逆房貸抵押品的處置時間對保險費率的影響

The Impact of the Disposition Time of Reverse Mortgage Collaterals on Insurance Premiums

楊屯山(Jerry T. Yang)；蔡錦堂(Jing-Tang Tsay)；林哲群(Che-Chun Lin)

不動產逆向抵押型房貸 ； 預期索賠損失 ； 預期保險費率 ； 處置（抵押品）時間 ； 保險費率 ； reverse mortgage ； expected claim losses ； expected insurance premium ； disposition time (of collateral) ； insurance premium rate

住宅學報

23卷1期（2014 / 06 / 01）

35 - 50

繁體中文

「不動產逆向抵押型房貸方案」，讓年長者的自有住宅，轉換為提供生活所需現金流之房產權益，發揮居住和融資的雙重功能。本文考慮當事人的平均餘壽、房價波動、折舊率、及市場利率等隨機因素，推導出當事人（借方）的最大可貸額度與銀行（貸方）每月須支付的金額。契約到期時，當貸款餘額大於當時房價，銀行可向保險公司索賠。本文以保險公司的「預期索賠損失的現值」等於「預期抵押貸款保險費之現值」損益兩平為前提，建議（保險公司）保險費率之設定。並針對（銀行）處置抵押品平均所花費的時間，探討處置時間點與保險費率的關聯性，希望藉由保險機制的引入，增加參與此方案的誘因，擴大其實施效能，並為設計與修訂此方案，提供關鍵資訊。

Reverse mortgage plans (RM) allow the elderly (borrowers) to employ their own real estate as both housing and a financing instrument throughout their life span. As the RM expires, the bank (lender) is entitled to lodge a claim on the discrepancy if the loan balance is greater than the house value with the insurance company (IC). Our contribution is threefold. First of all, we use the Taiwan Life Expectancy Database and simulated house prices and interest rates from stochastic processes to estimate the constant annuity and the maximum loan to value. Secondly, we build a simulation model for insurance premium rates, which are charged by the IC to the lender and determined under the condition where the present value of expected claim losses is equal to that of the insurance premiums. Finally, we analyze the impact of the disposition time of RM collateral on insurance premiums based on our simulation results. Our paper can shed light on the implementation and further development of reverse mortgage plans in Taiwan.

1. 李秉芳、楊屯山、林哲群(2011)。固定利率與指數型不動產逆向抵押貸款之比較分析。住宅學報，20(2)，27-46。
   連結：
2. Ma, S. R. & Y. H. Deng 2006 “Insurance Premium Structure of Reverse Mortgage Loans in Korea,” Working Papers 2006-1010, Lusk Center for Real Estate, University of Southern California
3. Ma, S. R. & Y. H. Deng 2010 “Evaluation of Reverse Mortgage Programs in Korea,” IRES Working Papers 2011-027, National University of Singapore.
4. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 1990 A Model to Calculate Borrower Paymentsand Insurance Risk.
5. Bardhan, A.,Karapandža, R.,Urošević, B.(2006).Valuing Mortgage Insurance Contracts in Emerging Market Economics.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,32(1),9-20.
6. Chinloy, P.,Megbolugbe, I. F.(1994).Reverse Mortgages: Contracting and Crossover Risk.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,22(2),367-386.
7. Lee, Y. T.,Wang, C. W.,Huang, H. C.(2012).On the Valuation of Reverse Mortgages with Regular Tenure Payments.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,51(2),430-441.
8. Ma, S. R.,Cho, D. H.(2004).Payment Plans of Reverse Mortgage System in the Korean Housing Market.1st International Solar Cities Congress
9. Ma, S. R.,Kim, G.,Lew, K.(2007).Estimating Reverse Mortgage Insurer's Risk Using Stochastic Models.Conference of Asia-Pacific Risk and Insurance Association
10. Mitchell, O. S.,Piggott, J.(2004).Unlocking Housing Equity in Japan.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,18(4),466-505.
11. Rodda, D. T.,Lam, K.,Youn, A.(2004).Stochastic Modeling of Federal Housing Administration Home Equity Conversion Mortgages with Low-cost Refinancing.Real Estate Economics,32(4),589-617.
12. Szymanoski, E. J.(1994).Risk and the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,22(2),347-366.
13. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(2000).,未出版
14. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(2003).Refinancing Premium, National Loan Limit, and Long-term Care Premium Waiver for FHA's HECM Program.
15. 張金鶚(2009)。台灣以房養老三方案模式提議。以房養老逆向抵押貸款方案研討會

1. 劉議謙,黃綱毅,李永琮(2021)。我國反向房屋抵押貸款商品之模型與評價。證券市場發展季刊，33(2)，153-194。
2. (2017)。從臺灣推行商業型以房養老商品─談維護老人權益議題。社區發展季刊，158，155-173。