成對親子在導正教養、連結與自主信念的關聯性研究

The Beliefs of Mother-Child dyad's Directive Parenting, Connectedness and Autonomy

10.29650/TCUJHSS.201608_(20).0005

林慧芬(Lin, Hui-Fen)

成對親子 ； 導正教養 ； 連結 ； 自主力 ； 自主權 ； mother-child dyad ； directive parenting ； connectedness ； autonomy ； jurisdiction

慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊

20期（2016 / 08 / 01）

118 - 148

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究檢視成對親子在導正教養、親子連結與自主力、自主權等信念的異同，並探討上述變項間的關聯性。研究方法：樣本為504對國小四、六年級學童及其母親。以平均數檢驗、相關與多元迴歸等統計分析成對親子在導正教養、連結、自主力、自主權等的差異與關聯性。研究結果：1.成對親子在導正教養、自主力信念有顯著差異，即學童比母親顯著高估其自主力，母親比學童顯著認同導正教養信念。2.學童年級較低對連結、導正教養信念的認同較高。3.「連結」是親子知覺學童自主力與自主權信念的重要因素，親子連結影響母親的層面在學童的自主力，影響學童的層面是學童的自主權。母親傾向認為親子連結越高，其子女的自主力也越高；學童傾向認為親子連結越高，父母也會給予較多的自主權；而母親給予學童多少自主權，主要根據學童的自主力，最後根據研究結果提出建議。

Purpose: The purpose of this study were to compare the differences of mother-child's beliefs on directive parenting, parent-child's connectedness, child's autonomy, and child's jurisdiction in personal domain, as well as to understand the multiple regression of these variables. Methods: 504 children (grade fourth and sixth) and their mothers participated in this study. Children and their mothers filled out four questionnaires. Results: 1. The beliefs of mother-child dyad on children's autonomy and directive parenting were significantly difference. The children's autonomy beliefs were significantly higher than their mothers; mothers' directive parenting beliefs were significantly higher than their children. 2. The fourth graders' beliefs of directive parenting and connectedness were significantly higher than the sixth graders. 3. The multiple regression indicated that parent-child's connectedness was the main factor to influence mothers and children's perceptions of children's autonomy and child's jurisdiction in personal domain. The mothers tend to believe that when parents and their children had higher connectedness, their children were more independent. The children tend to believe that when they had higher connectedness with their parents, their mothers would grant more autonomy to them. However, mothers expressed that they granted their children's autonomy according to their children's capability of autonomy.

1. 李美枝(1998)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例。本土心理學研究，9，3-52。
   連結：
2. 林惠雅(2012)。管教責任性、服從義務性與服從管教。教育心理學報，44(1)，139-157。
   連結：
3. 陳富美(2007)。親子在教養行為上的認知差異：預測子方教養知覺的因素探討。中華心理衛生學刊，20(1)，1-30。
   連結：
4. 劉惠琴(2005)。親子關係中「多元個體化」歷程的內含與測量。中華心理衛生學刊，18(4)，55-92。
   連結：
5. Adelson, J.(Ed.)(1980).Handbook of Adolescent Psychology.New York:John Wiley.
6. Baumrind, D.(1973).The development of instrumental competence through socialization.Minnesota symposia on child psychology,Minneapolis, MN:
7. Blos, P.(1979).The adolescent passage: Developmental issue.New York:International University Press.
8. Bowlby, J.(1969).Attachment and Loss: Attachment.New York:Basic Books.
9. Chao, R. K.(1994).Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training.Child Development,65,1111-1119.
10. Chao, R. K.(1996).Chinese and European American mothers' beliefs about the role of parenting in children's school success.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,27(4),403-424.
11. Grotevant, H. D.,Cooper, C. R.(1986).Individuation in family relationships: A perspective on individual differences in the development of identity and role-taking skill in adolescence.Human Development,29,82-100.
12. Hetherington, E. M.(Ed.)(1983).Handbook of child psychology.New York:Wiley.
13. Hoffman, J. A.(1984).Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents.Journal of Counseling Psychology,31(2),170-178.
14. Kagitcibasi, C.(2005).Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context -Implications for self and family.Journal of cross-cultural psychology,36(4),403-422.
15. Lin, C. C.,Fu, V. R.(1990).A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents.Child Development,61,429-433.
16. Mahler, M. S.,Pine, F.,Bergam, A.(1975).The psychological birth of the human infant.NY:basic books.
17. Miller, P. J.(1999).Moral agency and self-esteem: Two puzzles in the comparative study of Taiwanese and American socialization.meeting of the Indigenous Psychology Group,Taipei, Taiwan:
18. Noom, M.J.,Dekovic, M.,Meeus, W.(2001).Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,30(5),577-595.
19. Nucci, L.,Smetana, J. S.(1996).Mothers' concepts of young children's areas of personal freedom.Child Development,67(4),1870-1887.
20. Nucci, L.,Weber, E. K.(1995).Social interaction in the home and the development of young children's conceptions within the personal domain.Child Development,66,1438-1452.
21. Raeff, C.(1997).Individuals in relationships: Cultural values, children's social interactions, and the development of an American individualistic self.Developmental Review,17(3),205-238.
22. Ryan, R. M.,Lynch, J.(1989).Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood.Child Development,60,340-356.
23. Sato, T.(2001).Autonomy and relatedness in psychopathology and treatment: A cross-cultural formulation.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,127(1),89-127.
24. Smetana, J. G.(1994).Parenting styles and beliefs about parental authority.New Directions for Child Development,66,21-36.
25. Smetana, J. G.(1989).Adolescents' and parents' reasoning about actual family conflict.Child Development,60,1052-1067.
26. Smetana, J. G.(1988).Adolescents' and parent's conceptions of parental authority.Child Development,59(2),321-335.
27. Smetana, J. G.,Asquith, Pamela(1994).Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy.Child Development,65(4),1147-1162.
28. Smetana, J. G.,Crean, H. F.,Campione-Barr, N.(2005).Adolescent's and parents' changing conceptions of parental authority.New Directions for Child Development,2005(108),31-46.
29. Smetana, J. G.,Daddisy, C.(2002).Domain-specific antecedents of parental psychological control and monitoring: the role of parenting beliefs and practices.Child Development,73(2),563.
30. Steinberg, L.,Silverberg, S.(1986).The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence.Child Development,57,841-851.
31. Vuchinich, S.,Angelelli, J.(1996).Context and development in family problem solving with preadolescent children.Child Development,67(3),1276-1288.
32. 余德慧(1992)。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。中國人中國心：人格與社會篇，台北:
33. 吳慧珊(2009)。新北市，輔仁大學。
34. 林慧芬(2004)。大台北地區母親對「兒童自主」教養信念之詮釋性研究。國立台北師範學院學報，17(2)，229-260。
35. 林慧芬(2011)。「換個顏色吧？」─母親教養行為中的指示、應答與幼兒順從、不順從之個案研究。民生論叢，5，121-155。
36. 林慧芬(1997).The view of childhood in Chinese culture.National Association for the Education of Young Children（NAEYC）年會,美國：洛杉磯:
37. 林慧芬(2006)。台灣母親對幼兒自主的內涵與文化相關信念初探。國立台北教育大學學報，19(1)，139-171。
38. 邱靖薰、林惠雅(2012)。國小六年級學童知覺母親管教權合理性與心理控制之探討。輔仁民生學誌，18(1)，27-44。
39. 孫世維(1997)。親子依附與分離─個體化：大學時期的發展。政大教育與心理研究，20，271-296。
40. 黃慧真譯、Papalia, D. E.、Olds, S. W.(1984)。發展心理學─人類發展。台北:桂冠。
41. 楊國樞編、余安邦編(1993)。中國人的心理與行為─理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠。
42. 蔡秀玲、吳麗娟(1998)。不同性別大學生的依附關係、個體化與適應之關係。教育心理學報，30(1)，73-90。

1. 林慧芬(2018)。臺北市母親教養行為、幼兒自主行為及相關因素之探討。臺北市立大學學報：教育類，49(1)，27-49。