住宿式照顧機構收托費用差異性分析：與機構規模屬性之關聯

Disparity Analyses of Monthly Care Fee of Residential Care Facilities: Relations With Institutional Size and Ownership

10.6317/LTC.202312_26(2).0005

林淑芬(Shu-Feng Lin)；林金定(Jin-Ding Lin)

收托費用 ； 長期照顧機構 ； 機構規模 ； 機構屬性 ； monthly care fee (cost) ； LTC facility ； institutional size ； institutional ownership

長期照護雜誌

26卷2期（2023 / 12 / 01）

193 - 211

繁體中文;英文

目的：瞭解住宿式照顧收托費用情形，並分析該費用與不同機構規模及屬性之相關性。方法：以臺北市為研究場域，蒐集政府公開長照相關次級資料，於2021年10月至12月間調查機構收托費用現況。運用描述性統計、推論性與多變量統計，以規模與屬性進行差異比較及檢定。結果：臺北市月平均收托費用35,814元，中位數35,000元。規模50床以下之小型機構每月平均收托費用34,928元、超過50床之大型機構41,184元，大型機構收費高於小型機構。屬性方面，財團法人與醫院附設機構收托費用皆高於私立小型機構。以t檢定和單因子變異數分析進行收托費用與機構規模及屬性之相關性檢定，發現不同規模收托費用有顯著差異（p=.026），規模50床以下收費低於超過50床。社政體系和衛政體系在收托費用上有顯著差異（p<.001），社政體系機構收費低於衛政體系機構。營利與非營利機構在收托費用上有顯著差異（p=.004），營利機構收費低於非營利機構。羅吉斯迴歸分析顯示，非營利機構收取高收托費用的機率是營利機構的17.042倍。結論：屬性和規模與收托費用相關。建議政府應明定收托費用組成結構，健全各類住宿式機構之照護品質發展。

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the situation of monthly care fee of residential care facilities in Taipei City, and to analyze the disparity between the fees and the size and ownership of these institutions. Methods: The data was collected from public released on the website and related governmental data in this study during October to December 2021. The statistics methods include descriptive analyses, single variate analyses and multivariate analyses to describe, compare and identify the associated factors with residential care fee among the residential care in Taipei City. Results: The average monthly care fee of 113 residential care facilities in Taipei is NTD 35,814 (median is NTD 35,000). With regard to the relation of institutional size and the monthly care fee, findings show that the care fee is NTD 34,928 in small size and NTD 41,184 for the large size. Those large size institutions seem more expensive than the small size. In term of the ownership to the monthly care fee, we found that those incorporated foundation and hospital affiliated institutions are significant higher price than those of small private settings. Finally, this study found that institutional size has significant differences in monthly care fee in t-test analyses (p = .026) and the ownership for-profit (FP) and not for-profit (NFP) institutions has significant differences in monthly care fee (p = .004) with FP institutions charging lower fees than NFP institutions. And the NFP are 17.042 times more likely to charge high monthly care fee than FP analyze under Logistic regression. Conclusions: This study highlights that size and ownership are related to monthly care fee in Taipei care facilities. We suggest that the government should provide the precise price information in residential care services and monitor the quality care in residential care settings.

1. 吳孟嬪,黃肇明,孫文榮,施至遠,徐愫萱,黃勝堅(2018)。長期照護資源整合服務之推廣經驗—以臺北市立聯合醫院為例。護理雜誌，65(1)，24-32。
   連結：
2. 許碧峰(2020)。臺灣住宿型長照機構之市場結構與品質誘因。商略學報，12(4)，269-284。
   連結：
3. 陳正芬,官有垣(2015)。可望而不可及的服務：臺北市長期照顧機構組織屬性與公費安置老人服務量之研究。臺大社會工作學刊，32，33-78。
   連結：
4. 陳正芬,官有垣(2011)。台灣機構式長期照顧服務組織屬性與政府相關政策演變之探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊，15(1)，91-135。
   連結：
5. 趙雅儀,蕭哲芬,蔡秋田,鄭琬諭(2018)。非營利組織之資源運用及經營成果效率分析。管理資訊計算，7(特刊1)，157-166。
   連結：
6. Bae, K. B.,Sohn, H.(2018).Factors contributing to the size of nonprofit sector: Tests of government failure, interdependence, and social capital theory.International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,29(3),470-480.
7. Barber, S. L.,van Gool, K.,Wise, S.,Wood, M.,Or, Z.,Penneau, A.,Milstein, R.,Ikegami, N.,Kwon, S.,Bakx, P.,Schut, E.,Wouterse, B.,Flores, M.,Lorenzoni, L.(2021).Pricing long-term care for older persons.World Health Organization.
8. Barron, D. N.,West, E.(2017).The quasimarket for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?.Social Science & Medicine,179,137-146.
9. Ben-Ner, A.,Karaca-Mandic, P.,Ren, T.(2012).Ownership and quality in markets with asymmetric information: Evidence from nursing homes.The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy,12(1),1-31.
10. Ben-Ner, A.,Van Hoomissen, T.(1991).Nonprofit organizations in the mixed e conomy.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,62(4),519-550.
11. Bloomfield, P.(2006).The challenging business of long-term public-private partnerships: Reflections on local experience.Public Administration Review,66(3),400-411.
12. Harrington, C.,Choiniere, J.,Goldmann, M.,Jacobsen, F. F.,Lloyd, L.,McGregor, M.,Stamatopoulos, V.,Szebehely, M.(2012).Nursing home staffing standards and staffing levels in six countries.Journal of Nursing Scholarship,44(1),88-98.
13. Harrington, C.,Jacobsen, F. F.,Panos, J.,Pollock, A.,Sutaria, S.,Szebehely, M.(2017).Marketization in long-term care: A cross-country comparison of large for-profit nursing home chains.Health Services Insights,10,1178632917710533.
14. Huang, S. S.,Hirth, R. A.(2016).Quality rating and private-prices: Evidence from the nursing home industry.Journal of Health Economics,50,59-70.
15. McGregor, M. J.,Cohen, M.,McGrail, K.,Broemeling, A. M.,Adler, R. N.,Schulzer, M.,Ronald, L.,Cvitkovich, Y.,Beck, M.(2005).Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit longterm care facilities: Does type of ownership matter?.Canadian Medical Association Journal,172(5),645-649.
16. Ni Luasa, S.,Dineen, D.,Zieba, M.(2018).Technical and scale efficiency in public and private Irish nursing homes- A bootstrap DEA approach.Health Care Management Science,21(3),326-347.
17. Park, I.,Lee, K.,Yim, E.,Noh, K.(2021).Differences in function and healthcare cost of older adults with dementia by long-term care service type: A national dataset analysis.Healthcare,9(3),307.
18. Schmitz, H.,Stroka-Wetsch, M. A.(2020).Determinants of nursing home choice: Does reported quality matter?.Health Economics,29(7),766-777.
19. Suda, Y.(2014).Changing relationships between nonprofit and for-profit human service organizations under the long-term care system in Japan.Voluntas,25,1235-1261.
20. World Health Organization. (2021). Healthy ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
21. 日本厚生勞動省（2021）。介護保険制度の概要。https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hukushi_kaigo/kaigo_koureisha/chiiki-houkatsu/
22. 丘昌泰,楊澤之,翁于晴(2018)。小型長照機構的困局及其網絡治理策略研究。第十屆發展研究年會台灣經驗2.0：在地與全球的發展研究與實踐，臺北市:
23. 行政院內政部統計處（2021，8月6日）。110年第32週內政統計通報109年國人平均壽命達81.3歲，再創新高。https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9&s=235554https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9&s=235554
24. 李采娟,賴玫君,楊文惠,張麗雅,邱怡玟,李佳霙,呂美華,林正介(2001)。護理之家成本分析研究。Mid-Taiwan Journal of Medicine，6(4)，223-232。
25. 梁亞文,林玉惠,陳文意,謝嫣娉,張怡秋,曾月霞,潘國雄,林金立,朱僑麗(2020).長期照顧機構管理.華杏.
26. 許佩蓉,張俊喜,林靜宜,林壽惠,李世代(2006)。機構式長期照護綜論。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌，1(4)，198-215。
27. 黃龍冠,楊培珊(2021)。以長照2.0為基礎回顧臺灣長照政策發展與評析未來挑戰。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，9(2)，212-236。
28. 賴添福,王俊賢(2012)。台灣大型養護型長期照顧機構經營規模之研究。挑戰2025超高齡社會：101年度社會福利實務與學術研討會，臺中市:
29. 蘇嘉瑞(2018)。由長照機構法人制度看臺灣長照產業發展模式。會計研究月刊，394，90-95。