電子治理中政府對企業計畫（G2B）評估架構

An Evaluation Framework for Government to Business Programs (G2B) in Electronic Governance

10.29865/PAP.201306_(56).0001

朱斌妤(Pin-Yu Chu)；蕭乃沂(Nai-Yi Hsiao)；楊禮榮(Li-Zong Yang)

電子治理 ； 政府對企業 ； 績效評估 ； 層級分析法 ； e-governance ； government to business (G2B) ； performance evaluation ； Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

行政暨政策學報

56期（2013 / 06 / 01）

1 - 41

繁體中文

電子化政府在世界各國已形成風潮，並朝向電子治理發展，然而電子治理的績效評估目前仍多為概念探討，尤其欠缺從利害關係人角度出發的績效指標與實證研究。本研究綜合國家型電子治理評估、網頁感知品質型評估、滿意模型評估與利害關係人等評估指標文獻，同時以G2B電子治理計畫為例，發展計畫評估架構與指標。本研究進一步透過層級分析法，展示此評估架構與指標體系的應用，透過問卷蒐集萃取學者與實務專家的經驗，決定各層級G2B評估指標的權重，並比較各階段構面以探討其權重強弱的可能解釋。最後本段將以上述成果為基礎進行深入討論，並提出相關實務與研究建議。

E-Governance has been introduced and promoted for a long period of time; however, there still remains a number of questions regarding the performance evaluation of various e-government programs, particularly, lack of performance index from the perspective of stakeholders and extensibility of empirical studies. Through literature related to e-governance, perceived quality of web services, and satisfaction modelsl, an E-Governance evaluation framework for eovernment to business (G2B) programs has been developed. Based on framework, in-depth interviews, and the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we compare subjective expert judgments made by policy decision-makers, industrail experts, and academic scholars. Policy implications are further discussed.

1. 蕭乃沂、羅晉(2010)。電子化政府的價值鍊評估觀點：以數位台灣 e 化政府計畫為例。公共行政學報，36，1-37。
   連結：
2. European Commision, DG Information Society. 2004. Top of the Web: User Satisfaction and Usage Survey of e-Government Services. from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/egovernment_research/doc/top_of_the_web_report_2004.pdf. Retrived August 20, 2011.
3. OECD. 2006.OECD e-government project: Proposal for work on an inventory of egovernment business case indicators. Paris: OECD..
4. Gartner. 2008. Worldwide CIO Survey. from http://www.gartner.com. Retrived August 20, 2008.
5. Gupta, P. 2007. Challenges and Issues in e-Government Project Assessment. from http://www.nisg.org/knowledgecenter_docs/A03040005.pdf. Retrived August 20, 2011.
6. 行政院研究發展考核委員會，2011a，《優質網路政府計畫（97 年~99 年）執行成效評析報告》，台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
7. Rao, T. P. R, V. V. Rao, S. C. Bhatnagar, and S. J. Satyanarayana. 2004. E-Governance Assessment Frameworks（ EAF Version 2.0） . form http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/egov/documents/assessment-frameworks.pdf. Retrived August 20, 2011.
8. 行政院公共工程委員會，2012，《100 年度政府採購法業務推動情形及執行績效》，台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。
9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2007. E-Governance Capability Building. From http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=2179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html, Retrived June 19, 2008.
10. 行政院研究發展考核委員會，2009，〈第四階段電子化政府研擬作業〉，行政院研究發展考核委員會：https://pmo.nat.gov.tw/upload/download.aspx?fid=470，檢索日期：2012 年9 月5 日。
11. Belanger, F.,Hiller(2006).Framework for e-government: Privacy implications.Business Process Management Journal,12(1),48-60.
12. Bhatnagar, S.,Rao, R. T. P.,Singh, N.,Vaidya, R.,Mandal, M.(2007).Impact assessment study of e-government project in India.Ahmedabad:Center for e-Governance, Indian Institute of Management.
13. Chircu, A. M.(2008).E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework.Electronic Government: An International Journal,5(4),345-363.
14. DeLone, W. H.,McLean, E. R.(2003).The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update.Journal of Management Information Systems,19(4),9-30.
15. Esteves, J.,Joseph, R. C.(2008).A comprehensive framework for the assessment of e-Government projects.Government Information Quarterly,25(1),118-132.
16. European Commission, Information Society and Media(2006).,未出版
17. Grönlund, A.(2002).Electronic Government Design, Applications and Management.London:Idea Group Publishing.
18. Heeks, R.(2006).Understanding and measuring eGovernment: International benchmarking studies.UDESA workshop, E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future,Budapest, Hungary:
19. Holzer, M.,Kim, S. T.(2007).Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2007) A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Throughout the World.Washington:The American Society for Public Administration.
20. Horan, T. A.,Abhichandani, T.,Rayalu, R.(2006).Assessing user satisfaction of egovernment services: Development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information system (ATIS).Meetings of Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Science,Kauai, Hawaii:
21. Jassen, D.,Rotthier, S.,Snijkers, K.(2004).If you measure it they will score: An assessment of international e-government benchmarking.Information Polity,9(3-4),121-130.
22. Kearns, I.(2004).Public Value and E-Government.London:Institute for Public Policy Research.
23. Loiacono, E. T.,Watson, R. T.,Goodhue, D. L.(2007).WebQual: An instrument for cunsumer evaluation of web sites.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,11,51-87.
24. Millard, J.,Shahin, J.(2006).Towards the eGovernment vision for EU in 2010: research policy challenges.Spain:Institute for Prospective Technological Studies=IPTS.
25. Montagna, J. M.(2005).A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic government proposals.Electronic Commerce Research and Application,4(3),204-219.
26. OECD(2002).E-Government Projects, Seminar Vision, Responsiveness and Measurement,Paris:
27. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V.,Malhotra, A.(2005).E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality.Journal of Service Research,7(3),213-233.
28. Raus, M.,Liu, J.,Kipp, A.(2010).Evaluating IT innovations in a business-to-government context: A frameworkand its applications.Government Information Quarterly,27,122-133.
29. Rowley, J.(2010).e-Government stakeholders-Who are they and what do they want?.International Journal of Information Management,31(1),53-62.
30. Sakowicz, M.(2004).How Should e-Government Be Evaluated?.Different Methodologies and Methods,5(2),18-26.
31. Santos, J.(2003).E-Service Quality: A Model of Virtual Service Quality Dimensions.Managing Service Quality,13(3),233-246.
32. Sipahi, S.,Timor, Mehpare(2010).The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications.Management Decision,48(5),775-808.
33. Tapscott, D.,Agnew, D.(1999).Governance in the Digital Economy.Finance and Development,36(4),34-37.
34. Timmermans, D.,Vlek, C.(1996).Effects on decision quality of supporting multiattribute evaluation in groups.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,68(2),158-170.
35. Torres, L.,Pina, V.,Acerete, B.(2006).E-Governance developments in European Union cities: Reshaping government's relationship with citizens.Governance,19(2),277-302.
36. Vaidya, K.(2007).Applying the DeLone and McLean information success model to measure public e-procurement success.CollECTeR,Melbourne, Australia:
37. Verleye, G.,Karamagioli, E.,Verdegem, P.,Jenner, S.,Poelmans, M.(2010).,未出版
38. Wimmer, M. A.(Ed.),Scholl, H. J.(Ed.),Ferro, E.(Ed.)(2008).Electronic Government.Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Berlin.
39. Wolfinbarger, M.,Gilly, M. C.(2003).eTailQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality.Journal of Retailing,79(3),183-198.
40. Yoo, B.,Bonthu, N.(2001).Developing and validating a multidimensional consumerbased brand equity scale.Journal of Business Research,52(1),1-14.
41. 朱斌妤(2011)。行政院國科會委託研究期中報告行政院國科會委託研究期中報告,台北市:行政院研考會。
42. 朱斌妤、李洛維(2009)。電子治理的發展與挑戰。研習論壇月刊，107，1-13。
43. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2011)。,台北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
44. 行政院國家科學委員會(2011)。101 年度政府科技計畫概算編製暨審議作業手冊。台北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
45. 李洛維(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
46. 周思伶(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
47. 施能傑(2010)。電子化政府計畫的績效評估架構：平衡計分卡觀點。服務科學與政府公共服務績效國際學術研討會，台北:
48. 曾冠球、胡龍騰、莊文忠(2010)。,台北:行政院研考會。
49. 黃東益、朱斌妤、蕭乃沂(2009)。行政院研考會委託研究報告行政院研考會委託研究報告,台北:行政院研考會。
50. 黃朝盟、黃東益、朱斌妤(2008)。,台北:行政院研考會。
51. 楊禮榮(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
52. 蔣麗君、曾雅芬(2010)。行政院研考會委託研究之期中報告行政院研考會委託研究之期中報告,行政院研考會。
53. 鄧振源(2005)。計畫評估─方法與應用。台北:海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。