题名

幼兒中文視動整合與視知覺成長模式之探究

并列篇名

The Research on the Growth Model of Chinese Visual-Motor Integration and Visual Perception for Kindergarteners

作者

吳慧珉(Huey-Min Wu);林巾凱(Chin-Kai Lin);李政軒(Cheng-Hsuan Li);楊舒茹(Shu-Ru Yang)

关键词

仿畫 ; 字形 ; 基本筆畫 ; 視知覺 ; 視動整合 ; Basic stroke ; Chinese character ; drawing imitation ; visual-motor integration ; visual perception

期刊名称

測驗學刊

卷期/出版年月

66卷4期(2019 / 12 / 01)

页次

429 - 451

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

良好的視動整合以及視知覺能力與國字學習的表現息息相關,本研究期望找到仿畫、字形辨識、字體結構辨識之間的相關情形以及成長模式的預測因子。本研究採立意取樣,並追蹤一年的成長,兩年追蹤共233位幼兒。評量工具為「視覺動作整合電腦化評估工具」,又分為「視動整合測驗」和「視知覺測驗」兩種。「視動整合測驗」為仿畫一、二、三筆畫作為分測驗,「視知覺測驗」以一、二、三筆畫的字形辨識以及獨體字、水平字、垂直字的字體結構辨識作為分測驗。本研究以two-wave cross lagged panel驗證幼兒在視動整合中成長模式的預測因子。研究顯示:仿畫與字形辨識間的相關性為最佳,其次為字形辨識與字體結構辨識,最後為字體結構辨識與仿畫的相關,三者之間的相關會隨著年齡而降低。仿畫的自我預測力為最高,仿畫、字形辨識、字體結構辨識獨立當作預測變項時,又以第一年的仿畫預測第二年的仿畫預測力為最高。文末並對實務應用提出建議。

英文摘要

The visual-motor integration is a factor to predict writing significantly. While identifying Chinese words, visual perception is used to detect the space and radicals in two-dimensional positions of Chinese characters' morphology. Based on visual-Motor integration and visual perception theory, the relationships among the drawing imitation in Chinese basic stroke, the identification in Chinese character basic stroke, and the structures in Chinese character are explored. The growth model of assessment tool related to the drawing imitation in Chinese character basic stroke, the identification in Chinese character basic stroke, and the structures in Chinese character is validated in this research. The purposive sampling is used in this study. The 223 kindergarteners aged four to six years old participated in the study and were monitored for one year. Computerized Chinese visual-motor integration with three subtests and Chinese visual perception with six subtests are used in this research. A two-wave cross-lagged panel analysis is used to test the validity of the growth model. The Computerized Chinese visual-motor integration and Chinese visual perception Assessment Tool has good validity in a growth model. There was significant correlation among drawing imitation, identification in basic stroke and structure in Chinese character at different time points. Drawing imitation effectively predicated identification in basic stroke and structure in Chinese character. In the end of the paper, the suggestions in the practical application are provided.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 何芮瑤(2015)。「這是字嗎?」臺灣幼兒的文字樣貌概念初探。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊,18,115-136。
    連結:
  2. 林佩蓉(2013)。幼兒園語文教學的迷思。國教新知,60(4),3-19。
    連結:
  3. 陳秀芬,洪儷瑜,陳慶順(2008)。國小一至三年級讀寫字困難學童基本字讀寫能力之研究。臺東大學教育學報,19(2),31-60。
    連結:
  4. 陳惠茹(2015)。幼兒部件概念發展與認字。教育心理學報,47(1),45-62。
    連結:
  5. 陳惠茹,張鑑如(2011)。指讀及文字討論之共讀方式對幼兒認字的影響。教育心理學報,43(2),377-396。
    連結:
  6. 謝瑩慧,陳燕惠(2014)。幼兒在家庭中早期讀寫能力萌發之個案研究。臺中教育大學學報,28(1),77-104。
    連結:
  7. Adams, R. J.,Khoo, S. T.(1996).Quest: The interactive test analysis system.Melbourne, Victoria, Australia:Australian Council for Educational Research.
  8. Adams, R. J.,Wu, M. L.,Wilson, M. R.(2012).Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. R. (2012). Generalised Item Response Modelling Software. [ACER ConQuest 3]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research..
  9. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, W. D.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103,411-423.
  10. Beery, K. E.(2004).Beery VMI: The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration.Minneapolis, MN:Pearson.
  11. Beery, K. E.(1997).The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration.Parsippany, NJ:Modern Curriculum Press.
  12. Byrne, B. M.(2012).Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.NY:Routledge.
  13. Case-Smith, J.(Ed.)(2005).Occupational therapy for children.St. Louis, MO:Mosby.
  14. Daly, C. J.,Kelley, G. T.,Krauss, A.(2003).Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: A modified replication study.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,57(4),459-462.
  15. Embretson, S. E.,Reise, S. P.(2000).Item response theory for psychologists.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Hambleton, R. K.,Swaminathan, H.,Rogers, H. J.(1991).Fundamentals of item response theory.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  17. Ho, C. S. H.(2014).Preschool predictors of dyslexia status in Chinese first graders with high or low familial risk.Reading and Writing,27(9),1673-1701.
  18. Hong, J. C.,Wu, C. L.,Chen, H. C.,Chang, Y. L.,Chang, K. E.(2016).Effect of radicalposition regularity for Chinese orthographic skills of Chinese-as-a-second language learners.Computers in Human Behavior,59,402-410.
  19. Huang, H. S.,Hanley, J. R.(1997).A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan.International Journal of Behavioral Development,20(2),249-268.
  20. Lonigan, C. J.(2004).Evaluation of components of a pre-literacy intervention with children at-risk.annual Convention of the American Psychological Association,Honolulu, HI:
  21. Masters, G. N.(1982).A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika,47,149-174.
  22. Mercer, C. D.,Mercer, A. R.(1998).Teaching students with learning problems.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  23. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(1998).Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide.Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.
  24. O’Connor, R. E,Jenkins, J. R.(1999).Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade.Scientific Studies of Reading,32(2),159-197.
  25. Solan, H. A.,Ciner, E. B.(1989).Visual perception and learning: Issues and answers.Journal of the American Optometric Association,60(6),457-460.
  26. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.(2007).Using multivariate statistics.NY:Allyn & Bacon.
  27. Taft, M.,Zhu, X.,Ding, G.(2000).The relationship between character and radical representation in Chinese.Acta Psychologica Sinica,32,3-12.
  28. Tseng, M. H.,Cermak, S. A.(1993).The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,47(10),919-926.
  29. Tseng, M. H.,Chow, S. M. K.(2000).Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,54(1),83-88.
  30. Tseng, M. H.,Murray, E. A.(1994).Differences in perceptual-motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting.Occupational Therapy Journal of Research,14(1),19-36.
  31. Weil, M. J.,Cunningham-Amundson, S. J.(1994).Relationship between visuomotor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten.American Journal of Occupational Therapy,48(11),982-988.
  32. Wu, H. M.,Li, C. H.,Kuo, B. C.,Yang Y. M.,Lin, C. K.,Wang, W. H.(2017).Validity of the growth model of the Computerized Visual Perception Assessment Tool for Chinese Characters Structures.Research in Developmental Disabilities,67,71-81.
  33. Wu, H.-M.,Lin, C.-K.,Yang, Y.-M.,Kuo, B.-C.(2015).The development and discussion of computerized visual perception assessment tool for Chinese characters structures: Concurrent estimation of the overall ability and the domain ability in item response theory approach.Research in Developmental Disabilities,36,447-458.
  34. Yeung, P. S.,Ho, C. S. H.,Chan, D. W. O.,Chung, K. K. H.(2016).Orthographic skills important to Chinese literacy development: The role of radical representation and orthographic memory of radicals.Reading and Writing,29(9),1935-1958.
  35. Zhang, J.,Li, H.,Dong, Q.,Xu, J.,Sholar, E.(2016).Implicit use of radicals in learning characters for nonnative learners of Chinese.Applied Psycholinguistics,37(3),507-527.
  36. 王瀅晴,楊蒲娟,童珮詩(2007)。繪本教學對於學齡前幼兒讀寫萌發的成效。幼兒保育學刊,5,113-128。
  37. 何三本(2003).幼兒文學.臺北市:五南.
  38. 吳端文,陳韻如(2009).「手」能生「巧」:讓孩子快快樂樂寫字.臺北市:瑞政.
  39. 李安世(2006)。臺南市,國立臺南大學。
  40. 李芃娟(2014)。臺南市,國立臺南大學。
  41. 李連珠(2006).全語言教育.臺北市:心理.
  42. 李雯琪(2016)。論杜威進步教育下的兒童中心思想。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(6),195-201。
  43. 林千惠(2001)。重視國小學童的書寫問題。國小特殊教育,31,30-35。
  44. 林佩蓉(2013)。影響學前幼兒閱讀及書寫能力因素分析。南亞學報,31,443-468。
  45. 林冠伶,林麗卿(2010)。原住民幼兒在幼稚園的書寫發展與經驗探究:以一位五足歲原住民幼兒為例。幼兒保育學刊,8,77-100。
  46. 林思騏(2016)。幼童對於多義圖形之讀圖研究。朝陽人文社會學刊,14(1),61-83。
  47. 竺家寧(1998).中國的語言和文字.臺北市:臺灣書局.
  48. 邱清珠(2007)。臺東市,國立臺東大學。
  49. 侯郁如(2012)。新竹市,國立新竹教育大學。
  50. 洪仲誼(2012)。臺中市,國立臺中教育大學。
  51. 徐宜鈺(2015)。嘉義市,國立嘉義大學。
  52. 財團法人第一社會福利基金會(2006).嬰幼兒早期療育課程綱要.臺北市:作者.
  53. 高麗芷(2006).感覺統合上篇:發現大腦.臺北市:信誼.
  54. 康金雲(2010)。臺中市,國立臺中教育大學。
  55. 張菀真(2014)。桃園市,國立中央大學。
  56. 張韶霞,余南瑩(2010)。有無發展協調障礙之寫字困難幼兒的寫字表現與原因之探討。職能治療學會雜誌,28(1),13-28。
  57. 郭伯臣,吳慧珉,陳俊華(2012)。試題反應理論在教育測驗上之應用。新竹縣教育研究集刊,12,5-40。
  58. 陳玉茹(2010)。臺中市,國立臺中教育大學。
  59. 陳鳳卿(2011)。幼兒書寫能力萌發初探。幼兒教育,304,56-72。
  60. 鄭雅蓮(2008)。臺南市,國立臺南大學。
  61. 鄭媲瑾(2008)。臺北市,國立臺北教育大學。
被引用次数
  1. 薛霖鈺,蔣世寶(2022)。醫療系統的環境視覺設計現況調查-以斗六地區為例。嶺東學報,49,283-307。