國民中學閱讀推理篩選測驗編製報告

Reading Comprehension Screening Test for Junior High School Students

10.7108/PT.200712.0429

柯華葳(Hwa-Wei Ko)；詹益綾(Yi-Ling Chan)

文章結構關鍵詞 ； 國民中學學生 ； 閱讀推理 ； 閱讀理解 ； junior high school ； reading comprehension screening test ； text structure phrases

測驗學刊

54卷2期（2007 / 12 / 01）

429 - 449

繁體中文

本測驗旨在為國民中學學生編製一份有辨別力又容易實施的閱讀理解篩選測驗。研究指出有些學生認字在一般水準或以上但是理解有困難，他們明顯有文法覺知上的缺失(Nation & Snowling, 2000)。因此本研究開發以文章結構為依據的閱讀理解評量。經過多次試作與正式施測，選出18題代表共變、比較對照、描述、分類、序列五結構，再歸類成直述和類括兩大類。學生要由代表結構的關鍵詞推出哪一句適合上一句，本測驗因此稱為「國民中學閱讀推理篩選測驗」。施測結果顯示本測驗有內部一致性，且能有效區分年級上的差異。效標關連效度也證實所測量的為閱讀能力。更重要的是，測驗能區分出低、中及高閱讀程度學生。經由兩個星期的間隔，再測信度良好，答錯題目者依舊無法正確回答。本測驗題數不多，施測容易，且是一個能有效篩選國中學生是否有閱讀困難的工具。

Reading comprehension screening test was developed by adopting text structure liking phrases and/or connectives to check junior high school student's reading comprehension ability. This is a paper-and-pencil test with 18 items. Each item contains a phrase which highlights the relationship between 2 clauses. Student's job is to find an appropriate clause which fits the first one by the definition of the linking phrase. The test was carried out with 1688 grades 7 to 9 students throughout Taiwan island. The test-retest reliability and consistency analysis also show students who scored high for the first time kept the high score for the second time. Same pattern stands for those who scored low on the test. Moreover, the test has statistically high correlations with other standardized reading tests. It is evidenced that this is a valid and reliable reading comprehension screening test which is good for junior high school students.

1. 柯華葳、陳冠銘(2004)。文章結構標示與閱讀理解以低年級學生為例。教育心理學報，36(2)，185-200。
   連結：
2. Anderson, R.,R. Ruddell,M. Ruddell,H. Singer(Eds.)(1994).Theoretical models and processes of reading.Newark, Delaware:International Reading Association.
3. Carpenter, P.A.,Just, M.A.,D. La Berge,J. Samuals(Eds.)(1977).Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension.Hilisdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Chall, J.S.(1983).Stages of reading development.NY:McGraw-Hill.
5. Cook, L.,Mayer, R.(1988).Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),448-456.
6. Golding, J.M.,Millis, K.M.,Hauselt, J.,Sego, S.A.,R.F. Lorch, Jr.,E.J. O` Brien(Eds.)(1994).Sources of coherence in reading.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Graesser, A.C.,Singer, M.,Trabasso, T.(1994).Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101(3),371-395.
8. Halliday, M.A.K.,Hasan, R.(1976).Cohesion in English.London:Longman.
9. Meyer, B.J.F.,Brandt, D.H.,Bluth, G.J.(1980).Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of 9th grader students.Reading Research Quarterly,16,72-103.
10. Millis, K.K.,Just, M.A.(1994).The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language,33,128-147.
11. Mullis, I.,Kennedy, A.,Martin, M.,Sainsbury, M.(2006).PIRLS 2006: Assessment framework and specification.Chestnut Hill, MA:TEA.
12. Nation, K.,Snowling, M.J.(2000).Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders.Applied Psycholoinguistics,21,229-241.
13. Segal, E.M.,Duchan, J.F.,Scott P.J.(1991).The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adult`s interpretations of simple stories.Discourse Processes,14,27-54.
14. Trabasso, T.,Stein, N.,Rodkin, P.,Munger, M.,Baughn, C.(1992).Knowledge of goals and plans in the on-line narration of events.Cognitive Development,7,133-170.
15. 林清山譯(1997)。教育心理學－認知取向。台北市:遠流。
16. 柯華葳(2006)。國民中學閱讀理解測驗。桃園縣:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
17. 柯華葳、曾進興主編(1999)。語言病理學基礎。台北市:心理。
18. 洪儷瑜(2006)。中文閱讀障礙工具研討會手冊。台北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
19. 陳美芳(2006)。中文閱讀障礙工具研討會手冊。台北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
20. 程祥徽、田小琳(1992)。現代漢語。台北市:書林。
21. 詹益綾(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。

1. 張世賢(2017)。國中生參與線上閱讀認證與閱讀態度、閱讀理解之相關研究--以高雄市某國中為例。義守大學資訊管理學系學位論文。2017。1-110。