大學「藝術與設計實務導向研究」之教學個案：整合創作、理論與寫作

A Case Study on Teaching Art and Design Practice-Led Research in University: Integrating Creation with Theory and Writing

何文玲(Wen-Ling Ho)；李傳房(Chang-Franw Lee)；陳俊宏(Chung-Hong Chen)

FTCF模式 ； 大學藝術與設計教育 ； 實務導向研究 ； 藝術與設計創作 ； FTCF model ； art and design education in university ； practice-led research ； art and design production

藝術教育研究

26期（2013 / 12 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

最近歐、美，與澳洲高等教育中，藝術與設計之「實務導向研究」（practice-led research）已成為重要趨勢。為增進臺灣大學階段中藝術與設計實務導向研究之能力，對該實務導向研究的教學內容與方法進行探討實為亟要。因此，本文以大學視覺藝術系42名學生為研究對象，發展藝術與設計實務導向研究之教學內容與方法，探討教學個案之實施情形。具體而言，本文採用質性個案研究法，針對兩個研究目的：（1）分析學生在創作實務、理論與寫作，以及前述兩者整合之學習情形；以及（2）分析學生在藝術與設計實務導向研究中運用FTCF模式之學習情形。本文歸結兩方面之發現：（1）創作實務、理論與寫作，以及兩者整合之學習情形與教師改進方式；（2）實務導向研究中FTCF模式之創造性運用方式。最後，本文據此闡述對未來大學藝術與設計實務導向研究教學與研究之意涵。

Recently, practice-led research has become a major trend in higher education in Europe, the U.S.A, and Australia. To enhance the art and design research abilities of college students in Taiwan, it is crucial to study the teaching content and methods of practice-led research. Therefore, The authors explored such content and methods, examining the implementation thereof by studying 42 college students and adopting qualitative case study methods. This study had two objectives: (1) to analyze student learning in both creation practice, and theory and writing, as well as combinations thereof; and (2) to analyze student learning situations in art and design practice-led research by using the form/theme/context/function (FTCF) model. The results yielded the following: (1) problems related to learning and improvements for teaching methods that involve creation practice, and theory and writing, as well as combinations thereof; and (2) creative uses of the FTCF model for art and design practice-led research. Finally, the implications were discussed for future teaching and research of art and design practice-led research.

1. 何文玲、嚴貞(2011)。藝術與設計「實務研究」應用於大學藝術系學生創作發展之研究。藝術教育研究，21，85-110。
   連結：
2. 劉豐榮(2004)。藝術創作研究方法之理論基礎探析：以質化研究觀點為基礎。藝術教育研究，8，73-94。
   連結：
3. Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide. Retrieved from http://www.creativityandcognition.com/resources/PBR%20Guide-1.1-2006.pdf
4. Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2011). Guide to student finding (Version 1.2). London, UK: Arts and Humanities Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.Ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Pages/currentpostgraduateawardholders.aspx
5. Brown, B., Gough, P., & Roddis, J. (2004). Types of research in the creative arts and design. Retrieved from http://artsresearch.brighton.ac.uk/links/practice-led/4_research.pdf
6. Cools, J. (1999). Academization and its impact on research in art colleges: An optique belge. Retrieved from http://www.zhdk.ch/fileadmin/data_subsites/data_zdok/Pub09_PDFs/zdok9_cools.pdf
7. Allen, B. A.,Armour-Thomas, E.(1993).Constructing validation of metacognition.Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied,127(2),203-211.
8. Allison, B.(1992).Research index of art & design.Leicester, UK:Leicester Expertise.
9. Barak, M.(2009).Idea focusing versus idea generating: A course for teachers on inventive problem solving.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,46(4),345-356.
10. Barrett, E. J.(Ed.),Bolt, B. R.(Ed.)(2007).Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts inquiry.London, UK:I. B. Tauris.
11. Bogdan, A.(2000).Minding minds: Evolving a reflexive mind by interpreting others.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
12. Brophy, D. R.(1998).Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts.Creative Research Journal,11,123-150.
13. Chipman, S. F.(Ed.),Segal, J. W.(Ed.),Glaser, R.(Ed.)(1985).Thinking and learning skill, vol. 2: Research and open questions.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Associates.
14. Collinson, J. A.(2005).Artistry and analysis: Student experiences of UK practice-based doctorates in art and design.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,18(6),713-728.
15. Creswell, J. W.(1994).Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches.London, UK:Sage.
16. Cross, N.(1994).Engineering design method: Strategies for product design (2nd ed.).New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
17. Fell, T.(Ed.),Flint, K.(Ed.),Haines, I.(Ed.)(2011).Professional doctorates in the UK 2011.Lichfield, UK:UK Council for Graduate Education.
18. Flavell, J. H.(1999).Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind.Annual Review of Psychology,50,21-43.
19. Freitas, N.(2007).Activating a research context in art and design practice.International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,1(2),1-15.
20. Gray, C.(1998).Inquiry through practice.No guru, no method?,Helsinki, Finland:
21. Gray, C.(1996).Inquiry through practice: Developing appropriate research strategies.No Guru, No Method?
22. Hockey, J.(2007).United Kingdoms' art and design practice-based PhDs: Evidence from students and their supervisors.Studies in Art Education,48(2),155-171.
23. Howard-Jones, P. A.(2002).A dual-state model of creative cognition for supporting strategies that foster creativity in the classroom.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,12(3),215-226.
24. Isaksen, S. G.,Puccio, G. J.,Treffinger, D. J.(1993).An ecological approach to creativity research: Profiling for creative problem solving.Journal of Creative Behavior,27(3),149-170.
25. Isaksen, S. G.,Puccio, G. J.,Treffinger, D. J.(2004).Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving.Journal of Creative Behavior,38(2),75-101.
26. Kill, R.(2006).Coming in from the cold: Imperialist legacies and tactical criticalities.International Journal of Art and Design Education,25(3),308-312.
27. Kluwe, R. H.(1987).Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior.Metacognition, motivation, and understanding,Hillsdale, NJ:
28. Mäkelä, M.(Ed.),Routarinne, S.(Ed.)(2006).The art of research: Research practices in art and design.Helsinki, Finland:University of Art and Design.
29. Malins, J.,Gray, C.(1995).,未出版
30. Marchant, G. J.(1989).Meta-teaching: A metaphor for reflective teaching.Education,109(4),487-489.
31. McNiff, S.(1998).Art-based research.London, UK:Jessica Kingsley.
32. Merriam, S. B.(1988).Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
33. Nimkulrat, N.(2009).Paperness: Expressive material in textile art from an artist's viewpoint.Helsinki, Finland:University of Art and Design Helsinki.
34. Nimkulrat, N.(2011).Problems of practice-based doctorates in art and design: A viewpoint from Finland.2nd International Conference on Professional Doctorates,Lichfield, UK:
35. Nimkulrat, N.(Ed.),O''Riley, T.(Ed.)(2009).Reflections and connections: On the relationship between production and academic research.Helsinki, Finland:University of Art and Design Helsinki.
36. Nimkulrat, N.(Ed.),Óriley, T.(Ed.)(2009).Reflections and connections: On the relationship between production and academic research.Helsinki, Finland:University of Art and Design.
37. Noppe, L. D.(1996).Progression in the service of the ego, cognitive styles, and creative thinking.Creative Research Journal,8,369-383.
38. Resnick, L. B.(Ed.)(1976).The nature of intelligence.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
39. Rust, C.,Mottram, J.,Till, J.(2007).,未出版
40. Sandell, R.(2006).Form + Theme + Context: Balancing considerations for meaningful art learning.Art Education,59(1),33-37.
41. Sandell, R.(2009).Using Form + Theme + Context (FTC) for rebalancing 21st-century art education.Studies in Art Education,50(3),287-299.
42. Sinner, A.,Leggo, C.,Irwin, R. L.,Gouzouasis, P.,Grauer, K.(2006).Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars.Canadian Journal of Education,29(4),1223-1270.
43. Smith, H.(Ed.),Dean, R. T.(Ed.)(2009).Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts.Edinburg, UK:Edinburg University Press.
44. Sullivan, G.(2005).Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts.San Francisco, CA:Sage.
45. Tulving, E.(Ed.),Craik, F. I.(Ed.)(2000).The Oxford handbook of memory.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
46. Weinert, F. E.(1987).Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding.Metacognition, motivation, and understanding,Hillsdale, NJ:
47. Yee, J. S. R.(2010).Methodological innovation in practice-based design doctorates.Journal of Research Practice,6(2)
48. 何文玲(2011)。藝術與設計實務研究相關概念之分析。藝術研究期刊，7，27-58。
49. 陳向明(2004)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu Nan。
50. 劉豐榮(1996)。質的個案研究方法學在藝術教育研究之意義與應用。海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會論文集，嘉義市=Chiayi:

1. 陳奕璇(2020)。擴增實境融入多媒體教材：視覺藝術互動電子書之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，122，57-70。
2. 廖敦如(2018)。大學藝術與設計專業課程融入社會實踐之探究－以地方文化加值設計為例。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，207-245。
3. 林昭宇、吳可文(2015)。Facebook學習社群融入數位藝術創作對知識建構的影響。設計學研究，18(1)，123-145。
4. 呂琪昌(2016)。從實務導向研究的角度探討視覺藝術類創作論文的撰寫。藝術教育研究，31，111-145。
5. 謝芳貴、蕭佩珊、鄭千威、陳淑賢、王雅貞(2018)。提升某區域醫院護理人員個案報告撰寫繳交率之改善專案。長庚護理，29(4)，556-567。
6. 張純純,李美英(2015)。實作導向的個案報告訓練成效評值。領導護理，16(4)，66-75。
7. (2019)。混種與形變：人獸肖像於數位創作研究。藝術研究學報，12(1)，45-66。
8. (2024)。適性化的素描技能學習與創造思考教學之實施與成效：以數位媒體設計系設計素描課程為例。藝術學報，114，165-197。