電子化參與的效益與風險：民眾對政府網站的認知與使用行為之初探

Benefit and Risk of Electronic Participation: Exploring Citizen's Cognitive Attitude and Behavior of Using Governmental Websites

10.29843/JCCIS.200807.0005

羅晉(Jin Lo)

公共參與 ； 電子化政府 ； 電子化民主 ； 政府網站 ； 政治效能感 ； 資訊科技認知態度 ； public participation ； electronic government ； electronic democracy ； governmental websites ； political efficiency ； attitude about information technology

資訊社會研究

15期（2008 / 07 / 01）

181 - 208

繁體中文

人們對各種新興科技的認知與使用行為之關係，長久以來廣泛受到私部門研究的重視。相對的，憑藉著資訊通訊科技與網路所構築的電子化政府及其所衍生的電子化參與，推展至今，其「供給－需求」關係與發展現況，卻常為公共行政等社會科學相關領域研究所忽略。 有鑑於此，本研究以公共參與的角度，探討民眾對當前電子化政府中最為主要媒介－「政府網站」－的參與功效意識、認知與使用行為。目的在於檢視民眾的人口特徵、內外在政治效能感、民眾對政府資訊科技運用的風險認知，對於民眾對政府網站參與功能的效益認知、以及對其網站使用行為的影響。研究對象為具代表性的網路民眾隨機樣本，方法上主要透過相關分析、因素分析、邏輯迴歸與多元線性迴歸分析法予以探討。 研究發現，各變項之間大多呈現正向相關。其中，民眾的教育程度與外在政治效能感，可解釋民眾對於政府網站參與功能的評價；另一方面，民眾不同的年齡、教育程度、網路使用經驗、與民眾的內外在政治效能感、以及其對網站參與功能的認知，則可預測民眾對政府網站的使用行為。最後，本研究更據此討論出不同的政策建議與研究意涵，可供相關電子化政府實務推動與後續研究參考。

Private enterprises have been extensively stressed and studied people's cognition and behavior of using various new information technologies for long. However, the promotion of the relation of its supply-demand of service by the electronic government has often neglected by public administration's relevant documents. For this reason, this study is based on citizen's participation view and attempts to find out the relationship between people's participation efficiency consciousness (political efficiency), cognitive attitude and behavior about the 'Governmental websites', which are the main media in present electronic government. This study used online questionnaires to query respondents, who are representative samples of network people regarding their attitude and use of Governmental websites. In addition, we also used correlation, logistic regression and hierarchical multiple regression to analyze the data. The research findings reveal that the explanation ability and relation of the two models, which regard people's participation and actual using behavior, and the people opinion regarding participation function of Governmental websites as dependent variable, which could produce different policy meanings and could be a reference for follow-up research.

1. 王嵩音(2006)。網路使用與選舉參與之研究－以2004年立法委員選舉爲例。台灣民主季刊，3(4)，71-102。
   連結：
2. 林瓊珠(2005)。台灣民眾的政治知識：1992~2000年的變動。選舉研究，12(1)，147-171。
   連結：
3. 洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘(2005)。科技接受模式之彙總研究。資訊管理學報，12(4)，211-234。
   連結：
4. 張卿卿(2002)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響：以兩千年總統大選赤例。選舉研究，9(1)，1-39。
   連結：
5. 張卿卿(2002)。大學生的政治媒介認知、政治媒介行爲與其政治效能與政治參與之間的關係。選舉研究，9(2)，37-63。
   連結：
6. 彭芸(2002)。2001年台灣選民的媒介行爲與政治信任。選舉研究，9(2)，1-36。
   連結：
7. 楊明璧、詹淑文(2005)。電子化政府服務服務品質及民眾滿意程度分析－以臺北市電子化政府入口網站爲研究對象。顧客滿意學刊，1(1)，117-144。
   連結：
8. 羅晉(2008)。邁向電子化民主新階段？政府網站民主化指標建立與評估調查。東吳政治學報，26(1)，143-198。
   連結：
9. Ainsworth, S.,Hardy, C.,Harley, B.(2005).Online Consultation: E-Democracy and E-Resistance in the Case of the Development Gateway.Management Communication Quarterly,19,120-145.
10. Barber, B.(1997).The New Telecommunications Technology: Endless Frontier or the End of Democracy.Constellations,4(2),208-228.
11. Blasius J.,Thiessen V.(2001).Methodological Artifacts in Measures of Political Efficacy and Trust. An Application of Multiple Correspondence Analysis.Political Analysis,9,1-20.
12. Bovens, M.,Zouridis, S.(2002).From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion arid Constitutional Control.Public Administration Review,62(2),174-184.
13. Brown, D.(2005).Electronic government and public administration.International Review of Administrative Sciences,71(2),241-254.
14. Carter, L.,Bélanger F.(2005).The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors.Information Systems Journal,15(1),5-25.
15. Conference proceeding, Political Studies Association
16. Chadwick, A.,May, C.(2003).Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: `e-government` in the United States, Britain and the European Union.Governance,16(2),271-300.
17. Ciborra, C.(2005).Interpreting e-Government and Development Efficiency, Transparency or Governance at a Distance.Information Technology & People,18(3),260-279.
18. Dimitrova, D. V.,Chen, Y.-C.(2006).Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services.Social Science Computer Review,24(2),172-188.
19. Edmiston, K. D.(2003).State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges.American Review of Public Administration,33(1),20-45.
20. Golding, P.(1996).World Wide Wedge: Division and Contradiction in the Global Information Infrastructure.Monthly Review,48(3),70-85.
21. Graber, D.(2003).The media and democracy: Beyond myths and stereotypes.Annual Review of Political Science,6,139-160.
22. Heeks, R.(2006).Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text.London:Sage.
23. Hiller, J.,Belanger, F.(2001).EGovernment Series.Arlington, VA:PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
24. Huang, W.,Ambra, J. D.,Bhalla, V.(2002).An empirical investigation of the adoption of eGovernment in Australian citizens: Some unexpected research findings.Journal of Computer Information Systems,43(1),15-22.
25. Johnson, T. J.,Kaye, B. K.(2000).Using is Believing: the Influence of Reliance on the Credibility of Online Political Information Among Politically Interested Internet Users.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,77(4),865-879.
26. Kakabadse, A.,Kakabadse, N. K.,Kouzmin, A.(2003).Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate.Public Administration Review,63(1),44-60.
27. Kampen, J.,Snijkers, K.(2003).E-Democracy: A Critical Evaluation of the Ultimate E-Dream.Social Science Computer Review,21(4),491-496.
28. Nelson, M.(1997).Building trust in cyberspace.International Information and Library Review,29,153-157.
29. Nie, N.,Erbring, L.(2002).Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report.IT and Society,1(1),275-283.
30. Niemi, R. G.,Craig, S. C.,Mattei, F.(1991).Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in. the 1988 National Election Study.American Political Science Review,85,1407-1413.
31. Nisbet, M.,Scheufele, D. A.(2004).Internet use and participation: Political talk as a catalyst for online citizenship.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,81(4),877-896.
32. Norris, D.,Moon M. J.(2005).Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare.Public Administration Review,65(1),64-75.
33. Norris, P.(2001).Digital Divide. Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide.New York:Cambridge University Press.
34. OECD(2003).Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: 6iiallenges of Online Citizen Engagement.Paris:
35. Ren, W. H.(1999).Self-efficacy and the search for government information: a study of small-business executives.Reference and User Services Quarterly,38(3),283-291.
36. Scott, James K.(2006)."E" the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement.Public Administration Review,66(3),341-353.
37. Thomas, J. C.,Streib, G.(2005).E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments.Administration & Society,37(3),259-280.
38. Tolbert, C. J.,Mossberger, K.(2006).Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government.Public Administration Review,66(3),356-369.
39. Tsagarousianou, R.(1999).Electronic democracy: Rhetoric and reality.Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research,24(2),189-208.
40. Wallis, J.(2005).The web, accessibility, and inclusion: networked democracy in the United Kingdom.Library Review,54(8),479-486.
41. Paper presented at the Prospects for Electronic Democracy Conference
42. Weber, L.M.,Bergman, J.(2003).Who Participates and Why? An Analysis of Citizens on the Internet and the Mass Public.Social Science Computer Review,21(1),26-42.
43. Welch, E. W.,Hinnant, C. C.,Moon, M. J.(2005).Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(3),371-391.
44. West, D. M.(2004).E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes.Public Administration Review,64(1),15-27.
45. Wong, W.,Welch, E.(2004).Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability.Governance,17(2),275-297.
46. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007)。政府網站功能民主化。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。
47. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2006)。九十五年數位落差調查分析報告。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。
48. 陳祥、林明童(2002)。我國電子化政府整合型入口網站使用者行爲分析。圖書館學與資訊科學，28(2)，26-38。
49. 蕭乃沂、黃建國(2005)。電子民主的行政可行性：公務人員的行爲觀點。佛光大學第五屆政治與資訊科技研討會，宜蘭:
50. 蕭乃沂、盧志山、趙文彬、賴怡君(2002)。民眾使用網路報稅的評估：計劃行爲理論觀點的初探。公共行政學報，6，67-86。
51. 羅晉(2004)。網際審議式民主之實現與現實：以我國地方政府網際公共論壇爲例。行政暨政策學報，39，105-142。

1. 陳良駒,吳瑞琦,田美惠(2019)。政府網站資料品質評量因素之研究：資料提供者與使用者的雙重觀點。Electronic Commerce Studies，17(3)，197-224。
2. 李仲彬(2019)。什麼環境中才敢出聲？微觀、宏觀、文化、與制度途徑之「信任」對網路公民參與行為的影響。行政暨政策學報，69，1-47。
3. 林純雯(2021)。幼兒園家長資訊通信科技知能對其電子化校務參與動機之影響：以審議信念與領導支持為中介。課程與教學，24(4)，167-198。
4. 林巧敏(2011)。政府資訊公開與申請應用網站內容分析：以臺灣與美英兩國政府機關為例。大學圖書館，15(2)，78-98。
5. 羅晉、蕭乃沂(2010)。電子化政府的價值鏈評估觀點：以數位台灣e化政府計畫爲例。公共行政學報，36，1-37。