敘事研究中「存在經驗」與「存有」的地理學方法探問：從情緒地理學與詮釋現象學取「徑」

Enquiry of ＂Lived Experience＂ and ＂Being＂ in Narrative Study: Taking Path through Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Emotional Geography

10.3966/172851862021050061005

翁士恆(Shyh-Heng Wong)；彭榮邦(Rong-Bang Peng)

存在哲學 ； 敘事探問 ； 情緒地理學 ； 詮釋現象學 ； emotional geography ； existential philosophy ； hermeneutic phenomenology ； narrative enquiry

中華輔導與諮商學報

61期（2021 / 05 / 01）

119 - 151

繁體中文

本研究從本體論為起點探討「存在經驗」與「存有」的本體論點，接連「主體性」以及「主體間際性」的經驗論述，以詮釋現象學以及情緒地理學的本體論與知識論觀點，形成一個對於「存有」的地理學形式探問。在諮商與心理治療質性研究的敘事轉向的歷史中，「敘事」以被發展為探究主體經驗的研究依據，但對於主體敘說位置的不明，也常常讓敘事研究具有無法被批判或判準的濫觴。因此本研究定調在「探問」：從確認敘說者與研究者的位置作為一個倫理性的存在，試圖重新形成一個探問的起點。從詮釋現象學在歐陸對於存在哲學的影響，以及在台灣人文與臨床療癒的發展，本文提出意義收發的探問方向，從主體間際性與主體性在敘說與聆聽的迂迴途徑，去定義從外返身的探問。另外，從歐洲情緒地理學的發展，結合心理分析的「過渡」觀點，我們可以更定位主體性的經驗位置，同時取徑地理學的知識論與方法論。而在探問的方法論上，本文整理現有的諮商與心理治療方法論中提出兩個探問「存有」的地理學方法，第一，從內在空間與外在空間的移動勾勒內在地景的生成；第二，從詮釋現象學的意義裂解與還原經驗及敘事結構。從三個探問「存有」的方法論點，重新定位接引諮商與心理治療在敘事研究資料分析中，探索意義途徑與經驗結構的兩個方法論基礎。

The purpose of this study is to enquire ＂lived experience＂ and ＂being＂ from the nature of time and space. The authors argued that meaning construction needs to take terms methodologically by hermeneutic phenomenology and emotional geography. Four discussion points are showed as follows and used to articulate the utility of narrative analysis. Firstly, this study defines the enquiry itself as enquiring ＂being＂ in its subjectivity or intersubjectivity. Through reviewing the ＂narrative turn＂ in the history of qualitative research, narrative is stated as the representation of one's self and therefore studying one's life story is to explore the meaning construction of lived experience, which is through saying and said, and has its subject from and object for. Ontologically, it is argued that meaning in narrative has its own time and space and therefore researchers need to find the route of how meaning could be developing. The second part of this study is to further debate the nature of ＂lived experience＂ and ＂being＂ as topographical and geographical. Meaning develops with its directions between self and other; therefore, a researcher's ambition to ＂reflect＂ outside world or ＂reflexively＂ clarifies inner world of oneself and decides the attitude of studying meaning construction of lived experience. This part defines and reviews the ontological concern of ＂being＂ and its relation of space and time. From current finding of emotional geography in Europe, narrative could therefore be widen its epistemological and methodological perspective for exploring ＂being＂ and ＂lived experience＂. In the third part of this study, according to our ontological arguments epistemological perspectives have been elaborated for understanding meaning construction of ＂being＂ and ＂lived experience＂. The dimensions of time and space are particularly relevant here. Through Heidegger's contribution of Dasein analysis and dwelling concepts, we defined narrative has its time linear structure in which presence is in-between the past and future, and has its space structure of being-in-a-space, from geographer Malpas's contribution. We linked Winnicott's concept of ＂transitional space＂ and discussed the ＂being＂ as the ethics between self, other, and transitional space, and further discussed the indigenous studies conducted in Taiwan about the structural concern as well as the topographical nature of perception. The final part of the arguments focuses two methodological concerns: route and structure. The former lead to the discussion of geographical approach towards qualitative data. Here the illustration of mental landscape is offered and is argued as an analytic method. Humanistic geographical approach developed in recent decades focused on reflexive description of self-other relationship and the mental/emotional landscape, so that lived experience and being could be illustrated by where and how the meaning is constructed. Therefore the route and structure of meaning construction can then be represented. The second methodological concern take narratives to the hermeneutics and phenomenology of meaning construction, in which Husserl used ＂epoche＂ as the method of temporally disregarding its causality but the ＂things itself＂. This method could help a researcher systematically investigate both temporal and topographical nature of lived experience. From Wei-Lun Lee's six-step correction from Giorgi's five steps of analysis, the way in which ＂being＂ can be opened into the description of phenomenon. Also, Lee's methodological investigation to human perception was followed for exploring the structure of lived experience itself. This study particularly focuses on the temporal structure of narratives, and taking the final methodological path through the circle of hermeneutics, which regards narrative as having its circle of interpretation as the process of meaning construction. A method named Critical Narrative Analysis (CNA) is discoursed here. Six steps of data analysis for qualitative data is introduced for concluding the concern for enquiring meaning structure within narratives, especially when data is with historical and temporal characteristics. By above arguments, the understanding of narratives according its ontology, epistemology and methodology is carefully linked with the use of narrative analysis in counseling and psychotherapeutic practice. And methodological concerns of narrative are concluded for answering how and why taking path through hermeneutic phenomenology and emotional geography is important in narrative enquiries.

1. 王應棠, Y. T.(2009)。棲居與空間：海德格空間思維的轉折。地理學報，55，25-42。
   連結：
2. 余德慧, D. H.(2001)。心學：中國本我心理學的開展。本土心理學研究，15，271-303。
   連結：
3. 余德慧, D. H.,石世明, S. M,夏淑怡, S. Y.(2006)。探討癌末處境聖世界的形成。生死學研究，3，3-58。
   連結：
4. 余德慧, D. H.,余安邦, A. B.,李維倫, W. L(2011)。人文臨床學的探究。哲學與文化，37，63-84。
   連結：
5. 李維倫, W. L.(2015)。柔適照顧的時間與空間：余德慧教授的最後追索。本土心理學研究，43，175-220。
   連結：
6. 李維倫, W. L.(2017)。受傷的時間性：受性侵害及家庭關係斷損少女之存在經驗的存在現象學分析。中華心理學刊，59，145-161。
   連結：
7. 李維倫, W. L.(2004)。以「置身所在」做為心理學研究的目標現象及相關之方法論。應用心理研究，22，157-200。
   連結：
8. 李維倫, W. L.,賴憶嫻, Y. H.(2009)。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。
   連結：
9. 林耀盛, Y. S.,龔卓軍, J. J.(2009)。我的傷口先於我存在？從創傷的精神分析術到倫理現象學作為本土心理治療的轉化。應用心理研究，41，185-234。
   連結：
10. 夏林清, L. C.(2004)。一盞夠用的燈：辨識發現的路徑。應用心理研究，23，131-156。
    連結：
11. 翁士恆, S. H.,彭榮邦, R. B.(2018)。以「非我」為引探究受苦經驗與療癒實踐行動：從現象學取徑。中華心理衛生學刊，3，253-274。
    連結：
12. 曾旭正, S. C.(2010)。地點、場所或所在論"place"的中譯及其啟發。地理學報，58，25-42。
    連結：
13. Bondi, L.(2005).Making connections and thinking through emotions: Between geography and psychotherapy.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,30(4),433-448.
14. Bondi, L.(2014).Feeling insecure: A personal account in a psychoanalytic voice.Social & Cultural Geography,15(3),332-350.
15. Bondi, L.(2007).Psychoanalytic theory: Entry for the dictionary of human geograpgy.Scotland, England:Institute of Geograpgy, the school of geoscience, the university of Edinburg.
16. Cooper, M.,McLeod, J.(2007).A pluralistic framework for counselling and psychotherapy: Implications for research.Counselling and Psychotherapy Research,7(3),135-143.
17. Davidson, J.(Ed.),Bondi, L.(Ed.),Smith, M.(Ed.)(2007).Emotional geographies.Oxford, England:Taylor & Francis Ltd..
18. Ellis, C.(1999).Heartful autoethnography.Qualitative Health Research,9(5),669-683.
19. Ellis, C.,Bochner, A.(2000).Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject.Handbook of Qualitative Research,Thoundsand Oaks, CA:
20. Giorgi, A.(Ed.)(1985).Phenomenology and psychological research.Pittsburgh, PA:Duquesne University Press.
21. Goodson, I. F.,Gill, S. R.(2011).The narrative turn in social research.Counterpoints,386,17-33.
22. Heidegger, M.,Macquarrie, J.(Trans.),Robinson, E.(Trans.)(1962).Being and time.New York, NY:Harper.
23. Husserl, E.,BoyceGibson, W. R.(Trans.)(1963).Ideas: A general introduction to pure phenomenology.New York, NY:Collier Books.
24. Landridge, D.(2007).Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method.London, England:Pearson Education Limited.
25. Laverty, S. M.(2003).Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2(3),21-35.
26. Malpas, J.(2006).Heidegger's topology: Being, place, world.Cambridge, England:Mass. MIT Press.
27. Malpas, J.(1999).Place and experience.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
28. McAdams, D. P.(1993).The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
29. McLeod, J.(1997).Narrative and psychotherapy.London, England:Sage Publications Ltd..
30. McLeod, J.(2005).Counselling and psychotherapy as cultural work.Culture, psychotherapy, and counseling : Critical and integrative perspectives,Thousand Oaks, CA:
31. McLeod, J.(2001).Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications Inc.
32. Ricoeur, P.(1991).Narrative identity.Philosophy Today,35(1),73-81.
33. Ricoeur, P.(1979).The human experience of time and narrative.Research in Phenomenology,9,17-34.
34. Ricoeur, P.(1980).Narrative time.Critical Enquiry,7(1),169-190.
35. Riessman, C. K.(1991).Beyond reductionism: Narrative genres in divorce accounts.Journal of Narrative and Life History,1(1),41-68.
36. Schön, D. A.(1984).The reflective practitioner : How professionals think in action.New York, NY:Basic Books.
37. Smith, M.,Davidson, J.,Cameron, L.,Bondi, L.(2016).Emotion , place and culture.Oxford, England:Taylor & Francis Ltd..
38. Tuan, Y. F.(2006).Humanistic geography: A personal view.Geography,25(2),1-7.
39. Tuan, Y.-F.(1974).Topophilia: Study of environmental perception, attitudes and values.New Jersey, NJ:Prentice Hall.
40. Winnicott, D. W.(1971).Playing and reality.London, England:Tavistock Publication Ltd.
41. 余德慧, D. H.(2011)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
42. 余德慧, D. H.(2009)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
43. 程以萱, Y. H.(2015)。花蓮=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學諮商與臨床心理學系=Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, National Dong Hua University。
44. 葉秉憲, P. H.(2018)。花蓮=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學諮商與臨床心理學系=Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, National Dong Hua University。
45. 賴芸秀, Y. H.(2015)。花蓮=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學諮商與臨床心理學系=Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, National Dong Hua University。
46. 羅捷, C.(2019)。花蓮=Hualien, Taiwan，國立東華大學諮商與臨床心理學系=Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, National Dong Hua University。

1. 劉淑慧,林耀盛,李維倫(2021)。主編的話－現象學心理學的臺灣實踐。中華輔導與諮商學報，61，1-19。
2. (2024)。初探心理治療師與創傷兒童的主體間際性經驗。臺灣諮商心理學報，12(1)，64-98。
3. (2024)。居家安寧照顧中的家：家屬照顧者照顧處境經驗探究。本土心理學研究，61，165-233。