以概念結合理論為基礎的想像力測驗之編製

Construction of an Imagination Test Based on Theory of Conceptual Combination

洪瑞雲(Ruey-Yun Horng)；王精文(Ching-Wen Wang)；拾已寰(Yi-Hwan Shyr)；李泊諺(Po-Yen Lee)；王愉敏(Yu-Ming Wang)

創造力 ； 測驗編製 ； 想像力 ； 概念結合 ； conceptual combination ； creativity ； imagination ； test construction

測驗學刊

60卷4期（2013 / 12 / 01）

681 - 713

繁體中文

本研究擬依據概念結合理論發展一份「概念結合的想像力測驗」，每一個測驗題目由兩個完全不相關的名詞概念組合而成，其中第一個名詞的性質可能是抽象、自然物或人造物；第二個名詞的性質也可能是抽象、自然物或人造物；此3×3的組合各有兩組，共18題。受試者被要求設法想出兩者之間的關聯，並說明其聯想過程或理由。以602位大學生與研究生在此測驗上的反應，透過項目分析後，本測驗試題具有鑑別度，重測信度為.878，折半信度為.745，評分者間信度為.852；以110位設計系學生的設計專題期末成績為效標，其與想像力測驗分數的相關係數為顯著（r = .265），具有預測效度。此外，想像力測驗的分數與TTCT的獨創性有低的正相關，與TTCT其他的分歧思考能力則無相關，與創造性人格量表間也無相關，顯示此想像力測驗具有區別效度。

The purpose of this study was to develop a test of imagination based on theory of concept combination. The test comprises eighteen items. Each test item is composed of two unrelated nouns. The ontological category of the first noun and the second noun can be either an abstract concept, a natural object, or an artifact. The combination of nouns yielded nine types of noun-noun pairs. There are two items of the same type of nounnoun pairs. For each noun-noun pair, participants were asked to report what emerged in their mind's eye when they saw these two nouns connected together. They were also asked to explain the process or reasons for the emergence of their ideas. Data from six hundred and two college and graduate students indicated that the test-retest reliability of the test was 0.878, and the split-half reliability was 0.745. The test scores from imagination test had low but positive correlation with the originality score of TTCT, but no correlation with fluency, flexibility, or elaboration scores of TTCT. The predictive validity of the test was examined with 110 design students' performance in design projects. It was found that students' performance in design was correlated with their imagination score (r = .265). Imagination score showed low but positive correlation with originality scores of TTCT, but unrelated to other divergent thinking scores in TTCT, or two measures of creative personality. The results indicated that the imagination test developed in this study is valid and imagination ability is a construct different from creativity.

1. 任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲(2004)。創造力測量的輔助工具：中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究，21，195-217。
   連結：
2. 林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎？探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊，47(3)，211-227。
   連結：
3. Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and World
4. 洪瑞雲、王精文（1994）。Torrance 創造思考測驗簡題版。（未發表）。
5. Art Education Partnership (2008). Imagine nation in the news. Retrieved from http://www.theimaginenation.net/press/080124_namm.htm
6. Poincare, H. J. (1913). The foundations of science (G. B. Halsted Trans.). London, UK: Science Press.
7. Arieti, S.(1976).Creativity: The magic synthesis.New York, NY:Basic Books.
8. Bock, J. S.,Clifton, C., Jr.(2000).The role of salience in conceptual combination.Memory and Cognition,28,1378-1386.
9. Campbell, D. T.(1960).Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.Psychological review,67(6),380-400.
10. Collins, A. M.,Loftus, E. F.(1975).A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82(6),407-428.
11. Costello, F. J.,Keane, M. T.(2000).Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination.Cognitive Science,24,299-349.
12. Costello, F. J.,Keane, M. T.(1997).Polysemy in conceptual combination: Testing the constraint theory of combination.nineteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society,Hillsdale, NJ:
13. Downing, P.(1977).On the creation and use of English compound nouns.Language,53(4),810-842.
14. Estes, Z.,Ward, T. B.(2002).The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification.Creativity Research Journal,14(2),149-156.
15. Finke, R. A.(1996).Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure.Consciousness and Cognition,5,381-393.
16. Fodor, J. A.,Pylyshyn, Z.(1988).Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis.Cognition,28,3-71.
17. Gagné, C. L.,Shoben, E. J.(2002).Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun combinations.Memory & Cognition,30(4),637-646.
18. Gagné, C. L.,Shoben, E. J.(1997).Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23(1),71-87.
19. Gentner, D.(2010).Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical reasoning processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Science,34(5),752-775.
20. Griffiths, D. E.(Ed.)(1964).Behavioral science and educational administration: Sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
21. Guilford, J. P.(1950).Creativity.American Psychologist,5,444-454.
22. Guilford, J. P.(1956).The structure of intellect.Psychological Bulletin,53(4),267-293.
23. Guilford, J. P.,Christensen, P. R.(1973).The one way relation between creative potential and IQ.The Journal of Creative Behavior,7(4),247-252.
24. Holyoak, K. J.,Thagard, P.(1996).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
25. Horng, R. Y.(1986).A factor-analytic study of Chinese college students' creative self-perception.Mid-America Chinese Joint Annual Convention,Schaumburg, IL.:
26. Horng, R. Y.,Liu, P. H.,Liao, C. N.,Peng, S. Y.,Huang, Y. Y.(2008).Creative processes in conceptual combination.28th International Congress of Psychology,Berlin, Germany:
27. Khatena, J.(1971).Something About Myself: A brief screening device for identifying creatively gifted children and adults.Gifted Child Quarterly,15(4),262-292.
28. Mednick, S. A.(1962).The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,69(3),220-232.
29. Mednick, S. A.,Mednick, M. T.(1967).Examiner's manual, Remote Associate Test.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
30. Osborn, A. F.(1953).Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving.New York, NY:Charles Scribner's Son.
31. Osborn, A. F.(1993).Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving.New York, NY:Charles Scribner's Son.
32. Perkins, D.(2000).Archimedes' Bathtub: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking.New York, NY:W. W. Norton.
33. Quillian, M. R.(1962).A revised design for an understanding machine.Mechanical Translation,7,17-29.
34. Reichling, M. J.(1990).Image of imagination.Journal of Research in Music Education,38(4),282-293.
35. Rothenberg, A.(1986).Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combinedcomposite visual images.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50(2),370-381.
36. Simonton, D. K.(1999).Talents and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model.Psychological Review,106,435-457.
37. Simonton, D. K.(2003).Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives.Psychological Review,129,475-494.
38. Sobel, R. S.,Rothenberg, A.(1980).Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(5),953-961.
39. Sternberg, R. J.(2001).Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings.Educational Psychologist,36(4),227-245.
40. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
41. Sternberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. I.(1995).Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of comformity.New York, NY:The Free Press.
42. Thagard, P.,Steward, T. C.(2011).The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks.Cognitive Science,35,1-33.
43. Thomas, N. J. T.(1999).Are theories of imagery an active perception approach to conscious mental content.Cognitive Science,23(2),207-245.
44. Torrance, E. P.(1966).The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual.Princeton, NJ:Personnel Press.
45. Torrance, E. P.(1995).Why fly? A philosophy of creativity.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
46. Torrance, E. P.,Ball, O. E.(1984).The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Streamlined (revised) manual.Bensenville, IL:Scholastic Testing Service.
47. Torrance, E. P.,Khatena, J.(1970).What kind of person are You?.Gifted Child Quarterly,14(2),71-75.
48. Trotman, D.(2006).Interpreting imaginative life worlds: Phenomenological approaches in imagination and the evaluation of educational practice.Qualitative Research,6(2),245-265.
49. Ward, T. B.(1994).Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation.Cognitive Psychology,27,1-40.
50. West, M. A.(2002).Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups.Applied Psychology: An International Review,51(3),355-387.
51. Wisniewski, E. J.(1996).Construal and similarity in conceptual combination.Journal of Memory and Language,35,434-453.
52. Wisniewski, E. J.,Middleton, E. L.(2002).Of buckets bowls and coffee cup bowls: Spatial alignment in conceptual combination.Journal of Memory & Language,46(1),1-23.
53. Wisniewski, E. J.,Murphy, G. L.(2005).Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: A reanalysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,31(1),169-174.
54. Yu, B.,Zhang, W.,Jing, Q.,Peng, R.,Zhang, G.,Simon, H. A.(1985).STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials.Memory & Cognition,13,202-207.
55. 吳清麟(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。
56. 李秀瓊(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣大學心理研究所。
57. 林幸台(1995)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂報告。特殊教育研究學刊，11，133-149。
58. 林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗：創造性傾向量表。臺北市:心理。
59. 洪瑞雲、王精文(1989)。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
60. 胡志偉(2005)。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
61. 張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
62. 陳怡榮、陳學志、劉浩敏(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會大專學生專題計畫報告行政院國家科學委員會大專學生專題計畫報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
63. 黃文毅(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系研究所。
64. 黃伯聖、陳學志(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會大專學生專題計畫報告行政院國家科學委員會大專學生專題計畫報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
65. 黃翊瑩(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系。
66. 鄭昭明(1997)。什麼是創造力？。臺大校訊，1997(2 月3日)
67. 鄭昭明(1997)。什麼是創造力？。臺大校訊，1997(11月26日)

1. 何曉琪,王佳琪(2021)。想像與現實的交織：設計領域想像－創造歷程之建構。教育科學研究期刊，66(4)，245-280。
2. 黃琬婷、李建道、王精文(2016)。運用抽象概念結合思考模式對管院學生想像力的激發。教育心理學報，47(3)，373-390。
3. 王佳琪(2020)。科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證。教育心理學報，51(3)，341-367。