國中體育教師領導風格對學生上體育課動機的影響

Effects of Junior High School Teacher's Leadership Style on Students' Motivation of Attending Physical Education Class

10.5297/ser.200906_11(2).0002

陳其昌(Chi-Chang Chen)；謝文娟(Wen-Chuan Hsieh)

轉型領導 ； 互易領導 ； 放任領導 ； 自我決定理論 ； transactional leadership ； transformational leadership ； laissez-faire leadership ； self-determination theory

大專體育學刊

11卷2期（2009 / 06 / 30）

31 - 45

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的是探討國中體育老師的領導風格對國中生上體育課動機的影響，以96學年度就讀雲林縣的國中生為施測對象，有效問卷為886份（男450人、女436人）。本研究以「體育老師領導風格量表」與「體育課動機量表」進行施測，所蒐集的資料以逐步迴歸分析法進行分析。研究結果如下：一、體育老師的智能啟發領導可正向預測學生的「內在動機」，而消極介入管理與魅力是負向預測學生的「內在動機」；二、體育老師的智能啟發領導可正向預測學生的「整合調節」；三、體育老師的智能啟發、放任、及魅力領導可正向預測學生的「認同調節」；四、體育老師的消極介入管理和魅力領導可正向預測學生的「內射調節」；五、體育老師的放任和消極介入管理領導可正向預測學生的「外在調節」；六、體育老師的放任、消極介入管理、和權變報酬領導可正向預測學生的「無動機」，而智能啟發可負向預測學生的「無動機」。根據研究結果，本研究結論為國中體育老師應採用轉型領導風格以幫助學生的正面動機型態。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of junior high school teacher's leadership style on students' motivation of attending physical education (PE) class. The subjects of this study were junior high school students studying in Yunlin County in 2007 academic year (N=886, male=450, female=436). All the subjects were tested by PE Teacher Leadership Style Scale and PE Class Motivation Scale. Stepwise regression analysis method was used to analyze the collected data. The major findings of the study could be summarized as follows: 1. PE teacher's intellectual stimulation could predict students' intrinsic motivation positively, but passive management by exception and charismatic leadership could predict students' intrinsic motivation negatively; 2. PE teacher's intellectual stimulation could predict students' integrated regulation positively; 3. PE teacher's intellectual stimulation, laissez-faire leadership and charismatic leadership could predict students' identified regulation positively; 4. PE teacher's passive management by exception and charismatic leadership could predict students' introverted regulation positively; 5. PE teacher's laissez-faire leadership and passive management by exception could predict students' external regulation positively and 6. PE teacher's laissez-faire leadership, passive management by exception and contingent reward could predict students' motivation positively, but intellectual stimulation could predict students' motivation negatively. Based on the findings of this study, it was concluded that PE teacher should use transactional leadership style to improve student's positive motivation.

1. 宋一夫、湯慧娟(2005)。我國大專院校游泳教練家長式領導之調查研究。大專體育學刊，7(3)，151-160。
   連結：
2. 高三福、陳鈺芳(2006)。運動教練的教誨領導：高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊，8(1)，97-111。
   連結：
3. Avolio, B. J.,Bass, B. M.(2002).Developing potential across a full range of leadership.New Jersey:Mahwah.
4. Bass, B. M.(1985).Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York:Free Press.
5. Bass, B. M.,Avolio, B. J.(1989).Potential biases in leadership measures: How prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs.Educational and Psychological Measurement,49,509-527.
6. Burns, J. M.(1978).Leadership.New York:Harper & Row.
7. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
8. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.,R. Dienstbier (Ed.)(1991).Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspective motivation.Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.
9. Goudas, M.,Biddle, S. J. H.,Fox, K. R.(1994).Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes.British Journal of Educational Psychology,64,453-463.
10. Hagger, M. S.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.,Barkoukis, V.,Wang, C. K. J.,Baranowski, J.(2005).Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model.Journal of Educational Psychology,97,287-301.
11. Hagger, M. S.,Chatzisarantis, N.,Culverhorse, T.,Biddle, S. J. H.(2003).The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model.Journal of Educational Psychology,95,784-795.
12. Myers, A.(1989).Sex and age linked determinants of physical activity in adulthood.Canadian Journal of Public Health,80,256-261.
13. Ntoumanis, N.(2001).A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71,225-242.
14. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determinstion and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions.Journal of Educational Psychology,95,97-110.
15. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Pensgaard, A. M.(2005).The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and co-operative structures on the psychological wellbeing of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task.Motivation and Emotion,29,41-68.
16. Vallerand, R. J.,Blias, M. R.,Briere, N. M.,Pelletier, L. G.(1989).On the construction and validation of the French form of the Academic Motivation Scale.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,21,323-349.
17. 余宗勳(2004)。台南市，國立臺南師範大學輔導教育研究所。
18. 李國勝(2004)。台北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
19. 洪鳳美(2004)。台北市，銘傳大學教育研究所。
20. 陳偉瑀(1998)。專科體育教師教導方式對學生學習滿意度及內在動機的影響。國立體育學院論叢，9(1)，241-265。
21. 陳嘉惠(2002)。屏東市，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
22. 黃輝雄(1999)。屏東市，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
23. 廖英昭(2005)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
24. 廖啓雄(2003)。台北市，國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所。
25. 謝惠卿(2001)。高雄市，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。

1. 陳婷婷、王文宜(2015)。體育課無動機量表中文化後的信度與效度：以國小和國中學生為對象。臺灣運動心理學報，15(2)，1-17。
2. 黃敏萍、高鳳霞(2014)。價值契合觀點之魅力領導理論：中介歷程與多層次分析。中華心理學刊，56(2)，215-235。
3. 羅玉枝,廖俊欽,郭國隆,高俊傑(2019)。不同教學策略對籃球選修課程大學生學習動機之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，14(2)，43-57。
4. 聶喬齡、張嘉旭(2017)。沒有人該被放棄：體育課中的無動機與因應之道。體育學系系刊，16，57-67。
5. 蘇美如、黃英哲(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係———應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，33-50。
6. 張祿純、周宏室、周禾程(2011)。華文版學生知覺體育教師回饋量表之編訂。大專體育學刊，13(2)，132-140。
7. 鄭志富、詹俊成、陳素青(2013)。臺北市高中體育教師領導風格與班級氣氛對體育課學習動機之影響。體育學報，46(3)，257-272。