题名

修訂中文成人口吃嚴重度評估工具

并列篇名

The Revised Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 for Mandarin Speaking Adults

DOI

10.7108/PT.201212.0641

作者

楊淑蘭(Shu-Lan Yang);莊淳斐(Chune-Fei Chung)

关键词

口吃成人 ; 口吃伴隨行為 ; 口吃時長 ; 口吃評估 ; 口吃頻率 ; 口吃嚴重度 ; physical concomitant ; stuttering adults ; stuttering assessment ; stuttering duration ; stuttering frequency ; stuttering severity

期刊名称

測驗學刊

卷期/出版年月

59卷4期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

641 - 666

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究修訂Riley(2009)的「口吃嚴重度評估工具」(第四版)之成人部分,以評估說中文成人之口吃嚴重度。修訂過程包括:(1)材料編製:繪製二幅看圖說話的彩色圖片,並改寫閱讀的短文二篇;(2)口吃嚴重度區分:依人口比例招收口吃成人80名,除了以Riley的施測程序蒐集語言樣本外,另以有時間限制的回答問題法蒐集第二份語言樣本,之後認定口吃事件,依照受試者原始分數建立百分等級對照表,並將嚴重度分為九個等級;(3)進行信、效度考驗:信度方面,三個分測驗及總分的評分者內一致性皆達 .97以上,而評分者間一致性則皆達 .95以上;效度方面,口吃與非口吃成人在三個分測驗及總分皆達顯著差異,另外,本工具與「愛荷華口吃嚴重度量尺」和「口吃式不流暢」的效標關聯效度分別為 .92和 .94。

英文摘要

This study aimed to revise Riley's (2009) Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 for the adults who speak Mandarin. The main tasks had been accomplished as follows: 1. rewriting 2 readings and redrawing 2 pictures as stimuli for oral expressions; 2. recruiting 80 stuttering adults from 4 different areas according to the population ratio distributed in Taiwan; 3. identifying stuttering events in the speech samples collected by the time-limited question answering method and the researcher-initiating conversation method, separately; 4. calculating the stuttering frequency, stuttering duration, and physical concomitants for establishing the normative data and dividing them into 9 stuttering severities; 5. calculating the intra- and inter-reliability that are .97 and .95, respectively; 6. deriving the criterion-related validity between RSSI-4 and The Iowa Scale for Rating Severity of Stuttering, and SLD are .92 and .94, respectively. In addition, the significant differences were found between stuttering and non-stuttering adults on the 3 subtests (stuttering frequency, stuttering duration and physical concomitant) and the total score by t tests. The norm and 9 stuttering severities also were offered.Based on the data mentioned above, this Revised Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 for Mandarin Speaking Adults provide an objective and useful tool to assess the severities of the stuttering adults who speak Mandarin. Some suggestions were also proposed for using the instrument.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 伍瑞瑜、楊淑蘭(2007)。國小口吃兒童與一般兒童溝通態度、溝通焦慮與學校適應之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(1),93-120。
    連結:
  2. 楊淑蘭、周芳綺(2008)。修訂中文兒童口吃嚴重度評估工具。測驗學刊,55(1),61-88。
    連結:
  3. 內政部戶政司(2006)。戶籍人口統計年報之人口年齡分配。2007年3月12日,取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm
  4. 國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系(2007)。中文文章適讀性線上分析系統。2008年3月20日,取自http://140.127.45.25/Readability/Analyze/About.aspx
  5. Ambrose, N. G.,Yairi, E.(1995).The role of repetition units in differential diagnosis of early childhood incipient stuttering.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,4,82-88.
  6. Arndt, J.,Healey, E. C.(2001).Concomitant disorders in school-age children who stutter.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,32,68-78.
  7. Bloodstein, O.(1995).A handbook of stuttering.San Diego, CA:Singular.
  8. Conture, E. G.(2001).Suttering: Its natural, diagnosis, and treatment.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Costello, J.,Ingham, R. J.(1984).Assessment strategies for stuttering.Nature and treatment of stuttering,San Diego, CA:
  10. Green, T.(1999).The relationship of self-conception to perceived stuttering severity in children and adults who stutter.Journal of Fluency Disorders,24(4),281-292.
  11. Guitar, B.(2006).Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment.Baltimore, MD:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  12. Healey, E. C.(1991).Assessment review: Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults.Journal of Fluency Disorders,16,309-316.
  13. Klein, J. F.,Hood, S. B.(2004).The impact of stuttering on employment opportunities and job performance.Journal of Fluency Disorders,29(4),255-273.
  14. Lewis, K. E.(1995).Do SSI-3 score adequately reflect observations of stuttering behavior.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,4,46-59.
  15. Manning, W. H.(2010).Clinical decision making in fluency disorders.Clifton Park, NY:Delmar, Cengage Learning.
  16. Raming, P. R.,Shames, G. H.(1998).The fluency disorder of stuttering.Human communication disorders: An introduction,Boston, MA:
  17. Riley, G. D.(1981).Stuttering prediction instrument for young children.Austin, TX:Pro-ed.
  18. Riley, G. D.(2009).Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adult.Austin, TX:Pro-ed.
  19. Riley, J.,Riley, G. D.,Maguire, G.(2004).Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control, and avoidance: Research edition.Journal of Fluency Disorders,29,51-62.
  20. Sheehan, J. G.,Lyon, M. A.(1974).Role perception in stuttering.Journal of Fluency Disorders,7(2),113-125.
  21. Woolf, G.(1967).The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance and expectancy.British Journal of Disorders of Communication,2,158-171.
  22. Yairi, E.(1997).Home environment and parent-child interaction in childhood stuttering.Nature and treatment of stuttering: New direction,Naedham Heights:
  23. Yairi, E.,Ambrose, N. G.(2005).Early childhood stuttering: For clinicians by clinicians.Austin, TX:Pro-ed.
  24. Yang, S. L.(2000).Urbana-Champaign, IL,University of Illinois.
  25. Yang, S. L.(2011).The alternative for collecting speech samples of stuttering adults who speak mandarin.9th Oxford Dysfluency Conference,UK:
  26. Yang, S. L.,Chuang, C. F.(2010).Development of the communication anxiety inventory for adults who speak Mandarin.2010 BC Association of Speech/Language Pathologists & Audiologists Conference,Canada:
  27. Yaruss, J. S.,Quesal, R. W.(2006).Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment.Journal of Fluency Disorders,30,90-115.
  28. 教育部(2011)。,未出版
  29. 楊淑蘭(2003)。口吃的診斷與評估。特殊教育文集,屏東市:
  30. 楊淑蘭(2011)。口吃:理論與實務工作。臺北市:心理。
  31. 楊淑蘭、周芳綺(2004)。修訂中文口吃嚴重度評估工具。臺北市:心理。
被引用次数
  1. 楊淑蘭(2014)。口吃相關議題之網路口碑分析。特殊教育學報,40,35-62。
  2. 楊淑蘭(2017)。口吃成人工作適應之研究。特殊教育發展期刊,64,1-14。
  3. 楊淑蘭,林雅涵(2022)。口吃成人內在與外在非詞複誦表現之比較。特殊教育學報,56,1-30。