過程導向法及成品導向法對提升英文寫作能力之差別效益

On the Relative Effectiveness of the Process-and Product-Oriented Approaches to Teaching English Composition

10.29882/JTNUE.200604.0002

曹嘉秀(Chia-Hsiu Tsao)

英語寫作教學 ； 過程導向教學 ； 成品導向教學 ； English writing instruction ； process-oriented approach ； product-oriented approach

師大學報：教育類

51卷1期（2006 / 04 / 01）

23 - 39

繁體中文

本研究採準實驗設計，比較過程導向教學與成品導向教學在提升學生英文寫作能力的差別效益。研究對象為兩班大專外語科學生，研究時間為期一學年，研究結果顯示：（1）就提升整體英文寫作能力而言，兩種教學方式均有效，但無差別效益。（2）進一步分析兩種教學法在四個作文分項的差異性，發現過程組與成品組在內容、組織方面無顯著差異，然而在文法、語辭方面，成品組的進步顯著優於過程組。（3）探討兩種教學法對不同寫作程度學生的適用性，得知過程寫作教學在內容、組織方面頗具成效，但無法有效增進高、低程度學生運用文法、語辭的能力；而成品寫作教學則可有效增進不同程度學生在各向度的寫作能力，尤其是對提升低程度學生文法能力的效果最好。

Despite the long-running controversy regarding the relative merits of productand process-oriented approaches to teaching English composition, few empirical studies on the effectiveness of either approach have been conducted. This study compared the relative effectiveness of the two approaches by conducting a quasi-experiment. The subjects were 40 English majors form two intact advanced writing classes in a 5-year college program, and the experiment lasted for one academic year. The results showed that: (1) the two approaches are both valid means of upgrading the students' overall ability in English writing, but neither of the two is clearly superior to the other; (2) a further analysis of the difference between the two approaches with regard to the four categories of composition (content, organization, grammar and usage) revealed that the product-oriented approach is more effective than the process-oriented one in improving the students' grammar and diction; (3) with regard to the profieciency level of students, the product approach is particularly effective in enchancing the grammar skills of less proficient writers, while the process approach cannot really improve either the grammar or diction skills of students at all levels of proficiency.

1. Chang, C.(2000).The effect of error correction on grammatical structures.Changes and Challenges in ELT
2. Chen, D. W.(2001).The identity crisis of EFL composition instruction in Taiwan
3. Cohen, A.︱A. L. Wenden,︱J. Rubin(1987).Student processing of feedback on their compositions.Learner strategies in language learning,57-69.
4. Cohen, E.︱Scardamalia, M.(1983).The effect of instructional intervention in the revision of essays by grade six children.
5. DeKeyser, R.(1994).Implicit and Explicit Learning of L2 Grammar: A Pilot Study.TESOL Quarterly,28(1),188-194.
6. Ellis, R.(1998).Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching.TESOL Quarterly,32,39-60.
7. Faigley, L.(1986).Competing theories of Process: A critique and a proposal.College English,48(6),527-542.
8. Fathman, A.︱Whalley, E.︱B. Kroll(1990).Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content.Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom,178-190.
9. Ferris, D. R.(1995).Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms.TESOL Quarterly,29,33-53.
10. Ferris, D. R.(1999).The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott.Journal of Second Language Writing,8(1),1-11.
11. Ferris, D. R.(1997).The influence of teacher commentary on student revision.TESOL Quarterly,32,315-339.
12. Ferris, D. R.(1995).Teaching ESL composition students to become independent self-editors.TESOL Journal,4(4),18-22.
13. Fitzergald, J.,Markham, L.(1987).Teaching children about revision in writing.Cognition and Instruction,4,3-24.
14. Folse, K. S.,Muchmore-Vokoun, A.,Solomon, E. V.(1999).Great Essays
15. Fregeau, L. A.(1999).Preparing ESL Students for College Writing: Two Case Studies.The Internet TESL Journal,5(10)
16. Glynn, T.,Jerram, H.,Tuck, B.(1986).Writing as an interactive social process.Behavioral Approaches With Children,10,116-126.
17. Gomez, R. Jr.(1996).Process versus product writing with limited English proficient students.The Bilingual Research Journal,20(2),209-233.
18. Hedgcock, J.,Lefkowitz, N.(1994).Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing.Journal of Second Language Writing,3,141-163.
19. Hillocks, G. Jr.(1986).Research on written composition: New directions for teaching.
20. Huang, L. A.(1999).Promoting English listening proficiency through summary and dictation methods.
21. Jacobs, H.,Zinkgraf, S.,Wormuth, D.,Hartfiel, V.,Hughey, J.(1981).Testing ESL composition: A practical approach.
22. Kepner, C. G.(1991).An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills.The Modern Language Journal,75,305-313.
23. Krashen, S.(1993).Englewood.The power of reading: Insights from the research
24. Krashen, S.(1982).Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
25. Lalande, J. F. II(1982).Reducing composition errors: An experiment.Modern Language Journal,66,140-149.
26. Lee, S. Y.(2003).Teaching EFL writing in the university: related issues, insights, and implications.Journal of National Taipei Teachers College,16(1),111-136.
27. Murray, D. M.,R. Cooper,L. Odell(1978).Internal revision: A process of discovery.Research on composing: Points of departure,85-103.
28. Pennington, M. C.,Brock, M. N.,Yue, F.(1996).Explaining Hong Kong students‵ response to process writing: An exploration of causes and outcomes.Journal of Second Language Writing,5(3),227-252.
29. Raimes, A.(1991).Out of the woods: emerging traditions in the teaching of writing.TESOL Quarterly,25(3),407-430.
30. Raimes, A.(1986).Teaching ESL writing: fitting what we do to what we know.The writing instructor,5(4),153-166.
31. Reid, J.,J. M. Reid(Eds),,P. Byrd(Eds)(1997).Grammar in the Composition Classroom.Boston:Heinle.
32. Scardamalia, M.,Bereiter, C.,C. Wittrock(1986).Handbook of Research on Teaching.New York:Macmillan.
33. Scriven, J.,Glynn, T.(1983).Performance feedback on written tasks for low achieving secondary students.New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies,18(2),134-145.
34. Semke, H. D.(1984).Effects of the red pen.Foreign Language Annals,17,195-202.
35. Sheppard, K.(1992).Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?.RELC Journal,23,103-110.
36. Siegel, S.,Castellan, N. J. Jr.(1988).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.New York:McGraw-Hill.
37. Staton, J.(1982).Analysis of dialogue journal writing as a communicative event
38. Su, S. M.,Yui-nam Leung(2003).Product-Oriented or Process-Oriented Approach Toward Teaching ESP?-in the Case of an EFL Nursing English Course.Curriculum Reform in ELT.
39. Truscott, J.(1996).The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes.Language Learning,46(2),327-369.
40. Victori, M.(1999).An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: a case study of two effective and two less effective writers.System,27,537-555.
41. White, R.,Arndt, V.(1991).Process Writing.Harlow:Longman.
42. Yu, C. F.,Butler, B.(2000).Training Chinese students to become aware of words that mark lexical aspect in English.the 17th Conference on English Teaching and Learning,Taipei:
43. Zamel, V.(1982).Writing: The process of discovering meaning.TESOL Quarterly,16,195-209.
44. Zamel, V.(1987).Recent research on writing pedagogy.TESOL Quarterly,21,697-715.
45. 李嘉齡︱李嘉宜(1999)。寫作修改教學及其實施成效。健行學報，19(1)，161-178。
46. 林春仲︱陳秀潔︱劉振蘋︱林怡弟︱李慧嫺︱楊惠筠(2003)。大學聯攷英文科作文應採“整體式評分法”或“分析式評分法”？。第十二屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會，台北市:

1. 林婕婷、李明憲、呂正雄(2010)。系統化教學設計：以國中七年級英語寫作教學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，3(2)，101-126。
2. (2009)。大學生英作線上評分系統優使性評估。教學科技與媒體，90，49-62。