四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係

The Relationship among a 4-Dimensional Classroom Goal Structure, Personal Goal Orientation and Academic Help-Seeking Behavior

10.29882/JTNUE.200510.0005

彭淑玲(Shu-Ling Peng)；程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

課室目標結構 ； 個人目標導向 ； 課業求助行為 ； classroom goal structure ； individual goal orientation ； academic help-seeking behavior

師大學報：教育類

50卷2期（2005 / 10 / 01）

71 - 97

繁體中文

目標導向的研究分成個人與情境兩個研究層面。個人目標導向已發展至四向度，但情境層面的課室目標結構仍以二向度為主。基於此，本研究的目的是：（1）依據最新的四向度個人目標導向理論以建構四向度課室目標結構，並考驗此四向度課室目標結構模式是否更能解釋實際的觀察資料；（2）分析四向度課室目標結構與四向度個人目標導向是否相對應；（3）探討課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為三者間的關係，並分析個人目標導向在課室目標結構與課業求助行為間所扮演的中介角色。受試者抽取自台灣地區15所國中一到三年級共932位學生，所蒐集到的資料以結構方程模式與階層迴歸進行分析。研究結果顯示：（1）四向度課室目標結構模式具有理想的整體適配度、幅合與區別效度，適合用來解釋國中生的觀察資料，也支持本研究認為課室目標結構是四個可區分的建構之假設。（2）課室目標結構與個人目標導向有相對應的關係，即趨向精熟課室目標結構最能預測學習者的趨向精熟目標，逃避精熟課室目標結構最能預測學習者的逃避精熟目標，趨向表現課室目標結構最能預測學習者的趨向表現目標，逃避表現課室目標結構最能預測學習者的逃避表現目標。（3）國中生知覺的課室目標結構與課業求助行為間的關係會受到個人目標導向的中介，其中以趨向精熟課室目標結構透過趨向精熟目標對課業求助行為產生的效果最強。本研究依據研究結果在理論上的涵義進行討論並提出未來研究的建議。

Research on goals tends to look at both the personal and the contextual aspects of goals. As for the personal aspect, individual goal orientation has four dimensions, but a two-dimensional classroom goal structure has still been dominant in contextual goal research. The purposes of this study were to: (a) construct a 4-dimensional classroom goal structure based on 4-dimensional goal orientation theory, and test a confirmatory factor analysis model of this 4-dimensional classroom goal structure by using structural equation modeling (SEM); (b) analyze whether this 4-dimensional classroom goal structure fits in with the 4-dimensional goal orientation structure; (c) explore the relationship among the classroom goal structure, individual goal orientation and academic help-seeking behavior. The participants were 932 students from 15 junior high schools. Results indicated that (a) the theoretical model proposed by the authors fit the empirically observed data, and this result supported the hypothesis that the classroom goal structure was indeed divided into four dimensions; (b) the classroom goal structure fit in with individual goal orientation, in other words, the approach-mastery classroom goal structure was the best predictor of the approach-mastery goal of learners, the avoidance-mastery classroom goal structure was the best predictor of the avoidance-mastery goal of learners, the approach-performance classroom goal structure was the best predictor of the approach-performance goal of learners, and the avoidance-performance classroom goal construct was the best predictor of avoidance-performance goal learners; (c) individual goal orientation was the mediating variable between the perceived classroom goal structure and academic help-seeking behavior. Besides, the relationship between the approach-mastery classroom goal structure and academic help-seeking behavior was mediated through approach-mastery goal orientation. In the conclusion, the implications for theory and research are discussed.

1. 程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類，48(1)，39-58。
   連結：
2. 程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類，47(1)，39-58。
   連結：
3. Ames, C.(1992).Classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
4. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
5. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
6. Arbreton, A.(1998).In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
7. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
8. Butler, R.(1998).Determinants of help seeking.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(4),630-643.
9. Butler, R.,Neuman, O.(1995).Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitude.Journal of Educational Psychology,87(2),261-271.
10. Church, M. A.,Elliot, A. J.,Gable, S. L.(2001).Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(1),43-54.
11. Cohen, J(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum Associates.
12. Dweck, C. S.(1986).Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist,41,1040-1048.
13. Dweck, C. S.,Leggett, E. L.(1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review,95,256-273.
14. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
15. Elliot, A. J.,Church, M.(1997).A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,218-232.
16. Elliot, A. J.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(1996).Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70,461-475.
17. Elliot, A. J.,McGregor, H. A.(2001).A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(3),501-519.
18. Hair, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black,W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
19. Integrating the "classic" and"contemporary" approaches to achievement motivation(1997).A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement,10,143-179.
20. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(2001).LISREL (Version8.51)(Computer software).Chicago:Scientific Software International.
21. Kaplan, A.,Gheen, M.,Midgley, C.(2002).Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior.British Journal of Educational Psychology,72,191-211.
22. Maehr, M. L.,Midgley, C.(1991).Engancing stusent motivation.Education Psychologist,26,399-427.
23. Nelson-Le Gall, S.(1981).Help-seeking.Developmental Review,1,224-246.
24. Newman, R S.(2002).How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty.Theory into Practice,41(2),132-137.
25. Newman, R. S.(1998).Student help seeking during problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(4),644-658.
26. Nicholls, J G.(1984).Achievement motivation.Psychological Review,91,328-346.
27. Nicholls, J.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.
28. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).In M., Boekaerts, P. R., Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
29. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).Multiple goals, multuple pathways.Journal of Educational Psychology,92,544-555.
30. Ryan, A. M.,Gheen M. H.,Midgley, C.(1998).Why do students avoid asking for help?.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(3),528-535.
31. Ryan, A. M.,Pintrich, P. R.(1997)."Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(2),329-341.
32. Ryan, A. M.,Pintrich, P.,Midgley, C.(2001).Avoiding seeking help in the classroom.Educational Psychology Review,13(2),93-114.
33. Self-Brown, S. R.,Mathews, II, S.(2003).Effects of classroom structure on student achievement goal orientation.The Journal of Educational Research,97(2),106-111.
34. Skaalvik, E. M.(1997).Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(1),71-81.
35. Urdan, T.,Midgley, C.,Anderman, E. M.(1998).The role of classroom goal structure in student's use of self-handicapping strategies.American Educational Research Journal,35(1),101-122.
36. Xiang, P.,Lee, A.(2002).Achievement goals, perceived motivational climate, and student's self-reported mastery behaviors.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,73(1),58-65.
37. 李芩萍(2003)。台南市，國立成功大學教育研究所。
38. 侯梅如(2002)。台南市，國立成功大學教育研究所。
39. 陳嘉成(1999)。台北市，國立政治大學教育系博士班。
40. 鄭芬蘭(1995)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所。
41. 鄭芬蘭、林清山(1997)。目標導向因果模式之驗證。教育心理學報，29，215-232。
42. 蕭素玲(2002)。台南市，國立成功大學教育研究所。
43. 謝志偉(2003)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所。
44. 謝岱陵(2003)。台南市，國立成功大學教育研究所。

1. 陳玉樹、郭銘茜(2013)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響：創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，85-120。
2. 程炳林(2006)。主觀能力與逃避策略之關係。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，1-24。
3. 程炳林,張映芬(2011).國中生動機涉入之分類結構及其相關因素探討.教育心理學報,43(2),521-546.
4. 程炳林、江民瑜(2011)。四分法成就需求架構之驗證及其對成就目標導向模式的調節效果。教育心理學報，43(2)，397-418。
5. 程炳林、林宴瑛(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報，39(2)，173-194。
6. 程炳林、林宴瑛(2014)。超越四向度：六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報，46(1)，117-140。
7. 程炳林、林易慧(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果。教育心理學報，37(3)，231-255。
8. 程炳林、張映芬(2015)。國中生自我決定動機、目標導向與動機涉入之關係。教育心理學報，46(4)，541-564。
9. 程炳林、張映芬(2017)。課室社會目標結構之建構暨其與個人社會目標、求助行為之關係。教育心理學報，48(4)，509-530。
10. 許崇憲(2013)。目標結構知覺對成就目標取向、學業表現、及學習策略的預測力：期刊文獻的後設分析研究。教育心理學報，45(1)，63-82。
11. 許崇憲(2017)。學業競爭及升學因應策略對心理困擾的影響。教育心理學報，49(1)，43-67。
12. 黃永和(2023)。合作小組目標互賴與精緻互助行為關係研究。課程與教學，26(3)，91-124。
13. 林啟超(2008)。父母親成就教養取向、課室目標結構對高職學生之成就目標與學習行為之關係。測驗統計年刊，16(下)，59-84。
14. 林啟超(2009)。高職學生之未來時間觀、成就目標與適應性學習行為間徑路模式之檢驗。教育實踐與研究，22(1)，81-112。
15. 林宴瑛(2022)。國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報，53(4)，923-947。
16. 彭淑玲(2017)。未來取向之自我調整學習模式考驗暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報，48(3)，371-397。
17. 彭淑玲、林宏泰、王佩琪(2017)。你求助嗎？個人目標導向與適應／非適應課業求助／避助行為之關係。教育心理學報，49(2)，267-293。
18. 彭淑玲、林宴瑛(2015)。以多重目標觀點探討課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略的影響：課室教學實驗研究。教育心理學報，47(2)，159-178。
19. 吳中勤(2014)。六向度數學成就目標之驗證。臺北市立大學學報，45(1)，21-41。
20. 吳中勤(2014)。以多群組結構方程模式檢驗成就目標理論模式的測量恆等性。教育科學研究期刊，59(3)，59-95。
21. 吳中勤(2015)。課室目標結構知覺量表之修訂與信、效度之衡鑑。教育實踐與研究，28(2)，89-116。
22. 吳中勤(2016)。探究課室情境知覺及其與個人動機信念的關係。教育理論與實踐學刊，33，33-65。
23. (2011)。高職生烘焙實習求助行為與自我設限之探討。運動健康與休閒學刊，19，51-62。
24. (2016)。課室目標與成就目標的多層次關係之檢驗。教育與心理研究，39(1)，29-58。
25. (2018)。多重目標組型、多重課室目標結構組型與求助行為之關係：質、量觀點分析。教育與心理研究，41(3)，85-112。
26. (2018)。實習教師成就目標、教師信念及任教意願與創意教學信念關係之研究。教育研究學報，52(1)，41-63。
27. (2023)。控制—價值評估互動對愉悅／無聊情緒與動機涉入之效果。教育科學研究期刊，68(4)，1-33。