由世界運動禁藥管制規範分析個人資料跨境傳輸與委託行使公權力之法律議題

Analysis of the Legal Issues of Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data and Delegation of Power of the Public Authority From the World Anti-Doping Code

10.6162/SRR.202112_(159).0003

陳宏志(Hung-Chih Chen)

世界運動禁藥管制機構 ； 中華運動禁藥防制基金會 ； 行蹤資料 ； 藥檢報告 ； 結果公告 ； World Anti-Doping Agency ； Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency ； whereabouts data ； reports of drug test ； result announcement

大專體育

159期（2021 / 12 / 31）

44 - 54

繁體中文

在國內外運動賽事，運動禁藥管制對於主管機關、運動相關協會、教練或運動員來說，都十分重要。然而，運動禁藥管制措施和個人資料（簡稱個資）的蒐集、處理、利用息息相關，包括運動員行蹤報告制度、藥檢時需提取運動員的血液及尿液樣本，以及分析並利用樣本中的數據資料，涉及運動員之基本權的保護。且世界運動禁藥管制機構、中華奧林匹克委員會及中華運動禁藥防制基金會，三者之關係與運作，攸關臺灣執行運動禁藥管制規範之實踐。綜此，本文目的將以運動員行蹤資料、藥檢報告及結果公告三項規範出發，透過監察院2019年之實際案例，及審酌國內外主管機關資料，以瞭解臺灣法律之適用；並對個資跨境傳輸、委託行使公權力二大關鍵之法律議題進行分析。最後，本文建議提升法律位階，以保障運動員權利及符合法律保留原則。

The anti-doping control plays a critical rule for athletes, coaches, government and organization within internal/oversea sports events. Moreover, anti-doping control regulation is involved basic protection of athletes and also relevant to personal data collection, analysis including athlete's whereabouts reporting system and sample of athletes' blood or urinalysis. It's worthy to discuss three roles involving World Anti-Doping Agency, Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency, three of them impacts a lot for implementation of anti-doping code and practices and need further discussion. The purpose of this article is to take perspectives from athletes' whereabouts data, reports of drug test and result announcement based on Control Yuan's report of 2019 in Taiwan. Throughout real case studies and relevant reliable information from governments, aligns with Taiwan laws; and cross-border transfer of personal data and delegation of power of the public authority to analyze the two key legal issues. Finally, this article suggests to elevate the legal rank to protect the rights of athletes and comply with the principle of legal reservations.

1. 陳慶鴻, C.-H.(2015)。運動領域的法律與道德問題─以運動槍手為例。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，4(2)，1-15。
   連結：
2. 黃郁婷, Y.-T.,湯添進, T.-C.(2015)。世界運動禁藥管制機構(WADA) 之權力探源。中華體育季刊，29(2)，161-170。
   連結：
3. European Court of Human Rights. (2018). Doping control: Whereabouts requirement does not breach Convention. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-5977677-7646084&filename=Judgment%20F
4. Halt, J.(2009).Where is the privacy in WADA’s “whereabout” rule?.Marquette Sports Law Review,20(1)
5. MacGregor, O.,Griffith, R.,Ruggiu, D.,McNamee, M.(2013).Anti-doping, purported rights to privacy and WADA’s whereabouts requirements: A legal analysis.FairPlay, Revista De Filosofia, Ética Y Derecho Del Deporte,1(2),13-38.
6. Phillips, M.(2018).International data-sharing norms: From the OECD to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).Human Genetics,137(8),575-582.
7. van der Sloot, B.,Paun, M.,Leenes, R.(2020).Looking at the anti-doping regime through the EU Data Protection Lens.Athletes’human rights and the fight against doping: A study of the European legal framework,Berlin, Germany:
8. 中華運動禁藥防制基金會（無日期）。關於我們。資料引自 https://www.antidoping.org.tw/organization/[Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved from https://www.antidoping.org.tw/en/organization/]
9. 中華運動禁藥防制基金會（2021b）藥檢登錄名冊(RTP) 選手行蹤資料填寫說明。資料引自 https://www.antidoping.org.tw/whereabouts/[Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency. (2021b). Instruction of filling Registered Testing Pool (RTP) athlete whereabouts information. Retrieved from https://www.antidoping.org.tw/whereabouts/]
10. 中華運動禁藥防制基金會（2021a）。藥管法規。資料引自 https://www.antidoping.org.tw/regulations/[Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency. (2021a). Anti-doping regulations. Retrieved from https://www.antidoping.org.tw/en/regulations/]
11. 洪義筌, Y.-C.(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
12. 國家通訊傳播委員會（2012）。限制通訊傳播事業經營者將所屬用戶之個人資料傳遞至大陸地區。資料引自 https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail. aspx?site_content_sn=538&sn_f=26302[National Communications Commission. (2012). Restricting communication and communication business operators from transmitting personal data of their users to China. Retrieved from https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=538&sn_f=26302]
13. 陳伯儀, B.-I(2016)。保護乾淨運動員與運動禁藥管制教育。學校體育，154，41-47。
14. 陳筱琳（2019，3 月 27 日）。許淑淨事件中華奧會出面說明。中時新聞網。資料引自 https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190327003803-260403?chdtv[Chen, X.-L. (2019, March 27). Shu-Jing Xu incident, Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee came forward to explain. China Times. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190327003803-260403?chdtv]
15. 黃啟煌, C.-H.(2021)。國家運動禁藥機構之角色與世界運動禁藥管制趨勢。國民體育季刊，207，69-73。
16. 楊啟芳（2019，3 月 29 日）。莊佳佳 3 次藥檢未到遭禁賽現任跆協不知情。中央通訊社。資料引自 https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/2019032 90125.aspx[Yang, C.-F. (2019, March 29). Jia-Jia Zhuang was suspended for absent 3 drug tests, and the current Taekwondo Association did not know. Central News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201903290125.aspx]
17. 監察院（2019）。糾正案文（108 教正 0018），資料引自https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBox.aspx?n=134& CSN=2&page=8&PageSize=20[The Control Yuan. (2019). Correction document (108 Jiao-Jheng No.0018). Retrieved from https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBox.aspx?n=134&CSN=2&page=8&PageSize=20]
18. 監察院（2021）。調查報告（108 教調 0053），資料引自 https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx? s=6891[The Control Yuan. (2021). Investigation report (108 JiaoTiao No.0053). Retrieved from https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?s=6891]
19. 龍柏安（2019 年 3 月 27 日）。中華奧會：尊重隱私過去未公布涉禁藥選手名單。中央通訊社，資料引自 https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201903270294.aspx[Long, B.-A. (2019, March 27). Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee: Respect for privacy, the list of athletics involved in banned drugs has not been released in the past. Central News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201903270294.aspx]

1. 陳宏志(2022)。析論國際運動仲裁院與運動員自由權利限制之法律議題－由運動禁藥管制規範影響運動員參賽案例出發。體育學報，55(4)，403-413。
2. (2024)。由中國體育法修正談臺灣運動禁藥管制之精進。大專體育，166，1-8。