社會性長期照護保險的財務處理

Financing Arrangements of Long-Term Care Insurance in Taiwan

10.6265/TJSW.2014.12(1)3

鄭清霞(Ching-Hsia Cheng)；王靜怡(Ching-Yi Wang)

長期照護 ； 社會保險 ； 隨收隨付制 ； 完全儲備 ； 部分準備提存 ； Long-term care ； Social insurance ； Pay-as-you-go ； Full funding ； Partial funding

臺灣社會福利學刊

12卷1期（2014 / 12 / 01）

65 - 119

繁體中文

台灣社會保險給付涵蓋老年、身心障礙、健康、失業等，以及目前正在規劃的長期照護保險。然而，人口老化的速度卻衝擊這些回應社會風險的社會保險財務，永續經營成為社會保險改革與規劃的首要重點。費用掌握、財源籌措以及費率能否順利調整，是財務永續的關鍵因素，其中財務處理方式攸關費率水準的規劃，是財務規劃的重要關鍵部分。社會保險的財務處理方式主要有：完全儲備制（fully funded或稱基金制）、隨收隨付制（pay-as-you-go或稱完全賦課制）、部分提存準備（partial funding），各有其立論精神與優缺點，本研究首先討論社會性長期照護保險的財務處理方式，其次介紹德國及日本長期照護保險費用的調整；最後擬從1.財務永續性（financial sustainability）、2.可負擔性（affordability）、3.世代公平性（intergenerational equity）、4.費率調整的政治可行性（political feasibility）、5.基金規模（the optimal scale of funds）等面向，討論台灣長期照護保險的財務處理方式。

Social insurance benefits in Taiwan include old-age, disability, medical, unemployment, and long-term care insurance, the latter still in the planning stage. However, Taiwan's aging population is challenging the financial soundness of the social insurance systems, which makes sustainable operations the top priority of social insurance reform. Control of expenses, revenue collection and adjustment of the premium rate are the key factors for financial sustainability. Among these, the funding method is critical for premium planning, and it is an important part of overall financial planning. There are three social insurance funding methods: full funding, payas-you-go funding and partial funding. Every method has its perspective, advantages and shortcomings. We discuss the funding methods for long-term care insurance, and review Germany and Japan's experiences with premium adjustments. The last section focuses on the funding methods for long-term care insurance in Taiwan, which the authors evaluate from the following perspectives: 1. financial sustainability, 2. affordability, 3. intergenerational equity, 4. political feasibility of premium adjustments, and 5. the optimal scale for measuring fund amounts.

1. 陳明芳(2012)。福利國家的重構：以德國長期照護保險制度的建置與改革為例兼論臺灣可得之借鏡。台大社會工作學刊，25，157-207。
   連結：
2. 鄭清霞、鄭文輝(2007)。我國長期照護制度的費用估算與財務處理。台大社會工作學刊，15，167-218。
   連結：
3. (1999).With Respect to Old Age: Long Term Care: Rights and Responsibilities.London:The Stationery Office.
4. Maruo, N. (1997). Social Security in Japan: Toward a Japanese Model of the Welfare State. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved Sep.10, 2014, from http://www.mofa.go.jp/j_info/japan/socsec/maruo/index.html
5. 鄭清霞（2014）。〈台灣長期照護保險的費率預測與調整規劃〉。中正大學社會福利系，初稿。
6. 日本立川市（2012）。《立川市高齡者福祉介護計劃》。
7. 行政院衛生署長期照護籌備小組（2011）。《國民長期照護需要調查（第一階段）初步統計結果報告》
8. Ministry of Health, Labour, & Welfare (2011). Act for Partial Revision of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act, Etc., in Order to Strengthen Long-Term Care Service Infrastructure. Retrieved Sep.10, 2014, from http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/en_tp01.pdf
9. Heinicke, K., & L. S. Thomsen (2010). The Social Long-term Care Insurance in Germany: Origin, Situation, Threats and Perspective. Discussion Paper, No. 10-012. Germany: Center for European Economic Research
10. Arntz, M., R. Sacchetto, A. Spermann, S. Steffes, & S. Widmaier (2007). The German Social Long-term Care Insurance: Structure and Reform Options. IZA Discussion Paper No.2625. Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor
11. Arnold, R.,Rothgang, H.(2009).Financing Long-Term Care Insurance - Reconciling a Pay-As-You-Go System with a Partly Funded System.7th ESPAnet conference 2009 Stream nr. 8A - Financing the welfare state,Urbino:
12. Asher, M. G.(ed.),Oum, S.(ed.),Parulian, F.(ed.)(2009).ERIA Research Project Report 2009-9ERIA Research Project Report 2009-9,Jakarta:ERIA.
13. Barr, N. A.(1987).The Economics of the Welfare State.London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
14. Barr, N.(ed.)(2001).Economic Theory and the Welfare State, Edward Elgar Library in Critical Writings in Economics.
15. Barr, N.,Diamond, P.(2009).Reforming Pensions: Principles, Analytica l Errors and Policy Directions.International Social Security Review,62(2),5-29.
16. Barr, N.,Diamond, P.(2010).Pension Reform: A Short Guide.New York:OUP.
17. Barr, N.,Diamond, P.(2006).The Economics of Pensions.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,22(1),1-14.
18. Billig, A.,Ménard, J. C.(2013).Actuarial Balance Sheets as a Tool to Assess the Sustainability of Social Security Pension Systems.International Social Security Review,66(2),31-52.
19. Campbell, J. C.,Ikegami, N.(2003).Japan's Radical Reform of Long-term Care.Social Policy & Administration,37(1),21-34.
20. Colombo, F.,Llena-Nozal, A.,Mercier, J.,Tjadens, F.,OECD(ed)(2011).Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-term Care.OECD Publishing.
21. Colombo, F.,Mercier, J.(2012).Help Wanted ? Fair and Sustainable Financing of Long term Care Services.Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy,34(2),316-332.
22. Comas-Herrera, A.(ed.),Wittenberg, R.(ed.)(2003).PSSRU Discussion Paper 1840PSSRU Discussion Paper 1840,London:London School of Economics.
23. Demange, G.(2009).On Sustainable Pay-as-You-Go Contribution Rules.Journal of Public Economic Theory,11,493-527.
24. Feldstein, M.(1999).Prefunding Medicare.American Economic Review,89(2),222-227.
25. Fukawa, T.(2007).Health and Long-term Care Expenditures of the Elderly in Japan Using a Micro-simulation Modle.The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy,6(2),199-206.
26. Fukui, T.,Iwamoto, Y.(2007).Policy Options for Financing the Future Health and Long-term Care Costs in Japan.Fiscal Policy and Management in East Asia,Chicago:
27. Gibson, M. J.,Gregory, S.,Pandya, S.(2003).AARP Public Policy Institute Research ReportAARP Public Policy Institute Research Report,未出版
28. Gleckman, H.(2010).Long-term Care Financing Reform: Lessons from the U.S. and Abroad.
29. Hirsch, D.,Spiers, P.(2010).Funding Care: How Can Each Generation Pay Its Fair Share?.York:Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
30. Holdenrieder, J.(2006).Equity and Efficiency in Funding Long-term Care from an EU Perspective.Public Health,14,139-147.
31. Iwamoto, Y.(2008).The Choice of Japan toward the Construction of a Sustainable Social Security System.International Conference on "Public Finance/Social Security System and Intergenerational Issues in De-population Society"
32. Iwamoto, Y.,Fukui, T.(2009).Prefunding Health and Long-term Care Insutrance.Public Policy Review,5(2),255-286.
33. Joseph, K.(ed.),Cashin, C.(ed.),Jakab, M.(ed.)(2010).Implementing Health Financing Reform: Lessons from countries in transition.World Health Organization.
34. Kwon, S.(2008).Future of Long-term Care Financing for the Elderly in Korea: Lessons from Germany and Japan.Journal of Aging and Social Policy,20(1),119-136.
35. Lassila, J.,Valkonen, T.(2008).Bank of Finland Research, Discussion Papers 28/2008Bank of Finland Research, Discussion Papers 28/2008,Finland:Bank of Finland.
36. Lassila, J.,Valkonen, T.(2004).Pre-funding Expenditure on Health and Long term Care under Demographic Uncertainty.Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance,29(4),620-639.
37. Mossialos, E.(ed.),Figueras, J.(ed.),Dixon, A.(ed.)(2002).Funding Health Care: Options in Europe.Buckingham:Open University Press.
38. Myers, R. J.(1955).The Financial Principle of Self-support in the Old-age Survivors Insurance System.
39. Myers, R. J.(1953).Actuarial Aspects of Financing Old Age and Survivors Insurance.Social security bulletin,51(11)
40. Neck, R.(ed.),Sturm, J. E.(ed.)(2008).Sustainability of Public Debt.MIT Press.
41. Olivares-Tirado, P.,Tamiya, N.(2014).Trends and Factors in Japan's Long-Term Care Insurance System.New York:Springer.
42. Piachaud, D.,Macnicol, J.,Lewis, J.(2009).A Think Piece on Intergenerational Equity.London:The Equality and Human Rights Commission.
43. Rejda, G. E(1999).Social Insurance and Economic Security.USA:Prentice-Hall.
44. Rothgang, H.(2010).Social Insurance for Long-Term Care: An Evaluation of the German Model.Social Policy & Administration,44(4),436-460.
45. Rothgang, H.,Igl, G.(2007).Long-term Care in Germany.The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy,6(1),54-84.
46. Schulz, J. H.(2001).The Economics of Aging.New York:Auburn House.
47. Sinn, H. W.(2000).Why a Funded Pension System is Needed and Why It is Not Needed.International Tax and Public Finance,7(4-5),389-410.
48. Tsutsui, T.,Naoko, M.(2007).Japan's Universal Long-term Care System Reform of 2005: Containing Costs and Realizing a Vision.Journal of American Geriatrics Society,55,1458-1463.
49. ケアマネジメント研究フォーラム監、高室成幸監(2012)。図解入門ビギナーズ 最新介護保険の基本と仕組みがよーくわかる本。
50. 柯木興(1996)。社會保險。臺北市:中國社會保險學會。
51. 陳雲中(1993)。保險學。臺北:五南。
52. 楊靜利(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學社會福利系。
53. 鄭文輝、朱澤民、鄭清霞、朱僑麗、周台龍(2009)。行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究報告行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究報告,臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
54. 鄭文輝、藍忠孚、朱澤民(2005)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,臺北:內政部。
55. 鄭清霞(2013)。台灣長期照護保險費率規劃之探討。第三屆海峽兩岸農村社會保險理論與實踐研討會
56. 鄭清霞、王靜怡、李光廷、陳明芳、陳正芬(2012)。衛生福利部101年度委託科技研究計畫結案報告衛生福利部101年度委託科技研究計畫結案報告,臺北:衛生福利部。
57. 鄭清霞、陳正芬(2014)。長期照護制度建立的重要原則。2014年台灣社會福利學會年會暨國際學術研討會─組織再造、制度改革、福利精進
58. 鄭清霞、陳正芬、王靜怡、陳明芳(2011)。行政院衛生署長期照護保險籌備小組99年度委辦研究計畫結案報告行政院衛生署長期照護保險籌備小組99年度委辦研究計畫結案報告,臺北:衛生署。
59. 鄭清霞、鄭文輝(1997)。老年基礎年金財務處理方式之探討─個人式兩階段費率之模擬分析。人口老化與老年照護，臺北:
60. 鄭清霞、鄭文輝、林志鴻、林昭吟、陳正芬、周台龍、韓幸紋、洪明皇(2009)。中央健康保險局98年度委託研究計畫中央健康保險局98年度委託研究計畫,臺北:中央健康保險局。

1. 蘇淑貞、鄭清霞、吳麗雪(2015)。跨域參與共治的社區照顧模式－屏東日間托老服務實驗方案之分析。人文社會科學研究，9(2)，63-91。
2. 顏淑韻、鄭清霞(2015)。兒童津貼財源籌措之探討。臺灣社會福利學刊，12(2)，57-101。
3. 鄭清霞(2016)。臺灣長期照顧保險的費率預測與調整規劃。社會政策與社會工作學刊，20(1)，49-84。