题名

以競合關係為導向的選才模式

并列篇名

Co-competition based Recruitment Approach

DOI

10.6381/JD.201203.0002

作者

陸定邦(Ding-Bang Luh);呂佳珍(Chia-Chen Lu)

关键词

設計領導行為 ; 創造力 ; 設計熱忱 ; 溝通表達 ; Design Leadership ; Creativity ; lnterpersonal Communication ; Passion

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

17卷1期(2012 / 03 / 01)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

隨設計實務複雜度提升,團隊合作成為設計實務的普遍現象,突顯領導者的重要性。領導力是團隊成功的重要競爭能力,因此設計領導能力須加探究。本研究發展一套適用於設計系的選才模式,用以發掘具設計領導能力之學生。針對設計系的選才需求,透過相關文獻整理與分析,建立設計領導才能之四項核心構面,分別為創造力、溝通表達、設計熱忱及領導行為,共包含二十八項評量指標。歷經二次流程演練及二次前測,確認最終評估項目、評量指標、衡量尺度及選才流程,並提出COBRA(CO-competition Based Recruitment Approach)模式。經個案學校20位申請入學生的實證結果,所提模式中的十個評估項目,有七項具有良好的內部一致性與建構效度,可提供設計學系做為選才機制的基礎與參考。

英文摘要

Team work turns into a phenomenon when design practice gets more and more complex. Team formation highlights the role of a leader. Leadership is an important competitive ability in team work, and therefore design leadership needs further discussion. The main goal of this paper is to develop a model for selecting talent in order to find a student having design leadership. 8ased on a Iiterature review and the needs of talent selection in design school, the four central components for design leadership which included 28 criteria in total were constructed namely Creativity, lnterpersonal Communication, Design Passion and Leadership Behavior. This study proposed a COBRA model (CO-competition Based Recruitment Approach) which stood on the two pre-planning procedures and the two pretests to confirm the evaluative exercises, criteria, scales and processes. The empirical results were based on twenty students who admitted by application in this case school and the results showed that seven out of the ten evaluative exercises proposed in this model have good reliability and construct validity. These results provide a basis for the selected mechanism of design school.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 吳天方、郭美辰(2002)。溝通技巧在高職學校行為上的應用。學校行政,17,79-86。
    連結:
  2. 胡祱倫、陳世芬、呂秋萍(2008)。教師甄選面試結構化問卷之編製。測驗學刊,55(1),185-212。
    連結:
  3. 唐玄輝、林智文、陳文誌(2009)。合作設計過程中個人的創造潛能與國隊的概念衍伸對設計成果之影響。設計學報,14(3),51-71。
    連結:
  4. 張文智、張鎮雄、許言(2005)。工業設計師工作滿意度影響因素研究。設計學報,10(1),43-55。
    連結:
  5. 陸定邦、林群超(2005)。台灣設計和應用藝術教育於專業知識與技能之供需調查及研究。設計學報,10(2),89-103。
    連結:
  6. 楊敏英、游萬來、陳斐娟(2005)。探討工業設計系學生面臨的困擾及生涯輔導需求對設計教育的意涵。設計學報,10(2),57-75。
    連結:
  7. (2006)。領導才能訓練研習手冊。台北=Taipei:中華資優教育學會=Chinese Association of Gifted Education。
  8. (2009)。評分者,兩個恰恰好?─以國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗為例。飛揚,60,12-15。
  9. Deutsh, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and cornpetition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199-231
  10. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Boulder, Co, US:Westview Press.
  11. Bass, B. M.(1981).Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.New York, NY:Free Press.
  12. Campion, M. A.,Palmer, D. K.,Campion, J. E.(1997).A review of structure in the selection interview.Personnel Psychology,50,655-702.
  13. Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Tannenbaum, S. I.,Salas, E.,Volpe, C. E.(1995).Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements.Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations,San Francisco, CA:
  14. Cartwright, D.(ed.),Zander, A.(ed.)(1953).Group dynamics: Research and theory.Evanston, IL:Row, Peterson and Company.
  15. Colbert, A. E.,Kristof-Brown, A. L.,Bradley, B. H.,Barrick, M. R.(2008).CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams.Academy of Management Journal,51,81-96.
  16. David, A. R.、許晉福譯、袁世珮譯(2004)。魅力滿分:掌握人際關係的10大關鍵態度,提升待人處世的頂尖智慧。台北=Taipei:美商麥格羅‧希爾=McGraw-Hill。
  17. Dick, W.,Carey, L.(1990).The systematic design of instruction.Glenview, IL:Scott Foresman.
  18. Dougherty, D.(1992).Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.Organization Science,3(2),179-202.
  19. Gross, S. E.(1995).Compensation for teams.New York, NY:American Management Association.
  20. Gruber, H.(ed.),Terrell, G.(ed.),Wertheimer, M.(ed.)(1962).Contemporary approaches to creative thinking.New York, NY:Atherton.
  21. Gubman, E.(2004).From engagement to passion for work: The search for the missing person.Human Resource Planning,27(3),42-46.
  22. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  23. Jessup, H. R.(1990).New roles in team leadership.Training and Development Journal,44(11),79-83.
  24. Katz, R. L.(1955).Skill of an effective administrator.Harvard Business Review,33,33-42.
  25. Katzenbach, J. R.,Smith, D. K.(1993).The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
  26. Klein, A. L.(1996).Validity and reliability for competency-based system: Reducing litigation risks.Compensation and Benefits Review,28(4),31-37.
  27. Krajewski, R. J.,Martin, J. S.,Walden, J.(1983).The elementary school principalship: Leadership for the 1980s.New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  28. Lindzey, G.(ed.),Apronson, E.(ed.)(1969).The handbook of social psychology.Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley.
  29. Mannheim, B.,Halamish, H.(2008).Transformational leadership as related to team outcomes and contextual moderation.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,29(7),617-630.
  30. McMurry, R. N.(1958).The case for benevolent autocracy.Business Review,36,82-90.
  31. Nevo, B.,Berman, J. A.(1994).The two-step selection interview: Combining standardization with depth.Research & Practice in Human Resource Management,2(1),89-96.
  32. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  33. Parker, G. M.(1990).Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy.San Francisco, CA:Jossey.
  34. Runco, M. A.,Chand, I.(1995).Cognition and creativity.Educational Psychology Review,7(3),243-267.
  35. Sanders, R. E.(1991).The two-way relationship between talk in social interactions and actors' goals and plans.Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse,Hillsdale, NJ:
  36. Smith, P.(2002).Pursuing passion.New Zealand Management,47(11),94-97.
  37. Spitzberg, B. H.,Cupach, W. R.(1984).Interpersonal communication competence.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  38. Stark, J. S.,Lowther, M. A.,Hagerty, B. M. K.(1986).Responsive professional education: Balancing outcomes and opportunities.Washington, DC:ASHE.
  39. Sternberg, R. J.(ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  40. Stogdill, R. M.(1974).Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature.New Y ork, NY:Free Press.
  41. Thomas, J. B.,Kenneth, P. D. M.(1996).Diagnosing whether an organization is truly ready to empower work teams: A case study.Human Resource Planning,19(1),38-47.
  42. Torrance, E. P.(1974).Norms-technical manual: Torrance tests of creative thinking.Lexington, MA:Ginn.
  43. Tsai, W. C.,Chen, C. C.,Chiu, S. F.(2005).Exploring boundaries of the effects of applicant impression management tactics in job interviews.Journal of Management,31(1),108-125.
  44. Vallerand, R. J.,Blanchard, C.,Mageau, G. A.,Koestner, R.,Ratelle, C.,Léonard, M.,Gagné, M.,Marsolais, J.(2003).Les Passions de I'Âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(4),756-767.
  45. Wellins, R. S.,Byham, W. C.,Dixon, G. R.(1994).Inside teams: How 20 world-class organization are winning through teamwork.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  46. 王青(2004)。團隊就是力量:理論篇。台北=Taipei:百善書房=Bai San。
  47. 王鴻祥(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北=Taipei:台北科技大學創新設計研究所=National Taipei University of Technology。
  48. 林坤燦、林銘欽、林芳瑜(2010)。我國資賦優異教育相關法規初探。東華特教,44,1-6。
  49. 張春興(1992)。張氏心理學辭典。台北=Taipei:東華書局=TungHua。
  50. 張智文、江潤華(2005)。設計溝通模式與團隊創造力關係之探討。設計學報,14(2),1-18。
  51. 黃心怡、溫金豐(2005)。高雄=Kauhsiung,國立中山大學資源管理研究所=National Sun Yat-sen University。
  52. 楊利亨、尤松文(2006)。學生專案團隊中領導角色之扮演與團隊情感的影響。資訊管理展望,8(1),1-26。
  53. 葉雯旳(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北=Taipei:台北科技大學創新設計研究所=National Taipei University of Technology。
  54. 鄭贏川(2006)。人才甄選與面談技巧。台北=Taipei:汎果文化=Fan Kuo。
  55. 羅鳳珠(2003)。知識網路:文字、語音、語言、文學的結合及語言學習的應用。第七屆世界華語文教學研討會:語意網與中文資訊的前瞻座談會,台北=Taipei: