設計資源與設計能力之內涵及關聯性探討－以大可意念設計公司為例

Exploring the Content and Linkage of Design Resources and Design Capabilities: A Case Study on Duckimage

10.6381/JD.200809.0039

宋同正(Tung-Jung Sung)；張百佑(Pai-Yu Chang)

設計資源 ； 設計能力 ； 設計服務 ； 資源基礎觀點 ； Design Resource ； Design Capability ； Design Service ； Resource-Based View

設計學報

13卷3期（2008 / 09 / 01）

39 - 60

繁體中文

為獲得競爭優勢，企業策略性思考的重心漸由從外部競爭環境分析轉移至內部資源配置考量；此時，設計資源便成為企業設計能力的主要來源基礎。可惜的是，就現今產品設計服務公司（以下簡稱為設計公司）而言，企業設計資源與設計能力的真實內涵及兩者間之關聯性到底為何，迄今仍較模糊不清。基此，以資源基礎觀點(resource-based view, RBV)為立論依據，本研究主旨乃透過個案研究進行企業設計資源與設計能力之組成內容與關聯性探討。本研究首先發現，因為同時具備有特殊性、專屬性與模糊性等價值特質，「公司商譽」實可成為設計公司一項關鍵性的設計資源。其次，針對以傳統產業為主要服務對象的設計公司，由於「材料的開發與新應用」能夠強化其他設計能力，故可視為一關鍵性設計能力要項。最後，企業設計資源與設計能力兩者之間存有緊密關聯性；其中，「設計人力」、「設計經驗」與「公司商譽」對四大設計能力構面（功能性、美學性、技術性與品質性）皆產生影響。除提出若干設計管理實務與研究建議外，本研究更冀望研究成果可作為設計公司在未來策略性規劃設計資源與能力之組合時的重要參考依據。

When strategic thinking shifts from focusing on the investigation of external competitive environments to the analysis of the internal resource allocation in order to gain competitive advantages, design resource is increasingly considered as a source of design capability. By means of a case study on a renewed design service company in Taiwan, this study aims to illustrate how the company utilizes valuable design resources to create its distinctive design capabilities based on the theory of the resource-based view (RBV). First, the findings of the study confirm that “company reputation” can represent a crucial design resource of a design company since it inherits valuable characteristics of design resources in terms of uniqueness, specialty, and ambiguity. Secondly, ”the innovation and application of new materials” can represent a vital design capability of a design company since it can augment other design capabilities, especially for the company in which its clients are mainly from the traditional industry. Thirdly, ”design manpower,” ”design experience,” and ”company reputation” with respect to design resources are associated with all four dimensions (i.e., design function, design aesthetics, design technology, and design quality) of design capability. It is hoped that the results of this study could facilitate understanding of how design resources affect the design capability in the business of design consultancy. Further, the study discusses the implications of such findings and offers suggestions for future research.

1. 吳錦錩(2005)。從資源基礎、能耐基礎與動態能力觀點探討企業持續性競爭優勢構面－以台灣代工製造公司為例。東海管理評論，7(1)，137-166。
   連結：
2. Amit, R.,Schoemaker, P. J. H.(1993).Strategic & organizational rent.Strategic Management Journal,14(1),33-46.
3. Barney, J. B.(2001).Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view.Journal of Management,27(6),643-650.
4. Barney, J. B.(1991).Firm resources & sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management,17(1),99-120.
5. Bettis, R. A.,Hitt, M.(1995).The new competitive landscape.Strategic Management Journal,16,7-19.
6. Bloch, P. H.(1995).Seeking the ideal form: Product design & consumer response.Journal of Marketing,59(3),16-29.
7. Bowman, C.,Ambrosini, V.(2003).How the resource-based & the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy.British Journal of Management,14(4),289-303.
8. Boyer, K. K.,Lewis, M. W.(2002).Competitive priorities: Investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy.Journal of Operation Management,11(1),9-20.
9. Collis, D. J.,Montgomery, C. A.(1995).Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s.Harvard Business Review,73(4),118-128.
10. Eckman, M.,Wagner, J.(1994).Judging the attractiveness of product design: The effect of visual attributes & consumer characteristics.Advances in Consumer Research,21(1),560-564.
11. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Martin, J. A.(2000).Dynamic capabilities: What are they?.Strategic Management Journal,21(10/11),1105-1121.
12. Garvin, D. A.(1984).What does "Product Quality" really mean?.Sloan Management Review,26(1),25-43.
13. Gautam, R.,Barney J. B.,Muhanna, A. W.(2004).Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view.Strategic Management Journal,25(1),23-37.
14. Gemser, G.,Wijnberg, N. M.(2002).The economic significance of industrial design awards: A conceptual framework.Design Management Academic Review,2(1),61-71.
15. Grant, R. M.(1991).The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation.California Management Review,3(3),114-135.
16. Hall, R.(1992).The strategic analysis of intangible resources.Strategic Management Journal,13(2),135-144.
17. IF International Forum Design(2003).IF Design Award 2003.Switzerland:Birkhauser.
18. Marsh, S. J.,Stock, G. N.(2003).Building dynamic capabilities in new product development through intertemporal integration.Journal of Product Innovation Management,20(2),136-148.
19. McGrath, M. E.(2001).Product strategy for high-technology companies.NY:McGraw-Hill.
20. Peteraf, M. A.(1993).The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view.Strategic Management Journal,14(3),179-191.
21. Porter, M. E.(1980).Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries & competitors.NY:The Free Press.
22. Porter, M. E.(1985).Competitive advantage: Creating & sustaining superior performance.NY:The Free Press.
23. Rumelt, R. P.,R. B. Lamb (Ed.)(1984).Competitive Strategic Management.NY:Prentice-Hall.
24. Schmenner, R.W.,Swink, M.L.(1998).On theory in operation management.Journal of Operations Management,17(1),97-113.
25. Spivey, W. A.,Munson, J. M.,Wolcott, J. H.(1997).Improving the new product development process: A fractal paradigm for high-technology products.The Journal of Product Innovation Management,14(3),203-218.
26. Swan, K.,Kotabe, S. M.,Allred, B. B.(2005).Exploring robust design capabilities, their role in creating global products, & their relationship to firm performance.The Journal of Product Innovation Management,22(2),144-164.
27. Turner, R.,P. Gorb (Ed.)(1990).Design management.London:London Business School.
28. Wernerfelt, B.(1984).A resource-based view of the firm.Strategic Management Journal,5(2),171-180.
29. Yin, R. K.(2003).Case study research: Design & method.CA:Sage.
30. 司徒達賢、林晉寬(1998)。台灣優勢廠商之資源管理模式。管理學報，15(2)，255-270。
31. 台灣創意設計中心(2006)。臺灣設計力。台北:台灣創意設計中心。
32. 江佩蓉(2006)。成貫設計力：搶走華碩、明基風采。商業周刊，965，58。
33. 吳思華(2003)。策略九說：策略的思考本質。台北:臉譜文化。
34. 宋同正(1998)。台灣資訊業設計資源與設計績效之實証研究。科技學刊，7(2)，165-172。
35. 李欣岳(2007)。風格的技術對談。數位時代，155，146-151。
36. 經濟日報(2008/01/31)
37. 林孟儀、劉慧雯(2006)。設計創價時代。台北:臉譜。
38. 林晉寬(1995)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
39. 翁振宇(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所。
40. 經濟日報(2006/04/11)
41. 張紹勳(2000)。研究方法。台中:滄海。
42. 聯合報(2008/01/30)
43. 湯明哲、Porter, M. E.、高登第、李明軒譯(2001)。競爭論。台北:天下文化。
44. 楊美玲(2005)。詰佑用設計走出代工宿命。數位時代，155，94-95。
45. 滕淑芬(2007)。台灣設計亮起來。臺灣光華雜誌，5，8-11。
46. 經濟日報(2007/07/21)
47. 賴珍琳(2006)。善用材料並整合技術台灣工業設計揚名國際。數位時代，136，122-125。
48. 謝正桓(2007)。3C榮譽世家：靠設計賺裡子、拚面子。D·FUN設計風尚誌，7，55-57。
49. 藍麗娟(2006)。謝榮雅在稻田裡滋養靈感。天下，351，78-81。

1. 陳中志(2016)。台灣封裝設備產業關鍵成功因素研究。交通大學管理學院管理科學學程學位論文。2016。1-63。