敘事諮商歷程與敘事結構特徵中生活目標改變之詮釋分析

Hermeneutics Analysis of Life Goals Change within Narrative Therapy Process and Narrative Structure Feature

10.3966/172851862018040051005

黃素菲(Su-Fei Huang)

生活目標 ； 敘事結構 ； 敘事諮商 ； 詮釋分析 ； Hermeneutic analysis ； life goal ； narrative counseling ； narrative structure

中華輔導與諮商學報

51期（2018 / 04 / 01）

143 - 179

繁體中文

本研究的分析文本是研究參與者經過25次敘事諮商的逐字稿，採取現象學取向的方法，根據Van Kamm的七個步驟進行逐字稿文本分析。共獲得六個研究結果：一、描繪使她活成「沒有自己」的那個世界的特徵。二、經由鬆動主流故事，看到隱藏的故事線，以「離」開被建構的生活目標。三、釐清共寫與重構故事的歷程。四、探討經由敘事視框轉變如何浮現出主體性的生活目標。五、整理出生活目標在敘事結構中的改變特徵，包括：1.被建構的敘事：受制狀態的敘事結構特徵；2.解構的敘事，鬆動狀態的敘事結構特徵；3.重構的敘事，重寫狀態的敘事結構特徵；4.生活目標是在「前置經驗」與「接續選項」組成螺旋狀的敘說循環過程中生成。六、提出敘事結構特徵與敘事視框轉變的心智循環空間模型。其中研究目的一：了解社會文化脈絡如何形塑生活目標，由研究結果一、二回答；研究目的二：探討以生活目標為主訴的諮商工作其敘事視框的轉變，由研究結果三、四回答；研究目的三：探討生活目標在敘事諮商歷程中的敘事結構之改變特徵，由研究結果五回答；研究目的四：釐清敘事文本詮釋與知識生產，由研究結果六回答。最後，根據研究結果提出研究與應用的建議。

The life goal in everyday life can be used both as an alleged word or a subjective word. If life goal use as an alleged word, it is a communication tool for people to refer their relationship with social life. People in social activities use it as a tool function. If life goals use as a subjective word, life goal has left from social life field and enter into the subjective context or episodic memory field, life goal become a description of the person's life world. Life goal turned to be a subjective meaning space. Life goal is treated within personal meaning context in which it is as a manifested. According to the research title, purpose and research methods, literature review lists to discuss four themes: First, life goals as alleged word; Second, life goals as the subjective word; Third, the nature of the narrative psychotherapy; Fourth, narrative therapy work map and narrative structure. The text for research is based on 25 counseling sessions within 18 months by narrative psychotherapy method. In this research try to integrate therapy process and experience by case study, and systematically explore life goal change and narrative elements in therapy process. There are four research purposes: First, is to understand how the social and cultural context shapes life goals. Second, is explored life goal setting as chief complaint in therapy, how are the narrative perspective changed. Third, to clarify the life goals change in narrative therapy process how is the narrative structure emerged. Fourth, is to engage text interpretation and how the knowledge be produced. Phenomenological approach was applied as analyze method which is according to Moustakas' modified van Kaam method for analysis (Moustakas, 1994). This hermeneutic analysis method includes seven steps: 1. description of experience: listing and preliminary grouping, 2. horizonalization: reduction and elimination, 3. meaning units: clustering and thematizing the invariant constituents, 4. thematizing: final identification of the invariant constituents and themes by application, 5. individual textual description: construct for each co-researcher an individual textual description, 6. individual structural descriptionconstruct: construct for each co-researcher an individual structural description, and 7. textural-structural description: construct for research participant a textural-structural description of the meanings and essences of the experience. Six findings will be addressed below. First, depicting the characteristics of the world that made her live ＂without herself＂. Second, by de-construct the dominate stories to reveal alternative stories and ＂away from＂ constructed life goal. Third, clarify co-authoring and stories reconstruction process. Fourth, to explore how narrative frames transform that would emerge subjectivity life-goal. Fifth, sorting out the change features of life goal in narrative structure, which include: 1. Be-constructed narrative: the restricted narrative structure features; 2. De-constructive narrative: the release narrative structure feature; 3. Re-constructive narrative: the rewriting narrative structure feature; 4. Life goal is generate within ＂previous experience＂ and ＂continued options＂ which consist a narrative spiral. Sixth, proposed the mental circulation space model and the transform features of narrative structure. The first research purpose is to understand how social and cultural context shape life goals which could be answer by first & second results. The second research purpose is to exploring narrative frame transform that was based on narrative counseling by life goal as chief complain which could be answer by third & fourth results. The third research purpose is to explore narrative structure features changing in narrative counseling for life goals which could be answer by fifth result. The Fourth research purpose is to clarify narrative text analysis and knowledge production which could be answer by sixth results. The contribution of this study is found that the narrative structure of narrative therapy contain with three elements: 1. Beconstructed Narrative Structure- restricted state. The first narrative element is the cons tructed narrative structure. Stories about life goal in restricted narrative structure state mainly cluster of stories related with the problem stories. 2. Deconstruction Narrative Structure-release state. The second narrative element is the deconstruction narrative structure. Stories about life goal in releasing narrative structure state mainly cluster of stories related with conflict stories. 3. Reconstruction Narrative Structure-Rewriting state. The third narrative element is the reconstructed narrative. Stories about life goal in rewriting narrative structure state mainly cluster of stories related with the reconciliation stories. Finally, suggestions are offered and limitations of the study are explained.

1. 林慧姿、程景琳(2006)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報，38(2)，177-193。
   連結：
2. 賴英娟、陸偉明、董旭英(2011)。以結構方程模式探討台灣大學生自尊、生活目標、希望感及校園人際關係對憂鬱情緒之影響。教育心理學報，42(4)，677-699。
   連結：
3. Berger, P. L.,Luckmann, T.(1967).The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.Garden City, N.Y:Doubleday.
4. Bhhler, C.(Ed.),Massarik, F.(Ed.)(1968).The Course of Human Life: a Study of Goals in the Humanistic Perspective.New York:Springer.
5. Bruner, J.(1986).Actual Mind: Possible World.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
6. Bugental, James F. T.(Ed.)(1967).Challenges of Humanistic Psychology.New York:McGraw-Hill.
7. Bühler, C.(1961).The goal structure of human life.Journal of Humanistic Psychology,1(1),8-9.
8. Bühler, C.(1964).The human course of life in its goal aspects.Journal of Humanistic Psychology,4(1),1-18.
9. Crossley, N.(2004).Not being mentally ill: Social movements, system survivors and the oppositional habitus.Anthropology & Medicine,11(2),161-180.
10. Duvall, J.、Béres, L.、黃素菲譯(2016)。敘事治療三幕劇：結合實務、訓練與研究。台北:心靈工坊。
11. Freedman, J.,Combs, G.(1996).Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities.New York:Norton.
12. Freedman, J.、Combs, G.、易之新譯(2000)。敘事治療─解構並重寫生命的故事。臺北:張老師文化公司。
13. Gattiker, U. E.,Larwood, L.(1986).Subjective career success: A study of managers and support personnel.Journal of Business and Psychology,1(2),78-94.
14. Gergen, K. J.(Ed.),Gergen, M. M.(Ed.)(1984).Historical Social Psychology.Hillsdale (NJ):Erlbaum.
15. Guterman, J. T.,Rudes, J.(2005).A Narrative Approach to Strategic Eclecticis.Journal of Mental Health Counseling,27(1),1-12.
16. Heather, R.(2008).A Sequential Analysis of Externalizing in Narrative Therapy with Children.Contemp Fam Ther,31,262-279.
17. Heidegger, M.、王慶節譯、陳嘉映譯(1994)。存在與時間。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
18. Heidegger, M.、孫周興譯(1993)。走向語言之途。台北:時報出版公司。
19. Heidegger, M.、孫周興譯(1994)。林中路。台北:時報出版公司。
20. Heinz, W. R.(2002).Transition discontinuities and the biographical shaping of early work careers.Journal of Vocational Behavior,60(2),220-240.
21. May, R.、石明譯、龔卓軍譯(2013)。自由與命運。台北:立緒。
22. May, R.、彭仁郁譯(2010)。愛與意志。台北:立緒。
23. Mink, L. O.(1972).Interpretation and narrative understanding.The Journal of Philosophy,69(10),735-737.
24. Moustakas, C.(1994).Phenomenological Research Methods.California:SAGE Pulications, Inc..
25. Polkinghorne, D.(1988).Narrative knowing and the Human Science.Albany, NY:State University of New York.
26. Quine, W. V. O.(1960).Word and Object.Cambridge (MA):MIT Press.
27. Ray, W. A.,Keeney, B.(1993).Resource focused therapy.London, UK:Karnac Books.
28. Ricoeur, P.(1987).Facts and values:Philosophical reflections from Western and non-Western perspectives.Dordrdcht, Martinus:Nijhoff.
29. Ricoeur, P.,Thomson, J. B.(Trans.)(1981).Hermeneutics and the human sciences.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
30. Rogers, C.、宋文里譯(2014)。成為一個人：一個治療者對心理治療的觀點。台北:左岸文化。
31. Sarbin, T. (Ed.)(1986).Narrative Psychology: The Storied nature of Human Conduct.New York:Praeger.
32. Savickas, M. L.(2012).Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century.Journal of Counseling & Development,90(1),13-19.
33. Schultz, D. P.、Schultz, S. E.、危芷芬譯(2014)。人格心理學。臺北:雙葉書廊。
34. Snyder, C. R.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
35. Spence, P. D.(1984).Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis.New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company.
36. White, M.、Epston, D.、廖世德譯(2001)。故事、知識、權力：敘事治療的力量。臺北:心靈工坊。
37. White. M.(2007).Maps of Narrative Practice.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
38. White. M.,Morgan. A.(2006).Narrative Therapy with Children and their Families.Adelaide, South Australia:Dulwich Centre Publications.
39. White. M.、丁凡譯(2012)。敘事治療的實踐：與麥克持續對話。台北:張老師文化。
40. White. M.、黃孟嬌譯(2008)。敘事治療的工作地圖。台北:張老師文化。
41. Yalom, I. D.、侯維之譯(2007)。當尼采哭泣。台北:張老師文化。
42. Zuckerman, M.(1979).Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and dwell in attribution theory.Journal of Personality,47(2),245-287.
43. 余德慧(1994)。文化心理學的詮釋之道。社會科學研究法─檢討與前瞻，第二次科際研討會，台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
44. 余德慧(1992)。敘說資料的意義─生命視框的完成與進行。中國人的心理與行為─理念及方法篇，台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
45. 李宥萱(2005)。台北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學心理學研究所=National Chengchi University。
46. 金樹人(2011)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:東華書局=Don-Hwa Publication。
47. 畢恆達(2000)。家的意義。應用心理學研究，8，55-56。
48. 陳敬淑(2006)。彰化=Changhua, Taiwan，大葉大學教育專業發展研究所=Da-Yeh University。

1. 劉淑慧、孫頌賢、夏允中、王智弘(2018)。靈性與安身立命：從四大存有問題建構貫串靈性與生涯的本土化理論。中華輔導與諮商學報，51，1-26。