個案式教學法對學習者學習成效分析之研究

The Case-Study Teaching Method to Student Learning Effectiveness Analysis Research

10.6384/CIQ.202204_25(2).0007

萬同軒(Tung-Hsuan Wan)；駱俊賢(Chun-Hsien Lo)；謝宜芳(Yi-Fang Hsieh)；鄭如婷(Ju-Ting Cheng)

個案式教學法 ； 準實驗設計法 ； 學習成效 ； 學習滿意度 ； case-study teaching method ； quasi-experiment design ； learning effectiveness ； learning satisfaction

課程與教學

25卷2期（2022 / 04 / 01）

187 - 213

繁體中文

本研究採準實驗設計的方式，以某大學在職碩士學位學程學生為對象，針對個案教學法所帶來的教學效益進行探討。首先以同所大學修習相同課程的兩班在職研究生進行實驗，探討接受個案式教學法與傳統式的講授式教學法的學員，是否在學習滿意度與學習成效上會有差異。其次則再納入另一所同性質大學的在職研究生，接受同樣的個案教學法，探討不同學員職業組合多元程度的學習成效是否有所差異。教學成效的評量方式，則是以Q方法選取ETA職能模型中的核心管理子職能中所選取的40個關鍵行為。研究結果證實：接受個案教學法的學員，其學習滿意度與學習成效均高於接受傳統式講授法的學員。接受個案教學法的學員中，其職業組成相對多元者的學習成效會高於多元程度較低者。本研究結果將學習成效拓展至實務上的職能行為，應可強化個案教學在商管教育上的應用支持。

This research adopts a quasi-experimental design to explore the effectiveness of the case-study teaching method targeted at a university's on-the-job master's degree program students. The experiment involved students from two classes taking the same course in a university taught by the case-study method and lecture teaching method, respectively. The difference in learning satisfaction and effectiveness between the students exposed to the two different methods was examined. In addition, to explore the effect of different professional backgrounds on learning, another group of on-the-job graduate students from a second university was taught by the same case-study teaching method. The research results confirm that the case-study teaching method's learning satisfaction and learning effectiveness are higher than that of the lecture teaching method. The results also show that the more diverse the professional background, the more positive the learning effect. The findings of this study are expected to offer insight into the analysis of the effectiveness of functions of behavior in practice, which may strengthen the application support of the case-study teaching method in business management education.

1. 王毓敏,林繼正,陳月嬌(2008)。EMBA 班學習動機、價值觀、學習障礙與學習行為之探討。國立虎尾科技大學學報，27(1)，89-108。
   連結：
2. 李清潭(2009)。商管教育個案方法中教學策略的思維步驟。商管科技季刊，10(1)，179-184。
   連結：
3. 俞慧芸,周淑卿(2009)。哈佛為什麼是哈佛？商管教育以參與者為中心的學習法。商管科技季刊，10(10)，185-196。
   連結：
4. 柯承恩(2009)。個案教學與知識建構。商管科技季刊，10(2)，395-402。
   連結：
5. 張奕華(2009)。個案教學法應用在學校公共關係教學及其成效之研究。學校行政雙月刊，64，14-35。
   連結：
6. 游萬來,楊敏英,廖珮泠(2007)。大學工業設計系學生的學習態度調查。設計學報，12(2)，15-36。
   連結：
7. 劉政宏(2009)。對學習行為最有影響力的動機成分? 雙核心動機模式之初探。教育心理學報，41(2)，361-384。
   連結：
8. 劉若蘭,林大森(2011)。影響大學生畢業流向因素之研究。當代教育研究，19(1)，101-144。
   連結：
9. Aikenhead, G. S.(2000).Teacher guide to rekindling traditions: cross-cultural science & technology units.University of Saskatoon.
10. Armstrong, T.(1994).Multiple intelligences in classroom.Association for Supervision & Curriculum.
11. Austin, M. J.,Packard, T.(2009).Case-based learning: Educating future human service managers.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,29,216-236.
12. Barnes, L. B.,Christensen, C. R.,Hansen, A. J.(1994).Teaching and the Case Method.Harvard Business School.
13. Benham, M. K. P.(1996).The practitioner-scholars' view of school change: A case-based approach to teaching and learning.Teaching & Teacher Education,12(2),119-135.
14. Bergendahl, M.,Magnusson, M.(2015).Creating ideas for innovation: Effects of organizational distance on knowledge creation processes.Creativity & Innovation Management,24,87-101.
15. Berger, J. L.,Karabenick, S. A.(2011).Motivation and students use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms.Learning and Instruction,21(3),416-428.
16. Boyatzis, R. E.(2008).Competencies in the 21st century.Journal of Management Development,27(1),5-12.
17. Boyatzis, R. E.,Stubbs, E. C.,Taylor, S. N.(2002).Learning cognitive and emotional intelligence competencies through graduate management education.Academy of Management Learning and Education,1(2),150-162.
18. Brown, S. R.(1993).A Primer on Q Methodology.Operant Subjectivity,16(3),91-138.
19. Cagle, J.,Baucus, M. S.(2006).Case studies of ethics scandals: Effects on ethical perceptions of finance students.Journal of Business Ethics,64,213-229.
20. Campion, M. A.,Fink, A. A.,Ruggeberg, B. J.,Carr, L.,Phillips, G. M.,Odman, R. B.(2011).Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling.Personnel Psychology,64,225-262.
21. Campoy, R.W.(2005).Case study analysis in the classroom: Becoming a reflective teacher.Sage.
22. Cardy, R. L.,Selvarajan, T. T.(2006).Competencies: Alternative frameworks for competitive advantage.Business Horizons,49,235-245.
23. Carter, K.,Unklesbay, R.(1989).Cases in Teaching and Law.Curriculum Studies,21(6),527-536.
24. Cobern, W. W.,Loving, C. C.(2000).Defining “science” in a multicultural world: implications for science education.Science Education,86(1),50-67.
25. Colvin, J. W.(2007).Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education.Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning,15(2),165-181.
26. Dalton, M.(1997).Are Competency Models a Waste?.Training and Development,51(10),46-49.
27. Department of Labor. (2012). Technical Assistance Guide for Developing and Using Competency Models: One Solution for a Demand-driven Workforce System. http://www.careeronestop.org/competencymodel/Info_Documents/TAG.pdf
28. Dubois, D. D.(1993).Compete-Based Performance Improvement.HRD Press.
29. Ennis, M. R.(2008).,Office of Policy Development and Research, Employment and Training Administration, U. S. Department of Labor.
30. Fontenot, N. A.(1993).Effects of training in creativity and creative problem finding upon business people.Journal of Social Psychology,133,11-22.
31. Gardner, H.(1999).Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.Cambridge:
32. Guay, F.,Ratelle, C. F.,Chanal, J.(2008).Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education.Canadian Psychology,49(3),233-240.
33. Hargreaves-Heap, S. P.,Varoufakis, Y.(2004).Game theory: A critical text.Routledge.
34. Harrington, H.L.(1995).Fostering reasoned Decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,11(3),203-214.
35. Henson, K.T.(2003).Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base.Education,124(1),5-16.
36. Horng, J. S.,Lu, H. Y.(2006).Needs assessment of professional competencies of F&B/hospitality managements at college and university level.Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism,6(3),1-26.
37. Horng, J. S.,Wang, L. L.(2003).Competency analysis profile of F&B managers of international tourist hotel in Taiwan.Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,8(1),26-36.
38. Hubble, M. A.,Duncan, B. L.,Miller, S. D.(1999).The Heart and Soul of Change: What Works in Therapy.American Psychological Association.
39. Kay, C.,Moncarz, E.(2004).Knowledge, skills, and abilities for lodging management success.Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,45(3),285-298.
40. Kay, C.,Moncarz, E.(2007).Lodging management success: Personal antecedents, achievement, KSAs and situational influencers.International Journal of Hospitality Management,26(1),33-48.
41. Knirk, F. G.(1991).Case materials: research and practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly,4(1),73-81.
42. Kowalski, T. J.(1991).Case Studies on Educational Administration.Longman Publishing Group.
43. Lang, C.(1986).Case Method Teaching in the Community College.Massachusetts:Education Development Center.
44. Levin, B. B.(1995).Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases.Teaching & Teacher Education,11(1),63-79.
45. Llewellyn, D.(2010).Differentiated science inquiry.Corwin Press.
46. Llewellyn, S.(2007).Case studies and differentiated realities.Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,4(1),53-68.
47. Longino, H. E.(1990).Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry.Princeton University Press.
48. Mucchielli, R.(1968).La méthode des cas: connaissance du problème, applications pratiques.Librairies Techniques.
49. Nagel, C. K.(1991).Case method, its potential for training administrators.NASSP Bulletin,75(539),37-43.
50. Noe, R. A.,Hollenbeck, J. R.,Gerhart, B.,Wright, P. M.(2003).Human Resources Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage.McGraw-Hill.
51. Paolo, A. D.,Matas, A.,Raymond, J. L.(2014).Job accessibility, employment and job-education mismatch in the Metropolitan area of Barcelona.Research Institute of Applied Economics Working Paper,19,1-38.
52. Parry, S. B.(1998).Just what is a competency? And why should you care?.Training,35(6),58-64.
53. Patton, M.Q.(2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods.Sage.
54. Ployhart, R. E.,Moliterno, T. P.(2011).Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model.Academy of Management Review,36,127-150.
55. Posavac, E. J.(2011).Program evaluation: methods and case studies.Prentice-Hall.
56. Raymond, A. N.(1999).Employee Training & Development.McGraw-Hill.
57. Shulman, J. H.(1992).Case Studies for Teacher Problem Solving.Teachers College Press.
58. Spencer, L. M.,Spencer, S. M.(1993).Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance.John Wiley and Sons.
59. Stevens, C. K.,Gist, M. E.(1997).Effects of self-efficacy and goal-orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms?.Personnel Psychology,50,955-978.
60. Stolovitch, H.,Keeps, E.J.(1991).Selecting and writing case studies for improving human performances.Performance Improvement Quarterly,4(1),43-54.
61. Torrance, E. P.(1974).Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norm-Technical Manual.Scholastic Testing Service.
62. Wang, C. W.,Horng, R. Y.(2002).The effects of creative problem-solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance.R&D Management,32,35-45.
63. Wang, C. W.,Wu, J. J.,Horng, R. Y.(1999).Creative thinking ability, cognitive type and R&D performance.R&D Management,29,247-271.
64. Wassermann, S.(1994).Introduction to Case Method Teaching: A Guide to the Galaxy.Teachers College Press.
65. Yarnall, L.,Kafai, Y.(1996).,未出版
66. Young, M.,Klemz, B.,Murphy, J.(2003).Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior.Journal of Marketing Education,25(2),130-142.
67. 王文科,王智弘(2004).教育研究法.五南圖書.
68. 王精文,洪瑞雲(2003)。創造性問題解決訓練對管理者問題解決過程的影響。交大管理學報，23(1)，183-208。
69. 司徒達賢(2015).司徒達賢談個案教學：聽說讀想的修鍊.天下文化圖書.
70. 司徒達賢(2002)。個案教學知識與資訊處理能力-終身學習基礎之養成。產業管理學報，3(1)，1-12。
71. 行政院主計總處（2020）。就業失業統計。行政院主計處。
72. 吳清山(2016)。未來教育發展動向之探究。教育研究月刊，270，13-27。
73. 吳清山(2016)。多管齊下縮短學用落差。師友月刊，585，0-4。
74. 呂文惠(2011)。教學評量結果能否反應教學品質？。臺灣教育評論月刊，1(2)，46-47。
75. 呂書屏,李富進(2019)。學生學習成效關鍵因素之探討。全球管理與經濟，15(1)，57-64。
76. 李明芬,張德永,洪櫻純(2012)。臺灣非正規教育課程認證的系統性分析與未來展望：從政策發展的單向接軌到多元發展。教育政策論壇，15(4)，25-62。
77. 村上良三(1988).人事考核手冊-制度設計與運用.台華工商圖書公司.
78. 林大森(2010)。台灣大學生畢業流向之初探。台灣教育社會學研究，10(1)，85-125。
79. 林秀真,洪煌佳(2019)。大學畢業生學用相符追蹤調查研究。休閒與社會研究，20，35-62。
80. 林俊彦,陳幼珍(2017)。縮小學用落差是產官學共同的責任。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(8)，45-48。
81. 林哲瑩(2018)。個案教學法應用於社會工作專精課程之成果評估研究。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(8)，234-251。
82. 邱玉蟾(2012)。國際文教行政人員職能分析之探討-ETA 職能模式之應用。文官制度季刊，4(4)，87-126。
83. 秦夢群,莊清寶(2010)。大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊，94，85-112。
84. 高博銓(2007)。郭爾保理論在道德教育課程與教法上的啟示。師說，198，55-60。
85. 張民杰(2001).個案教學法-理論與實踐.五南圖書.
86. 陳俊廷(2008)。個案教學之理論與推動實務。人事月刊，47(4)，42-46。
87. 陳國蕙(2009)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
88. 陳婉琪(2009)。社會『學』了沒？社會系畢業生就業調查報告。臺灣社會學通訊，1，1-16。
89. 陳鳳如(2008)。問題導向學習在大學生學習輔導上的應用。教育研究月刊，173，44-53。
90. 陳憶芬,張克章,吳壽山(2004)。案例教學法及學生回饋意見之分析研究。國立編譯館館刊，32(3)，44-55。
91. 陳龍安(2006).創造思考教學的理論與實際.心理出版社.
92. 游玉梅(2007)。提升公部門訓練機構教學績效的有效策略-以學習者為中心的個案教學法運用。人事月刊，44(2)，17-46。
93. 黃富順(2010)。我國社區大學的實務運作、特色與挑戰。成人及終身教育，31，9-22。
94. 楊瑩(2011)。以學生學習成效為評量重點的歐盟高等教育品質保證政策。評鑑雙月刊，30，27-34。
95. 溫嘉榮,施文玲(2002)。從網路學習理論觀點談教師在科技變革中的因應之道。資訊與教育，91，90-99。
96. 賴春金,李隆盛(2011).職能分析的方法選擇.臺北市:飛訊文化圖書公司.
97. 羅文輝(1986)。Q 方法的理論與應用。民意學術專刊，春季號，41-53。
98. 黄毅志,林俊瑩(2010)。教育與職業不相稱的新測量與其對工作收入、主觀意識的影響。臺灣教育社會學研究，10(1)，45-83。

1. 馮祥勇,李詠青(2023)。大學通識課程融入食農與環境議題之分析與探討。運動休閒餐旅研究，18(1)，34-49。