性別議題融入藝術教育之統整課程行動研究實例

Integrating Gender Issues into the Arts Curriculum-an Example of Action Research

10.29882/JTNUE.200610.0005

陳育淳(Yu-Chun Chen)

行動研究 ； 性別 ； 實作評量 ； 藝術統整課程 ； action research ； gender issues ； performance assessment ； integrated arts curriculum

師大學報：教育類

51卷2期（2006 / 10 / 01）

91 - 119

繁體中文

課程的行動探究是改進課程與教學的有效途徑，教師透過教學才能整合「計劃」、「行動」與「評鑑」，本研究提供一次課程的經驗，以建構性的活動與統整概念，發展結構性的教學，運用分組、角色扮演、敘述性的教學活動與實作評量，實踐將性別議題融入藝術教育的課程內涵與教學主張。研究結果顯示學生的藝術行為如同文化的批判，可以透過藝術教育探索生活中人、事、物之特質與意義。將藝術知識與生活經驗相互結合，不僅培養學生藝術專業上的基本能力，亦促進性別觀念的學習。教師則透過行動的探究，加強對專業知識、自我以及教學環境覺知，更加敏銳的處理性別相關議題，修正原先的意識型態，為自己選擇的行動負責。

Action research, in which teaching and evaluation are combined, is one of the most effective ways to improve instruction and curricula. This investigation provides one actual experience through constructional activities and integrated concept to develop structural curriculum. The researcher used teamwork, role-playing, narrative educational activities and performance assessments in order to integrate both the role of gender and the different ways of student arts representation. It was found that in art class students can investigate, through the creation of works of art, the meanings and characteristics of gender difference as well as many other issues present in everyday life. Art classes can combine student's life experience to further develop their critical thinking ability. Through this action research project, Art instructors not only developed their professional knowledge but also their consciousness of their educational environment. More specifically, they became more sensitive to gender issues, more aware of their own unconscious gender ”ideology”, and become more responsible for his/her behavior through teaching.

1. 陳瓊花(2004)。從書與話探討台灣兒童與青少年的性別概念。藝術教育研究，8，1-38。
   連結：
2. Anderson, T.(2003).The International Journal of Arts Education.
3. Armstrong, C.(1994).Designing assessment in art..Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
4. Ballengee-Morris, C.,Stuhr, P.(2001).Art Education.
5. Banks, J. A.,J. A. Banks,C. A. M. Banks(1993).Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives.Boston:Allyn and Bacon..
6. Barrett, T.(2003).Interpreting visual culture..Art education,56(2),6-12.
7. Beane, J.(1997).Curriculum integration: designing the core of democratic education..New York:Teachers College Press..
8. Belenky, M.,Clinchy, B., Golderberg, N.,Tarule, J.(1986).Women's ways of knowing..New York:Basic Books..
9. Cazden, C. B.(1986).Handbook of research on teaching.New York:MacMillan.
10. Chapman, L. H.(2003).Studies of the mass arts..Studies in Art Education,44(3),230-245.
11. Clark, G.,Zimmerman, E.(1997).Project Arts: Programs for ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, high ability, visual arts students in rural communities..Bloomington, IN:Indiana University..
12. Collins, G.,Sandell, R.,S. La Pierre,E.Zimmerman(1997).Research methods and methodologies for art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association..
13. Core, J.,C. Luke,Core(1992).Feminisms and critical pedagogy.New York:Routledge..
14. Dalton, P.(2001).The gendering of art education: Modernism, identity and critical feminism..Philadelphia:Open University Press.
15. Duncum, P.(2002).Visual culture art education Why, what and how..Journal of Art and Design Education,21(1),14-21.
16. Eisner, E. W.(2003).What do the arts teach?.
17. Eisner, E. W.(2000).Educating artistic vision..New York, NY:Teacher Colledge Press.
18. Freedman, K.(2003).The importance of student artistic production to teaching visual culture..Art education,56(2),38-43.
19. Jacobs, H.(1997).Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12..Alexandria, VA:ASCD..
20. Kindler, A. M.(2003).Visual culture, visual brain and (art) education..Studies in Art Education,44(3),290-295.
21. Kindler, A. M.,Darras, B.(1997).Map of artistic development..Child development in art,17-44.
22. McLaren, P.(1995).Post-Colonial Pedagogy: Post- colonial desire and decolonized community..Postmodernism, post-colonialism and pedagogy,227-268.
23. Nitko, A. J.(1996).Educational assessment of students.Englewood Clitts, NJ:Prerice-Hall.
24. Nitko, A. J.(2001).Educational assessment of students..Upper Saddle river, NJ:Prerice-Hall..
25. Parsons, M. J.(2003).The movement toward an integrated curriculum: some background influences in art education in the USA.
26. Pauly, N.(2003).Interpreting visual culture as cultural narratives in teacher education..Studies in Art Education,44(3),264-283.
27. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform..Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
28. Sturken, M.,Cartwright, L.(2001).Practice of looking: An introduction to visual culture..New York:Oxford.
29. Swain, S.(1998).Great Housewives of Art.
30. Tavin, K. M.(2003).Wrestling with Angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of Visual culture..Studies in Art Education,44(3),197-213.
31. Tyler, R. W.(1949).Basic Principles of curriculum and instruction..Chicago:The universiry of Chicago Press..
32. Walker, D.(1990).Fundamentals of curriculum.New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33. Walker, S.(2001).Teaching meaning in artmaking.Davis Publications:Worcester, MA.
34. White, M.,N. Yelland(1998).Gender in early childhood.London:Routledge.
35. Wiggins, G. P.(1998).Educative assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
36. Wilson, B.(2003).Of diagram and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping the content o fart education..Studies in Art Education,44(3),214-229.
37. Wilson, B.(2000).Of diagram and rhizomes: Disrupting the content of art education.Taipei:
38. 王文科(1994)。課程與教學論
39. 夏林清、P.P.Altrichter & B. Somekh(1997)。行動研究方法導論－教師動手做研究。
40. 徐秀菊、藝術教育研究編輯委員會(2002)。藝術統整課程設計原理與實務。藝術與人文教育，401-426。
41. 張麗麗(2002)。藝術與人文學習領域的教學評量。藝術與人文教育，579-636。
42. 教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。
43. 郭俊賢、陳淑惠、D.Lazear(1999)。落實多元智慧教學評量。
44. 郭禎祥(2002)。當代藝術教育的新方向。澳門特別行政區政府教育暨青年快舉辦之200年藝術教育交流會，澳門
45. 郭禎祥、趙惠玲、藝術教育研究編輯委員會(2002)。視覺文化與藝術教育。325-366。
46. 陳月娥(2001)。社會學。
47. 陳瓊花(2002)。大學通旘教育教育之藝術鑒賞課程設計。視覺藝術，5，27-70。
48. 陳瓊花(2002)。反向思考。美育，128，22-31。
49. 游惠貞、L.Nochlin(1995)。女性，藝術與權力。
50. 溫明麗、潘慧玲(2003)。性別與哲學－女性主義彰顯的哲學啓思。性別議題導論，5-27。
51. 甄曉蘭(1995)。合作行動研究－進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。
52. 甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務－解構與重建。
53. 潘慧玲(1999)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育學系主辦之「性別與教育」論壇。
54. 蔡清田(1998)。從行動研究論教學實習課程與教師專業成長。教師專業成長：理想與實際，177-202。
55. 駱慧文(1998)。兩性平等教育教學方法的應用。高市文教，64，44-48。
56. 簡茂發(1999)。教師天地。
57. 蘇芊玲(2001)。性別教育課程的理論與實踐。教育局於台北市萬芳高中舉辦之「性別議題融入九年一貫課程－『以藝術與人文學習領域』為例」教學研討會
58. 顧維周(1992)。巨匠美術週刊73馬薩其奧。
59. 荘明貞(1999)。兩性教育九年一貫國民教育課程網要之規則。教育研究資訊，7(4)，28-47。
60. 荘明貞(1997)。道德教學與評量－多元文化教育觀點。

1. 韓佩凌(2014)。賦能觀點性別課程對大學生跨性別認知與跨性別態度影響之行動研究。教育理論與實踐學刊，29，159-186。
2. 廖美蓮(2012)。性別與社會建構：初探社會工作系學生性別意識形塑。臺大社工學刊，25，1-50。
3. 童鳳嬌、莊楹蕿、林志成(2010)。建立有品校園之行動研究。學校行政，70，207-233。
4. 溫知穎(2014)。以視覺影像為主題的藝術課程行動研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，7(2)，49-76。
5. 鄭月秀(2012)。運用芝加哥模式之網路藝術教學：以國小四年級社會學習領域為例。教育研究集刊，58(4)，1-50。
6. (2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程中之性別平等教育議題。教育資料與研究，98，79-100。