長照復能服務成效探討

Effectiveness of Long-term Care Reablement

10.6317/LTC.202212_25(2).0003

林佩欣(Pay-Shin Lin)；游曉微(Hsiao-Wei Yu)；宋貞儀(Chen-Yi Song)；蘇信昌(Shin-Chang Su)

復能 ； 成效指標 ； 長期照顧十年計畫2.0 ； reablement ； indicators of effectiveness ； Taiwan's National 10-Year Long-term Care Plan Version 2.0

長期照護雜誌

25卷2期（2022 / 12 / 01）

115 - 132

英文

「復能」是以個案為中心的全人照顧，目的是強化個案的生理和／或其他功能，以增加或維持個案在其居住的地方，從事有意義的生活活動，並減少長照服務需求。臺灣於2016年長照2.0導入復能服務，然目前有關其服務成效和指標探討之文獻仍不足。本文藉由國外多篇系統性文獻回顧及國內近期復能介入或照顧管理資料分析的整理，探討復能成效、成效測量指標建議及影響復能成效的因素等議題。結果顯示，成效指標中的照顧成本降低、個案後續使用居家照顧服務次數減少及不健康事件結果風險未提高等三個指標之研究結果較一致；然而，一般較常使用的個案身體或日常生活功能性能力改善情況及健康相關生活品質評估之成效，前人研究結果卻較未定論。回顧成效測量指標建議，以日常生活功能和身體行動能力為最常見指標，其餘有加拿大職能表現測量（COPM）、生活品質、心智健康狀態、和照顧者負擔狀況等為常見成效指標。影響復能成效的因素有來自於組織端、服務使用者端、工作團隊成員、介入方式、方案成效評估和個案及照顧者特質等。縱觀前人復能實證研究，可能由於各國對名詞的定義及介入方式內容尚未一致、研究設計、樣本來源、介入方式及期程、測量指標差異等等，使得復能成效尚未獲得學術一致性結果，值得再進一步研究。

Reablement is a case-centered holistic care with the aim of enhancing the physical and/or other functions of the cases, so as to increase or maintain the case in the place where they live, to engage in meaningful life activities, and to reduce the need for long-term care services. In 2016, Taiwan introduced long-term service 2.0, reablement is one of the services. However, there are still insufficient evidence of its effectiveness and consensus about its outcome measures. The current article compiled many systematic literature reviews as well as recent literature of reablement intervention or care management data in Taiwan. In addition, reablement effectiveness, recommendations for outcome measurement indicators, and factors affecting reablement effectiveness will be provided. The results show significant benefits of reablement services in the outcome indicators are the reduction of care costs, the reduction in the number of follow-up use of home care services and the risk of adverse events. However, the more commonly used outcome indicators as the physical function or ADL and the health-related quality of life are relatively inconclusive. Reviewing the recommendations for outcome measurement indicators, the most common indicators are the ADL and physical mobility, otherwise, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), quality of life, mental health status, and caregiver burden are other common outcome indicators. The factors that affect the effectiveness of reablement will be discussed from the organization, service users, staff, intervention, program effectiveness evaluation, and the characteristics of cases and caregivers. Looking at previous empirical studies on reablement, it may be due to differences in the definitions of terms and intervention methods in different countries, research designs, samples, intervention method and duration, and differences in measurement indicators, etc., so that the effectiveness of reablement has not yet achieved academic consistency. Therefore, it warrants further study.

1. Aspinal, F.,Glasby, J.,Rostgaard, T.,Tuntland, H.,Westendorp, R. G.(2016).New horizons: Reablement - supporting older people towards independence.Age & Ageing,45(5),572-576.
2. Buma, L. E.,Vluggen, S.,Zwakhalen, S.,Kempen, G. I. J. M.,Metzelthin, S. F.(2022).Effects on clients' daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: A systematic literature review.European Journal of Ageing,19,903-929.
3. Burton, E.,Lewin, G.,Boldy, D.(2013).Barriers and motivators to being physically active for older home care clients.Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics,31(1),21-36.
4. Burton, E.,Lewin, G.,Boldy, D.(2013).Physical activity levels of older adults receiving a home care service.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity,21(2),140-154.
5. Burton, E.,Lewin, G.,Clemson, L.,Boldy, D.(2013).Effectiveness of a lifestyle exercise program for older people receiving a restorative home care service: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Clinical Interventions in Aging,8,1591-1601.
6. Cochrane, A.,Furlong, M.,McGilloway, S.,Molloy, D. W.,Stevenson, M.,Donnelly, M.(2016).Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,10,Cd010825.
7. Eliassen, M.,Henriksen, N. O.,Moe, S.(2018).Physiotherapy supervision of home trainers in interprofessional reablement teams.Journal of Interprofessional Care,33(5),1-7.
8. Glendinning, C.,Jones, K.,Baxter, K.,Rabiee, P.,Curtis, L. A.,Wilde, A.,Arksey, H.,Forder, J. E.(2011).Home care re-ablement services: Investigating the longer term impacts (prospective longitudinal study).Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
9. Han, D. S.,Chuang, P. W.,Chiu, E. C.(2020).Effect of home-based reablement program on improving activities of daily living for patients with stroke: A pilot study.Medicine,99(49),e23512.
10. Hattori, S.,Yoshida, T.,Okumura, Y.,Kondo, K.(2019).Effects of reablement on the independence of community-dwelling older adults with mild disability: A randomized controlled trial.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,16(20)
11. Hjelle, K. M.,Skutle, O.,Alvsvag, H.,Forland, O.(2018).Reablement teams' roles: A qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams' experiences.Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare,11,305-316.
12. Hjelle, K. M.,Tuntland, H.,Forland, O.,Alvsvag, H.(2017).Driving forces for home-based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults' experiences.Health and Social Care in the Community,25(5),1581-1589.
13. Hu, F. W.,Huang, Y. T.,Lin, H. S.,Chen, C. H.,Chen, M. J.,Chang, C. M.(2020).Effectiveness of a simplified reablement program to minimize functional decline in hospitalized older patients.Geriatrics & Gerontology International,20(5),436-442.
14. International Federation on Ageing. (2016). Copenhagen summit report on reablement and older people. Retrieved from https://www.ifa-fiv.org/publication/health/copenhagen-summit-report-reablement-older-people/
15. King, A. I.,Parsons, M.,Robinson, E.(2012).A restorative home care intervention in New Zealand: Perceptions of paid caregivers.Health and Social Care in the Community,20(1),70-79.
16. King, A. I.,Parsons, M.,Robinson, E.,Jorgensen, D.(2012).Assessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: A cluster randomised controlled trial.Health and Social Care in the Community,20(4),365-374.
17. Kjerstad, E.,Tuntland, H. K.(2016).Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: A cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial.Health Economics Review,6(1),15.
18. Lampe, D.,Hasemann, L.,Nebling, T.,Thiem, U.,Greiner, W.(2022).Health economic perspective on a community-based intervention for older people at risk of care dependency– results of a prospective quasi-experimental study.Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine,8,1-10.
19. Langeland, E.,Tuntland, H.,Folkestad, B.,Førland, O.,Jacobsen, F. F.,Kjeken, I.(2019).A multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway: A clinical controlled trial.BMC Geriatrics,19(1),29.
20. Lewin, G.,Alfonso, H.,Alan, J.(2013).Evidence for the long term cost effectiveness of home care reablement programs.Clinical Interventions in Aging,8,1273-1281.
21. Lewin, G.,Allan, J.,Patterson, C.,Knuiman, M.,Boldy, D.,Hendrie, D.(2014).A comparison of the home-care and healthcare service use and costs of older Australians randomised to receive a restorative or a conventional home-care service.Health and Social Care in the Community,22(3),328-336.
22. Lewin, G.,De San Miguel, K.,Knuiman, M.,Alan, J.,Boldy, D.,Hendrie, D.,Vandermeulen, S.(2013).A randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program, an Australian restorative home-care programme for older adults.Health and Social Care in the Community,21(1),69-78.
23. Lewin, G.,Vandermeulen, S.(2010).A non-randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program (HIP): An Australian restorative programme for older home-care clients.Health and Social Care in the Community,18(1),91-99.
24. Metzelthin, S. F.,Rostgaard, T.,Parsons, M.,Burton, E.(2020).Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: A Delphi study.Ageing and Society,42(3),703-718.
25. Parsons, J. G. M.,Sheridan, N.,Rouse, P.,Robinson, E.,Connolly, M.(2013).A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,94(6),1015-1022.
26. Parsons, J.,Rouse, P.,Robinson, E. M.,Sheridan, N.,Connolly, M. J.(2012).Goal setting as a feature of homecare services for older people: Does it make a difference?.Age & Ageing,41(1),24-29.
27. Rabiee, P.,Glendinning, C.(2011).Organisation and delivery of home care re-ablement: What makes a difference?.Health and Social Care in the Community,19(5),495-503.
28. Senior, H. E.,Parsons, M.,Kerse, N.,Chen, M. H.,Jacobs, S.,Hoorn, S. V.,Anderson, C. S.(2014).Promoting independence in frail older people: A randomised controlled trial of a restorative care service in New Zealand.Age & Ageing,43(3),418-424.
29. Sims-Gould, J.,Tong, C. E.,Wallis-Mayer, L.,Ashe, M. C.(2017).Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Directors Associatiov,18(8),653-663.
30. Song, C. Y.,Lin, P. S.,Hung, P. L.,ADLers Occupational Therapy Clinic(2021).Effects of community-based physical-cognitive training, health education, and reablement among rural community-dwelling older adults with mobility deficits.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(17),9374.
31. Tessier, A.,Beaulieu, M. D.,Mcginn, C. A.,Latulippe, R.(2016).Effectiveness of reablement: A systematic review.Healthcare Policy,11(4),49-59.
32. Tinetti, M. E.,Baker, D.,Gallo, W. T.,Nanda, A.,Charpentier, P.,O'Leary, J.(2002).Evaluation of restorative care vs usual care for older adults receiving an acute episode of home care.The Journal of the American Medical Association,287(16),2098-2105.
33. Tinetti, M. E.,Charpentier, P.,Gottschalk, M.,Baker, D. I.(2012).Effect of a restorative model of posthospital home care on hospital readmissions.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,60(8),1521-1526.
34. Tuntland, H.,Aaslund, M. K.,Espehaug, B.,Førland, O.,Kjeken, I.(2015).Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: A randomised controlled trial.BMC Geriatrics,15,145.
35. Tuntland, H.,Kjeken, I.,Langeland, E.,Folkestad, B.,Espehaug, B.,Førland, O.,Aaslund, M. K.(2016).Predictors of outcomes following reablement in community-dwelling older adults.Clinical Interventions in Aging,12,55-63.
36. World Health Organization(2015).World report on ageing and health.
37. 許靜儀(2021)。亞洲大學健康產業管理學系。
38. 陳詩涵(2021)。長庚大學健康照護產業碩士學位學程。
39. 黃思嘉(2021)。長庚大學健康照護產業碩士學位學程。
40. 衛生福利部（2019）。長照復能服務操作指引。取自 https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-4444-47438-201.html

1. (2024)。運用復能照顧計畫於一位失能合併壓傷個案之居家照護經驗。領導護理，25(2)，80-96。