產業工會對“派遣勞工”的態度及其對勞資關係意涵之初探

A Preliminary Study on the Attitude of Labor Unions Toward Dispatched Workers in Taiwan and Its Policy Implication

10.30388/BLR.200607_(20).0003

成之約(Chih-Yu Cheng)

派遣勞動 ； 派遣勞工 ； 勞資關係 ； 勞動政策 ； 產業工會 ； Dispatched Work ； Dispatched Workers ； Industrial Relations ； Labor Policies ； Labor Union

政大勞動學報

20期（2006 / 07 / 01）

97 - 123

繁體中文

在市場供需及勞動彈性化等因素的影響下，「派遣勞動」的發展已經成為一個趨勢。根據研究顯示，無論對於個別或集體勞資關係，「派遣勞動」都或多或少會產生一定的影響。因此，如何因應「派遣勞動」的發展已經成為許多國家勞動政策制定的重要議題。 根據文獻探討與實證研究發現，相較於一般聘僱關係的勞工而言，「派遣勞工」的勞動條件與權益相對較低或較差。因此，如何保障「派遣勞工」的權益，實為值得深入研究的課題。 有鑒於以往有關「派遣勞動」的研究方向與議題，似乎「派遣勞工」與工會之間的有關議題尚未觸及。即便是少數研究著重於「派遣勞工」的探討，重點也多擺在「派遣勞工」勞動條件與權益保障等議題。據此，本文針對台北地區產業工會進行問卷調查，以瞭解產業工會接納「派遣勞工」的態度或意向。藉由這樣的調查與分析，本文進一步對「派遣勞動」發展所產生的問題做深入的瞭解，並對勞動政策的制訂方向提出建議。

Due to the influence of market forces and the strategies of labor flexibility, development of ”dispatched work” has become an inevitable trend. Based on the research findings, ”dispatched work” would cause effects on industrial relations, both individually and collectively. In order to cope with the development of ”dispatched work”, many countries have made a lot of effort on the study of effects of ”dispatched work” and also on the design of labor policies aimed at dealing with ”dispatched work”. Under this circumstance, even though the development of ”dispatched work” in Taiwan is still at its primary stage, the study on effects of ”dispatched work” and its relevant policies shall not be neglected. However, in consideration of research foci currently undertaken on ”dispatched work” in Taiwan, the attitude of labor unions toward ”dispatched workers” would be chosen as the main topic of discussion for the essay. In other words, through an empirical survey on labor unions in Taipei area, this essay is intended to sketch what the attitude of labor unions would be toward ”dispatched workers” and what the obstacles for dispatched workers would be to exert their right to participate in labor unions. To sum up, objectives of this essay include: 1. Exploring the attitude of labor unions toward ”dispatched workers”. 2. Exploring the intention of labor unions to accept ”dispatched workers” as members. 3. Based upon the above-mentioned findings, making policy suggestions about how to protect the right of dispatched workers to participate in labor unions.

1. Belous, Richard(1989).How Human Resource System Adjust to the Shift toward Contingent Workers.Monthly Labor Review,112(3),8.
2. Biagi, Marco.,Treu, Tiziano(1997).Italy`s Law on Promotion of Employment: An Explanation and Summary.Comparative Labor Law Journal,19(1),98.
3. Bronstein, A.S.(1991).Temporary Work in Western Europe: Threat or Complement to Permanent Employment.International Labour Review,130(3),293.
4. Buechtemann, Christoph F. (ed.)(1993).Employment Security and Labor Market Behavior.Ithaca, NY:ILR Press.
5. Cordova, Efren(1986).From Full-time Wage Employment to Atypical Employment: A Major Shift in the Evolution of Labour Relations.International Labour Review,125(6),625.
6. De Grip, Andries(1997).Atypical Employment in the European Union.International Labour Review,136(1),51.
7. Heery, Edmund,Salmon, John (ed.)(2000).The Insecure Workforce.London:Routledge.
8. ILO(1997).Record of Proceedings of International Labour Conference.Geneva:ILO.
9. Ozaki, Muneto(1999).Negotiating Flexibility: The Role of the Social Partners and the State.Geneva:ILO.
10. Standing, Guy(1986).Labour Flexibility: Cause or Cure for Unemployment (Public Lecture Series).Geneva:International Institute for Labour Studies.
11. Standing. Guy(1997).Globalization, Labour Flexibility and Insecurity: The Era of Marekt Regulation.European Journal of Industrial Relations,3(1),8-9.
12. Vosko, Leah F(1997).Legitimizing the Triangular Employment Relationship: Emerging International Labour Standards from a Comparative Perspective.Comparative Labor Law Journal,19(1),44.
13. 成之約(2002)。台灣地區『派遣勞動』的發展及其對勞資關係與勞動政策影響之研究（II）。行政院國家科學委員會。
14. 載自行政院勞工委員會網站
15. 林淑雲(2004)。國立政治大學勞工研所。
16. 邱駿彥(1996)。勞工派遣業法律問題之探討。行政院勞工委員會。
17. 翁玉珍(2000)。國立中正大學勞工研究所。
18. 楊通軒(1998)。「勞動派遣問題研討」座談會。台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
19. 鄭津津(1998)。「勞動派遣問題研討」座談會。台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。

1. 黃佩鈺、陳珍珍、林冠廷(2012)。以 Kano 模式探討派遣員工之工作品質與員工滿意。人力資源管理學報，12(3)，75-96。
2. 劉旺松、葉子明(2013)。高科技產業短期派遣人員甄選關鍵決策因素探討。管理實務與理論研究，7(3)，33-58。
3. (2009)。台湾における女性労働者非正規雇用の現状と問題。應用外語學報，12，79-93。
4. (2014)。全球化下的勞動與貧窮。社區發展季刊，148，64-77。