题名

從設計領域觀點探索大學人文及社會科學領域的社群參與

并列篇名

Exploring Community Engagement of the Humanities and Social Sciences Disciplines in Universities from the Perspective of Design Disciplines

作者

洪偉肯(Wei-Ken Hung)；劉舜仁(Shuenn-Ren Liou)

关键词

社群參與 ； 人文敘事 ； 社會實踐 ； 跨域合作 ； Community Engagement ； Humanity's Narratives ； Social Practice ； Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

期刊名称

設計學報

卷期/出版年月

25卷4期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

19 - 41

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究運用個案研究法，從設計觀點探索「人文及社會科學知識跨界應用能力培育計畫（HFCC）」專案，針對五所基礎人文及社會科學領域系所大學團隊成員進行訪談。結果發現：1.場域設置考量包括「可控制性」與「利害關係人複雜度」，而場域助理扮演關鍵角色；2.社群參與課程的創新包括長期與實地的「敘事轉譯」以及「共創的社會實踐」以促進「互為主體」，並可視為行銷創新與組織創新；3.跨域與設計領域合作的模式，「人社領域議題導向」課程係經由「設計思考」融入課程，設計領域扮演「促進者」與「專案管理者」角色，而在「設計技術應用導向」課程合作則可區分為「共同設計者」與「啟發者」；4.在創業案例部分，本研究發現人社領域的部署文化創業模式，其價值主張為文化的稀缺性，因而形成獨特性與正當性，有助於累積社會資本以促成創業。此案例貫串了前述場域與課程，特別是透過組織創新，建構了大學培育創業的機制。
英文摘要

This study employed case study approach to explore the practical experiences of community engagement of the humanities and social sciences disciplines in universities from the typical perspective of the field of design. It explored the Humanities, Field, and Co-Creation (HFCC) Project initiated by the Department of Information and Technology Education, Ministry of Education, Taiwan. Specifically, this study interviewed university project team members from five departments or institutes of fundamental humanities and social sciences to investigate field settings, planning of a community engagement curriculum, and interdisciplinary collaboration with those in the design field, as well as entrepreneurship cases and considerations. Research results revealed that controllability and stakeholder complexity are considerations related to field settings. Moreover, field assistants played a crucial role in field settings. Impressive community engagement curricula were divided into long-term fieldwork for ＂narrative translation＂ and ＂co-creation of social practice＂ that facilitated intersubjectivity and could be treated as marketing innovation and organizational innovation. In terms of interdisciplinary collaboration between those in humanities, social sciences, and design, the integration of design thinking into social topic-oriented courses was observed, with the discipline of design serving as a facilitator and project manager. Furthermore, the roles of designers in design application-oriented curricula could be categorized into co-designer and inspirer. Regarding case analysis on entrepreneurship, this study found that the value proposition of sociology-based entrepreneurship cases was relatively scarce, thus bringing uniqueness and legitimacy. Sociology-based entrepreneurship was regarded as a culture-deploying model to accumulating social capital for entrepreneurship and the key point was organizational innovation that would build a mechanism to foster entrepreneurship in a university.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 林開世, K.-S.(2016)。什麼是「人類學的田野工作」？知識情境與倫理立場的反省。考古人類學刊，84，77-100。
    連結：
  2. 洪偉肯, W.-K.,黃天佑, W.(2012)。設計為科技加值的途徑：以 Dechnology 專案為例。設計學報，18(1)，41-64。
    連結：
  3. 蔡琰, Y.,臧國仁, K.-J.(2007)。「創意／創新」與時間概念：敘事理論之觀點。新聞學研究，93，1-39。
    連結：
  4. Acosta, B.,Acosta, M.,Espinoza, B.(2016).Understanding innovation based on company optics: Interpretation mistakes on the types of innovation developed.RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação,13(4),295-304.
  5. Andrews, J.,Smith, D. C.(1996).In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products.Journal of Marketing Research,33(2),174-187.
  6. Armbruster, H.,Bikfalvi, A.,Kinkel, S.,Lay, G.(2008).Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys.Technovation,28(10),644-657.
  7. Atkinson, R.(1999).Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria.International Journal of Project Management,17(6),337-342.
  8. Bal, P. M.,Veltkamp, M.(2013).How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation.PloS One,8(1),1-12.
  9. Bason, C.(2010).Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society.Bristol:The Policy.
  10. Batson, C. D.(2011).Altruism in humans.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  11. Benneworth, P.(2015).Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas?.Arts and Humanities in Higher Education,14(1),45-60.
  12. Beringer, C.,Jonas, D.,Gemunden, H. G.(2012).Establishing project portfolio management: An exploratory analysis of the influence of internal stakeholders’ interactions.Project Management Journal,43(6),16-32.
  13. Binder, M.,Heupel, M.(2015).The legitimacy of the UN security council: Evidence from recent general assembly debates.International Studies Quarterly,59(2),238-250.
  14. Bloom, R. (2016, October 21). The art of facilitation and design thinking. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/art-facilitation-design-thinking-robert-bloom
  15. Bourdieu, P.(1975).The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason.Social Science Information,14(6),19-47.
  16. Brown, T.(2008).Design thinking.Harvard Business Review,86(6),84-92.
  17. Burkett, I. (2019). An introduction to co-design. Retrieved fromhttps://www.yacwa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/An-Introduction-to-Co-Design-by-Ingrid-Burkett.pdf
  18. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching(2006).The carnegie classification of institutions of higher education.Menlo Park, CA:Carnegie Publication.
  19. Cialdini, R. B.(2009).Influence: Science and practice.Boston, MA:Pearson education.
  20. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium(2011).Principles of community engagement.Bethesda, MD:NIH Publication.
  21. Cox, G.(2005).Cox, G. (2005). The cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strength. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120704143146/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Cox_review-foreword-definition-terms-exec-summary.pdf.https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120704143146|http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Cox_review-foreword-definition-terms-exec-summary.pdf
  22. Cross, N.(2001).Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science.Design Issues,17(3),49-55.
  23. Damanpour, F.(2014).Footnotes to research on management innovation.Organization Studies,35(9),1265-1285.
  24. Davis, K.(2018).Reconciling the views of project success: A multiple stakeholder model.Project Management Journal,49(5),38-47.
  25. De Carolis, D. M.,Saparito, P.(2006).Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,30(1),41-56.
  26. Driver, A. J.,Peralta, C,Moultrie, J.(2011).Exploring how industrial designers can contribute to scientific research.International Journal of Design,5(1),17-28.
  27. Dziurski, P.(2017).Stakeholder management in cultural oganisations.Cultural Management: Science and Education,1(2),65-78.
  28. Foster, M.,Meinhard, A.,Berger, I.(2003).The role of social capital: Bridging, bonding or both.Toronto:Ryerson University.
  29. Garud, R.,Schildt, H. A.,Lant, T. K.(2014).Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy.Organization Science,25(5),1479-1492.
  30. Gehman, J.,Soublière, J. F.(2017).Cultural entrepreneurship: From making culture to culturalmaking.Innovation,19(1),61-73.
  31. Gifford, R.(2007).Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.Colville, WA:Optimal books.
  32. Giuffre, M.(1997).Designing research: Ex post facto designs.Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing,12(3),191-195.
  33. Gunday, G.,Ulusoy, G.,Kilic, K.,Alpkan, L.(2011).Effects of innovation types on firm performance.International Journal of Production Economics,133(2),662-676.
  34. Hammersley, M.(1992).Some reflections on ethnography and validity.Qualitative Studies in Education,5(3),195-203.
  35. Hekkert, P.(2006).Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design.Psychology Science,48(2),157.
  36. Ho, D. K. L.,Lee, Y. C.(2012).The quality of design participation: Intersubjectivity in design practice.International Journal of Design,6(1),71-83.
  37. Hollan, D. W.,Throop, C. J.(2011).The anthropology of empathy: Experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies.New York, NY:Berghahn Books.
  38. Hung, D.,Tan, S. C.,Koh, T. S.(2006).From traditional to constructivist epistemologies: A proposed theoretical framework based on activity theory for learning communities.Journal of Interactive Learning Research,17(1),37-55.
  39. Johnston, K. A.,Taylor, M.(2018).The handbook of communication engagement.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell.
  40. Kagan, J.(2009).The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  41. Lee, S. Y.,Oh, S.,Jung, S.(2014).The effects of scarcity appeal on product evaluation: Consumers’ cognitive resources and company reputation.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,42(5),743-756.
  42. Linton, J.(2018).Quiet contributors: The role of the arts, humanities and social sciences in innovation.Foresight and STI Governance,12(3),6-12.
  43. Lounsbury, M.,Glynn, M. A.(2001).Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources.Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),545-564.
  44. LSE Public Policy Group. (2008). Maximizing the social, policy and economic impacts of research in the humanities and social sciences. Retrieved fromhttp://www.lse.ac.uk/government/Assets/Documents/pdf/research-groups/ppg/legacypdf/BA-Final-Report-July-2008.pdf
  45. Mankiw, N. G.(2014).Principles of economics.New York, NY:Cengage Learning.
  46. McAndrew, F. T.(1993).Environmental psychology.Pacific Grove, CA:Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  47. McGonigal, J.(2011).Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world.New York, NY:Penguin.
  48. Meeker, B. F.(1971).Decisions and exchange.American Sociological Review,36(3),485-495.
  49. Na, J.,Choi, Y.,Harrison, D.(2017).The design innovation spectrum: An overview of design influences on innovation for manufacturing companies.International Journal of Design,11(2),13-24.
  50. New York Film Academy. (2016). Three principles every video game designer should follow. Retrieved from https://www.nyfa.edu/student-resources/three-principles-every-game-designer-should-follow/
  51. Niezink, L.,Rutsch, E.(2016).Empathy circles: A blended empathy practice.France:Lidewij Niezink.
  52. Norman, D. A.(1988).The psychology of everyday things.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  53. OECD(2005).Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data.Paris:OECD.
  54. Paese, P. W.,Gilin, D. A.(2000).When an adversary is caught telling the truth: Reciprocal cooperation versus self-interest in distributive bargaining.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26(1),79-90.
  55. Pentland, B. T.(1999).Narrative methods in collaborative systems research.Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-32),New York, NY:
  56. Randall, W. L.,Kenyon, G. M.(2001).Ordinary wisdom: Biographical aging and the journey of life.Wesport, CN:Praeger.
  57. Romme, A. G. L.(2003).Making a difference: Organization as design.Organization Science,14(5),558-573.
  58. Sanders, E. B. N.(2006).Design research in 2006.Design Research Quarterly,1(1),1-8.
  59. Sanders, E. B. N.,Stappers, P. J.(2008).Co-creation and the new landscapes of design.CoDesign,4(1),5-18.
  60. Schifferstein, H. N. J.(Ed.),Hekkert, P.(Ed.)(2008).Product experience.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
  61. Simonsen, J.,Robertson, T.(2012).Routledge international handbook of participary design.London:Routledge.
  62. Slater, S. F.,Narver, J. C.(1998).Customer‐led and market‐oriented: Let’s not confuse the two.Strategic Management Journal,19(10),1001-1006.
  63. Stephen, M. D.(2018).Legitimacy deficits of international organizations: Design, drift, and decoupling at the UN security council.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,31(1),96-121.
  64. Thiel, P. A.,Masters, B.(2014).Zero to one: Notes on startups, or how to build the future.New York, NY:Broadway Business.
  65. Tinkler, J.(2008).Maximising the social, policy and economic impacts of the humanities and social sciences.London:British Academy.
  66. Verganti, R.(2009).Design driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean.New York, NY:Harvard Business Press.
  67. Yang, C. F.,Sung, T. J.(2016).Service design for social innovation through participatory action research.International Journal of Design,10(1),21-36.
  68. 黃炳煌, B.-H.(2002).社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略.台北市=Taipei:師大書苑=Shtabook Bookstore.
print cancel