國中資優學生人格特質、壓力調適及其相關因素之研究

A Study of Personality Traits, Stress Adaptation and Related Factors of Gifted Students in Junior High School

10.7089/JGE.200606.0041

孫瑜成(Yu-Cheng Sun)

資優學生 ； 人格特質 ； 壓力調適 ； gifted students ； personality traits ； stress adaptation

資優教育研究

6卷1期（2006 / 06 / 01）

41 - 68

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討國中資優學生的人格特質、壓力調適（壓力感受程度和壓力因應方式）及其相關因素之概況，並分析不同人格類型及背景變項（年級、性別、班級型態、家庭社經地位、地區和國小教育安置型態）在壓力調適上之差異及預測情形。本研究之調查對象為92學年度第一學期就讀臺灣地區資優班的551位一般智能優異學生。研究者採用自編之國中學生壓力調適量表」和賴氏人格測驗」為研究工具。量表調查所得之資料以描述性統計、多變量變異數分析、單變量變異數分析、因素分析、積差相關、典型相關和逐步迴歸分析等方法加以統計分析後，有以下發現： 一、國中資優學生的人格特質以正向特質的C型人格（鎮靜型）和D型人格（指導型）為主，其次為負向特質的B型人格（暴力型）和E型人格（怪癖型）。 二、國中資優學生的主要壓力來源以學業壓力」為主，其次為自我期許壓力」。 三、國中資優學生最常使用的壓力因應方式以理性應對」為主，其次為穩定情緒」。四、具有正向人格特質的國中資優學生對壓力感受程度較低，且較常使用正向壓力因應方式去面對壓力；具有負向人格特質的國中資優學生則對壓力感受程度較高，且較常使用負向壓力因應方式去處理壓力。 五、不同人格類型及背景變項的國中資優學生在壓力調適上之差異分析方面，全部的二因子多變量變異數分析和二因子單變量變異數分析在壓力感受程度和壓力因應方式分量表上皆未有交互作用；就單因子多變量變異數分析結果而言，國中資優學生的壓力感受程度」在不同人格類型、年級、班級型態和地區上有主要效果；而壓力因應方式」則在不同人格類型、性別、班級型態和地區上有主要效果。在家庭社經地位和國小教育安置型態上則無顯著性差異。 六、不同壓力感受程度的國中資優學生在壓力因應方式上之差異分析方面，所有的二因子多變量變異數分析在壓力因應方式上皆未有交互作用；而二因子單變量變異數分析僅在壓力感受程度×國小教育安置型態」和壓力感受程度×家庭社經地位」上有交互作用；就單因子多變量變異數分析結果而言，國中資優學生的壓力因應方式」在不同壓力感受程度、地區、年級、性別和班級型態上有主要效果，而在家庭社經地位和國小教育安置型態上則無顯著性差異。 七、國中資優學生壓力感受程度與壓力因應方式之問有顯著的相關及典型相關存在。其中，壓力感受程度較低的國中資優學生傾向使用正向的壓力因應方式；壓力感受程度較高的國中資優學生傾向使用負向的壓力因應方式。 八、人格類型、年級、性別、班級型態、地區及國小教育安置型態對國中資優學生的壓力感受程度和壓力因應方式有預測力；家庭社經地位則對國中資優學生的壓力感受程度和壓力因應方式無預測力。根據上述研究結果，研究者提出數點在輔導及未來研究上的建議，以供教師和父母參考。

The purposes of this study were to investigate personality traits, stress adaptation and related factors of gifted students in junior high school, and to analyze the differences and predictions of stress adaptation in personality types and background variables. The instruments were self-developed ”Stress Adaptation of Junior High School Students Scale” and ”Lai Personality Scale.” The participants were 551 gifted students in Taiwan. All of collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, MANOVA, ANOVA, factor analysis, Pearson correlation, canonical correlation and stepwise regression. The results were as follows: 1. The personality traits of most of gifted students were positive type C and type D, which indicated calmness and guidance. Negative type B and type E were the second personality traits, which referred to the violence and eccentricity. 2. The main source of stress for gifted students was ”academic stress”, and then, ”self-expectation stress” 3. The frequently-used coping strategy for gifted students was ”rational coping”, and then ”stable emotion” 4. Gifted students with positive personality traits had lower stress perception and often used positive coping strategies, but gifted students with negative personality traits had higher stress perception and often used negative coping strategies. 5. By analyzing the differences of stress adaptation in personality types and background variables, both of two-way MANOVA and two-way ANOVA analyses didn't have interaction on stress perception and coping strategies. Personality types, gender, class type, and region of one-way MANOVA analyses had main effect on stress perception and coping strategies. Family socio-economic status and placement of elementary students of one-way MANOVA analyses didn't have main effect on stress adaptation. 6. By analyzing the differences of coping strategies in stress perception and background variables, the two-way MANOVA analysis didn't have interaction on coping strategies. but the two-way ANOVA analysis had interaction on placement of elementary students and family socio-economic status. Stress perception, grade, gender class type, and region of one-way MAN OVA analyses had main effect on coping strategies, but family socio-economic status and placement of elementary students of one-way MAN OVA analyses didn't have main effect on coping strategies. 7. Stress perception was significantly correlated with coping strategies. Gifted students with lower stress perception often adopted positive coping strategies, but gifted students with higher stress perception often adopted negative coping strategies. 8. Personality types, grade, gender, class type, region, and placement of elementary school had prediction for stress adaptation of gifted students. Family socio-economic status didn't have prediction for stress adaptation of gifted students. According to the above results, the investigator proposed several suggestions for educational guidance and further studies.

1. Abouserie, R.(1994).Sources and Levels of Stress in Relation to Locus of Control and Self Esteem in University Students.Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,14(3),323-330.
2. Buescher, T.(1990).Helping adolescents adjust to giftedness.ERIC Document Reproduction service.
3. Clasen, D. R.,Clasen, R. E.,N. Colangelo,S. G. Assouline,D. L. Ambroson (Eds.)(1992).Talent development: Proceeding from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development.New York:Trillium Press.
4. Cornell, D. G.,Grossberg, I. W.(1986).Silbing of children in gifted programs.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,9,252-264.
5. Davis, G. A.,Rimm S. B.(2004).Education of Gifted and Talented.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
6. de Anda, D.,Bradley, M.(1997).Study of stress, stressors, and coping strategies among middle school adolescents.Social Work in Education,19(2),87-99.
7. Delisle, J. R.(1988).Stress and the gifted child.ERIC Document Reproduction service.
8. Dickey, J. P.,Henderson, P.(1989).What Young Children Say about Stress and Coping in School.Health Education,20(1),14-17.
9. Evans, E. S.(1982).Dissertations Abstracts International.
10. Flagler, L. K.(1990).Dissertations Abstracts International.
11. Helms, B. J.(1985).Dissertations Abstracts International.
12. Holt, D. G.(1993).Dissertations Abstracts International.
13. Howe, I. H.(1986).Dissertations Abstracts International.
14. Kaplan, L. S.(1990).Helping gifted students with stress management.ERIC Document Reproduction service.
15. Kivimaki, M. J.(1997).Stress and personality factors: Specifications of the role of test anxiety, private self-consciousness, type A behavior pattern, and self-esteem in the relationship between stressors and stress reactions. (Master Thesis, Helsingin Yliopisto.Dissertations Abstracts International,59(1),160.
16. Lazarus, R. S.(1991).Emotion and Adaptation.New York:Oxford.
17. Lazarus, R. S.,Folkman, S.(1984).Stress, Appraisal, and Coping.New York:Springer.
18. Moon, S. M.,Kelly, K. R.,Feldhusen, J. F.(1997).Specialized counseling services for gifted youth and their families: A needs assessment.Gifted Child Quarterly,41,16-25.
19. Moon, S. M.,N. Colangelo,G. A. Davis (Eds.)(2003).Handbook of gifted education.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
20. Parker, W. D.,Adkins, K. K.(1995).Perfectionism and the gifted.Roeper Review,17,173-176.
21. Richards, V. K.(1982).Dissertations Abstracts International.
22. Shaughnessy, M. F.,Kang, M. H.,Greene, M.,Misutova, M.,Suomala, J.(2004).16 PF personality profile of gifted children: preliminary report of an international study.North American Journal of Psychology,6(1),51-54.
23. Sliveman, L. K.(1993).Counseling the gifted and talented.Denver:Love.
24. Sliverman, L. K.(1993).Counseling the gifted and talented.Denver:Love.
25. Sternberg, R. J.,Davidson, J. E.,F. D. Horowitz,M. O`Brien (Eds.)(1986).The gifted and talented: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills.Fort Worth:Harcourt Brace Janovich College Publishers.
26. Swiatek, M. A.(2000).Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept.Journal of Outcome Measurement,4(4),19-39.
27. Terman, L. M.(1982).Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
28. Torrance, E. P.,Sisk D. A.(1997).Gifted and talented children in the regular classroom.Buffalo, New York:Creative Education Foundation Press.
29. Vollrath, M.(2001).Personality and stress.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,42,335-347.
30. 王文科(1994)。國科會專題研究計畫未出版之成果報告。
31. 吳武典(2001)。資優學生的適應類型與心理輔導。測驗與輔導，166，3481-3484。
32. 吳武典、蔡明富(2001)。國小資優學生學校生活壓力與學校適應之相關研究。資優教育研究，1(1)，41-56。
33. 呂敏昌(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
34. 李乙明(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究碩士論文。
35. 李乙明(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。
36. 李欣瑩(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
37. 林慧蘭(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
38. 林寶珍(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
39. 孫瑜成(1997)。行政院國家科學委員會大專學生參與專題研究計畫成果報告。
40. 張馨仁(2001)。資優生過度激動特質之研究。資優教育研究，1(2)，45-70。
41. 梁秀琴、陳韻淳(2002)。談資優生的自殺問題。資優教育季刊，83，28-31。
42. 郭靜姿(1993)。資優學生鑑定與輔導。臺北:心理。
43. 郭靜姿(2002)。台北市資賦優異教育資源中心工作執行成果報告書。
44. 郭靜姿(1986)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
45. 陳玫伶(1996)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。
46. 陳美芳(1986)。資優學生身心特質與評量。教育資料集刊，21，13-26。
47. 曾建章(1986)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
48. 曾淑容譯(1984)。資優學生和非資優學生困擾問題的比較。資優教育季刊，12，27-29。
49. 黃玉真(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
50. 鄒浮安(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究博士論文。
51. 鄒浮安(1998)。高中分散式、集中式數理資優生與普通生在生活壓力與身心健康之比較研究。雄中學報，1，317-343。
52. 歐陽萌君(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
53. 蔡典謨、國立高雄師範大學特教中心主編(1995)。認識特殊教育系列演講。國立高雄師範大學特教中心。
54. 賴保禎(1993)。賴氏人格測驗指導手冊。臺北:心理。

1. 呂筱萍(2016)。國中資優數學中一元二次方程式教材編撰之研究。中原大學應用數學系學位論文。2016。1-146。