後投保協議時代的兩岸商務仲裁－以兩岸投保協議第十四條第四款前段之解釋與適用為中心

Commercial Arbitration after the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement-Focused on the Interpretation and Application of Article 14 (4) of the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement

陳希佳(Helena H. C. Chen)

兩岸商務糾紛 ； 投保協議 ； 兩岸商務仲裁 ； 兩岸仲裁 ； 仲裁 ； Cross-Strait Commercial Disputes ； Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement ； Cross-Strait Commercial Arbitration ； Cross-Strait Arbitration ； Arbitration

臺北大學法學論叢

92期（2014 / 12 / 01）

137 - 185

繁體中文

海峽兩岸投資保障和促進協議於2012年8月簽署後，海基會隨即於其出版之《兩岸經貿〉九月號登載：依據兩岸投保協議第14條第4款前段：「商務糾紛的當事雙方可選擇兩岸的仲裁機構及當事雙方同意的仲裁地點」之規定，臺商和中國大陸國營企業或其他私人公司發生糾紛，當事人「可選擇兩岸仲裁機構」、「仲裁地點可選第三地」、並且有「臺灣仲裁機構可至大陸仲裁」之突破。然而，大陸現行仲裁法制依個案是否具有涉外因素，區別為真有涉外因素的「涉外仲裁」與不具有涉外因素的「國內仲裁」。臺商在大陸設立之子公司若擬將其與大陸自然人或企業的商務糾紛提付仲裁，在別無其他涉外因素的情況下，該案件為國內仲裁，依大陸司法實務，國內仲裁案件之當事人不得約定境外的仲裁機構、不得約定在境外進行仲裁；同時，大陸最高人民法院曾經在「旭普林案」中表示拒絕承認國際商會在上海作成的仲裁判斷，則在中國大陸仲裁法制架構下，應如何理解及適用上引兩岸投保協議第14條第4款前段的約定？在實務上可能面臨哪些問題，殊值吾人深入探討。

After entering into the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement, the Straits Exchange Foundation immediately published in the ＂Straits Business Monthly＂ that: The first sentence of Article 14 (4) of the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement provides that ＂[T]he parties to a commercial dispute may designate an arbitration institution of either side of the Strait and agree on the seat of arbitration.＂ Pursuant to this provision, in the event where a dispute arises between a Taiwanese company and a Chinese state-owned enterprise or other Chinese private company, the parties may ＂designate an arbitration institution of either side of the Strait＂ and ＂agree on the seat of arbitration located in a third place.＂ Furthermore, it is a breakthrough that a Taiwanese arbitration institution may administer arbitration cases in Mainland China. However, the current arbitration regime of Mainland China distinguishes between an arbitration involving foreign elements (foreign-related arbitration) and an arbitration that does not involve any foreign elements (domestic arbitration). Under such regime, if a subsidiary established by a Taiwanese company in Mainland China wishes to refer a commercial dispute with a Chinese citizen or company to arbitration, where such dispute does not involve any foreign elements , the said dispute would be fall within the category of a domestic arbitration. According to the judicial practice in Mainland China, parties to a domestic arbitration cannot agree to refer the dispute to an arbitration institution outside Mainland China and cannot agree to arbitrate in a place outside of Mainland China. Moreover, the Supreme People's Court of the PRC in the Ziiblin case had refused to recognize the arbitration award made by the International Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai. As such, it is worth observing how, under the current arbitration regime, Article 14 (4) of the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement should be interpreted and applied, as well as the problems that the parties may encounter III practIce.

1. (2004)。涉外商事海事審判指導。人民法院出版社=Court Press=ren min fa yuan chu ban she。
2. BLACKABY, NIGEL(2009).REDFERN AND HUNTER ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION.
3. BORN, GARY B.(2012).INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: LAW AND PRACTICE.
4. Chen, Helena H.C.(2012).A Review of the Taiwanese Court's Ruling on Ad Hoc Arbitral Awards.ASIAN PACIFIC LAW REVIEW,20(1),89-111.
5. Cohen, Jerome A.(2005).Time to Fix China's Arbitration.FAR EASTERN ECONOMIC REVIEW,31+33.
6. GREENBERG, SIMON(2011).INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION.
7. JOHN SUTTON, DAVID ST.,GILL, JUDITH(2003).RUSSELL ON ARBITRATION.
8. KUN, FAN(2013).ARBITRATION IN CHINA.
9. Kun, Fan(2011).Prospects of Foreign Arbitration Institutions Administering Arbitration in China.J. INT'L, ARB.,28(4),343-353.
10. Moser, Michael J.(ed.)(2007).MANAGING BUSINESS DISPUTES IN TODAY'S CHINA-DUELLING WITH DRAGONS.
11. TAO, JINGZHOU(2012).ARBITRATION LAW AND PRACTICE IN CHINA.
12. TWEEDDALE, ANDREW,TWEEDDALE, KAREN(2005).ARBITRATION OF COMMERCIAL DISPUTES.
13. 王生長(2005)。關於修訂《中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會仲裁規則》的說明。仲裁與法律，96
14. 王欽彥(2011)。我國只有機構仲裁而無個案（ad hoc）仲裁？─最高法院99年度台抗字第358號裁定背後之重大問題。台灣法學雜誌，171
15. 江偉(2012)。仲裁法。中國人民大學出版社=China Remin University Press=zhong guo ren min da xue chu ban she。
16. 呂炳斌(2010)。論外國仲裁機構到我國境內仲裁的問題─兼析我國加入《紐約公約》時的保留。法治研究，2010(10)
17. 宋連斌編(2005)。仲裁理論與實務。湖南大學出版社=Hunan University Press=hu nan da xue chu ban she。
18. 宋連斌、王珺(2011)。國際商會在中國內地仲裁：准入、裁決國籍及執行─由寧波中院的一份裁定談起。西北大學學報（哲學社會科學版），41(3)
19. 宋連斌、韓健編、林一飛編(2005)。商事仲裁法律報告。中信出版社=CITIC Publishing House=zhong xin chu ban she。
20. 海基會(2012)。兩岸投資保障和促進協議Q & A。兩岸經貿月刊，2012(9月號=September)
21. 馬占軍(2011)。仲裁法修改新論。法律出版社=Law Press China=fa lu chu ban she。
22. 高言、劉璐(1996)。仲裁法理解適用與案例評析。人民法院出版社=Court Press=ren min fa yuan chu ban she。
23. 張斌生編(2010)。仲裁法新論。廈門大學出版社=Xiamen University Press=xia men da xue chu ban she。
24. 陳希佳(2010)。大陸關於認定仲裁協議效力的規定與實務見解。仲裁，91
25. 陳希佳(2013)。二○一二年中國大陸民事訴訟法修訂對其仲裁制度之影響。月旦民商法雜誌，41
26. 陳長文編、李家慶編(2012)。兩岸投資保障和促進協議與兩岸商務投資糾紛解決機制。五南圖書出版股份有限公司=Wunan Book Co., Ltd.=wu nan tu shu chu ban gu fen you xian gong si。
27. 最高人民法院中國應用法學研究所編(2000)。人民法院案例選。中國法制出版社=China Legal Publishing House=zhong guo fa zhi chu ban she。
28. 程德鈞、王生長、康明(1993)。國際慣例和涉外仲裁實務。中國青年出版社=China Youth Publishing=zhong guo qing nian chu ban she。
29. 黃亞英(2007)。外國仲裁裁決論析─基於《紐約公約》及中國實踐的視角。現代法學，29(1)
30. 楊弘磊(2009)。人民法院涉外仲裁司法審查情況的調研報告。武大國際法評論，9(1)
31. 楊玲(2013)。中國承認與執行仲裁裁決─以「涉外商事海事審判指導」（二○○一至二○一一年）為考察對象。月旦法學雜誌，218
32. 萬鄂湘(2009)。《紐約公約》在中國的司法實踐。法律適用，276
33. 趙秀文(2012)。國際商事仲裁法。中國人民大學出版社=China Remin University Press=zhong guo ren min da xue chu ban she。
34. 趙秀文(2005)。論ICC國際仲裁院裁決在我國的承認與執行。法學，2005(6)
35. 趙秀文(2006)。中國《仲裁法》與建設社會主義和諧社會─為記念我國《仲裁法》實施十週年而作。仲裁與法律，101
36. 趙秀文(2009)。中國仲裁市場對外開放研究。政法論壇，27(6)
37. 趙威編(1995)。國際仲裁法理論與實務。中國政法大學出版社=China University of Political Science and Law Press=zhong guo zheng fa da xue chu ban she。
38. 劉貴祥、沈紅雨(2012)。我國承認和執行外國仲裁裁決的司法實踐述評。北京仲裁，79
39. 劉曉紅編(2009)。國際商事仲裁專題研究。法律出版社=Law Press China=fa lu chu ban she。
40. 劉曉紅(2011)。海峽兩岸仲裁裁決相互認可與執行制度之檢視與修正。法學，2011(12)
41. 譚兵編(1995)。中國仲裁制度研究。法律出版社=Law Press China=fa lu chu ban she。
42. 蘇澤林編、景漢朝編(2011)。立案工作指導。人民法院出版社=Court Press=ren min fa yuan chu ban she。

1. 陳希佳(2014)。從中國大陸司法實踐論紐約公約第五條「公共政策」之可預測性。國立臺灣大學法律學系學位論文。2014。1-203。