题名

客觀標準化不動產估價之可行性分析-市場比較法應用於大量估價

并列篇名

A Feasibility Analysis of the Standardization Valuation Model-Applying the Sales Comparison Approach to the Automated Valuation Model

DOI

10.6375/JHS.200712.0023

作者

龔永香(Yung-Shiang Kung);江穎慧(Ying-Hui Chiang);張金鶚(Chin-Oh Chang)

关键词

不動產估價 ; 市場比較法 ; 比較標的選取 ; 大量估價 ; real estate appraisal ; sales comparison approach ; comparable selection ; automated valuation model

期刊名称

住宅學報

卷期/出版年月

16卷2期(2007 / 12 / 01)

页次

23 - 42

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文運用估價師進行市場比較法行爲邏輯,並結合特徵價格理論,建立大量樣本的客觀標準化估價模型。估價模型建構,乃透過特徵價格模型中的標準化β係數以計算明科斯基距離(Minkowski metric),作爲選取可比較標的依據;調整階段以模型中的β係數作爲依據;權重則是按照調整階段之比例作爲依據。經實證發現,以隨機抽樣三十次進行重覆試驗觀察模型準確度,其平均絕對百分比誤差爲15.48%,標準差爲0.0066;落在正負10%與20%的命中率分別爲41.82%與71.65%,而其標準差分別爲0.0268與0.0229。整體而言,模型準確度達一定水準,且具相當穩定程度,顯示透過標準化市場比較法進行大量估價是可行的。此外,運用此模型分析,估價師不需要主觀預測,可改善過去估價結果不一致情形,並達到大量估價目的。

英文摘要

The purpose of this paper is to examine an alternative to the sales comparison approach using the automated valuation model. To qualify the comparables, we adopt the Minkowski metric and β coefficient of the hedonic model to select comparable sales. The empirical results show that the MAPE of the AVM model is 15.48% based on thirty repeated experiments using random sampling. The hit rates within 10% and 20% are 41.82% and 71.65%, respectively, and the corresponding standard deviations are 0.0268 and 0.0229. The findings indicate that the application of the AVM model is feasible and could overcome the drawbacks of the appraiser's subjective bias.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚(1996)。住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市爲例。住宅學報,4,1-30。
    連結:
  2. 廖咸興、張芳玲(1997)。不動產評價模式特徵價格法與逼近調整法之比較。住宅學報,5,17-35。
    連結:
  3. Adelman, I.,Z. Griliches(1961).On an Index of Quality Change.Journal of the American Statistical Association,16(2),12-23.
  4. Calhoun, A. C.(1983).Property Valuation Methods & Data in the United States.Housing Finance International,1,11-29.
  5. Colwell, F. P.,R. E. Cannaday,C. C. Wu(1983).The Analytical Foundations of Adjustment Grid Methods.Real Estate Economics,11(1),11-29.
  6. Diaz, Julian III(1990).The Process of Selecting Comparable Sales.The Appraisal Journal,58(4),535-540.
  7. DiPasquale, D.,W. C. Wheaton(1996).Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  8. Drivers Jonas/IPD(1990).The Variance in Valuations: An Update.London:Drives Jonas/Investment Property Databank.
  9. Frew, J.,G.D. Jud.(2003).Estimating the Value of Apartment Building.The Journal of Real Estate Research,25(1),77-86.
  10. Gau, G. W.,T. Y. Lai,K. Wang(1992).Optimal Comparable Selection and Weighting in Real Property.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,20(1),107-123.
  11. Isakson, H. R.(2002).The Linear Agebra of the Sales Comparison Approach.The Journal of Real Estate Research,24(2),117-128.
  12. Isakson, H. R.(1986).The Nearest Neighbor Appraisal Technique: An Alternative to the Adjustment Grid Methods.AREUEA Journal,14(2),274-286.
  13. Kang, H. B.,A. K. Reichert(1991).An Empirical Analysis of Hedonic Regression and Grid-Adjustment Techniques in Real Estate Appraisal.AREUEA Journal,19,70-91.
  14. Kinnard, W. N.,B. N. Boyce(1978).An Introduction to Appraisal Real Property.Chicago:Society of Real Estate Appraisers.
  15. Lusht, K. M.(1996).A Comparison of Prices Brought by English Auction and Private Negotiations.Journal of Real Estate Economics,24(5),17-530.
  16. Matysiak, G.,P. Wang(1950).Commercial Property Market Prices and Valuation: Analyzing the Correspondence.Journal of Property Research,12,181-202.
  17. Pagourtzi, E.,V. Assimakopoulos,T. Hatzichristos,N. French(2003).Real Estate Appraisal: A Review of Valuation Methods.Journal of Property Investment & Finance,21(4),383-401.
  18. Sirmans, G. S.,D. A. Macpherson,E. Zietz(2005).The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models.Journal of Real Estate Literature,13(1),1-44.
  19. Todora, J.,D. Whiterell(2002).Automating the Sales Comparison Approach.Assessment Journal,9(1),25-33.
  20. Vandell, K. D.(1991).Optimal Comparable Selection and Weighting in Real Property Valuation.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,19(2),213-239.
  21. 內政部建築研究所(2005)。台灣房地產景氣動向季報,7(4)
  22. 李月華(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。淡江大學管理科學學系。
  23. 林英彥(2003)。不動產估價理論。台北:文笙書局。
  24. 林祖嘉(1992)。台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究。台灣銀行季刊,43(1),279-312。
  25. 張小燕(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北大學。
  26. 張金鶚、劉秀玲(1993)。房地產品質、價格與消費者物價指數之探討。國立政治大學學報,67,369-400。
  27. 黃淑惠(2000)。地價指數編制方法及應用結果之研究。台中技術學院學報,1,261-280。
被引用次数
  1. 陳麗品(2016)。臺灣地區房屋標準單價表公平性之探討。臺中科技大學財政稅務系租稅管理與理財規劃碩士班學位論文。2016。1-83。