論系譜學方法與主體化倫理問題之分析

On Genealogical Methodology and Analysis of Subjectification Ethics

10.6388/JES.201012.0031

王俊斌(Chun-Ping Wang)

系譜學 ； 主體化 ； 倫理學 ； 多元性 ； 教化機制 ； Genealogy ； Subjectification ； Ethics ； Plurality ； Pedagogic Device

教育科學期刊

9卷2期（2010 / 12 / 01）

31 - 52

繁體中文

有關倫理學的理論研究，人們總會在義務論、傳統自由論、德行論、效益論或者論辯倫理學等主流道德哲學之中選擇某個立場。在實踐的層次上，人們則是將道德的行爲者視爲具有自主性的主體，不然就是把它與民族、種族、文化、認同等聯結在一起。跟這一類主流倫理觀點相較，本文的目的則是追溯系譜學方法的發展並且進而探究「倫理教化／主體化構成」之間的可能關聯。據此，本文首先即透過「何謂系譜學？」的討論，指出此一方法的內涵與發展的概要脈絡；其次，藉由「道德系譜與Nietzsche的價值重新評估」、「倫理系譜與Foucault的精神性鍛鍊」以及「主體化系譜學的倫理解析」等不同面向的討論，清楚爬梳系譜學方法發展的轉折。最後，本文也歸結前述理論分析之立場，一方面嘗試提出對於「教育實踐過程中主體化現象」的觀察，另一方面也思考「方法論的內在困境與積極價值的陳顯」，期待以方法學的再問題化反省，奠定我們對系譜學研究應有妥適把握與態度。

Concerning about different approaches of ethical theories, the majority usually will base their viewpoints on one of main moral philosophies (e.g. deontology, traditional liberalism, virtue ethics, utilitarianism and discourse ethics). In addition, people are used to define moral practitioner as an autonomy subject, or presume that moral education has tightly connections with nation, race, culture and identity. On the contrary, this paper wants to explore the dialectic relationship between 'ethical regulations' and 'subjectification' under 'genealogical method' horizons. To put its more precisely, the researcher wants to analyze the theoretical discourses of genealogical methods (from Nietzsche to Foucault) on the one hand; follows the genealogical researching groundwork to construct a pedagogic device analysis structure (including curriculum aims, textbooks and instruction methods) on the other. Finally, this research not only provides its analytical conclusion of 'the subjectification phenomena during the ethical instructive process', but also indicates the possible problems of genealogical method itself, and suggests a more appropriate attitude for pedagogic devices of ethics to put into practice in the future.

1. Kuo, Shih-Yu(2006).Does multicultural education really benefit various cultures?.Bulletin of educational Research,51(4),73-88.
   連結：
2. 歐用生(2006)。建立課程的公共性：課程公共論述的危機與出路。師大教育研究集刊，52(1)，1-27。
   連結：
3. (1996)。道德與健康（一上）教師手冊。台北市:康軒文化。
4. Bauman, Z.(1993).Postmodern ethics.Oxford:Blackwell.
5. Cameron, F.(2002).Nietzsche and the 'problem' of morality.New York:Peter Lang.
6. Conway, D. W.(ed.)(1998).Nietzsche : Critical assessments.London:Routledge.
7. Corder, C.(2004).Foucault and ethical universality.Inquiry,47,580-596.
8. Cuypers, S.(1992).Is personal autonomy the first principle of education?.Journal of Philosophy of Educaiotn,26(1),5-18.
9. Dreyfus, H. L.(ed.),Rabinow, P.(ed.)(1983).Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.New York:Harvester Press.
10. Flynn, T.(2005).Philosophy as a way of life: Foucault and Hodot.Philosophy and Social Criticism,31,609-622.
11. Foucault, M.(1977).Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews.New York:Cornell University Press.
12. Foucault, M.(2005).The hermeneutics of the subject.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Foucault, M.(1980).The history of sexuality, vol. 1, : An introduction.New York:Vintage Books.
14. Foucault, M.(1986).The history of sexuality, vol. 3, : The care of the self.New York:Pantheon Books.
15. Foucault, M.(2001).Fearless speech.Los Angeles:Semiotext(e).
16. Foucault, M.(1980).Power/Knowledge: Selected interview and other writings.New York:Harvester Press.
17. Foucault, M.(1990).The history of sexuality, vol. 2, : The use of pleasure.New York:Vintage Books.
18. Frankfurt, H. G.(1999).Necessity, volition, and love.Cambridge:Cambridge University.
19. Goicoechea, David(ed.)(1983).The great year of Zarathustra.University Press of America.
20. Hall, S.(ed.),Gay, P. D.(ed.)(1996).Questions of cultural identity.London:SAGE.
21. Heelas, P.(ed.),Lash, S.(ed.),Morris, P.(ed.)(1993).De-traditionalization: Critical reflections on authority and identity.Oxford:Blackwell.
22. Heidegger, M.(1977).The question concerning technology and other essays.New York:Harper & Row.
23. Hoy, D. C.(ed.)(1986).Foucault: A critical reader.Cambridge:Basil Blackwell.
24. Hubert, L. D.(ed.),Rabinow, P.(ed.)(1983).Michel Foucault : Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.New York:Harvester Press.
25. Hunt, L. H.(1991).Nietzsche and the origin of virtue.London:Routledge.
26. Jacques, T. C.(1991).Whence does the critic speak? A study of Foucault's genealogy.Philosophy and Social Criticism,17,325-344.
27. Lyotard, J. -F.(1993).Political writings.London:University College London.
28. Marshall, J. D.(1997).Michel Foucault: Problematising the individual and constituting 'the' self.Educational Philosophy and Theory,29(1),32-39.
29. Marshall, J. D.(1996).Michel Foucault: Personal autonomy and education.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Martin, L. H.(ed.),Gutman, H.(ed.),Hutton, P. H.(ed.)(1988).Technologies of the self.London:Tavistock Publications.
31. McGushin, E.(2005).Foucault and the problem of dubject.Philosophy and Social Criticism,31(5-6),623-648.
32. Nietzsche, F. M.(1967).ON the genealogy of morals & Ecco Homo.New York:Vintage Books.
33. Nietzsche, F. W.(1995).Thus Spoke Zarathustra.New York:The modern Library.
34. Nietzsche, F. W.(1972).The gay science.New York:Vintage Books.
35. Nietzsche, F. W.(1996).Human, all too human : a book for free spirits.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
36. Nietzsche, F. W.(1998).Beyond good and evil.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
37. Pai, Y. F.(1995).University of Wisconsin-Madison.
38. Pecora, V. P.(1991).Nietzsche, genealogy, critical theory.New German Critique,53,104-130.
39. Rabinow, P.(ed.)(1984).The Foucault reader.New York:Pantheon.
40. Rabinow, P.(ed.)(1984).The Foucault reader.New York:Pantheon Books.
41. Rabinow, P.(ed.)(1997).Ethics: Subjectivity and truth.New York:New Press.
42. Schacht, R.(ed.)(1994).Nietzsche, genealogy, moral. essays on Nietzsche' s genealogy of morals.California:University of California Press.
43. Smart, Barry(ed.)(1994).Michel Foucault: critical assessments Vol.3.London:Routledge.
44. Smith, S. J.(1996).Nietzsche's Genealogy.Philosophy Today,40,486-495.
45. Wilson, T. H.(1995).Foucault, genealogy, history.Philosophy Today,39(2),157-170.
46. 于奇智(1999)。傅柯。台北市:東大圖書公司。
47. 白亦方(2006)。課程史研究，此其時矣。課程研究，1(2)，1-29。
48. 但昭偉(2000)。多元文化主義觀點之下的道德教育與評量─一項初步的觀察。教育資料集刊，25，225-242。
49. 但昭偉(2002)。重讀彌爾的效益論。台北市:學富文化。
50. 杜召棠(1985)。童子軍教育為光後復大陸後洗滌毒素之法寶。童軍教育論著選集，台北市:
51. 楊深坑(2004)。後現代主義的品格與道德教育。教育研究月刊，120，15-21。
52. 蔡錚雲(2006)。論傅柯的主體系譜學。「晚期傅柯與傅柯之後：跨文化視野下的主體問題與自我技術」學術研討會，台北市:

1. 王俊斌(2013)。善的至高性與脆弱性：Murdoch與Nussbaum的立場及其德育蘊義。教育研究集刊，59(3)，1-33。
2. 王俊斌(2014)。理性反思、詩性想像與倫理教育 ─ 論Peter Winch 與Martha Nussbaum 哲學思考的文學跨界。興大人文學報，52，291-316。
3. (2011)。「良師典範」理念之合理性析辨。教育資料與研究，102，19-44。