繪本融合習式方法：香港幼兒戲劇教育的實踐模式、狀況與挑戰

Integrating Conventions Approach with Picture Books: The Approaches, Situations and Challenges of Early Childhood Drama Education in Hong Kong

10.6622/RAE.2017.34.03

譚寶芝(Po-Chi Tam)

創意空隙 ； 過程戲劇 ； 繪本融合習式方法 ； 教育戲劇 ； creative gaps ； process drama ； integrating conventions approach and picture books ； drama-in-education

藝術教育研究

34期（2017 / 12 / 01）

65 - 91

繁體中文

「繪本融合習式方法」為香港幼兒教育日漸普及的一種教育戲劇的教學方式。本文根據讀者回應理論，建立「創意空隙」（creative gaps）的概念框架，提出六種不同面向及程度的創意空隙，以評估教學案中能給予幼兒重新想像、探索和重述故事的機會與可能性。作者提出，教師在設計教案時，應發掘繪本的創意空隙，以選配和編排適當的戲劇習式。本文藉研究幼兒教師與戲劇導師共同設計的20個教案，探討這模式在香港的實踐狀況。結果顯示，教學設計雖未能完全擺脫文本的束縛以開放地讓幼兒參與，但當中的創意空隙能引導幼兒進行多方面故事探索和重新想像。不過，以現實生活經驗來重創故事，討論當中的品德情意與社會議題的表現，卻未見顯著。本研究建議師資訓練多強調有關繪本和創意空隙的分析與應用的知識和技巧。

The use of Conventions Approach with picture books has become a popular teaching mode of Drama-in-Education in the early childhood education in Hong Kong. Drawing on the reader-response theories, the author constructs a conceptual framework called ＂creative gaps.＂ This framework includes six aspects and gradations of creative gaps which aims to evaluate the opportunities and possibilities given to children to re-imagine, explore and retell the story in a drama lesson. The author argues that teachers should identify the creative gaps of the picture book when assigning and arranging appropriate drama conventions to teach. Through analyzing 20 teaching plans co-written by preschool teachers and drama artists, the author examines the practice of this drama teaching approach collected from eight preschools in Hong Kong. The results reveal that although the teachers could not totally break through the confinement of the original text for open participation, the creative gaps identified in their teaching plans could support young children to re-imagine and explore the story in various ways. Still, attempts were made to facilitate the children to re-create the story through everyday experiences and to discuss the social and moral messages in the story. In the end, the author suggests that teacher training should put more emphasis on the knowledge and skills about analyzing and applying picture books and creative gaps.

1. 譚寶芝(2012)。以繪本紙袋公主結合教育戲劇實踐批判閱讀教學之自我研究：陶造與再陶造戲劇慣例的運用。當代教育研究季刊，20(4)，85-120。
   連結：
2. 喬燕冰（2015 年，5 月11 日）。今天的孩子更要學戲劇。中國藝術報。取自http://www.cflac.org.cn/xw/bwyc/201505/t20150511_294663.htm Qiao, Yan-Bing (2015, May 11). Children should learn drama. China Art News. Retrieved from http://www.cflac.org.cn/xw/bwyc/201505/t20150511_294663.htm
3. Ackroyd, J.,Boulton, J.(2001).Drama lessons for five to eleven-year-olds.London, UK:David Fulton.
4. Adomat, D. S.(2010).Dramatic interpretations: Performative responses of young children to picture book read-alouds.Children's Literature in Education,41(3),207-221.
5. Barthes, R.(1974).S/Z.New York, NY:Hill and Wang.
6. Cheng, D. P. W.(2001).Difficulties of Hong Kong teachers' understanding and implementation of 'play' in the curriculum.Teaching and Teacher Education,17(7),857-869.
7. Flood, J.(Ed.),Lapp, D.(Ed.),Heath, S. B.(Ed.)(1997).A handbook for literacy educators: Research on teaching the communicative and visual arts.New York, NY:Macmillan.
8. Haseman, B.、O'Toole, J.、黃婉萍譯、陳玉蘭譯(2005)。戲劇實驗室：學與教的實踐。臺北市=Taipei:財團法人成長文教基金會=Healthy Growth。
9. Heinig, R. B.、陳仁富譯(2001)。即興表演家喻戶曉的故事：戲劇與語文教學的融合。臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
10. Iser, W.(1978).The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response.London, UK:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11. Iser, W.(1989).Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology.London, UK:Johns Hopkins.
12. Jackson, A. R.(1999).The centrality of the aesthetic in educational theatre.Drama Australia,23(2),51-63.
13. Karolides, N. J.(Ed.)(1997).Reader response in elementary classrooms: Quest and discovery.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
14. Li, Y. L.(2004).The culture of teaching in the midst of Western influence: The case of Hong Kong kindergartens.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,5(3),330-348.
15. Lin, Y. S.(2008).Applying drama in Taiwan's primary curriculum: The reality and difficulties through primary school teachers' viewpoints.Asia-Pacific Journal for Arts Education,6(1),1-27.
16. Neelands, J.(2008).A Review of: Structure and spontaneity: The process drama of Cecily O'Neill by Taylor, P. and Warner, C. D..British Journal of Educational Studies,56(1),112-113.
17. Neelands, J.、Goode, T.、舒志義譯、李慧心譯(2005)。建構戲劇：戲劇教學策略70 式。臺北市=Taipei:成長文教基金會=Healthy Growth Foundation。
18. Neelands, J.、周小玉譯(2005)。教育戲劇的多樣面貌：教育戲劇在學校中的應用。2005 臺灣教育戲劇／劇場國際年會：戲劇教育國際論壇，臺北市=Taipei:
19. Neelands, J.、陳仁富譯、黃國倫譯(2010)。透視戲劇：戲劇教學實作指南。臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
20. Nikolajeva, M.(2005).Aesthetic approaches to children's literature: An introduction.Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press.
21. O'Neill, C.(1995).Drama worlds: A framework for Process Drama.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
22. O'Toole, J.、Dunn, J.、劉純芬譯(2005)。假戲真做・做中學：以戲劇作為教學工具，幫助學生有效進入主題學習。臺北市=Taipei:成長基金會=Healthy Growth Foundation。
23. O'Toole, J.、陳韻文譯(2005)。門邊的巨人：讓戲劇在教育中立足。2005 臺灣教育戲劇／劇場國際年會：戲劇教育國際論壇，臺北市=Taipei:
24. Prendiville, F.,Toye, N.(2007).Speaking and listening through drama 7-11.London, UK:Paul Chapman.
25. Rosenblatt, L. M.(1978).The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work.Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.
26. Schonmann, S.(Ed.)(2011).Key concepts in theatre/drama education.Rotterdam, NL:Sense.
27. Wang, W. J.,Tam, P. C.,Kim, B. J.,Kok, H. L.(2013).New imaginings and actions of drama education and applied theatre in NIE4 in Asia.Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance,18(1),79-93.
28. Winston, J.(2015).Story, play and enchantment: The importance of drama for children in the early years of education.The Journal of Drama and Theatre Education in Asia,5(1),11-26.
29. Winston, J.、Tandy, M.、陳韻文譯、張鐙尹譯(2008)。開始玩戲劇4-11 歲：兒童戲劇課程教師手冊。臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
30. 李孟穎、陳韻文(2012)。慣例方法之戲劇課程視野。十年耕耘：視野與前瞻—2012 年戲劇教育與應用國際學術研討會大會手冊，臺南=Tainan:
31. 林玫君(2005)。戲劇教育之範圍及其在臺灣發展的概況。2005 臺灣教育戲劇／劇場國際年會：戲劇教育國際論壇，臺北市=Taipei:
32. 張曉華(2005)。學制內戲劇教育之規範與發展現況之解釋。2005 臺灣教育戲劇／劇場國際年會：戲劇教育國際論壇，臺北市=Taipei:
33. 梁長城編、黃瑞珍編(2004)。閱讀研究與教學的新路向。香港=Hong Kong:香港閱讀學會=Hong Kong Reading Association。
34. 梁敏兒(2003)。文本的閱讀：文學與教育之間。香港幼兒學報，2(1)，5-10。
35. 許明輝編、舒志義編(2010)。香港學校戲劇教育：成果的研究與評鑒。香港=Hong Kong:香港教育學院=The Hong Kong Institute of Education。
36. 陳玉蘭、Dunn, J.(2016)。熱情、夥伴、權力與堅持：一個跨國戲劇課程的生命歷程。亞洲戲劇教育學刊，6(1)，9-26。
37. 陳韻文(2006)。英國教育戲劇的發展脈絡。戲劇學刊，3，39-62。
38. 彭玉文編(2001)。課室變法：創造劇與教育戲劇實踐。香港=Hong Kong:香港教育專業人員協會=Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union。
39. 舒志義編、黃婉萍編(2007)。崎嶇小徑抑或康莊大道？─香港戲劇教育的危．機。香港=Hong Kong:香港教育劇場論壇=Hong Kong Drama/Theatre and Education Forum。
40. 龍協濤(1997)。讀者反應理論。臺北市=Taipei:智揚=Yang-Chih。
41. 譚寶芝(2016)。戲劇教育：給幼兒體驗、探索與創作繪本的樂趣。戲有益：戲劇融入學前教育教案結集，香港=Hong Kong:

1. 譚寶芝、林玫君(2018)。臺灣與香港幼兒戲劇教育全球在地化：視像人種誌對話研究。課程與教學，21(3)，1-27。
2. (2023)。跨域課程專題導向學習的成果探究：以教育戲劇融入心理學為例。教育實踐與研究，36(2)，1-36。