教育改革對教師專業認同之影響：五位資深教師的探索性研究

The Influence of Educational Reform on Teachers' Professional Identities: an Exploratory Study of Five Junior High School Teachers

10.29882/JTNUE.200804.0002

楊巧玲(Chiao-Ling Yang)

教育改革 ； 教師專業 ； 專業認同 ； 國中教師 ； educational reform ； teachers' profession ； professional identity ； junior high school teachers

師大學報：教育類

53卷1期（2008 / 04 / 01）

25 - 54

繁體中文

教育改革頻仍，教師專業自主、專業成長常被倡議、強調，但是教師在教育改革中如何重新認識自己的專業，卻極少受到關注。本研究旨在探究教育改革如何影響教師的專業認同，透過五位年資十年以上的國中教師的言說，本文發現隨著教育改革對教師專業的持續重行定義，包括工作內容、形式與對象，教師的專業認同不斷形塑、解構、重建，這與多數學者對認同所持的看法一致，亦即認同不再只是個體的內在特質，而是個體在社會情境中持續建構的過程，值得注意的是，認同除了具流動性、矛盾性，也具一致性，已有學者指出人們終其一生都在為個人特質的持續性而努力，教師的專業認同亦然。根據研究結果，本文針對研究主題與方法進行討論，針對教育實務與研究提出建議。

New educational reform initiatives emerge very often. While the professional autonomy and development of teachers are advocated and emphasized, the question of how teachers understand their profession has rarely been raised. This study aims to inquire into how educational reform influences teachers' professional identities. Based on talks with five junior high school teachers with 10 or more years of service, this study found that teachers constantly shape, deconstruct and reconstruct their professional identities in part because educational reforms repeatedly redefine the teaching profession, including its content, form and ”audience.” This finding concurs with the contemporary view of identity, which sees identity as not a combination of individual characteristics but as an on-going process of social construction. It is noteworthy, however, that identity has consistency in addition to mobility, complexity and even self-contradictoriness. Many researchers have pointed out that people strive throughout their life for consistent characters, and teachers prove to be no exception. Based on the research results, the author further discusses the subjects and the method ology of this study, and makes some suggestions for the improvement of educational practice and for future research.

1. 周鳳美、宋佩芬(2005)。實習教師建構教師專業認同之研究。新竹師院學報，20，1-26。
   連結：
2. 林生傳、李新民、廖仁智(2002)。運用學校本位經營機制推動教學創新之探討。教育研究集刊，48(3)，151-182。
   連結：
3. 張盈堃、陳慧璇(2004)。矛盾：基層教師生活世界的宰制與抗拒。應用心理研究，21，35-62。
   連結：
4. 陳琦媛(2005)。教師面對教育改革態度之研究。學校行政，38，106-118。
   連結：
5. 陳麗珠(2004)。教育部委託專題研究計畫期末報告。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
   連結：
6. Acker, S.(1996).Gender and teachers`work.Review of Research in Education,21,99-162.
7. Britzman, D. P.(1992).The terrible problem of knowing thyself: Toward a poststructural account of teacher identity.JCT,9(3),23-46.
8. C. Glesne,莊明貞,陳怡如(譯)(2005).質性研究導論（Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. Second Edition）.台北市:高等教育.
9. Carspecken, P. F.(1996).Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide.New York:Routledge.
10. Coldron, J.,Smith, R.(1999).Active location in teachers` construction of their professional identities.Journal of Curriculum Studies,31(6),711-726.
11. Crabtree, B. F.,Miller, W. (Eds.)(1999).Doing qualitative research.London:Sage.
12. Crowson, R. L.(2003).The turbulent policy environment in education: Implications for school administration and accountability.Peabody Journal of Education,78(4),29-43.
13. Day, C.(2002).School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity.International Journal of Educational Research,37,677-692.
14. Drake, C.,Spillane, J. P.,Huffered-Ackles, K.(2001).Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject-matter context.Journal of Curriculum Studies,33(1),1-23.
15. Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data
16. Enyedy, N.,Goldberg, J.,Welsh, K.M.(2006).Complex dilemmas of identity and practice.Science Education,90(1),68-93.
17. Feagin, J.,Orum, A.,Sjoberg, G. (Eds.)(1991).A case for case study.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
18. Fitz, J.(2003).The politics of accountability: A perspective from England and Wales.Peabody Journal of Education,78(4),230-241.
19. Flores, M. A.,Day, C.(2006).Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers` identities: A multi-perspective study.Teaching and Teacher Education,22,219-232.
20. Fullan, M.,A. Hargreaves,A. Lieberman, M. Fullan,D. Hopkins (Eds.)(1998).International Handbook of Educational Change, Part I.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
21. Gee, J. P.(2001).Identity as an analytic lens for research in education.Review of Research in Education,25,99-125.
22. Geijsel, F.,Meijers, F.(2005).Identity learning: The core process of educational change.Educational Studies,31(4),419-430.
23. Goodson, I.(1991).Biography, identity, and schooling.London:Falmer.
24. Hargreaves, A.(1994).Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers work and culture in the postmodern age.London:Cassell.
25. Hargreaves, A.,Dawe, R.(1990).Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture and the case of peer coaching.Teaching and Teacher Education,6(3),227-241.
26. Hargreaves, A.,Goodson, I.,I. Goodson,A. Hargreaves (Eds.)(1996).Teachers` professional lives.London:Falmer Press.
27. Hargreaves, D.,P. Woods (Ed.)(1980).Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school.London:Groom Helm.
28. Jurasaite-Harbison, E.(2005).Reconstructing teachers’ professional identity in a research discourse: A professional development opportunity in an informal setting.TRAMES,9(2),159-176.
29. Korthagen, F. A. J.(2004).In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,20,77-97.
30. Locke, T.(2004).Someone else`s game: Constructing the English teaching professional in New Zealand.Teaching and Teacher Education,20,17-29.
31. MacLure, M.(1993).Arguing for your self: Identity as an organising principle in teachers` jobs and lives.British Educational Research Journal,19(4),311-322.
32. McNess, E.,Broadfoot P.,Osborn, M.(2003).Is the effective compromising the affective.British Educational Research Journal,29(2),243-257.
33. Miles, M. G.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
34. Musgrove, F.(1977).Margins of the mind.London:Methuen.
35. Rex, L.A.,Nelson, M. C.(2004).How teachers` professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms.Teachers College Record,106(6),1288-1331.
36. Sachs, J.(2001).Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes.Journal of Education Policy,16(2),149-161.
37. Sikes, P. J.,Measor, L.,Woods, P.(1985).Teacher careers: Crises and continuities.London:Falmer Press.
38. Sofer, C.(1970).Men in mid-career.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
39. Stake, R.(1995).The art of case research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
40. The Qualitative Report
41. van Veen, K.,Sleegers, P.(2006).How does it feel? Teachers` emotions in a context of change.Journal of Curriculum Studies,38(1),85-111.
42. van Veen, K.,Sleegers, P.,van de Ven, P.H.(2005).One teacher`s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive-affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms.Teaching and Teacher Education,21,917-934.
43. Webb, R.,Vulliamy, G.(1999).Changing times, changing demands: A comparative analysis of classroom practice in primary schools in England and Finland.Research Papers in Education,14(3),229-255.
44. Weber, S.,Mitchell, C.,I. Goodson,A. Hargreaves (Eds.)(1996).Teachers` Professional Lives.London:Falmer Press.
45. Woods, P.(1990).Cold eyes and warm hearts: changing perspectives on teachers` work and careers.British Journal of Sociology of Education,11(1),101-117.
46. Yin, R.(1989).Case study research: Design and methods.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
47. Yin, R.(1994).Case study research: Design and methods.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
48. Zeichner, K. M.(1991).Contradictions and tensions in the professionalization of teaching and the democratization of schools.Teachers College Record,92(3),363-379.
49. 天下雜誌(2006)。教育專刊：關鍵能力。台北市:天下雜誌。
50. 王念騏(2001)。台南市，臺南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班。
51. 卯靜儒(2003)。性別、族群、與教學：教師生涯發展傳記研究之初探。教育研究資訊，11(5)，59-82。
52. 朱永馨(2001)。台中市，臺中師範學院/諮商與教育心理研究所。
53. 江文慈(2003)。教育改革中的教師情緒。師友，436，0-5。
54. 行政院教改會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北市:行政院教改會。
55. 余安邦(1999)。九年一貫課程真的是以孩子為中心嗎。教育資料文摘，43(4)，74-79。
56. 余安邦、凌俊嫻(1997)。真的是以孩童為中心嗎?開放教育的盲點與迷失。教師天地，91，32-41。
57. 吳明清(2006)。讓專業成為教育改革動力。台灣教育，637，24-29。
58. 吳清山(2006)。台灣教育改革的檢討與策進：1994-2006年。教育資料集刊，32，1-21。
59. 周祝瑛(2003)。誰捉弄了台灣的教改。台北市:心理。
60. 林家任(2002)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
61. 林清江(1999)。與教師一起進行教育改革。中等教育，50(1)，10-11。
62. 邱義烜(2001)。台中市，臺中師範學院國民教育研究所。
63. 東森ETtoday
64. 范熾文(2006)。從教育改革談教師的專業倫理與承諾。師友，469，0-4。
65. 東森ETtoday
66. 張芳全(2006)。一九九四年以降之台灣教育改革分析。教育資料與研究，68，221-240。
67. 張淑雲(2001)。台南市，臺南師範學院教師在職進修輔導教學碩士學位班。
68. 全國教育發展會議
69. 陳文琪(2002)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
70. 陳伯璋、載於中華民國課程與教學學會主編(2001)。行動研究與課程教學革新。台北市:揚智。
71. 曾吉雄(1999)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
72. 曾志朗(2001)。教師的專業成長與新使命：別觀望別猶豫全心投入做個有使命的教改人。主計月刊，551，6-13。
73. 馮朝霖(2002)。自我賦權、公民社會與教育改革：台灣近十年教育改革的理論與反思。亞洲研究，42，53-74。
74. 黃光國(2003)。我的陽謀。台北市:INK印刻。
75. 黃武雄(1995)。台灣教育的重建：面對當前教育的結構性問題。台北市:遠流。
76. 楊巧玲(2007)。教育改革與教師工作：台灣南部一所國中之個案研究。教育政策論壇，10(3)，143-181。
77. 東森ETtoday
78. 歐用生(2000)。新學校的建立－九年一貫的展望。學校行政，7，3-7。
79. 歐用生(1996)。教育改個的希望在教師。桃縣文教，1，19-21。
80. 蔡世雄(2002)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
81. 蔡孟珍(2000)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
82. 蔡純姿(1997)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學輔導學系。
83. 蔡維薇(2000)。教育為培養廿一世紀人才而服務：以學生為中心的教育。文教新潮，5(3)，31-36。
84. 戴文青(2005)。從深層結構論台灣幼兒園教師專業認同轉化可能性。南大學報，39(2)，19-42。
85. 薛承泰(2003)。十年教改為誰築夢。台北市:心理。
86. 饒見維(2001)。九年一貫課程與教師專業角色的省思。教師天地，113，99-162。

1. 劉邦鉉(2016)。教師搜索之研究—違法性與違法性意識之探討。國立臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所學位論文。2016。1-102。 
2. 陳惠雪(Hui-Hsueh Chen)(2023)。國小雙語自然教師的專業認同：「衝突」－「協調」－「再生」。教育研究集刊。(69:2)。1-48。