性別與專業交織的照顧工作：特殊教育助理員的建制民族誌分析

Carework in the Division of Labor of Gender and Professionalism: An Institutional Ethnography of Teachers' Assistants in Special Education in Taiwan

10.6255/JWGS.2016.39.1

黃綉雯(Xiu-wen Huang)；張恒豪(Heng-hao Chang)；唐文慧(Wen-hui Anna Tang)

特教助理員 ； 照顧工作 ； 建制民族誌 ； 性別 ； 專業主義 ； special education assistants in Taiwan ； carework ； institutional ethnography ； gender ； professionalism

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

39期（2016 / 12 / 01）

1 - 58

繁體中文

本文探討台灣特殊教育體制中，擔負著重要照顧工作的助理員之工作內容與角色地位。我們採建制民族誌取徑，從助理員的經驗出發，收集助理員的工作知識，探討以女性為多數的助理員，做為密集接觸障礙學生身體照顧的第一線工作者，在台灣特教體制下所呈現的勞動處境。研究發現台灣建制化的特教職場存在著專業主義與性別交織的階層化分工，透過法規與工作評量表格等文本，助理員被組織編派專事學生的照顧工作；以專業為名的身心二分照顧邏輯，透過性別化分工，使助理員面臨特教資源不足的制度困境，形成特教職場中不合理的統治關係。

This paper discusses the carework of teachers' assistants in Taiwan's special education system. Adopting an institutional ethnographic perspective and starting from these assistants' experiences, we have analyzed their work knowledge and presented their working conditions and professional status as teachers' assistants in intimate contact with their handicapped students. Our study found that Taiwan's special education system has a unique position in the government of the institutions, one which is intertwined with a division of labor according to gender and professionalism. In the name of professionalism, with the special education law and regulations as guides and mediation in the division of labor between ＂mind＂ and ＂body＂ work, the teachers' assistants are assigned to care for the students' bodies and to do the ＂dirty work.＂ Teachers' assistants thus compensate for the deficit of care to support students with disabilities; and they form the lower ranks in the stratified structure of the special education system in Taiwan.

1. 王增勇、陶蕃瀛(2006)。專業化＝證照＝專業自主。應用心理研究，30，201-224。
   連結：
2. 張恒豪(2007)。特殊教育與障礙社會學：一個理論的反省。教育與社會研究，13，71-94。
   連結：
3. 吳佩玲（2010年5 月4 日）〈學校特教助理員1 人顧 23人 肌萎男童摔成重傷…...人力已不足，替代人力竟變打雜工！〉，《聯合報》，A7。
4. 吳江泉（2015年11月7日）〈血汗！ 教保員 20K 不如外傭〉，《中時電子報》。〔online〕. 2015/11/7 .Available: http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151107000460-260107
5. 羅德水（2014年10月9日）〈幼托整合不該成為教師與教保員的戰爭〉，《天下雜誌》。〔online〕. 2015/11/7.Available: http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/266/article/1956
6. 張心華（ 2012年11 月11 日）〈教育平權 校園無礙 千人上街 為權利而走〉，《苦勞網》。〔online〕. 2015 /11/7 .Available: http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/71451
7. Ashforth, B.,Kreiner, G.(1999).How can you do it? Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity.Academy of Management Review,24(2),413-434.
8. Bagilhole, B.,Cross, S.(2010)."It never struck me as female": Investigating men's entry into female-dominated occupations.Journal of Gender Studies,15(1),35-48.
9. Barker, D.(ed.),Allen, S.(ed.)(1976).Dependence and exploitation in work and marriage.London:Longman.
10. Bolton, S.(2005).Women's work, dirty work: The gynecology nurse as "other".Gender, Work and Organization,12(2),169-186.
11. Bradley, C. ,Lawrence, U. D.(1993).Gender differences in careers.Anthropology News,34,35.
12. Cognard-Black, A. J.(2004).Will they stay, or will they go? Sex-atypical work among token men who teach.The Sociological Quarterly,45(1),113-139.
13. Connell, R. W.(2005).Masculinities.Cambridge:Polity.
14. Duffy, M.(2007).Doing the dirty work: Gender, race, and reproductive labor in historical perspective.Gender and Society,21(3),313-336.
15. Dunne, M.,Leach, F.,Chilesa, B.,Maundeni, T.,Tabulawa, R.,Kutor, N.,Forde, D.,Assamoah, A.(2003).Gendered experiences: The impact on retention and achievement.London:DFID.
16. England, P.(2005).Emerging theories of care work.Annual Review of Sociology,31(1),381-99.
17. Epstein, C. F.(1985).Ideal roles and real roles or the fallacy of the misplaced dichotomy.Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,4,29-51.
18. Etzioni, A.(1969).The semi-professions and their organization.New York:Free Press.
19. Farquhar, S.(1997).A few good men or a few too many? A study of male teachers.Palmerstone North:Department of Educational Psychology, Massey University.
20. Farquhar, S.,Cablk, L.,Buckingham, A.,Butler, D.,Ballantyne, R.(2006).Men at work: Sexism in early childhood education.Porirua:Child Forum Research Network.
21. Fraser, N.,Gordon, L.(1994).A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state.Signs,19(2),309-336.
22. Hochschild, A. R.(1983).The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling.Berkeley:University of California Press.
23. Kröger, T.(2009).Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common?.Critical Social Policy,29(3),398-420.
24. Liang, L.(2015).The distortion of care needs and medical professionalism: The ruling practices of migrant labor policy in Taiwan.Journal of Aging Studies,34,29-37.
25. Lorber, J.(ed.),Farrell, S. A.(ed.)(1991).The social construction of gender.Newbury:Sage.
26. MacKinnon, C.(1989).Feminism unmodified.Cambridge:Harvard Press.
27. Murdock, G. P.,Provost, C.(1973).Factors in the division of labor by sex: A cross-cultural analysis.Ethnology,12,203-252.
28. Nelsen, B. G.,Carlson, F. M.,West, R. Sr.(2006).Men in early childhood: An update.Young Children,61(5),34-36.
29. Parsons, T.(ed.)(1954).Essays in sociological theory.New York:The Free Press.
30. Roth, L. M.(2004).Engendering inequality: Processes of sex-segregation on Wall Street.Sociological Forum,19(2),203-228.
31. Sargent, P.(2005).The gendering of men in early childhood education.Sex Roles,52(3/4),251-259.
32. Smith, D. E.(2005).Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people.Oxford:AltaMira Press.
33. Twigg, J.(2000).Care work as a form of body work.Aging and Society,20,389-411.
34. West, C.,Zimmerman, D. H.(1987).Doing gender.Gender and Society,1(2),125-121.
35. Wharton, A.(2005).The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research.Malden:Blackwell.
36. Williams, C. L.(1992).The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions.Social Problems,39(3),253-267.
37. 王國羽編、林昭吟編、張恒豪編(2012)。障礙研究：理論與政策應用。台北:巨流。
38. 王儀嘉(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
39. 沈姍姍(1996)。專業主義、教師權力與教育行政體制關係：教師權力消長的動態研究。新竹師院學報，9，103-128。
40. 徐宗國(2001)。拓邊照顧工作：男護士在女人工作世界中得其所在。台灣社會學刊，26，163-209。
41. 張乃心(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北教育大學特殊教育學系。
42. 郭玉霞(1996)。教育專業地位的維護與師資素質的提高。初等教育學報，9，479-486。
43. 楊巧玲(2007)。學校中的性別政權：學生校園生活與教師工作文化之性別分析。台北:高等教育。
44. 瞿海源編(2012)。社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法。台灣:東華。
45. 藍佩嘉(2009)。照護工作：文化觀點的考察。社會科學論叢，3(2)，1-28。

1. 林昱瑄(2018)。追求教學卓越？台灣高教的表現管理建制研究。台灣社會學，35，59-107。
2. 鄭雅容(2023)。特殊教育助理人員個人背景變項、社會支持、工作滿意度和生涯承諾關係之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，38，49-70。
3. 周宇翔,王舒芸(2022)。協作還是控制？當性別化的暖照顧遇上冷科技。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，51，109-149。
4. (2023)。特教助理員聘用制度之探究—從身心障礙學生受教育權角度。市北教育學刊，72，95-130。