题名

臺灣國小數學CLIL教科書內容分析

并列篇名

Content Analysis on a CLIL Mathematics Textbook for Elementary Students in Taiwan

DOI

10.6384/CIQ.202301_26(1).0002

作者

呂妍慧(Yen-Hui Lu)；袁媛(Yuan Yuan)

关键词

內容分析 ； 教科書研究 ； 數學雙語教育 ； 學科內容和語言整合學習 ； content analysis ； textbook research ； bilingual education in mathematics ； content and language integrated learning

期刊名称

課程與教學

卷期/出版年月

26卷1期（2023 / 01 / 01）

页次

27 - 56

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

教科書在教師的教學過程中扮演重要的角色，在臺灣推動雙語教育之際，完備的CLIL教科書，是影響雙語教師執行雙語教學的重要因素之一。本研究以內容分析法，從教科書的組織結構、文本內容、學習活動、圖文表達以及編寫體例五大面向，進行數學CLIL教科書和國內三家版本國小數學教科書之比較，並探討數學CLIL教科書待改進之處。研究結果顯示，數學CLIL教科書具有三特點：（1）具完整的數學學習內容；（2）具主題式的情境布題特色；（3）具多元性的學習鷹架。數學CLIL教教科書待改進之處為：（1）學生練習的題數較少；（2）情境布題比較不多元；（3）文字問題的編寫略有局限性。根據研究結果，本文對數學CLIL教科書的教學提出使用建議，也建議未來發展中高年級教材時，需因應數學概念的複雜度進行教材發展模式的調整。
英文摘要

Textbooks are important to the teaching process. Under Taiwan's bilingual education policy, a well-developed Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) textbook is an important factor interacting the implementation of bilingual teaching. This study used the content analysis approach to examine a CLIL mathematics textbook, newly developed by the authors, in five aspects - organization, content, learning activity, mathematical representation, and text - comparing to other three major mathematics textbooks, published locally. The three major features of the CLIL mathematics textbooks include well-developed math learning contents, theme-based situated learning, and diverse learning scaffoldings. However, certain adjustments may be needed for the authors' version. For example, more exercises for practice, more diverse mathematics examples, and more word problems must be added. Based on the research results, this study provides suggestions for teachers using the CLIL mathematics textbook in CLIL classrooms. This study also suggests that more adjustments are needed while developing other textbooks for intermediate and higher-level graders.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 呂妍慧,袁媛(2020)。數學領域雙語教育之教學模式初探。臺灣數學教育期刊，7(1)，1-26。
    連結：
  2. 范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：導讀《國民核心素養：十二年國教課程改革的 DNA》。教育脈動，5，1-7。
    連結：
  3. 徐偉民(2013)。國小數學教科書數學問題類型與呈現方式之比較分析 - 以臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡為例。科學教育學刊，21(3)，263-289。
    連結：
  4. 徐偉民(2017)。小學數學教科書使用之探究。教科書研究，10(2)，99-132。
    連結：
  5. 徐偉民,柯富渝(2014)。臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書幾何教材之比較。教科書研究，7(3)，101-141。
    連結：
  6. 徐偉民,徐于婷(2009)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析：臺灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，67-94。
    連結：
  7. 楊德清,施怡真,徐偉民,尤欣涵(2011)。臺灣、美國和新加坡小一數學教材內容之比較研究。課程與教學季刊，14(2)，103-134。
    連結：
  8. 楊德清,鄭婷芸(2015)。臺灣、美國與新加坡國中階段幾何教材內容之分析比較。教育科學研究期刊，60(1)，33-72。
    連結：
  9. Abdullah, A. H.,Shin, B.(2019).A comparative study of quadrilaterals topic content in mathematics textbooks between Malaysia and South Korea.Journal on Mathematics Education,10(3),315-340.
  10. Ball, P.(2018).Innovations and challenges in CLIL materials design.Theory Into Practice,57,222-223.
  11. Cambridge English for Speakers of Other Languages(2010).Teaching maths through English – A CLIL approach.Cambridge ESOL.
  12. Chang, C.,Silalahi, S.(2017).A review and content analysis of mathematics textbooks in educational research.Problems of Education in the 21th Century,75(3),235-251.
  13. Chang, W.,Yuan, Y.,Lee, C.,Chen, M.,Huang, W.(2013).Using magic board as a teaching aid in third grader learning of area concepts.Educational Technology & Society,16(2),163-173.
  14. Charalambous, C.,Delaney, S.,Hsu, H.,Mesa, V.(2010).A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries.Mathematical Thinking and Learning,12(2),117-151.
  15. Chen, F.,Kao, S.,Tsou, W.(2020).Toward ELF-informed bilingual education in Taiwan: Addressing incongruity between policy and practice.English Teaching & Learning,44,175-191.
  16. Coyle, D.,Hood, P.,Marsh, D.(2010).Content and language integrated learning.Cambridge University Press.
  17. Guerrini, M.(2009).CLIL materials as scaffolds to learning.CLIL practice: Perspectives from the field
  18. Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Verdugo, M.D. (2011). Stories as a tool for teaching and learning in CLIL. https://www.pi.ac.cy/pi/files/epimorfosi/analytika/epimorf/agglika_dem/Stories_ioannougeorgioudoloresramirez.pdf
  19. Lu, Y.,Yuan, Y.(2022).CLIL mathematics: Course book 1A.MindKee.
  20. Mehisto, P.(2012).Criteria for producing CLIL learning material.Encuentro,21,15-33.
  21. Meyer, O.(2010).Towards quality-CLIL: successful planning and teaching strategies.Puls,33,11-29.
  22. Özer, E.,Sezer, R.(2014).A comparative analysis of questions in American, Singaporean, and Turkish mathematics textbooks based on the topics covered in 8th grade in Turkey.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,14(1),411-421.
  23. Pérez, M.,Malagón, C.(2017).Creating materials with ICT for CLIL lessons: A didactic proposal.Social and Behavioral Sciences,237,633-637.
  24. Reyhani, E.,Izadi, M.(2018).Comparative content analysis of mathematics textbooks taught to the first grade students of elementary schools in Iran, Japan and America.International Journal of Industrial Mathematics,10(3),295-310.
  25. Reys, B.,Reys, R.,Chávez, O.(2004).Why mathematics textbooks matter.Educational Leadership,61(5),61-66.
  26. Riccomini, P.,Smith, G.,Hughes, E.,Fries, K.(2015).The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary.Reading & Writing Quarterly,31,235-252.
  27. Slavit, D.,Ernest-Slavit, G.(2007).Teaching mathematics and English to English language learners simultaneously.Middle School Journal,39(2),4-11.
  28. Wang, T.,Yang, D.(2016).A comparative study of geometry in elementary school mathematics textbooks from five countries.European Journal of STEM Education,1(3),1-10.
  29. Willis, J.(2013).English through music: Designing CLIL materials for young learners.Padresy Maestros,349,29-32.
  30. Yang, D.(2020).The study of geometry in elementary mathematics textbooks in Finland, Singapore, and Taiwan.Journal of Mathematics Education,5(1),16-29.
  31. Zhu, Y.,Fan, L.(2006).Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,4(4),609-626.
  32. 王文科(2020).教育研究法.五南.
  33. 行政院（2018）。2030 雙語國家政策發展藍圖。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/b7a931c4-c902-4992-a00c-7d1b87f46cea
  34. 吳昭容,曾建銘,鄭鈐華,陳柏熹,吳宜玲(2018)。領域特定詞彙知識的測量：三至八年級學生數學詞彙能力。教育研究與發展期刊，14(4)，1-40。
  35. 呂妍慧,袁媛(2020)。數學雙語師資培育之實踐與省思。臺灣教育評論月刊，9(10)，47-51。
  36. 國教院（2018）。高級中等學校及國民中小學教科用書審查基準。https://censor.naer.edu.tw/Law.aspx
  37. 教育部（2020）。教育部啟動全英語教學師資培育計畫。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=BE94948F0D339502
  38. 陳慧琴,呂翠玲,許媖華,鄒文莉(2018)。CLIL 在數學領域的運用。CLIL 教學資源書：探索學科內容與語言整合教學
  39. 黃琡懿,鍾靜(2016)。用繪本學數學 - 以中年級為例。臺灣數學教師，37(2)，1-16。
  40. 鄭章華(2018)。淺論十二年國教數學素養導向教學。臺灣教育，709，83-91。
print cancel