探究國小輔導實務工作中之教師諮詢執行經驗－雙向現象場視框之觀照

Implementation of Teacher Consultations in Elementary School Counseling: Comparison of a Dual Framework Phenomenal Field

10.3966/172851862020010057004

劉麗娟(Li-Chuan Liu)；高淑貞(Shu-Chen Kao)

國小輔導 ； 教師諮詢 ； 雙向視框 ； Dual framework ； elementary school counseling ； teacher consultation

中華輔導與諮商學報

57期（2020 / 01 / 01）

85 - 120

繁體中文

本研究主要以輔導實務工作中教師諮詢者與教師求詢者的雙向視框，探究國小輔導實務工作中之教師諮詢執行經驗。研究參與者包括8位具專業背景與實務經驗之教師諮詢者與7位曾參與諮詢經驗之教師求詢者，採質性研究中之紮根理論為方法依據，以探究國小輔導實務工作中教師諮詢現況，增加雙方觀點的理解以促進合作的開展，並從雙方可對照經驗中探究提升教師諮詢效能的可行方式。研究發現如下：（1）教師諮詢影響因子：其主要內涵有（a）諮詢者的專業承諾有助於自我專業角色的定位與困境的轉化；（b）諮詢前先評估教師準備度、特質與信念，不過早進入工作階段；（c）互有主體性是教師諮詢關係的重要體現；（d）不要忽略行政領導與組織氛圍對教師諮詢的影響。（2）輔導人員與教師諮詢經驗之對照：其主要內涵有（a）角色定位不同顯現關注立場的根本差異；（b）輔導人員須要更多家長諮詢的能力以協助親師溝通；（c）教師須要更多具體示範來協助諮詢目標的達成；（d）雙方抱持彈性與開放，利於促成諮詢合作關係；（e）頻繁而短時間的機動性諮詢切合實務現場的需要。研究者依據上述研究結果，進行綜合討論提升教師諮詢效能的可行方式，並據此對教師諮詢者、學校及相關系統提出建議。

With the increase in the number of and diversity in student issues and the recent policy of hiring full-time school counselors in elementary schools, the importance and feasibility of teacher consultation deserves to be explored in depth. Teacher consultation can not only solve students' problems but also improve teachers' abilities to solve students' problems, resulting in primary prevention of school-related problems. The importance of teacher consultation is highlighted by the efficiency and influence of counseling interventions and their ability to prevent future problems. Although counseling practitioners and teachers focus on assisting students' adaptation to school life, it is not easy to successfully conduct teacher consultations. Teacher and counseling practitioners have their own role and position, which further alters the demands and expectations. This in turn widens the gap, making it increasingly difficult to establish cooperation. This study attempts to explore the experiences of both practitioners and teachers in teacher consultation in an attempt to improve their practical knowledge base and establish a clear, feasible path towards teacher consultation. Channeling knowledge will increase the possibility of cooperation and dialogue between teachers and counseling practitioners. Student counseling often works because of students' willingness to cooperate and create a win-win situation for their well-being and others involved in the case. This study is based on grounded theory and primarily focused on the dual framework of counseling practitioners and teachers to investigate the implementation and current status of teacher consultations in elementary schools. Participants included eight professional and experienced teacher consultants as well as seven teacher consultees who had participated in the consultation process. This study employed a qualitative research design. The findings of this study will enhance the understanding of the importance of teacher consultation from the perspectives of both practitioners and teachers to promote cooperation and increase the effectiveness of teacher consultations by examining overlapping experiences. In terms of the factors influencing the teacher consultation process, the study found that the professional commitment of the consultant not only helped the positioning of the self-professional role but also the resolution of the counseling dilemma. However, before conducting a teacher consultation, it was necessary to evaluate the teacher's readiness to consult, traits, and educational beliefs. In addition, teacher consultation involved professional cooperation; thus, mutual subjectivity was an important manifestation of the consulting relationship and also a key factor in maintaining a smooth relationship. Finally, school counseling often needed to be combined with student services provided by other administrative units, in order to not overlook the impact of executive leadership and organizational climate on teacher consultations. There were differences between the counselors' and teachers' consulting experiences. First, the roles of the teachers and counselors were different in terms of their concerns and the assistance they provided. Second, the students' problems were mostly family related, and counselors need to have capacities for consultation with parents in order to assist teachers in their communication with their students' parents. Third, teachers need more specific demonstrations to effectively achieve the consulting objectives. Fourth, both counselors and teachers need to be flexible and open to encourage consultation and cooperation. Finally, in teacher consultations, frequent, flexible, and short-term consultations are more in line with the needs of the situation. Based on the above-mentioned findings, the researchers conducted a comprehensive discussion on the possible ways to improve the effectiveness of teacher consultation and ensure that there are trained and supervised practitioners and school counselors who can handle school and system related issues.

1. 王麗斐, L. F.,杜淑芬, S. F.,趙曉美, H. M.(2008)。國小駐校心理諮商師有效諮商策略之探討性研究。教育心理學報，39，413-434。
   連結：
2. 杜淑芬, S. F.(2018)。諮商師透過諮詢與教師合作處理學生問題行為之行動研究。教育實踐與研究，31(1)，39-70。
   連結：
3. 邢志彬, C. P.,許育光, Y. K.(2014)。學校心理師服務實務與模式建構初探：困境因應與專業發展期待分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，39，117-150。
   連結：
4. 林美珠, M. J.(2002)。諮詢能力內涵與評量之探討研究。中華輔導學報，12，117-152。
   連結：
5. 邱獻輝, H. H.(2003)。諮詢的基本概念探究。諮商與輔導，216，2-10。
   連結：
6. 許育光, Y. K.(2011)。國小輔導教師之實務培訓與督導需求初探。教育實踐與研究，24(2)，99-128。
   連結：
7. 許育光, Y. K.(2013)。國小輔導教師實務內涵初探：從困境與期待分析進行對話。中華輔導與諮商學報，38，57-90。
   連結：
8. 鄭如安, J. A.,葉宣瑩, H. Y.(2011)。高雄市駐校心理師服務現況與困境之分析研究。美和學報，30(2)，15-40。
   連結：
9. American Psychological Association(2007).Guidelines for education and training at the doctoral and postdoctoral levels in consulting psychology/organizational consulting psychology.American Psychologist,62,980-992.
10. American School Counselor Association(2005).The ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA:American School Counselor Association.
11. Briere, D. E.,Simonsen, B.,Sugai, G.,Myers, D.(2015).Increasing new teachers' specific praise using a within-school consultation intervention.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,17(1),50-60.
12. Brown, D.,Pryzwansky, W. B.,Schulte, A. C.(2011).Psychological consultation and collaboration: Introduction to theory and practice.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.
13. Caplan, G.(1970).The theory and practice of mental health consultation.New York, NY:Basic Books.
14. Caplan, G.,Caplan, R. B.(1999).Mental health consultation and collaboration.Prospect Heights, IL:Waveland Press, Inc..
15. Cheney, D.,Flower, A.,Templeton, T.(2008).Applying response to intervention metrics in the social domain for students at risk of developing emotional or behavioral disorders.Journal of Special Education,42(2),108-126.
16. Conoley, J. C.,Conoley, C. W.(1992).School consultation practice and training.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
17. Corey, G.,Corey, M. S.,Callnan, P.(1993).Issues and ethics in the helping professions.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing.
18. Costenbader, V.,Swartz, J.,Petrix, L.(1992).Consultation in the schools: The relationship between preservice training, perception of consultative skills, and actual time spent in consultation.School Psychology Review,21,95-108.
19. Dinkmeyer, D., Jr.,Carlson, J.(2006).Consultation: Creating school-based interventions.New York, NY:Taylor & Francis.
20. Dinkmeyer, D.,Carlson, J.,Dinkmeyer, D., Sr.(1994).Consultation: School mental health professionala as consultants.Muncie, IN:Accelerated Development.
21. Dinkmeyer, D.,McKay, G.,Dinkmeyer. D., Jr.(1980).Systematic training for effective teaching.Indiana:Ags Pub.
22. Dougherty, A. M.(2000).Psychological consultation and collaboration in school and community settings.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
23. Dutton Tillery, A.,Varjas, K.,Meyers, J.,Collins, A. S.(2010).General education teachers' perceptions of behavior management and intervention strategies.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,12(2),86-102.
24. Dwyer, K.,Osher, D.,Warger, C.(1998).Dwyer, K., Osher, D., & Warger, C. (1998). Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education..
25. Erchul, W. P.,Martens, B. K.(2010).School consultation: Conceptual and empirical bases of practice.New York, NY:Springer.
26. Farrell, P. T.,Howes, A. J.,Jimerson, S. R.,Davies, S. M.(2009).Promoting inclusive practice in schools: A challenging role for school psychologists.The handbook of school psychology,Hoboken, NJ:
27. Frey, A. J.,Lee, J.,Small, J. W.,Seeley, J. R.,Walker, H. M.,Feil, E. G.(2013).The motivational interviewing navigation guide: A process for enhancing teachers' motivation to adopt and implement school-based interventions.Advances in School Mental Health Promotion,6(3),158-173.
28. Gueldner, B.,Merrell, K.(2011).Evaluation of a social-emotional learning program in conjunction with exploratory application of performance feedback incorporating motivational interviewing technique.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,21,1-27.
29. Gysbers, N. C.,Henderson, P.(2000).Developing and managing your school guidance program.Alexandria, VA:American Counseling Association.
30. Hastings, R. P.,Bham, M. S.(2003).The relationship between student behavior patterns and teacher burnout.School Psychology International,24,115-127.
31. Holdaway, A. S.,Owens, J. S.(2015).The effect of training and consultation condition on teachers' self-reported likelihood of adoption of a daily report card.Journal of Educational Psychology,107(1),222-235.
32. Klingner, J. K.,Harry, B.(2006).The special education referral and decision making process for English language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences.Teachers College Record,108,2247-2281.
33. Knotek, S.(2003).Bias in problem solving and the social process of student study teams: A qualitative investigation.The Journal of Special Education,37,2-14.
34. National Association of School Psychologists(2010).National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Bethesda, MD: Author..
35. Newell, M. L.(2012).Transforming knowledge to skill: Evaluating the consultation competence of novice school-based consultants.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research,64(1),8-28.
36. Noell, G. H.,Witt, J. C.,Gilbertson, D. N.,Ranier, D. D.,Freeland, J. T.(1997).Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback.School Psychology Quarterly,12,77-88.
37. Reinke, W. M.,Lewis-Palme, T.,Merrell, K.(2008).The classroom check-up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior.School Psychology Review,37(3),315-332.
38. Reinke, W. M.,Sprick, R.,Knight, J.(2009).Coaching classroom management.Coaching: Approaches & perspectives,Thousand Oaks, CA:
39. Rollin, S. A.,Subotnik, R. F.,Bassford, M.,Smulson, J.(2008).Bringing psychological science to the forefront of educational policy: Collaborative efforts of the American Psychological Association's coalition for psychology in the schools and education.Psychology in the Schools,45,194-205.
40. Rosenfield, S.,Levinsohn-Klyap, M.,Cramer, K.(2010).Educating consultants for practice in the schools.Handbook of education, training and supervision of school psychologists in school and community,New York, NY:
41. Rubinson, F.(2002).Lessons learned from implementing problem-solving teams in urban high schools.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,13,185-217.
42. Sanetti, L. M.,Collier-Meek, M. A.,Long, A. C. J.,Byron, J.,Kratochwill, T. R.(2015).Increasing teacher treatment integrity of behavior support plans through consultation and implementation planning.Journal of School Psychology,53(3),209-229.
43. Sarason, S. B.(1982).The culture of the school and the problem of change.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
44. Schein, E. H.(2009).The corporate culture survival guide.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
45. Spratt, J.,Shucksmith, J.,Philip, K.,Watson, C.(2006).Interprofessional supportof mental well-being in schools: A Bourdieuan perspective.Journal of Interprofessional Care,20(4),391-402.
46. Suldo, S. M.,Friedrich, A. A.,Michalowski, J.(2010).Factors that limit and facilitate school psychologists' involvement in mental health services.Psychology in the Schools,47,354-373.
47. White, J.,Mullis, F.(1998).A systems approach to school counselor consultation.Education,119,242-252.
48. 王麗斐, L. F.(2002).國小個案處理工作內涵之研究：實務經驗與未來方向.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:學富文化=Pro-Ed Publishing Company.
49. 王麗斐, L. F.(2002)。建構國小輔導工作的未來。輔導季刊，38，1-7。
50. 王麗斐, L. F.,趙曉美, H. M.(2005)。小學輔導專業發展的困境與出路。教育研究月刊，134，42-53。
51. 吳芝儀（譯）,廖梅花（譯）,Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(2001).質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法.嘉義:濤石文化.
52. 林美珠, M. J.(2000)。國小輔導工作實施需要、現況與困境之研究。中華輔導學報，8，51-76。
53. 張臻萍, J. P.(2009)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
54. 蔡憶萍, Y. P.(1996)。花蓮=Hualian, Taiwan，國立花蓮師範學院=National Hualian Teachers College。

1. 戴芳儀,陳婉真,宋宥賢,江守峻(2021)。國中導師對於輔導工作的觀點與挑戰：從專業典範差異看導師與輔導老師之跨領域合作。輔導與諮商學報，43(1)，57-90。
2. 許育光(2021)。學校心理諮詢LIFE實務模式的初步建構：以反映性實踐對話歷程為基底的應用。台灣遊戲治療學報，10，33-60。