boekestein, W.(2016).Positive leadership: Leading like Jesus (riot Rehoboam).Puritan Reformed Journal,8(2),139-157.
19. Bogotch, I.,Schoorman, D.,Reyes-Guerra, D.(2017).Educational curriculum leadership as currere and praxis.Leadership and Policy in Schools,16(2),303-327.
20. Bollen, K. A.,Stine, R. A.(1992).Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.Sociological Methods & Research,21(2),205-229.
21. Boyce, J.,Bowers, A. J.(2018).Toward an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years.Journal of Educational Administration,56(2),161-182.
22. Cameron, K. S.(2013).Practicing positive leadership: Tools and techniques that create extraordinary results.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
23. Cameron, K. S.(2012).Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
24. Derrington, M. L.,Campbell, J. W.(2018).Teacher evaluation policy tools: Principals’ selective use in instructional leadership.Leadership and Policy in Schools,17(4),568-590.
25. Duffin, L. C.,French, B. F.,Patrick, H.(2012).The teachers’ sense of efficacy scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,28(6),827-834.
26. Feuerborn, L. L.,Tyre, A. D.,Beaudoin, K.(2018).Classified staff perceptions of behavior and discipline: Implications for schoolwide positive behavior supports.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,20(2),101-112.
27. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
28. Gupton, S. L.(2003).The instructional leadership toolbox: A handbook for improving practice.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
29. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
30. Hallinger, P.,Walker, A.,Dao-Thi, H. N.,Truong, T.,Nguyen, T. T.(2017).Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: A preliminary model.Journal of Educational Administration,55(2),222-239.
31. Harris, A.,Jones, M.,Lee-Cheah, K. S.,Devadason, E.,Adams, D.(2017).Exploring principals’ instructional leadership practices in Malaysia: Insights and implications.Journal of Educational Administration,55(2),207-221.
32. Harron, J. R.,Hughes, J. E.(2018).Spacemakers: A leadership perspective on curriculum and the purpose of K-12 educational makerspaces.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,50(3),253-270.
33. Hayes, A. F.(2009).Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium.Communication Monographs,76(4),408-420.
34. Hoenle, S.(2016).The power of positive leadership.Global Focus,10,15-18.
35. Kalman, M.,Arslan, M. C.(2016).School principals’ evaluations of their instructional leadership behaviours: Realities vs. ideals.School Leadership & Management,36(5),508-530.
36. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford.
37. Kotz, S.(ed.),Johnson, N. L.(ed.),Read, C. B.(ed.)(1985).Encyclopedia of statistical science, multivariate analysis to plackett and burman designs.New York, NY:Wiley.
38. Kwan, P.(2016).The effect of trust on the relationship between instructional leadership and student outcomes in Hong Kong secondary schools.The Asia - Pacific Education Researcher,25(1),111-121.
39. Leaf, A.,Odhiambo, G.(2017).The deputy principal instructional leadership role and professional learning: Perceptions of secondary principals, deputies and teachers.Journal of Educational Administration,55(1),33-48.
40. Lebor, M.(2016).So what do managers say about classroom management? Qualitative practitioner research exploring managers’ views on classroom management.Journal of further and Higher Education,40(4),568-583.
41. Leithwood, K.,Riehl, C.(2005).What do we know about educational leadership?.A new agenda for research in educational leadership,New York, NY:
42. Liu, X.,Babchuk, W.(2018).Developing classroom management skills in non-native culture: A single case study.The Qualitative Report,23(4),779-800.
43. Long, A. C. J.,Renshaw, T. L.,Camarota, D.(2018).Classroom management in an urban, alternative school: A comparison of mindfulness and behavioral approaches.Contemporary School Psychology,22(3),233-248.
44. Lopes, J.,Silva, E.,Oliveira, C.,Sass, D.,Martin, N.(2017).Teacher’s classroom management behavior and students' classroom misbehavior: A study with 5th through 9th-grade students.Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,15(3),467-490.
45. Lustick, H.(2017).Making discipline relevant: Toward a theory of culturally responsive positive schoolwide discipline.Race, Ethnicity and Education,20(5),681-695.
46. Manaseh, A. M.(2016).Instructional leadership: The role of heads of schools in managing the instructional programme.International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management,4(1),30-47.
47. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. R.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis.Psychological Methods,7,64-82.
48. Moore, D. W.,Anderson, A.,Glassenbury, M.,Lang, R.,Didden, R.(2013).Increasing on-task behavior in students in a regular classroom: Effectiveness of a self-management procedure using a tactile prompt.Journal of Behavioral Education,22(4),302-311.
49. Moshagen, M.,Auerswald, M.(2018).On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling.Psychological Methods,23(2),318-336.
50. Önder, E.,Yurdagül-Önder, O.(2018).Variables that predict classroom management anxiety and classroom management anxieties level of pre-service teachers.Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction,8(4),645-664.
51. Perry, J. L.,Nicholls, A. R.,Clough, P. J.,Crust, L.(2015).Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling.Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,19(1),12-21.
52. Quinn, D. M.(2002).The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement.Journal of Educational Administration,40(5),447-467.
53. Ramazan, C.,Hanifi, P.(2018).Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy.The International Journal of Educational Management,32(4),550-567.
54. Reid, A.,Koglbauer, R.(2018).“I see what you mean”: Using visual data collection methods to explore leadership curriculum planning.Management in Education,32(1),19-25.
55. Rombot, O.,Sapoetra, J.,Mirayani, R.(2015).The effect of positive discipline method on the student’s self regulatory skills and interpersonal skills of the students of the first grade class at quantum change academy.Advanced Science Letters,21(7),2221-2225.
56. Sarikaya, N.,Erdogan, Ç.(2016).Relationship between the instructional leadership behaviors of high school principals and teachers' organizational commitment.Journal of Education and Practice,7(3),72-82.
57. Shengnan, L.,Philip, H.(2018).Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model.Educational Administration Quarterly,54(4),501-528.
58. Shih, C.,Wu, C.,Lai, F.,Liao, C.(2015).The study of teachers’ attitudes of positive disciplines and class management effectiveness in junior high school.International Journal of Information and Education Technology,5(7),507-511.
59. Shrout, P. E.,Bolger, N.(2002).Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods,7(4),422-445.
60. Sisman, M.(2016).Factors related to instructional leadership perception and effect of instructional leadership on organizational variables: A meta-analysis.Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri,16(5),1761-1787.
61. Sobel, M. E.(1982).Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models.Sociological methodology,Washington DC:
62. Steins, G.(2016).Classroom management at schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas with particular consideration of the teacher-student-relationship.Die Deutsche Schule,108(4),340-353.
63. Wu, C.,Lai, F.,Shih, C.,Liao, C.(2015).Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of their homeroom teachers’ leadership and classroom management at vocational high schools.International Journal of Information and Education Technology,5(5),319-325.
64. Zhao, X.,Lynch, J. G.,Chen, Q.(2010).Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis.Journal of Consumer Research,37(2),197-206.
65. 王雅玲(2018)。十二年國教中的正向管教之理論與實踐策略探討。臺灣教育評論，7(10)，232-237。
66. 吳清山,林天祐(2008)。正向管教。教育研究，176，133。
67. 李玲惠(2008)。善用正向管教創造教室裡的春天。臺灣教育，651，43-47。
68. 林雅萍,田建中(2017)。校長儲訓課程規劃與校長領導實務需求之探討－以高雄市 105 年度校長儲訓課程為例。教育行政論壇，9(1)，73-95。
69. 林鴻政(2017)。新竹市，國立清華大學社會學習領域教師碩士在職專班。
70. 邱皓政(2002).量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析.臺北市:五南.
71. 柯至芸,吳俊憲(2013)。多元智能與正向管教在班級經營上的應用。臺灣教育評論，2(9)，52-54。
72. 徐嘉珍(2015)。教師如何實施正向管教，提升班級經營效能。臺灣教育評論，4(3)，58-62。
73. 國家教育研究院（編）(2017).中華民國教育年報 104 年版.新北市:國家教育研究院.
74. 張芬芬(2019)。十二年國教的統整課程與分科課程：對立？取代？互補？。臺灣教育評論，8(1)，195-200。
75. 教育部統計處（2019）。國民中學概況表（107學年度）。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=1B58E0B736635285&s=D04C74553DB60CAD
76. 陳騏龍(2011)。從正向心理學出發談霸凌的正向管教。諮商與輔導，304，24-27。
77. 曾端真(2011)。正向管教與紀律的養成。中等教育，62(1)，20-31。
78. 楊振昇(2018)。校長領導與教師教學支持。教育研究，292，26-36。
79. 楊振昇,董映伶,吳孟珊,李逸侜(2018)。行政院科技部專題研究成果報告行政院科技部專題研究成果報告,未出版
80. 廖勇潭(2011)。正向管教的心方法。品質，47(10)，37-38。

1. 陳建志(2020)。滴水穿石：偏遠地區國小教師實踐正向管教於弱勢學童之個案研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，45，29-58。
2. 林志興(2022)。多元教學活動融入正向管教精神－提升班級經營成效之行動研究。教育理論與實踐學刊，45，63-89。
3. 張文權,范熾文(2022)。國小校長教學領導與教師專業素養關係模式驗證及教師專業素養IPA差異分析。課程與教學，25(4)，159-190。