英文摘要
|
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between school's organizational structures and teacher's job burnout. The study methods were adopted literature review and questionnaire. The subjects included 448 teachers from public schools. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistic, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis.
1. Schools with different size and area factors had significant differences on organizational structures in junior high school.
2. Teacher's background variables (sex, age, annual pays, educational background, marriage status, school size) had significant difference on teacher's job burnout.
3. The correlation between school's organizational structure and teacher's job burnout was significant.
4. Teacher's job burnout can be explained by school's organizational structure and teacher's background variables.
According to the main conclusions, the researcher offered some suggestions:
1. Improve the organizational structure to set up ”specialization”, ”standardization”, and ”formalization” of remote area school.
2. Provide multipal in-service opportunity to increase teacher's teaching achievement.
3. Exercise motivation to increase new members, junior and female teacher's job adaptation.
4. Implement organizational learning to upgrade organizational change ability.
5. Strengthen normal teaching to reduce teacher's burnout.
6. Adopt democratic leadership strategy and encourage teachers to participate schools' administration.
7. Enact regulations of tutor's responsibility and establish professional helping system.
|
参考文献
|
-
Albee, G. W.(2004).Commentary on prevention and counseling psychology.The Counseling Psychologist,28,845-853.
-
Alexander-Lofton, B. E.(1993).Characteristics of stress and burnout experienced by developmental education faculty members in centralized and decentralized organizational structures.MI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication Dissertation.
-
Bacharach, B. S.(1983).Organizational analysis of stress: The Case of Elementary and Secondary School.ERIC Document.
-
Barnard, C. I.(1968).The functions of the executive.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Pringing Office.
-
Baumann, M. R.,Bonner, B. L.(2004).The effects of variability and expectations on utilization of member expertise and group performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,93(2),89-101.
-
Castle, D. K.,Estes, N.(1995).High-performance learning communities.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
-
Cherniss, C.(1980).Professional burnout in human service organization.New York:Praeger.
-
Cuban, L.(1995).The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform.Theory into Practice,34(1),4-11.
-
Edelwich, J.,Brodsky, A.(1980).Burnout: stages of disillusionment in the helping Profession.New York:Human Science Press.
-
Farber, B. A.,Miller, J.(1981).Teacher burnout: A psychological-educational perspective.Teacher College Record,83(2),235-243.
-
Freudenberger, H. J.,Richelson, G.(1980).Burnout: The high cost of high achievement.New York:Anchor Press.
-
Friedman, I.(1995).School principal burnout: the concept and its components.Journal of Organisational Behavior,16,191-198.
-
Kast, F. E.,Rosenzweig, J. E.(1974).Organization and management: A system approach.New York:McGraw-Hill.
-
Killian, J. G.(2004).Career and technical education teacher burnout: Impact of humor-coping style and job-related stress.UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication Dissertation.
-
Kyriacou, C.(2001).Teacher stress: directions for future research.Educational Review,53(1),28-35.
-
Lawler, E. E.(1994).Performance management: The next generation.Compensation and Benefits Review,26(3),16-19.
-
March, J. G.,Simon, H. A.(1958).Organization.New York:John Wiley & sons.
-
Maslach, C.(1976).Burnout.Human Behavior,5,16-22.
-
Maslach, C.,Jackson , S. E.(1981).The Measurement of experienced burnout.Journal of Occupational Behavior,2,99-113.
-
Matheny, K. B.,Gfroerer, C. A.,Harris, K.(2000).Work stress, burnout, and coping at the turn of the century: An Adlerian perspective.Journal of Individual Psychology,56(1),74-87.
-
Pennings, J.(1973).Measure of organizational structure: A methodological note.American Journal of Sociology,3,685-688.
-
Porter, L. A.,Lawler, E. E.(1965).Properties of organizational structurein relation to job attitude and job behavior.Psychological Bulletin,64,23-51.
-
Robbison, S. P.(1998).Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
-
Spaniol, L.,Caputo, J.(1980).How to recognize, cope with and avoid professional burnout.Instructional Innovator,25,18-20.
-
Troman, G..,Woods, P.(2001).Primary teachers' stress.New York:Routledge/Falmer.
-
王秋絨(1981)。台北,國立師範大學教育研究所。
-
吳宗立(1992)。台北,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
吳清基(1990)。教育與行政。台北:師大書苑。
-
吳清基(1990)。教師與進修。台北:師大書苑。
-
吳清基(1979)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
-
吳麗芬(1986)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
-
李垣武(1988)。台北,國立師範大學教育研究所。
-
周立勳(1986)。高雄,國立高雄師範學院教育研究所。
-
施振典(1991)。台北,國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所。
-
柯嘉興(2004)。新竹,國立新竹師院國民教育研究所。
-
師範大學學生輔導中心(1989)。台北市國小教師背景因素、非理性信念與工作倦怠之相關研究。台北市:台灣師範大學學生輔導中心。
-
徐木蘭(1984)。見樹又見林。台北:經濟與生活出版事業公司。
-
高強華(1989)。教師壓力與倦怠問題初探。中等教育,40(4),41-45。
-
張明輝(1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。
-
張榮宗(2002)。台北,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
張曉春(1983)。專業人員工作疲乏之研究模式-以社會工作員為例(下)。思與言,21(2),179-201。
-
張曉春(1983)。專業人員工作疲乏研究模式-以社會工作員為例(上)。思與言,21(1),66-79。
-
郭生玉(1987)。教師工作心厭與背景因素關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學報,20,37-54。
-
郭為藩(1986)。科技時代的人文教育。台北:幼獅。
-
郭峰偉(2000)。台南,國立成功大學教育研究所。
-
黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政學。台北:東華。
-
黃淑珍(1988)。台北,國立師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
-
黃德祥(1986)。輔導人員「專業枯竭」成因與克服之道。諮商與輔導,12,2-4。
-
葉一明(2000)。台中,國立台中師範學院國民研究所。
-
廖貴鋒(1986)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
-
趙傑夫(1988)。台北,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
劉淑慧(1987)。台北,國立台灣教育學院輔導研究所。
-
蔡培村(1985)。台北,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
蔡淑娟(1990)。台北,國立師範大學社會教育研究所。
-
蔡樹勳(2001)。新竹,國立新竹師範學院學效行政研究所。
-
謝文豪(1987)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
-
謝月英(1989)。台北,國立師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
-
顏耀南(2002)。嘉義,國立中正大學教育研究所。
-
羅寶鳳(2004)。教師與心理衛生。教育資料與研究,60,10-19。
-
蘇育任(1985)。台北,國立師範大學教育研究所。
|