题名

教保服務人員美感經驗教學量表建構

并列篇名

Development of an Instrument for Measuring Preschool Educators' Aesthetic Experience Instruction

DOI

10.6622/RAE.202205_(43).0001

作者

孫良誠(Liang-Chen Sun)

关键词

美感經驗 ； 美感教學 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； 測量恆等性 ； aesthetic experience ； aesthetic teaching ； confirmatory factor analysis ； measurement invariance

期刊名称

藝術教育研究

卷期/出版年月

43期（2022 / 05 / 01）

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

美感教育可改變學生看待世界的方式，有助於提升生命品質。幼兒階段是實施美感教育的關鍵期，但評估教保服務人員美感經驗教學的工具付之闕如，故本研究目的為建構「教保服務人員美感經驗教學量表」。首先經文獻分析彙整美感經驗教學的內涵並編製問卷初稿，再邀請學者專家審查初稿後修訂為預試問卷，並以202份有效問卷進行項目分析與探索性因素分析，顯示量表具有「投入與感受」、「知覺與理解」、「聯想與應用」三個因子。正式問卷以767份有效問卷進行驗證性因素分析，顯示量表具有良好的模式適配度，最後經恆等性檢驗顯示量表具有跨樣本的有效性及穩定性。本研究建構之美感經驗教學量表，可做為教保服務人員自我檢核個人美感經驗與執行美感教學的參考。
英文摘要

This study aims to develop an instrument to measure preschool educators' aesthetic experience teaching, as well as establish its reliability and validity. First, through a comprehensive literature review, the instrument of preschool educators' aesthetic experience teaching content was summarized. Second, the instrument was critiqued and reviewed by scholars and experts in order to establish content validity. Third, the refined instrument was evaluated by using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis from 202 valid responses. The results showed that the questionnaire contained three factors: being engrossed and moved, perception and understanding, and connection and application. The formal questionnaire was completed after being revised. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed after 767 valid questionnaires were collected. Results showed that the fitness of the model was acceptable, and the instrument had good reliability and validity. Finally, through the cross-validation analysis with preschool teachers and caregivers, it showed that the instrument was a well-constructed and stable model. The contribution of this research is to develop an instrument to measure preschool educators' aesthetic experience teaching, the reference is for preschool educators to evaluate aesthetic experience teaching.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳冠嫻, Kuan-Hsien(2017)。臺灣民眾「美感素養量表」之建構與調查。測驗學刊 Psychological Testing，64(2)，131-154。
    連結：
  2. 李雅婷, Ya-Ting(2010)。美感教育之實踐策略探究：以敘事課程為例。教育學刊，35，65-98。
    連結：
  3. 周淑卿, Shu-Ching(2011)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質：藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學，14(1)，19-40。
    連結：
  4. 林玫君, Mei-Chun(2012)。臺灣幼兒園課綱美感領域學習指標發展初探：以戲劇指標與量表之建構歷程為例。當代教育研究季刊，20(4)，1-44。
    連結：
  5. 洪詠善, Yung-Shan(2005)。以美感經驗轉化教學。課程與教學，8(2)，25-40。
    連結：
  6. 張原誠, Yuan-Cheng,蕭佳純, Chia-Chun(2016)。學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力：教師創造力教學有效嗎？。教育實踐與研究，29(2)，65-104。
    連結：
  7. 陳玉婷, Yu-Ting(2017)。幼兒美感課程教學實踐之協同行動研究。教科書研究，10(1)，35-64。
    連結：
  8. 陳玲璋, Ling-Jan(2013)。全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究。藝術教育研究，25，109-135。
    連結：
  9. 葉玉珠, Yu-Chu,賴思齊, Ssu-Chi,李若瑜, Jo-Yu(2015)。「大學生設計產品美感生活體驗量表」之發展。設計研究學報，8，64-80。
    連結：
  10. 劉家妤, Jia-Yu,白慧娟, Hui-Chuan(2010)。歌德式美學在華德福幼兒園的呈現：以臺中市某托兒所為例。教育科學期刊，9(1)，51-70。
    連結：
  11. Alberta Education. (2020). Teaching quality standard. Retrieved from https://www.alberta.ca/assets/documents/ed-teaching-quality-standard-english-print-ready.pdf
  12. Barone, T.(1983).Education as aesthetic experience.Educational Leadership,40(4),21-26.
  13. Bilir-Seyhan, G.,Ocak-Karabay, S.(2018).Early childhood pre-service teachers’ views about visual arts education and aesthetics.Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,73,131-148.
  14. Bowmer, A.,Mason, K.,Knight, J.,Welch, G.(2018).Investigating the impact of a musical intervention on preschool children’s executive function.Frontiers in Psychology,9,2389.
  15. Calvo-Merino, B.,Jola, C.,Glaser, D. E.,Haggard, P.(2008).Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art.Consciousness and Cognition,17(3),911-922.
  16. Chen, Y. T.(2014).A study on early childhood educators’ aesthetic teaching beliefs and practices in Taiwan.Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education,8(3),21-39.
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Robinson, R. E.(1991).The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter.Los Angeles, CA:J.P. Getty Museum.
  18. Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage: Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/974907/EYFS_framework_-_March_2021.pdf
  19. Dewey, J.(1980).Art as experience.New York, NY:Perigee.
  20. Eisner, E.(2006).Does arts-based research have a future?.Studies in Art Education,48(1),9-18.
  21. Eisner, E.(2002).What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education?.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,18(1),4-16.
  22. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  23. Frawley, T. J.(2013).Aesthetic education: Its place in teacher training.Art Education,66(3),22-28.
  24. Government of Singapore. (2017). Skills framework for early childhood care and education. Retrieved from https://www.earlychildhoodworkforce.org/Skills-Framework-for-Early-Childhood-Care-and-Education
  25. Greene, M.(2001).Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetic education.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  26. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Babin, B. J.,Black, W. C.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
  27. Isac, M. M.,da Costa, P. D.,Araújo, L.,Calvo, E. S.,Albergaria-Almeida, P.(2015).Teaching practices in primary and secondary schools in Europe: Insights from large-scale assessments in education.Luxembourg, Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union.
  28. Jacobsen, T.,Beudt, S.(2017).Stability and variability in aesthetic experience: A review.Frontiers in Psychology,8,143.
  29. Jalongo, M. R.,Stamp, L. N.(1997).The arts in children’s lives: Aesthetic education for early childhood.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  30. Kunter, M.,Klusmann, U.,Baumert, J.,Richter, D.,Voss, T.,Hachfeld, A.(2013).Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.Journal of Educational Psychology,105(3),805-820.
  31. Leder, H.,Belke, B.,Oeberst, A.,Augustin, D.(2004).A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.British Journal of Psychology,95,489-508.
  32. Lim, B.(2004).Aesthetic discourses in early childhood settings: Dewey, Steiner, and Vygotsky.Early Child Development and Care,174(5),473-486.
  33. Lim, B.(2005).Aesthetic experience in a dynamic cycle: Implications for early childhood teachers and teacher educators.Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education,25(4),363-373.
  34. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-culture data: Practice and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,18(1),39-50.
  35. Locher, P.,Overbeeke, K.,Wensveen, S.(2010).Aesthetic interaction: A framework.Design Issues,26,70-79.
  36. Lodico, M. G.,Spaulding, D. T.,Voegtle, K. H.(2006).Method in educational research: From theory to practice.San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
  37. Lussier, C.(2010).Aesthetic literacy: The gold medal standard of learning excellence in dance.Physical & Health Education Journal,76(1),40-44.
  38. National Association for the Education of Yong Child(2020).National Association for the Education of Yong Child. (2020). Professional standards and competencies for early childhood educators. Washington, DC: Author..
  39. Pike, M. A.(2004).Aesthetic teaching.Journal of Aesthetic Education,38(2),20-37.
  40. Savoie, A.(2017).Aesthetic experience and creativity in arts education: Ehrenzweig and the primal syncretistic perception of the child.Cambridge Journal of Education,47(1),53-66.
  41. Schumacker, R. E.,Lomax, R. G.(2004).A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  42. Sena Moore, K.,Hanson-Abromeit, D.(2018).Feasibility of the musical contour regulation facilitation (MCRF) intervention for preschooler emotion regulation development: A mixed methods study.Journal of Music Therapy,55(4),408-438.
  43. Shusterman, R.(Ed.),Tomlin, A.(Ed.)(2008).Aesthetic experience.New York, NY:Routledge.
  44. Stamatopoulou, D.(2004).Integrating the philosophy and psychology of aesthetic experience: Development of the aesthetic experience scale.Psychological Reports,95,673-695.
  45. Townsend, C.,Sood, S.(2014).Self-affirmation through the choice of highly aesthetic products.Journal of Consumer Research,39,415-428.
  46. Wanzer, D. L.,Finley, K. P.,Zarian, S.,Cortez, N.(2020).Experiencing flow while viewing art: Development of the aesthetic experience questionnaire.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,14(1),113-124.
  47. 天下編輯部、天下 Web only（2015 年 1 月 30 日）。蔣勳：美，威力最強的競爭力。天下雜誌。取自 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5064224 CommonWealth Bianjibu, & CommonWealth Web only. (2015, January 30). Jiang Syun: Mei, weili zuiqiang de jingzhengli. CommonWealth Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5064224
  48. 天下雜誌（編）=CommonWealth Magazine(Ed.)(2002).美的學習：捕捉看不見的競爭力.臺北市=Taipei:天下雜誌=CommonWealth Magazine.
  49. 余民寧, Ming-Ning(2006).潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用.臺北市=Taipei:高等教育=Higher Education.
  50. 吳明隆, Ming-Long(2007).結構方程模式：AMOS 的操作與應用.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan.
  51. 李鴻生, Hung-Sheng(2012)。教育人員涵育美感素養之探詢。耕莘學報，10，74-84。
  52. 林小玉, Sheau-Yuh(2015)。美感教育在二十一世紀的時代性。臺灣教育，693，9-15。
  53. 林玉体, Yu-Ti(1993).教育價值論.臺北市=Taipei:文景=Win-Join.
  54. 林玫君, Mei-Chun(2015).幼兒園美感教育.臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological.
  55. 林素卿, Su-Ching(2009)。美感經驗對課程美學建構之啟示。東海教育評論，3，43-70。
  56. 林逢祺, Ferng-Chyi(1998)。美感經驗與教育。教育研究集刊，7(41)，155-170。
  57. 邱皓政, Haw-Jeng(2010).結構方程式模式：LISREL 的理論技術與應用.臺北市=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh.
  58. 涂金堂, Chin-Tang(2012).量表編製與 SPSS.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan.
  59. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2018)。教育部（2018）。教育部美感教育中長程計畫：第二期五年計畫（108 年至 112 年）：美感即生活—從幼扎根．跨域創新．國際連結。臺北市：作者。 Ministry of Education. (2018). Jiaoyubu meigan jiaoyuz hongchangheng jihua: Dierqi wunian jihua (108 nian zhi 112 nian): Meigan ji shenghuo-Congyou zhagen, kuayu chuangxin, guoji lianjie. Taipei: Author.。
  60. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2013)。教育部（2013）。教育部美感教育中長程計畫：第一期五年計畫（103 年至 107 年）：臺灣．好美—美感從幼起、美力終身學。臺北市：作者。 Ministry of Education. (2013). Jiaoyubu meigan jiaoyuz hongchangheng jihua: Diyiqi wunian jihua (103 nian zhi 107 nian): Taiwan, haomei-Meigan congyouqi, meili zhongshenxue. Taipei: Author.。
  61. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2016)。教育部（2016a）。中華民國教師專業標準指引。臺北市：作者。 Ministry of Education. (2016a). R.O.C. teachers’ professional standards guidelines. Taipei: Author.。
  62. 教育部（2016b）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。臺北市：作者。 Ministry of Education. (2016b). ECEC curriculum framework. Taipei: Author.
  63. 郭書韶, Shu-Shao,陳嘉成, Chia-Cheng(2017)。大學生的幸福方程式：美感經驗與藝文活動參與的預測分析。臺中教育大學學報：數理科技類，31(2)，65-84。
  64. 陳伯璋, Po-Chang,張盈堃, Yin-Kun(2007)。來自日常生活的教育學院：社區、課程與美學的探究。教育與社會研究，12，41-72。
  65. 陳育淳, Yu-Chun(2017)。美力洋溢：美感生活一起來。美育，219，32-38。
  66. 陳寬裕, Kuan-Yu(2018).結構方程模型分析實務：SPSS 與 SmartPLS 的運用.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan.
  67. 歐崇敬, Chung-Ching(2009)。審美經驗與藝術的界定。環境與藝術學刊，7，37-60。
  68. 羅心玫, Hsin-Mei(2008)。臺南市=Tainan，國立臺南大學幼兒教育系=Department of Early Childhood Education, National Tainan University。
print cancel