學生人格特質、流暢體驗與體育課情感之關係

Relationships among Students' Characteristics, Flow Experience and Emotions towards Physical Education

10.5297/ser.1703.003

洪升呈(Sheng-Cheng Hung)

技巧 ； 挑戰 ； 內外控傾向 ； skill ； challenge ； locus of control

大專體育學刊

17卷3期（2015 / 09 / 30）

274 - 286

繁體中文;英文

本研究主要目的是探討大學生體育教學活動中學生人格特質、流暢體驗與體育課情感間之關係，以配額抽樣法調查北、中、南共9所大學院校，每所學校發放問卷100份，共計發出900份，有效問卷824份，運用AMOS 17.0統計軟體進行結構方程模式適配度之分析與假設驗證。研究結果顯示：學生的個人的技巧、挑戰性評估、內外控人格特質，對於體育課流暢體驗有正向影響，而流暢體驗對正向情感亦有正向的影響關係，另外人格特質為內控或外控之學生，皆須藉由體育教學過程中，讓學生產生流暢體驗，方能對體育課情感產生正向影響。本研究結論：本研究結果對於體育教學者而言，透過瞭解學生在體育課活動過程中形成流暢體驗的前因與學生體育課情感的關係，能更加瞭解不同學生特性對體育課的需求，有助於擬定提升學生體育課情感的策略，相信對體育課的推展應有所裨益。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships among students' characteristics, flow experience and emotions towards physical education (PE). Quota sampling was applied to investigate this study purpose on students from 9 colleges nationwide. A total of 900 questionnaires were equally distributed to 9 colleges, 100 to each college, and 824 valid questionnaires were obtained. AMOS 17.0 was employed to process the analysis, and structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesis fitness. Results indicated that students' characteristics including personal skills, challenging evaluation, as well as internal and external locus of control were affected positively to the flow experience towards physical education, and flow experience showed positive impact on positive emotions. In addition, students with internal or external locus of control had to have flow experience during physical education courses to result in positive emotions towards physical education. By recognizing the relationship on how flow experience is formed between physical education and students' emotions towards physical education, the PE teachers can better understand the demands from students with different characteristics. This study may further help teachers in setting up the new strategies to enhance students' emotions towards physical education and it is believed to be beneficial in the promotion of physical education.

1. 巫喜瑞、陳廷忠(2012)。冒險遊憩活動中人格特質、沉浸體驗與滿意度間關係之研究─溯溪活動服務之例。戶外遊憩研究，25(2)，75-91。
   連結：
2. 林晏新(2008)。雲林縣=Yunlin, Taiwan，國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所=Graduate School of Leisure and Exercise, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。
   連結：
3. 邱奕銓、洪升呈、周宏室(2013)。從質性到量化途徑發展大學生體育課情感量表。體育學報，46(2)，153-166。
   連結：
4. 邱思慈、黃芳銘、陳冠中、張家銘(2010)。太極拳心流體驗量表編製研究。運動休閒管理學報，7(1)，200-214。
   連結：
5. 張孝銘、林士翔、李銘升(2007)。登山冒險性運動觀光參與行為模式之研究。運動休閒管理學報，4(2)，95-109。
   連結：
6. 許銘華、邱靖華(2008)。大學生參與桌球運動流暢經驗之研究─以國立中興大學學生為例。興大體育學刊，9，35-46。
   連結：
7. 陳春希、張緯杰、李旭梅、袁梅玲(2012)。領導與部屬交換關係、內外控人格對於員工工作態度之影響─心理賦能之中介效果。交大管理學報，32(2)，77-104。
   連結：
8. 陳聰毅、黃森芳(2012)。大學體育課程與教學內容之規劃。大專體育，119，15-21。
   連結：
9. 曾文志(2010)。大學生日常生活主觀經驗品質之探討：知覺的挑戰與技巧之效果分析。中華心理學刊，52(2)，133-153。
   連結：
10. 葉源鎰(2007)。具心流體驗之高爾夫運動參與者之心流體驗、休閒阻礙與遊憩精熟度之相關性研究。戶外遊憩研究，20(1)，69-94。
    連結：
11. 蔡芬卿、周宏室(2007)。大專興趣選項體育課學生流暢體驗與學習滿意度之相關研究。體育學報，40(4)，37-50。
    連結：
12. 教育部體育署（2013，4 月）。100 學年度學校體育統計年報。2014 年1 月20 日， 資料引自http://www.sa.gov.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1387869981943.pdf[Sports Administration, Ministry of Education. (2013, April). Annual report and statistics for school sports of Sports Administration, Ministry of Education 2011. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from http://www.sa.gov.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1387869981943.pdf]
13. Asakawa, K.(2004).Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life?.Journal of Happiness Studies,5(2),123-154.
14. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
15. Baird, J. R.,Penna, C.(1996).Challenge in learning and teaching science.Research in Science Education,26(3),257-269.
16. Berkowitz, L.,Troccoli, B. T.(1990).Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluations of others.Cognition and Emotion,4,305-325.
17. Chen, A.,Liu, X.(2009).Task values, cost, and choice decisions in college physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,28,192-213.
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York:Harper & Row.
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
20. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(1995).In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectance-related beliefs.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,21(3),215-225.
21. Garson, B. E.,Stanwyck, D. J.(1997).Locus of control and incentive in self-managing teams.Human Resource Development Quarterly,8(3),247-258.
22. Ghani, J. A.,Supnick, R.,Rooney, P.(1991).The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups.Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems,New York:
23. Hoffman, D. L.,Novak, T. P.(1996).Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations.Journal of Marketing,60,50-68.
24. Hoffman, D. L.,Novak, T. P.(1997).A new marketing paradigm for electroniccommerce.The Information Society,13(1),43-54.
25. Hoffman, D. L.,Novak, T. P.,Schlosser, A. E.(2003).Locus of control, web use, and consumer attitudes toward internet regulation.Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,22(1),41-57.
26. Jackson, S. A.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1999).Flow in sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
27. Janssen, T.,Carton, J. S.(1999).The effects of locus of control and task difficulty on procrastination.Journal of Genetic Psychology,160(4),436-442.
28. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
29. Koufaris, M.(2002).Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior.Information Systems Research,13(2),205-223.
30. Levenson, H.(1974).Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internalexternal control.Journal of Personality Assessment,38(4),377-383.
31. Mills, A. S.,Butler, T. S.(2005).Flow experience among Appalachian trai l thru-hikers.Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium,New York:
32. Novak, T. P.,Hoffman, D. L.,Yung, Y. F.(2000).Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach.Marketing Science,19(1),22-42.
33. Pervin, L. A.,Oliver, P. J.(1997).Personality: Theory and research.New York:Wiley.
34. Pringle, R.(2010).Finding pleasure in physical education: A critical examination of the educative value of positive movement affects.Quest,62,119-134.
35. Roberts, G. C.(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
36. Rotter, J. B.(1966).Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs,80(1),1-28.
37. Skinner, N.,Brewer, N.(2004).Adaptive approaches to competition: Challenge appraisals and positive emotion.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,26,283-305.
38. Voelkl, J. E.,Ellis, G. D.(1998).Measuring flow experiences in daily life: An examination of the items used to measure challenge and skill.Journal of Leisure Research,30(3),380-389.
39. 吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式：AMOS 的操作與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-nan。
40. 周宏室(2009)。體育課程與教學專業。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=Shta Bookstore。
41. 胡炬波、金新玉、王進(2008)。基於流暢體驗理論探索大學生體育選課滿意度。體育學刊，15(8)，68-71。
42. 莊雅雯(2004)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系研究所=Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, Dayeh University。
43. 陳仁精、李蕙貞、鍾志強、郭志騰(2010)。大學體育課程體驗對體育行為的影響。雲科大體育，12，41-48。
44. 程瑞福(2010)。學校體育課程教學現況與展望。學校體育，121，25-29。
45. 齊璘(2011)。籃球運動員人格特質與流暢經驗產生之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，10(3)，82-89。
46. 鄭政宗(2011)。影響志願服務者心流體驗因素之研究─以臺中縣立港區藝術中心為例。朝陽商管評論，10(1)，1-19。
47. 賴清財、蘇俊賢(2009)。大專技職校院學生「內外控人格特質」在「動態生活」之差異比較。彰化師大體育學報，8，84-96。
48. 聶喬齡(2000)。不同性別、運動項目、經驗長短及特質性焦慮在運動流暢經驗上的差異。中華體育季刊，14(2)，116-123。

1. 洪升呈(2016)。大專學生體育課流暢體驗量表之建構。淡江體育學刊，19，37-50。