题名

整合未來時間觀與數學學習投入：國中生數學學習模式之研究

并列篇名

Integrate Future Time Perspective and Learning Engagement: The Study of Mathematical Models of Learning for Junior High School Students

DOI

10.6384/CIQ.202101_24(1).0009

作者

劉玉玲(Yu-Ling Liu)；謝子陽(Tzu-Yang Hsien)

关键词

未來時間觀 ； 學習投入 ； 學習策略 ； 學科情緒 ； 中介作用數 ； future time perspective ； mathematics learning engagement ； mathematics learning strategy ； mathematics academic emotion ； mediation models

期刊名称

課程與教學

卷期/出版年月

24卷1期（2021 / 01 / 01）

页次

235 - 263

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究之目的是要了解未來時間觀、學習投入、學習策略與學科情緒等變項對學習成就的影響力大小，同時建構未來時間觀與學習成就的中介模式。問卷調查主要包含「未來時間觀量表」、「學習投入」、「學習策略」，以及「數學情緒」等量表。以107學年度之國中生為研究對象，自臺灣北、中、南、東及離島（金門、馬祖）五區抽選，有效問卷735份。主要研究發現有：1.未來時間觀與數學成就之間以學習投入為中介變數，可發展最佳學習模式；未來時間觀與數學成就之間以學習策略為中介變項，為次佳學習模式。2.數學學業情緒在未來時間觀與數學成就之間無法產生中介作用。3.數學學習投入的影響力大於數學學習策略，學習投入、學習策略與學業成就之間僅可產生部分中介作用。研究結果可提供教師對學習輔導或差異化教學的參考，亦可提供發展客製化教材的考量。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was tried to use future time perspectives, learning engagement, learning strategies, and academic emotions as factors to understand statistical influence, as well as construct mediation models of future time perspectives and learning achievements. The instruments were ＂learning strategy scale＂, ＂academic emotion scale＂, and separately compiled ＂future time perspective scale＂ and ＂math learning engagement scale＂. The study was conducted on 735 students who came from 107 middle school which were selected from the five districts of Taiwan: North, Middle, South, East, and Islands (Kinmen, Matsu). The results of the study showed that future time perspective, learning engagement and academic achievement was the best mediation model. The second good mediation model was future time perspective, learning strategy and academic achievement. Learning engagements, learning strategies and academic achievements can only produce part of the mediation effect. Mathematics emotions cannot be used as a mediation variable. Based on the analysis results, this study had implications for class management in mathematics, customized or differentiated teaching.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 余民寧,李昭鋆(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，247-271。
    連結：
  2. 余民寧,趙珮晴,陳嘉成(2010)。以社會認知生涯理論探討影響選擇數學職業意圖的因素。教育科學研究期刊，55(3)，177-201。
    連結：
  3. 林秀玲,吳相儀,吳清麟,邱發忠,陳學志,陳慧娟(2015)。小學生「未來時間觀量表」之中文化及信、效度評估。測驗學刊，62，153-179。
    連結：
  4. 林宴瑛,程炳林(2012)。環境目標結構與控制：價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報，44(1)，49-72。
    連結：
  5. 林啟超(2009)。高職學生之未來時間觀、成就目標與適應性學習行為間徑路模式之檢驗。教育實踐與研究，22(1)，81-11。
    連結：
  6. 林漢唐,陳慧娟(2016)。家長網路管教、學校投入與青少年危險網路行為之關係：家庭凝聚力之調節效果分析。教育科學研究期刊，61(4)，205-242。
    連結：
  7. 張芳全,洪筱仙(2019)。澎湖縣國中生未來時間觀、自律學習與學習成就之研究。臺北市立大學學報：教育類，50(2)，1-32。
    連結：
  8. 張映芬,程炳林(2017)。教師教學情緒、學生學業情緒與動機涉入之關係探究。教育心理學報，49(1)，113-136。
    連結：
  9. 黃珮婷,陳慧娟(2016)。大學生未來時間觀與自我調整學習之關係：知覺工具性中介效果檢驗。教育心理學報，47(3)，329-354。
    連結：
  10. 趙珮晴,余民寧(2018)。未來職業意圖受［情境］影響？以社會認知生涯理論分析 TIMSS 2011 年數學資料。教育科學研究期刊，63(3)，231-255。
    連結：
  11. 劉玉玲(2016)。國中生數學學業情緒及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究。課程與教學季刊，19(2)，161-192。
    連結：
  12. 劉玉玲,沈淑芬(2019)。國中生數學自我概念、數學學習策略與數學學業成就之模式建構。課程與教學季刊，22(3)，187-214。
    連結：
  13. 劉玉玲,薛岳(2013)。國中生數學學業自我概念及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究－自我提升模式觀點。課程與教學季刊，16(1)，179-208。
    連結：
  14. 劉鎮寧(2016)。中小學補救教學政策執行問題之分析－以高雄市為例。學校行政，101，166-184。
    連結：
  15. Alansari, M.,Worrell, F. C.,Rubie-Davies, C.,Webber, M.(2013).Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS) scores and academic outcomes in secondary school females in New Zealand.International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education,1(3),251-274.
  16. Andre, L.,van Vianen, A. E.,Peetsma, T. T.(2017).Adolescents’ and parents’ regulatory focus as determinants of future time perspective on school and professional career.Learning and Individual Differences,59,34-42.
  17. Andretta, J. R.,Worrell, F. C.,Mello, Z. R.(2014).Predicting educational outcomes and psychological wellbeing in adolescents using time attitude profiles.Psychology in the Schools,51,434-451.
  18. Bang, H.,Chang, M.,Lee, C.(2020).Racial and linguistic status differences in the effect of interscholastic sport participation on school engagement and academic performance among high school students.Psychological Reports,123(2),452-471.
  19. Bembenutty, H.,Karabenick, S. A.(2013).Self-regulation, culture, and academic delay of gratification.Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,12(3),323-337.
  20. Bitti, P.,Zambianchi, M.,Bitner, J.(2015).Time perspective and positive aging.Time perspective theory: Review, research and application,New York, NY:
  21. Boekaerts, M.(2016).Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process.Learning and Instruction,43,76-83.
  22. Boniwell, I.,Zimbardo, P. G.(2015).Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning.Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life,Hoboken, NJ:
  23. Bourgeois, S. J.,Boberg, J. E.(2016).High-achieving, cognitively disengaged middle level mathematics students: A self-determination theory perspective.Research in Middle Level Education,39(9),1-18.
  24. Brodie, R. J.,Hollebeek, L. D.,Jurić, B.,Ilić, A.(2011).Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research.Journal of Service Research,14(3),252-271.
  25. Butterworth, B.,Varma, S.,Laurillard, D.(2011).Dyscalculia: From brain to education.Science,332(6033),1049-1053.
  26. Chishima, Y.,McKay, M. T.,Murakami, T.(2017).The reliability and validity of the Temporal Focus Scale in young Japanese adults.Personality and Individual Differences,119,230-235.
  27. Chishima, Y.,Murakami, T.,Worrell, F. C.,Mello, Z. R.(2019).The Japanese version of the Adolescent Time Inventory–Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) Scale: Internal consistency, structural validity, and convergent validity.Assessment,26(2),181-192.
  28. De Bilde, J.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Lens, W.(2011).Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory.Learning and Instruction,21(3),332-344.
  29. De Volder, M. L.,Lens, W.(1982).Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42(3),566.
  30. Dotterer, A. M.,Lowe, K.(2011).Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,40(12),1649-1660.
  31. Fieulaine, N.,Apostolidis, T.(2015).Precariousness as a time horizon: How poverty and social insecurity shape individuals’ time perspectives.Time perspective theory: Review, research and application,New York, NY:
  32. Fredricks, J. A.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Paris, A. H.(2004).School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research,74(1),59-109.
  33. Fredricks, J. A.,McColskey, W.(2012).The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments.Handbook of research on student engagement,New York, NY:
  34. Fredricks, J.,McColskey, W.,Meli, J.,Mordica, J.,Montrosse, B.,Mooney, K.(2011).Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments.Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
  35. Frey, C. B.,Osborne, M. A.(2017).The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization?.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,114,254-280.
  36. Geary, D. C.(2013).Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities.Current Directions in Psychological Science,22(1),23-27.
  37. Gjesme, T.(1983).On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some functions’ and measurements’ implications.International Journal of Psychology,18(1-4),443-461.
  38. Griffiths, A.,Liles, E.,Furlong, M. J.,Sidhwa, J.(2012).The relations of adolescent student engagement with troubling high-risk behaviors.Handbook of research on student engagement,New York, NY:
  39. Handelsman, M. M.,Briggs, W. L.,Sullivan, N.,Towler, A.(2005).A measure of college student course engagement.The Journal of Educational Research,98(3),184-192.
  40. Hilpert, J. C.,Husman, J.,Stump, G. S.,Kim, W.,Chung, W. T.,Duggan, M. A.(2012).Examining students’ future time perspective: Pathways to knowledge building 1.Japanese Psychological Research,54(3),229-240.
  41. Horstmanshof, L.,Zimitat, C.(2007).Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first‐year university students.British Journal of Educational Psychology,77(3),703-718.
  42. Hudley, C.,Daoud, A.,Polanco, T.,Wright-Castro, R.,Hershberg, R.(2003).Student engagement, school climate, and future expectations in high school.2003 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development,Tampa, Florida, USA:
  43. Husman, J.,Shell, D. F.(2008).Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective.Learning and Individual Differences,18(2),166-175.
  44. King, R. B.(2016).Gender differences in motivation, engagement and achievement are related to students’ perceptions of peer – but not of parent or teacher – attitudes toward school.Learning and Individual Differences,52,60-71.
  45. Kooij, D. T.,Kanfer, R.,Betts, M.,Rudolph, C. W.(2018).Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,103(8),867.
  46. Kuh, G. D.(2003).What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices.Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,35(2),24-32.
  47. Kuh, G. D.(2009).The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations.New Directions for Institutional Research,141,5-20.
  48. Lang, F. R.,Carstensen, L. L.(2002).Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships.Psychology and Aging,17(1),125-139.
  49. Lei, H.,Cui, Y.,Zhou, W.(2018).Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,46(3),517-528.
  50. Liu, Y. L.(2019).The effects of future time perspective, learning engagement and mathematics academic achievement for adolescents in middle high school.2nd International Conference on Economics and Business at the Interface of Natural Sciences,Singapore:
  51. Mello, Z. R.,Walker, E. B.,Finan, L. J.,Stiasny, A.,Wiggers, I. C.,McBroom, K. A.,Worrell, F. C.(2018).Time perspective, psychological outcomes, and risky behavior among runaway adolescents.Applied Developmental Science,22(3),233-243.
  52. Mello, Z. R.,Worrell, F.(2015).The past, the present, and the future: A conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence.Time perspective theory: Review, research and application,New York, NY:
  53. Mello, Z. R.,Worrell, F. C.(2007).The adolescent time inventory – English.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
  54. Mello, Z. R.,Zhang, J. W.,Barber, S. J.,Paoloni, V. C.,Howell, R. T.,Worrell, F. C.(2016).Psychometric properties of time attitude scores in young, middle, and older adult samples.Personality and Individual Differences,101,57-61.
  55. Middleton, M. J.,Midgley, C.(2002).Beyond motivation: Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27(3),373-391.
  56. National Research Council,Institute for Medicine(2004).Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
  57. Newman, B. M.,Newman, P. R.(2017).Development through life: A psychosocial approach.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
  58. Nowack, K.,Milfont, T. L.,van der Meer, E.(2013).Future versus present: Time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge.International Journal of Psychophysiology,87(2),173-182.
  59. Paré, D.,Quirk, G. J.,Ledoux, J. E.(2004).New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear.Journal of Neurophysiology,92(1),1-9.
  60. Peetsma, T. T. D.(2000).Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,44(2),177-192.
  61. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Frenzel, A. C.,Perry, R. P.(2011).Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ).Contemporary Educational Psychology,36,36-48.
  62. Reschly, A. L.,Pohl, A.,Christenson, S. L.,Appleton, J. J.(2017).Engaging adolescents in secondary schools.School mental health services for adolescents,Oxford, UK:
  63. Richland, L. E.,Zur, O.,Holyoak, K. J.(2007).Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom.Science,316(5828),1128-1129.
  64. Schlechty, P. C.(2011).Engaging students: The next level of working on the work.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  65. Seginer, R.,Lens, W.(2015).The motivational properties of future time perspective future orientation: Different approaches, different cultures.Time perspective theory: Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo,Cham:
  66. Seligman, M. E. P.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Positive psychology – An introduction.American Psychologist,55(1),5-14.
  67. Seligman, M. E.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2014).Positive psychology: An introduction.Flow and the foundations of positive psychology,New York, NY:
  68. Shell, D. F.,Husman, J.(2001).The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26(4),481-506.
  69. Skilling, K.(2014).Teacher practices: How they promote or hinder student engagement in mathematics.Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice,Sydney, Australia:
  70. Skilling, K.,Bobis, J.,Martin, A. J.(2020).The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: Shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers.Mathematics Education Research Journal,33,469-493.
  71. Slavin, R. E.(2019).Educational psychology: Theory and practice.Boston, MA:Pearson.
  72. Van Cappellen, P.,Toth-Gauthier, M.,Saroglou, V.,Fredrickson, B. L.(2016).Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions.Journal of Happiness Studies,17(2),485-505.
  73. Wang, M. T.,Willett, J. B.,Eccles, J. S.(2011).The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity.Journal of School Psychology,49(4),465-480.
  74. Worrell, F. C.,Mello, Z.,Buhl, M.(2013).Introducing English and German versions of the adolescent time attitude scale.Assessment,20,496-510.
  75. Wylie, C.,Hodgen, E.(2012).Trajectories and patterns of student engagement: Evidence from a longitudinal study.Handbook of research on student engagement,New York, NY:
  76. Zimbardo, P.,Boyd, J.(2008).The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life.New York, NY:Simon & Schuster.
  77. 王振世,何秀珠,曾文志,彭文松(2008).教育測驗與評量.臺北市:雙葉書廊.
  78. 王韻齡（2016）。TIMSS 國際評比臺灣學生數學、科學成績佳，熱情自信敬陪末座。取自 https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/2960
  79. 何嘉欣(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士班。
  80. 周淑楓(2007)。臺南市，國立成功大學教育研究所。
  81. 林素微(2018)。數學課室教師支持與學生數學素養關聯探討：以 PISA 2012 臺灣資料為例。臺灣數學教師，39(1)，1-17。
  82. 林麗芳(2009)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學。
  83. 邱英豪(2007)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所。
  84. 俞國良,董妍(2007)。青少年學業情緒問卷的編制及應用。心理學報，39(5)，852-860。
  85. 陳梅芳,劉安倫,廖雪華,楊美雪,林聯賓(2004)。教育部教育部補助九十三年度鼓勵中小學教師從事行動研究期中報告教育部教育部補助九十三年度鼓勵中小學教師從事行動研究期中報告,臺北市:教育部。
  86. 臺灣 PISA 國家研究中心（ 2015 ）。 PISA 數學樣本試題 。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/sample_papers/2009/2011_1223_mathematics.pdf
  87. 劉玉玲,沈淑芬(2015)。數學自我概念、數學學習策略、數學學業情緒與數學學業成就之研究－自我提升模式觀點。教育心理學報，46(4)，491-516。
  88. 謝慶華,段曉林,靳知勤,陳淑貞(2016)。國中自然與生活科技學習參與量表的發展與相關驗。教育心理學報，47(3)，329-354。
print cancel